Page 27 of 37
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:12 pm
by anticapitalista
CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS is needed from what I found on the net.
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:17 pm
by dolphin_oracle
anticapitalista wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:12 pm
CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS is needed from what I found on the net.
here's what we have on the 32 bit.
I'm trying one of the antiX kernels.
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:34 pm
by anticapitalista
antiX kernels has that as CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=y
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:42 pm
by davemx
I installed it last night, on Desktop only. I'm using it now. So far the stuff I've done so far works, but GIMP 2.10 clashes with data files needed for MyPaint (no such problem with 2.8 and I hate the grey scheme but none of that is the fault of this excellent distro). Hopefully I'll be able to push a few things and test them over the next few days.
Can report now: Printing and Scanning working perfectly
To revert GIMP interface theme:
https://www.daviesmediadesign.com/custo ... interface/
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:02 pm
by dolphin_oracle
anticapitalista wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:34 pm
antiX kernels has that as CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=y
I tried a snapshot with the antix 4.19.7 kernel but I'm getting a copy modules error in the cli LUM.
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:05 pm
by Stevo
Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:10 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Stevo wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:05 pm
Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.
honestly not sure, but the 64 bit has an "m" as well.
I've only tried 2, but I can't make a 32 bit encrypted usb with a 4.19 kernel, yet.
building a 64 bit encrypted usb seems to work fine with our kernel (confirming richb's post)
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:27 pm
by mystic
MX-LSD conky disappears when I click anywhere on the desktop
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:33 pm
by dolphin_oracle
dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:10 pm
Stevo wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:05 pm
Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.
honestly not sure, but the 64 bit has an "m" as well.
I've only tried 2, but I can't make a 32 bit encrypted usb with a 4.19 kernel, yet.
building a 64 bit encrypted usb seems to work fine with our kernel (confirming richb's post)
same story with the 4.18 kernel. 32 bit kernel from alpha 1
Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:43 pm
by anticapitalista
dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:33 pm
dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:10 pm
Stevo wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:05 pm
Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.
honestly not sure, but the 64 bit has an "m" as well.
I've only tried 2, but I can't make a 32 bit encrypted usb with a 4.19 kernel, yet.
building a 64 bit encrypted usb seems to work fine with our kernel (confirming richb's post)
same story with the 4.18 kernel. 32 bit kernel from alpha 1
same with antiX-4.19.7 kernel (on antiX).
I know the 4.9 antiX kernel does work.