Page 1 of 1

MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:30 pm
by wptophat
SO MX is not living up to the hype! Some of the claims I have heard that got me to make the switch:

"It just works"
"THe community is amazing"
"Its easy to inatall"

I have found none of these to be true so far.

I have hardly gotten any response to my previous thread. One unhelpful reply.
Installing was NOT easy in comparison to Manjaro or Zorin.
And "It just works"? Humph! I have had nothing but problems since installing it!

There is the Pulse audio issue I talk about in my other thread.
The system will not logout, reboot, or shutdown. I click any of these options and the system just freezes up and sits there until I hold the power button in until it shuts down.
Firefox would not load until I removed and reinstalled it
My network card would not work at first until I reinstalled the network manager.

I have a Dell Inspiron Gaming 7576 with 24gb ram, a 128gb ssd and a 1tb HDD. Graphics are Nvidia geforce 1051ti/Intel HD 6230. The computer has run Manjaro, Zorin, and Mint with none of these issues.

I am going to give it one more day to change my mind, but then I am getting the hell off of MX.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:36 pm
by anticapitalista
reinstall to a linux / and /home directory, not ntfs and see if it runs better ie do not keep your old /home, put /home in the / directory.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:37 pm
by Eadwine Rose
Did you check the md5sum of the download, and of the installation media?


That not matching can cause weird things to happen.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:37 pm
by Stevo
How does it run from the Live USB? Does it have the same problems there? If not, I would suspect the problems are due to you bringing over your Manjaro home folder on NTFS. Maybe you could set up a new MX home folder, and then bring over your settings from the old folder.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:39 pm
by wptophat
Eadwine Rose wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:37 pm Did you check the md5sum of the download, and of the installation media?


That not matching can cause weird things to happen.
Yes I did, and it matched.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:42 pm
by wptophat
Stevo wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:37 pm How does it run from the Live USB? Does it have the same problems there? If not, I would suspect the problems are due to you bringing over your Manjaro home folder on NTFS. Maybe you could set up a new MX home folder, and then bring over your settings from the old folder.
Yes, admittedly runs perfect on USB live.

But I use this Home folder as NTFS so I can access everything easily on Windows and Linux both, without having to jump through a ton of hoops to set things up and keep them synced. Having a second home folder just complicates things. The point is that other Linux OS's can work with this setup just fine. Why does MX have the issue?

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:59 pm
by wptophat
I just do not think MX is ready yet. It has potential and has some awesome tools. And I am certain that I could resolve all of the issues I am having IF I wanted to spend hours, or even days researching and trying to fix them.

But why would I want to do that when there are other options that truly do work right out of the box with my partition configuration and hardware?

I think this is probably a great distro for those that have pretty typical setups, like not sharing the home directory with multiple OS's via NTFS format. Apparently that is something that MX is not capabl of doing (at least not without a bunch of work).

I will definietely revisit this distro at a later date, but for now, I will go with something that just worls for me.

Thank you to those members of the community that did try to help!

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:02 pm
by wptophat
anticapitalista wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:36 pm reinstall to a linux / and /home directory, not ntfs and see if it runs better ie do not keep your old /home, put /home in the / directory.
So just move 200+ gb of data? And give up the ability to easily access the directory from Windows?

Ummm....no thanks. I mean, Why? When this setup works for every other Linux Distro I have tried? MX is not good enough to through all that work if there are other options that DO work.

"A solution that is not really a solution is no solution at all" robert kiyosaki

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:19 pm
by anticapitalista
wptophat wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:02 pm
anticapitalista wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:36 pm reinstall to a linux / and /home directory, not ntfs and see if it runs better ie do not keep your old /home, put /home in the / directory.
So just move 200+ gb of data? And give up the ability to easily access the directory from Windows?

Ummm....no thanks. I mean, Why? When this setup works for every other Linux Distro I have tried? MX is not good enough to through all that work if there are other options that DO work.

"A solution that is not really a solution is no solution at all" robert kiyosaki
The easiest way is to symlink your existing home to the one set up by MX Linux.
But you've already made your mind up that MX is not for you.
Bye

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:28 pm
by Sparky
Don 't feed the troll!
Being #1 has its costs, this is one of them.
Ignore him/her

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:37 pm
by paulfsams
With any muti-os sharing the same "home partition." You will likely be better off creating a small /home directory on your MX install, and any other distro you use. Symlink your data files to your MX /home directory, you can easily do so with Midnight Commander. Your configuration file for MX or any other distro will be in the /home directory for that install, and it would help you to avoid conflicts with your windows install. The fact that you have had success with other distro's is not your issue. There are some differences of opinion between Manjaro/Mint, Ubuntu/Mint and the many other distro's. They may have differences of opinion on security, even their init systems and software could be different. MX is a "just works" distro as it's parent distro, Debian Stable. These distro's work well with NTFS, windows does not play well with ext4, if at all. While I realize you "must have windows," you may learn windows is not friendly working with other operating systems. All of these various distro's have worked hard to make it easy to work with NTFS, which is not native to any of them. If only Microsoft would be as cooperative. You have been given plenty of good advice in this thread, perhaps you should try the advice instead of telling all of us it will not work. I work with NTFS files often.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:49 pm
by wptophat
paulfsams wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:37 pm With any muti-os sharing the same "home partition." You will likely be better off creating a small /home directory on your MX install, and any other distro you use. Symlink your data files to your MX /home directory, you can easily do so with Midnight Commander. Your configuration file for MX or any other distro will be in the /home directory for that install, and it would help you to avoid conflicts with your windows install. The fact that you have had success with other distro's is not your issue. There are some differences of opinion between Manjaro/Mint, Ubuntu/Mint and the many other distro's. They may have differences of opinion on security, even their init systems and software could be different. MX is a "just works" distro as it's parent distro, Debian Stable. These distro's work well with NTFS, windows does not play well with ext4, if at all. While I realize you "must have windows," you may learn windows is not friendly working with other operating systems. All of these various distro's have worked hard to make it easy to work with NTFS, which is not native to any of them. If only Microsoft would be as cooperative.
Thanks for a response with some actual meaning!

I have dual booted for years with no issue using this partition setup. But you are right, each distro does things differently.

And if I COULD live without Winblows I certainly would. Unfortuantley, one of my largest clients requires me to use a piece of software that will not work under Linux, even Wine. So do what I must there.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:55 pm
by dolphin_oracle
wptophat wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:49 pm
paulfsams wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:37 pm With any muti-os sharing the same "home partition." You will likely be better off creating a small /home directory on your MX install, and any other distro you use. Symlink your data files to your MX /home directory, you can easily do so with Midnight Commander. Your configuration file for MX or any other distro will be in the /home directory for that install, and it would help you to avoid conflicts with your windows install. The fact that you have had success with other distro's is not your issue. There are some differences of opinion between Manjaro/Mint, Ubuntu/Mint and the many other distro's. They may have differences of opinion on security, even their init systems and software could be different. MX is a "just works" distro as it's parent distro, Debian Stable. These distro's work well with NTFS, windows does not play well with ext4, if at all. While I realize you "must have windows," you may learn windows is not friendly working with other operating systems. All of these various distro's have worked hard to make it easy to work with NTFS, which is not native to any of them. If only Microsoft would be as cooperative.
Thanks for a response with some actual meaning!

I have dual booted for years with no issue using this partition setup. But you are right, each distro does things differently.

And if I COULD live without Winblows I certainly would. Unfortuantley, one of my largest clients requires me to use a piece of software that will not work under Linux, even Wine. So do what I must there.
I also use an ntfs partition for data storage. I keep my home folders for each linux installation (and windows for that matter) seperate (in the system partition for each system), and link in the data partition. Here's a screenshot of my setup.

I've found over the years that having the settings between linux distros seperate has helped me far more than it has hurt.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:15 pm
by paulfsams
I also use an ntfs partition for data storage. I keep my home folders for each linux installation (and windows for that matter) seperate (in the system partition for each system), and link in the data partition. Here's a screenshot of my setup.

I've found over the years that having the settings between linux distros seperate has helped me far more than it has hurt.
Dolphin Oracle, I learned from many of my mistakes. It was Mepis Linux, long time ago, I discovered synaptic, and the user friendliness which has continued with MX Linux made setup so easy, then I was able to learn so much more. However, I still know just enough to be dangerous!

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:05 pm
by JayM
Sparky wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:28 pm Don 't feed the troll!
Being #1 has its costs, this is one of them.
Ignore him/her
He's (She's? I'll just use "he".) not trolling, he's just venting some frustrations. It's too bad that he didn't ask for help rather than ranting, which isn't helping him or anyone else. He did ask regarding a problem with pulseaudio not starting, which seemed to be related to the issue of using an ntfs home partition (a permissions problem) but never about the other issues.

For the life of me, I can't understand why the ntfs partition that has all of his data in it absolutely has to be his Linux /home partition. Why not mount it at /media/wptophat/data instead? Then it'll be there in Thunar, all of his stuff will be there, /home will be formatted as ext4 so all Linux permissions will work, and life is good.

Home directories contain a lot of system files too, such as configuration files and cache directories. They're in home because they can be different from user to user depending on how that user set up Linux. It's never a good idea to use a file system that isn't native to the OS for a system partition. It would be like trying to use a Linux ext4 partition for Windows' "Documents and Settings" folder. (See how even the name of the equivalent to /home in Windows is Documents and Settings? Those would be system files that are tailored for that individual user. I bet Windows would be broken too if it couldn't manage the ntfs permissions of files in that folder.)

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:40 pm
by wptophat
dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:55 pm I also use an ntfs partition for data storage. I keep my home folders for each linux installation (and windows for that matter) seperate (in the system partition for each system), and link in the data partition. Here's a screenshot of my setup.

I've found over the years that having the settings between linux distros seperate has helped me far more than it has hurt.
That is a perfect solution to that part of my problem! Thanks,

Now if I can get Pulseaudio working properly I will be happy.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:47 pm
by wptophat
JayM wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:05 pm
For the life of me, I can't understand why the ntfs partition that has all of his data in it absolutely has to be his Linux /home partition. Why not mount it at /media/wptophat/data instead? Then it'll be there in Thunar, all of his stuff will be there, /home will be formatted as ext4 so all Linux permissions will work, and life is good.
FIrst, I am a he. LOL
And to answer your insinuated question honestly, when I first started dual booting some 15+ years ago, this is how I was taught to do this. It always worked, so I never had a reason to look at any other way of doing things. After almost 20 years in using Linux, this the first time I ever had this kind of problem.

And yes, I will admit I should have approached my frustrations better. My apologies for ranting.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 10:22 pm
by komer
Post deleted by author.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 10:34 pm
by JayM
wptophat wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:47 pm
JayM wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:05 pm
For the life of me, I can't understand why the ntfs partition that has all of his data in it absolutely has to be his Linux /home partition. Why not mount it at /media/wptophat/data instead? Then it'll be there in Thunar, all of his stuff will be there, /home will be formatted as ext4 so all Linux permissions will work, and life is good.
FIrst, I am a he. LOL
And to answer your insinuated question honestly, when I first started dual booting some 15+ years ago, this is how I was taught to do this. It always worked, so I never had a reason to look at any other way of doing things. After almost 20 years in using Linux, this the first time I ever had this kind of problem.

And yes, I will admit I should have approached my frustrations better. My apologies for ranting.
I don't think you were given very good advice 15 or 20 years ago about using a shared NTFS data partition as a Linux /home, not to mention that while that may have worked OK at the time, a lot has changed in Linux since then. Linux has gotten a lot more complex since the olden days of the early versions of Gnome and KDE. I think that was back before Linux used journaling file systems, for one thing. IIRC Linux originally used the minix file system but (I think) could even run on FAT32, though without the ability to control permissions, as well as on NTFS and a few other file systems. That was back when there was just a handfull of distros: RedHat, Slackware and Mandrake/Mandriva were the biggest as I recall.

If this is a recent MX installation and you haven't done a lot of tweaking and customizing yet, I think your best bet would be to reinstall MX, this time telling the installer that /home is inside of root. Then when you reboot into MX, open Thunar and locate your NTFS data partition under Devices over in the left-hand pane to access your data. I suspect that your pulse audio will work too. If you have done customisations that you prefer not to do over again you could try making a personal snapshot then installing it. But given the problems that you're having with your home directory right now, I'm not 100% confident that creating a snapshot then burning the resulting ISO to a USB or DVD would even work.

Or, instead of reinstalling you could try logging in as root, unmounting the NTFS drive or partition, creating /home in root if it's not already there, editing fstab to tell MX to use that as its /home, creating a subdirectory inside of home for your user account, copying everything from /etc/skel to that directory including all hidden files and directories, changing ownership and group ownership of it to your unprivileged user, then setting the proper permissions so you can access everything when you log in as the user. If you're able to do that, later on you can edit fstab (or use System/Disk Manager for a GUI tool) to tell MX to auto-mount the NTFS partition when it boots, then delete your Documents, Downloads, Pictures, Music. etc. directories inside of your home directory and create symlinks to the ones on the NTFS drive, if you don't like the idea of having to remember that you have to click on the NTFS drive in Thunar to get to your data (and after that many years of your stuff being in home doing it differently would take some getting used to, I'm sure.)

I think the easiest way would be to reinstall though, then you can still do the auto-mount and symlinks thing afterward. If you let the installer set up the user account you'll be sure that all files and permissions needed by MX to let you log in and let everything work will be in place, where if you do it manually as root something might go wrong.

If the NTFS partition is on a different hard disk (you didn't post your Quick System Info in either this thread or your Pulse Audio thread so I can't tell), if I was you I would physically disconnect the cables from that drive (with the computer powered off and the power cord unplugged) prior to reinstalling MX just to be on the safe side, to prevent any possibility of MX still trying to use it as /home and reformatting it as ext4. I'm certain that MX wouldn't do this, but I always like to take the extra step to be safe, just in case.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:28 am
by penguin
Upsss. So many to read. My recommendations to @wptophat.

I am not going in detail or to discus your experience and history. Actually I have 3 laptops and I am a distro hoper.Only in the week end I have tried maybe 5 or 6 different linux (slackaware based or respins of MX based in Debian or Devuan), but this is not the clue( still back to MX Linux, ARCH and Sparky Linux).I have also Windows in all laptops that I own. Finally I removed Windows from one of them.Not worthy to have Windows anymore. How I switch or have files for/from Windows and Linux ? Windows is Windows and Linux is Linux (separately).I have another partition as NFTS format.It is my Storage partition.That's it. Windows and Linux share this partition. Would be better to be puritan. Ext4 is much secure than NFTS (with all of shitty things around) Also, if you have all ext4 partition in your Linux machine, you can use utilities/programs to read ext4 partition from Windows. Disk Genius(from Windows) is one of them. It do not need to have special services to read ext4. It loads by demand. Also another program is : ExtFS for Windows | Paragon Software (the best that I found), but also other. This is my experience.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:32 am
by tascoast
I have long used a shared Data partition, when dual booting with MS and since using Linux exclusively. By habit I use a NTFS format for this. So long as I auto-mount from each installed distro, the rest is easy. The bonus is that Linux installs can be more compact, not requiring large storage capacity, allowing for more partitions to be created.
Welcome

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:05 am
by JayM
Well, this thread's probably going to be locked soon now thanks to all the threadcrapping. if it wasn't before. I hope OP gets his computer configuration sorted out and stops sharing the same home directory among multiple distros plus Windows.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:08 am
by anticapitalista
JayM wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:05 am Well, this thread's probably going to be locked soon now thanks to all the threadcrapping. if it wasn't before. I hope OP gets his computer configuration sorted out and stops sharing the same home directory among multiple distros plus Windows.
That was the very first reply ... OP ignored the advice.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:17 am
by Eadwine Rose
Please stop adding derailing comments to the thread, jackdanielsesq and Sparky.


The TS has already apologized and there was actual useful information being shared. I wager you missed that so I suggest you read back in the thread. Thank you.

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:59 am
by Jerry3904
MOD: I have removed a number of nasty and irrelevant posts. To quote a colleague: "do not derail a thread just because you don't like it."

Re: MX NOT Living Up To The Hype

Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:52 pm
by lekkermx
MX Linux updates and works better than Zorin OS and Manjaro.

I wanted to use Manjaro but the update failed and the whole update failed. One Gig in all.

Zorin 15 looked great, but had some internet connection on my 3G connection.

No such problems on MX Linux.

Oh yeah, the panel is also very responsive, unlike Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, just didn't respond the first time a moved the mouse cursor it's way.

I still can't believe my eyes, to see MX Linux work better than Ubuntu, with Ubuntu having more resources.