Looking forward to seeing the MX19 based KDE spin :)jackdanielsesq wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 9:07 am Mine is hot ....![]()
![]()
There is simply no comparison - try it, you are a co-conspirator, baby - whether you like it or not
Jack
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mx-kde-iso/files/
JayM wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:38 am They must have improved Plasma a lot since I last used it. Even Adrian's KDE respin is slower than Xfce. I haven't tried Jack Daniel's.
Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
-
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
In my MX-19 beta VM I have 423MBs with 93 tasks and 124 threads with 1 running according to htop.
I removed Spice agent, cups, and clipit from application autostart.
Running in VirtualBox with drag & drop, clipboard and other VirtualBox things use up at tiny bit memory that wouldn't necessarily be going on a physical install.
gvfs is kinda a hog across the board. Conky uses some that most people could live without.
The one thing about XFCE is that you can it provides all the functionality you really need OOTB, doing basic things doesn't soak up a ton of memory, and honestly I always see memory resources go back down to around 425MBs after closing everything.
Typically don't see over zealous resource usage day to day from things. Its not hard to get XFCE below 400MBs, although time will tell with 4.14.
I am very intrigued to try Jack Daniels KDE spin now though.
I removed Spice agent, cups, and clipit from application autostart.
Running in VirtualBox with drag & drop, clipboard and other VirtualBox things use up at tiny bit memory that wouldn't necessarily be going on a physical install.
gvfs is kinda a hog across the board. Conky uses some that most people could live without.
The one thing about XFCE is that you can it provides all the functionality you really need OOTB, doing basic things doesn't soak up a ton of memory, and honestly I always see memory resources go back down to around 425MBs after closing everything.
Typically don't see over zealous resource usage day to day from things. Its not hard to get XFCE below 400MBs, although time will tell with 4.14.
I am very intrigued to try Jack Daniels KDE spin now though.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
I never pay any attention to the numbers, but booting into Kubuntu 18.04 with KDE Plasma 5.12.8, running top in Konsole with nothing else opened, it showed me about 340 MiB used. I do keep most of the effects turned off, but not everything. Gotta have the cube, lol.
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
Well, Phoronix wrote that 4.16 is due in about six months. Maybe it will have more fireworks, but xfce isn't that kind of desktop.
- Auro Kumar Sahoo
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 7:54 am
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
My system running MX 18 because of its stability, reliability and usability.nixy wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:23 am Care to share some screenshots of that Plasma setup which uses 350MB on boot?
I sometimes test other distribution on VM and don't keep them.
I have tested kde neon and kubuntu 19.04 one/two months earlier, probably on kubuntu 19.04 minimal install I have got this memory footprint of 350-400 mb with 1% cpu usage. But kde neon is very similar too. (In MX because of older KDE plasma it is going to be higher) But you can have latest plasma 5.16 review here:
https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/pla ... eview.html
Note:- I have no problems with xfce in particular, but like mate desktop which once shifted to gtk3, it becomes little more heavy, I assume xfce 4.14.1 will be going to little more heavy on Ram usage after gtk3, and when I tested mx19 b1, from my pendrive I was proved, MX running at 450 mb Ram on fresh startup compare to 300-350 mb of mx18.3. it's nothing to do with MX, but I assume gtk3.
Wallpapers for mx : https://www.flickr.com/photos/aurokumar ... 2672882131 & page2
MX help : https://mxlinux.org/manuals/
दुर्लभम् हि सदा सुखम् ||{Ramayan २-१८-१३}
To be happy always is something which is difficult to achieve.
MX help : https://mxlinux.org/manuals/
दुर्लभम् हि सदा सुखम् ||{Ramayan २-१८-१३}
To be happy always is something which is difficult to achieve.
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
Remember xfce has a reasonably new project leader (Sean Davis: https://bluesabre.org/tag/xfce/). Also, he picked up the ball from others who allowed the release cycle to take its time.Stevo wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:46 pm Well, Phoronix wrote that 4.16 is due in about six months. Maybe it will have more fireworks, but xfce isn't that kind of desktop.

I plan to continue using Sean's tools (I like the xfce toolset)... but by way of full disclosure; I'm sticking with bspwm as my window manager, for a while. Unlike many here, I love all the scripting, tweaking, building I can do in a tiler like bspwm.


Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
That's impressive. On a fresh boot today of MX 18.3 neofetch shows I'm using 539mb ram.malspa wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:23 pm I never pay any attention to the numbers, but booting into Kubuntu 18.04 with KDE Plasma 5.12.8, running top in Konsole with nothing else opened, it showed me about 340 MiB used. I do keep most of the effects turned off, but not everything. Gotta have the cube, lol.
Code: Select all
$ neofetch
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNMMMMMMMMM viking@mx
MMMMMMMMMMNs..yMMMMMMMMMMMMMm: +NMMMMMMM ---------
MMMMMMMMMN+ :mMMMMMMMMMNo` -dMMMMMMMM OS: MX 18.3 Continuum x86_64
MMMMMMMMMMMs. `oNMMMMMMh- `sNMMMMMMMMM Host: 4291ZDF ThinkPad X220
MMMMMMMMMMMMN/ -hMMMN+ :dMMMMMMMMMMM Kernel: 4.19.0-1-amd64
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMh- +ms. .sMMMMMMMMMMMMM Uptime: 45 secs
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMN+` ` +NMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Packages: 2003 (dpkg)
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMNMMd: .dMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Shell: bash 4.4.12
MMMMMMMMMMMMm/-hMd- `sNMMMMMMMMMMMMM Resolution: 1366x768
MMMMMMMMMMNo` -` :h/ -dMMMMMMMMMMMM DE: Xfce
MMMMMMMMMd: /NMMh- `+NMMMMMMMMMM WM: Xfwm4
MMMMMMMNo` :mMMN+` `-hMMMMMMMM WM Theme: Arc-Dark
MMMMMMh. `oNMMd: `/mMMMMMM Theme: Greybird-mx17 [GTK2]
MMMMm/ -hMd- `sNMMMM Icons: Papirus [GTK2]
MMNs` - :dMMM Terminal: xfce4-terminal
Mm: `oMM Terminal Font: Liberation Mono 11
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM CPU: Intel i5-2520M (4) @ 3.200GHz
GPU: Intel 2nd Generation Core Processor Family
Memory: 539MiB / 7861MiB
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
To me it was very surprising. Only reason I checked was because of what folks were saying in this thread about KDE. I don't care much about the numbers; I'm good as long as the system doesn't feel too sluggish on whatever hardware I'm running it on.
As Dedoimedo wrote about Xfce 4.14 in conclusion, "The performance benefit isn't as huge as it used to [be], because Plasma is super lean, too." That does seem to be true. Also, he ended with these words: "To be continued." I have to assume that he'll be doing a more in-depth piece later.
I haven't seen much difference between Xfce 4.14 in Arch and 4.12 in Debian, other than the newer version having more configuration options. Nothing really to get all excited about, and I think that was Dedoimedo's main point.
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
MX-19b1 with Xfce-4.14
is basically Xfce4-RC on MX-19-b1.
IMHO, it's just a curiosity piece
on how is MX doing
with the new Xfce4 release?
Will MX19 fix what's fixable in Xfce4/gtk3?
What problems now?
Will they be fixed in MX-19?
And, like all writers, he has to write something. :)
And he is a vocal beta tester with a platform.
is basically Xfce4-RC on MX-19-b1.
IMHO, it's just a curiosity piece
on how is MX doing
with the new Xfce4 release?
Will MX19 fix what's fixable in Xfce4/gtk3?
What problems now?
Will they be fixed in MX-19?
And, like all writers, he has to write something. :)
And he is a vocal beta tester with a platform.
Thinkpad T430 & Dell Latitude E7450, both with MX-21.3.1
__kernal 5.10.0-26-amd64 x86_64; Xfce-4.18.0; 8 GB RAM
__Intel Core i5-3380M, Graphics, Audio, Video; & SSDs.
HP Ryzen 5 17-cp3xxx with MX23.4 AHS & Liquorix 6.10-12~mx23ahs amd64
__kernal 5.10.0-26-amd64 x86_64; Xfce-4.18.0; 8 GB RAM
__Intel Core i5-3380M, Graphics, Audio, Video; & SSDs.
HP Ryzen 5 17-cp3xxx with MX23.4 AHS & Liquorix 6.10-12~mx23ahs amd64
Re: Dedoimedo to Xfce 4.14: meh
He's writing about Manjaro, though.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400