A Great Review/Deep-Dive into Debian 13

[m_pav]

By implication, you are suggesting that MX-Forum posts having an AI scores greater than some number should be censored.

Not even close.

The concern I have is that of AI's signature being embedded into everything it creates, therefore I am projecting into the future by examining trends that are always going to repeat themselves. Based on monetary greed and mans quest to get more, at some point in the future, some nong investor will decide they are not gaining enough revenue from their AI engines and start proceedings to claim rights of all such content created by it, thereby requiring all who are proven to hold such content to pay a tribute towards it or forfeit it altogether. Keep in mind their hidden signature is deeply embedded into everything it creates, so easily identifiable by a simple search with the right parameters.

The point of all this AI from the players, (not the plebs like us), is monetisation. Even going back just a handful of years, we can clearly see what has come of Online providers. Example, YT, which is smashing up big bold, in-your-face banners saying "ad blockers are not allowed on this platform" To them I say "who made you lord and king?" I'm already paying for some of your services, so get naffed. besides, I have no interest in most content creators junk so I rarely visit their platform.

All I am saying in all of this is, we need to be careful to remove the fingerprinting signature from AI generated content and where possible, take it as a que to re-write in more human terms, that is why I provided the example from cleanpaste and referenced them in so doing.

When I need a pic for an ad, I ask AI to make one for me and require it to be royalty free. I take said image and screenshot it at full resolution, then delete the image and edit it with GIMP so it becomes a derivative work. Let's face it, there is nothing new under the sun, so all that was will be again, so plagiarism is just a part of what and who we are. The more fingerprinting we can strip out of AI created content, the less vulnerable we will be on the day the investors try to cash-in and the further we will be from their wanton gaze.

Mark my words, this will happen and the day is not that far off and investors are already seeing reducing gains on their investments.

[Arnox]

some nong investor will decide they are not gaining enough revenue from their AI engines and start proceedings to claim rights of all such content created by it

Didn't the US Copyright Office say though that AI-created content is not valid for copyright?

[tascoast]

Elysium? Without next-gen computing or power production, AI will be the reserve of the 1%, or less, unmotivated to change the increasingly asymmetrical wealth distribution patterns globally, the AI Corporate Entities relentless in their litigation and counteractions....

[j2mcgreg]

Careful folks, this thread is edging closer and closer to political debate. Either return to the topic or I will lock it.

[m_pav]

Didn't the US Copyright Office say though that AI-created content is not valid for copyright?

That they did, and yet it's super easy to obtain material from AI that is copyrighted elsewhere due to it being in the nature of a derivative work. When you dig deeper, you'll find the ruling is essentially a get out of jail free license and while that sounds great in the here and now, the future will show a slightly more in focus view. Keep in mind the US only contains 4.13% of the worlds population

I think we need to stop now because this topic has drifted and I guess I'm to blame for that

[thinkpadx]

at least you have a nice mototcycle to escape with... :-))))