To systemd or not systemd - Ever wonder about it?
Re: To systemd or not systemd - Ever wonder about it?
It's the emacs vs. vi wars all over again.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.
Re: To systemd or not systemd - Ever wonder about it?
zimbodel, I do have to agree with Adrian that your initial claims that:zimbodel wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:16 am I havent used Fedora or Redhat for over 10 years and did not follow at all what they do.
I just used gnome applications if they were indispensable.
Did not expect this kind of subterfuge of init.
Anyway you helped me a lot. I now know where the fish rots.
Thanks
asqwerth wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:54 am OK, so now we know how you got gnome onto your system. The way you did it probably caused your problems.
But if you are so against systemd, I'm rather surprised you would not know how interconnected with systemd the full gnome suite is. It's the red hat, poettering connection.
Not many people are going to compile gnome from scratch ; they would install binaries from Debian repos. And that can be done in mx without leading to removal of sysv or samba.
1) MX was running systemd by default (and thus that MX's statements about itself were wrong)
2) removing systemd would remove sysV and various other MX default packages
3) (another thread) that samba was not on your system by default and could not be installed
were not correct.
Like I said, I think how you installed gnome wholesale (and did not check what was being removed) caused the issues.
By default, sysV is definitely on the MX live and installed system, and systemd is not running. Samba is also preinstalled.
If you check MX Packageinstaller >> Popular Apps tab >> desktop environment category, you can install a base Gnome system without causing havoc to your system or changing the default init manager.
You may also want to read this thread about whether it's appropriate to use MX as a server: viewtopic.php?f=104&t=48337
From the thread discussion (although it isn't long), the conclusion appears to be that standard Debian kernels with lower frequency are more suited to server usage, while MX is optimised for desktop use with higher frequency kernel. However, samba is already set up.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
- Eadwine Rose
- Administrator
- Posts: 15135
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am
Re: To systemd or not systemd - Ever wonder about it?
Topic closed pending mod discussion
MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-38amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.247.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.247.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030