MX Linux Forum

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:53 am**

Hi,

I notice that there was a new liquorix kernel, so I decided to try it like I normally do, but hit into this error over the last several days on different computers. I thought it might just be a server issue and selected different repositories, but same error. Is there something else I should have enabled to use this kernel?

Code: Select all

Reading state information...
E: Unable to locate package linux-image-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64
E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'linux-image-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64'
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-image-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64'
E: Unable to locate package linux-headers-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64
E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'linux-headers-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64'
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-headers-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64'

My system info attached.

Code: Select all

System:
  Kernel: 6.4.15-2-liquorix-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 12.2.0 parameters: audit=0
    intel_pstate=disable hpet=disable rcupdate.rcu_expedited=1
    BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.4.15-2-liquorix-amd64 root=UUID=<filter> ro quiet splash
  Desktop: Xfce v: 4.18.1 tk: Gtk v: 3.24.36 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm v: 4.18.0 vt: 7
    dm: LightDM v: 1.26.0 Distro: MX-23_ahs_x64 Libretto July 31  2023 base: Debian GNU/Linux 12
    (bookworm)
Machine:
  Type: Desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II v: Rev 1.xx
    serial: <superuser required> UEFI: American Megatrends v: 5102 date: 05/31/2023
Battery:
  Device-1: hidpp_battery_0 model: Logitech M720 Triathlon Multi-Device Mouse serial: <filter>
    charge: 55% (should be ignored) rechargeable: yes status: discharging
CPU:
  Info: model: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Zen 2 gen: 3 level: v3 note: check
    built: 2020-22 process: TSMC n7 (7nm) family: 0x17 (23) model-id: 0x71 (113) stepping: 0
    microcode: 0x8701030
  Topology: cpus: 1x cores: 8 tpc: 2 threads: 16 smt: enabled cache: L1: 512 KiB
    desc: d-8x32 KiB; i-8x32 KiB L2: 4 MiB desc: 8x512 KiB L3: 32 MiB desc: 2x16 MiB
  Speed (MHz): avg: 2422 high: 4161 min/max: 2200/4426 boost: enabled scaling:
    driver: acpi-cpufreq governor: ondemand cores: 1: 2200 2: 2051 3: 2800 4: 2072 5: 2781 6: 2800
    7: 1949 8: 2200 9: 2200 10: 2200 11: 2200 12: 4161 13: 2200 14: 2551 15: 2200 16: 2200
    bogomips: 115208
  Flags: avx avx2 ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3 svm
  Vulnerabilities:
  Type: gather_data_sampling status: Not affected
  Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected
  Type: l1tf status: Not affected
  Type: mds status: Not affected
  Type: meltdown status: Not affected
  Type: mmio_stale_data status: Not affected
  Type: retbleed mitigation: untrained return thunk; SMT enabled with STIBP protection
  Type: spec_rstack_overflow mitigation: safe RET
  Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
  Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
  Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines, IBPB: conditional, STIBP: always-on, RSB filling,
    PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected
  Type: srbds status: Not affected
  Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics:
  Device-1: NVIDIA GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] vendor: ASUSTeK driver: nvidia v: 525.125.06
    non-free: 530.xx+ status: current (as of 2023-03) arch: Pascal code: GP10x process: TSMC 16nm
    built: 2016-21 pcie: gen: 3 speed: 8 GT/s lanes: 8 link-max: lanes: 16 bus-ID: 09:00.0
    chip-ID: 10de:1c82 class-ID: 0300
  Device-2: Creative Webcam Live!/Live! Pro type: USB driver: gspca_zc3xx bus-ID: 1-6:4
    chip-ID: 041e:4036 class-ID: ff00
  Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.7 compositor: xfwm v: 4.18.0 driver: X: loaded: nvidia
    gpu: nvidia display-ID: :0.0 screens: 1
  Screen-1: 0 s-res: 4480x1440 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 1185x381mm (46.65x15.00")
    s-diag: 1245mm (49.01")
  Monitor-1: DP-0 pos: primary,right res: 2560x1440 hz: 60 dpi: 105
    size: 621x341mm (24.45x13.43") diag: 708mm (27.89") modes: N/A
  Monitor-2: HDMI-0 pos: left res: 1920x1080 dpi: 90 size: 544x303mm (21.42x11.93")
    diag: 623mm (24.52") modes: N/A
  API: OpenGL v: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 525.125.06 renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti/PCIe/SSE2
    direct-render: Yes
Audio:
  Device-1: NVIDIA GP107GL High Definition Audio vendor: ASUSTeK driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel
    pcie: gen: 3 speed: 8 GT/s lanes: 8 link-max: lanes: 16 bus-ID: 09:00.1 chip-ID: 10de:0fb9
    class-ID: 0403
  Device-2: AMD Starship/Matisse HD Audio vendor: ASUSTeK driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel pcie:
    gen: 4 speed: 16 GT/s lanes: 16 bus-ID: 0c:00.4 chip-ID: 1022:1487 class-ID: 0403
  API: ALSA v: k6.4.15-2-liquorix-amd64 status: kernel-api tools: alsamixer,amixer
  Server-1: PipeWire v: 0.3.65 status: active with: 1: pipewire-pulse status: active
    2: wireplumber status: active 3: pipewire-alsa type: plugin 4: pw-jack type: plugin
    tools: pactl,pw-cat,pw-cli,wpctl
Network:
  Device-1: Intel I211 Gigabit Network vendor: ASUSTeK driver: igb v: kernel pcie: gen: 1
    speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: d000 bus-ID: 03:00.0 chip-ID: 8086:1539 class-ID: 0200
  IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
  Device-2: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 driver: iwlwifi v: kernel modules: wl pcie: gen: 2 speed: 5 GT/s
    lanes: 1 bus-ID: 06:00.0 chip-ID: 8086:2723 class-ID: 0280
  IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
Bluetooth:
  Device-1: Intel AX200 Bluetooth type: USB driver: btusb v: 0.8 bus-ID: 1-7:8 chip-ID: 8087:0029
    class-ID: e001
  Report: hciconfig ID: hci0 rfk-id: 2 state: up address: <filter> bt-v: 3.0 lmp-v: 5.2
    sub-v: 2090 hci-v: 5.2 rev: 2090
  Info: acl-mtu: 1021:4 sco-mtu: 96:6 link-policy: rswitch sniff link-mode: peripheral accept
    service-classes: rendering, capturing, audio, telephony
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 1.82 TiB used: 135.15 GiB (7.3%)
  SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required.
  ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 maj-min: 259:0 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB size: 931.51 GiB
    block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 31.6 Gb/s lanes: 4 type: SSD serial: <filter>
    rev: 2B2QEXM7 temp: 40.9 C scheme: GPT
  ID-2: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: Western Digital model: WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 size: 931.51 GiB
    block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> rev: 20WD
    scheme: GPT
Partition:
  ID-1: / raw-size: 512.7 GiB size: 503.58 GiB (98.22%) used: 46.46 GiB (9.2%) fs: ext4
    dev: /dev/nvme0n1p2 maj-min: 259:2
  ID-2: /boot/efi raw-size: 256 MiB size: 252 MiB (98.46%) used: 29.5 MiB (11.7%) fs: vfat
    dev: /dev/nvme0n1p1 maj-min: 259:1
Swap:
  Alert: No swap data was found.
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 45.0 C mobo: 35.0 C gpu: nvidia temp: 38 C
  Fan Speeds (RPM): cpu: 1391 case-1: 0 case-2: 1094 case-3: 1106 gpu: nvidia fan: 30%
  Power: 12v: 10.25 5v: N/A 3.3v: N/A vbat: 3.33
Repos:
  Packages: pm: dpkg pkgs: 2496 libs: 1337 tools: apt,apt-get,aptitude,nala,synaptic pm: rpm
    pkgs: 0 pm: flatpak pkgs: 0
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
    1: deb https://www.bchemnet.com/suldr/ debian extra
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ bookworm-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list
    1: deb [arch=amd64] https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-earth-pro.list
    1: deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/earth/deb/ stable main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
    1: deb http://mirrors.rit.edu/mxlinux/mx-packages/mx/repo/ bookworm main non-free
    2: deb http://mirrors.rit.edu/mxlinux/mx-packages/mx/repo/ bookworm ahs
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/spotify.list
    1: deb http://repository.spotify.com/ stable non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/teamviewer.list
    1: deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/teamviewer-keyring.gpg] https://linux.teamviewer.com/deb stable main
Info:
  Processes: 444 Uptime: 16d 20h 4m wakeups: 391 Memory: 62.7 GiB used: 12.23 GiB (19.5%)
  Init: SysVinit v: 3.06 runlevel: 5 default: graphical tool: systemctl Compilers: gcc: 12.2.0
  alt: 12 Client: shell wrapper v: 5.2.15-release inxi: 3.3.26
Boot Mode: UEFI

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 9:24 am**

I'm on MX-23 fluxbox (with AHS enabled) and I don't see the 6.5.3 kernel available.
I'm using the LA repo so maybe your repo isn't up to date.

quickshot_231006_061952.png

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 9:31 am**

6.5.3-2 ??

As @siamhie stated in post above ... current/latest liquorix is 6.5.5-2

asof: 2023/10/06 - 15:30

Screenshot_2023-10-06_15-20-10.jpg

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 9:35 am**

Being human and not having infinite time, I port over a newer Liquorix kernel maybe once a week. However, the current 6.5-6 in our repos is based on 6.5.5 and 6.5.6 release candidates.

Liquorix versions their kernels in a different manner than Debian, but for us there was never a 6.5.3-2: https://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/ahs/l/linux-liquorix/

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 10:27 am**

sorry, i'm not a programmer, i don't know much about the background, i'm an advocate of "use the MXPI" myself whenever possible, but also see if it's always necessary.
I've been using the liquorix kernel directly from liquorix for over 2 years now. i've also adopted it as the source in packagemanger, which means i always get the latest in mormal, automatic, backup- currently that's the 6.5.5-2.
I could never determine in practical work whether there were differences in performance or operational stability between kernel from the mxpi or directly from the creator.

currently i have no kernel from mxpi, my fallback is the current xanmod :)

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 11:59 am**

FWIW. I'm using Liquorix 6.5.5 on vanilla debian & LiliDog, no MX repos involved

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:03 pm**

See snapshot of liquorix that shows as available.

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:04 pm**

the popular apps entries are static/manually done, and I probably messed up the entry. i'll update the mxpi listings. thanks.

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:04 pm**

On MXPI, I don't see 6.5.5 ...hmm ... odd? Only see the one shown in above pix.

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:22 pm**

razor2021 wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:04 pm On MXPI, I don't see 6.5.5 ...hmm ... odd? Only see the one shown in above pix.

@razor2021 Go to the Enabled Repos tab and search for liquorix.

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:26 pm**

siamhie wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:22 pm
razor2021 wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:04 pm On MXPI, I don't see 6.5.5 ...hmm ... odd? Only see the one shown in above pix.

@razor2021 Go to the Enabled Repos tab and search for liquorix.

I'll add that you will need to install the headers as well as the kernel.

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:30 pm**

MX-Updater>History

Code: Select all

2023-10-06  09:05:49  upgrade  linux-image-liquorix-amd64             amd64  6.5-5~mx21+1                                6.5-6~mx21+1
2023-10-06  09:05:49  upgrade  linux-headers-liquorix-amd64           amd64  6.5-5~mx21+1                                6.5-6~mx21+1
2023-10-06  09:05:42  install  linux-image-6.5.5-2-liquorix-amd64     amd64  <none>                                      6.5-6~mx21+1

The top two were installed from MXPI>Enabled Repo, they are metapackages, non-version specific, i.e. no numbers in MXPI's "package name",
therefore they auto-update to the latest .dot release.
HTH

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 1:23 pm**

I see the headers for liquorix in the enabled repos! Usually it got installed when I choose the kernel. Is this new that I need to do this when choosing a new kernel?

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 3:12 pm**

Ok, I just saw @dolphin_oracle comment on refreshing the MXPI listing. I'll update the kernel once that's done. I see the headers and images in the enabled repos. And I now understand what you guys were referring to in other similar kernel posts for other issues. That explains some of the other liquorix kernels that was higher than what I saw available in my MXPI.

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 3:58 pm**

for the record, I did have

Code: Select all

2023-10-03  20:23:00  install  linux-image-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64        amd64  <none>                           6.5-2~mx23+1
2023-10-03  20:22:57  install  linux-headers-6.5.3-2-liquorix-amd64      amd64  <none>

installed at one time, which is probably why I screwed up the mxpi entry. it might never had made it to main, staying in our ahs-staging repo instead and preempted by the 6.5.5 kernel.

Posted: **Fri Oct 06, 2023 4:06 pm**

new deb for mx-packageinstaller-pkglist here. sent to repo so should be up soonish.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g8qy6e ... drive_link

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2023 2:47 am**

currently in mxpi, if you have the liquorix repo included, 6.5.6.1, was then also updated normally this morning. difference to the predecessor I could not notice now, runs smoothly, like its predecessor, its predecessor (and so on, the last 2 years)

Posted: **Sat Oct 07, 2023 10:02 am**

All works well now with the MXPI refreshed. I see only 6.5.5-2 available. If another kernel shows up later, will update as well. I agree the liquorix kernels are very smooth.

MX Linux Forum

Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet? [Solved]

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?

Re: Kernel 6.5.3-2-liquorix not available yet?