For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.
No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.
Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.
You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
CharlesV wrote: Wed Sep 10, 2025 11:29 am
When I went shopping for my latest build, the RTX 2060 had quite a bit better rating than the 3050 in everything except power consumption. And while that card I think would be just fine, I chose the 2060 over it because of that. https://tech4gamers.com/rtx-3050-vs-2060/
*QSI = Quick System Info from menu (Copy for Forum) *MXPI = MX Package Installer *Please check the solved checkbox on the post that solved it. *Linux -This is the way!
CharlesV wrote: Wed Sep 10, 2025 11:29 am
When I went shopping for my latest build, the RTX 2060 had quite a bit better rating than the 3050 in everything except power consumption. And while that card I think would be just fine, I chose the 2060 over it because of that. https://tech4gamers.com/rtx-3050-vs-2060/
*QSI = Quick System Info from menu (Copy for Forum) *MXPI = MX Package Installer *Please check the solved checkbox on the post that solved it. *Linux -This is the way!
I went the opposite direction when I was building my computer a couple of years ago. I went with PowerColor for my AMD card over the usual
vendors like MSI, ASRock, GIGABYTE, etc. because the price range fit my budget better.
@operadude Definitely shop around between manufactures.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.
Again, I am not a gamer, so maybe ? - I want solid FAST performance, and not a lot of problems! So, I tend to stick to known brands and also good, older equipment.
You can see some ratings and compare a side by side if you like here ( best I have found )
*QSI = Quick System Info from menu (Copy for Forum) *MXPI = MX Package Installer *Please check the solved checkbox on the post that solved it. *Linux -This is the way!
And I have found with the Passmark charts a great way to 'shop' using them.. .is to start at the top of the high end chart and work your way down into the price ranges your looking for (they are spread out! so dont get fooled! ) .. and then mark the ones you like the price of for a compare - then go compare them. Sometimes I am shocked at how good a certain CPU or GPU is - for the money I am wanting to spend / not spend ;-p
*QSI = Quick System Info from menu (Copy for Forum) *MXPI = MX Package Installer *Please check the solved checkbox on the post that solved it. *Linux -This is the way!
Are you saying you would prefer a 'reliable' name-brand over a no-name item that has more RAM, and a higher bit-rate ?
I have no idea how much the bit-rate matters (e.g. 256 vs. 192).
Also, not sure how much the RAM makes a difference, especially when Gigabyte is marketing it as an "OC" card. So, even though the Gigabyte is less RAM, and lower bit-rate, maybe it's a better card, anyway ???
I really have no idea how to compare these cards...
Also, no gaming, just AI and VMs. the AI stuff can get VERY slogged-down by a weak GPU.
So, you would go with the Gigabyte card, even though "on paper" it is the weaker card ???