Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

Help for Current Versions of MX
When asking for help, use Quick System Info from MX Tools. It will be properly formatted using the following steps.
1. Click on Quick System Info in MX Tools
2. Right click in your post and paste.
Message
Author
User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3491
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#1 Post by siamhie »

Firefox released version 125 on April 15th, so LibreWolf usually releases their version within two or three days but I'm still on 124.
about.jpg


This LibreWolf installation page for Debian systems has a Debian Unstable (unofficial) repo which does seem to have version 125 for LibreWolf.

How would I go about updating the repo?

Code: Select all

╔═[siamhie@flux23]═[07:48  26/04/24]═══════════════════════════════════════════════[~]
╚═> inxi -r
Repos:
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.list
    1: deb [arch=amd64] http://deb.librewolf.net bookworm main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
    1: deb http://la.mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ bookworm main non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/nordvpn.list
    1: deb https://repo.nordvpn.com/deb/nordvpn/debian stable main
╔═[siamhie@flux23]═[07:48  26/04/24]═══════════════════════════════════════════════[~]
╚═>



full QSI

Code: Select all

Snapshot created on: 20240325_2322
System:
  Kernel: 6.8.7-siamhie arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 12.2.0 clocksource: tsc
    avail: hpet,acpi_pm parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.7-siamhie root=UUID=<filter> ro
    init=/lib/systemd/systemd
  Desktop: Fluxbox v: 1.3.7 with: tint2 tools: avail: light-locker vt: 7 dm: LightDM v: 1.26.0
    Distro: MX-23.2_fluxbox_x64 Libretto January 21 2024 base: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Machine:
  Type: Desktop Mobo: Micro-Star model: B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) v: 2.0 serial: <superuser required>
    uuid: <superuser required> UEFI: American Megatrends LLC. v: A.F0 date: 10/11/2023
CPU:
  Info: model: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Zen 3+ gen: 4 level: v3 note: check
    built: 2022 process: TSMC n6 (7nm) family: 0x19 (25) model-id: 0x21 (33) stepping: 2
    microcode: 0xA20120E
  Topology: cpus: 1x cores: 16 tpc: 2 threads: 32 smt: enabled cache: L1: 1024 KiB desc: d-16x32
    KiB; i-16x32 KiB L2: 8 MiB desc: 16x512 KiB L3: 64 MiB desc: 2x32 MiB
  Speed (MHz): avg: 2500 high: 3467 min/max: 2200/5083 boost: enabled scaling:
    driver: acpi-cpufreq governor: schedutil cores: 1: 2200 2: 2200 3: 2200 4: 2200 5: 3400 6: 2200
    7: 2200 8: 2878 9: 2200 10: 2880 11: 2200 12: 2200 13: 2200 14: 2882 15: 2200 16: 2200 17: 2200
    18: 2200 19: 2200 20: 2200 21: 2200 22: 3400 23: 3467 24: 2200 25: 2877 26: 2880 27: 2880
    28: 2878 29: 3400 30: 2200 31: 2200 32: 2200 bogomips: 217597
  Flags: avx avx2 ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3 svm
  Vulnerabilities:
  Type: gather_data_sampling status: Not affected
  Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected
  Type: l1tf status: Not affected
  Type: mds status: Not affected
  Type: meltdown status: Not affected
  Type: mmio_stale_data status: Not affected
  Type: reg_file_data_sampling status: Not affected
  Type: retbleed status: Not affected
  Type: spec_rstack_overflow mitigation: Safe RET
  Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
  Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
  Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines; IBPB: conditional; IBRS_FW; STIBP: always-on; RSB
    filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected
  Type: srbds status: Not affected
  Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD Navi 22 [Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT/6750 XT / 6800M/6850M XT] vendor: Tul / PowerColor
    driver: amdgpu v: kernel arch: RDNA-2 code: Navi-2x process: TSMC n7 (7nm) built: 2020-22 pcie:
    gen: 4 speed: 16 GT/s lanes: 16 ports: active: DP-3 empty: DP-1, DP-2, HDMI-A-1, Writeback-1
    bus-ID: 2d:00.0 chip-ID: 1002:73df class-ID: 0300
  Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.7 compositor: Compton v: 1 driver: X: loaded: amdgpu
    unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,radeon,vesa dri: radeonsi gpu: amdgpu display-ID: :0.0 screens: 1
  Screen-1: 0 s-res: 2560x1440 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 677x381mm (26.65x15.00") s-diag: 777mm (30.58")
  Monitor-1: DP-3 mapped: DisplayPort-2 model: HP X27q serial: <filter> built: 2021
    res: 2560x1440 hz: 165 dpi: 109 gamma: 1.2 size: 597x336mm (23.5x13.23") diag: 685mm (27")
    ratio: 16:9 modes: max: 2560x1440 min: 720x400
  API: EGL v: 1.5 hw: drv: amd radeonsi platforms: device: 0 drv: radeonsi device: 1 drv: swrast
    gbm: egl: 1.4 drv: kms_swrast surfaceless: drv: radeonsi x11: drv: radeonsi inactive: wayland
  API: OpenGL v: 4.6 vendor: amd mesa v: 22.3.6 glx-v: 1.4 es-v: 3.2 direct-render: yes
    renderer: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (navi22 LLVM 15.0.6 DRM 3.57 6.8.7-siamhie) device-ID: 1002:73df
    memory: 11.72 GiB unified: no
Audio:
  Device-1: AMD Navi 21/23 HDMI/DP Audio driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel pcie: gen: 4
    speed: 16 GT/s lanes: 16 bus-ID: 2d:00.1 chip-ID: 1002:ab28 class-ID: 0403
  Device-2: AMD Starship/Matisse HD Audio vendor: Micro-Star MSI driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel
    pcie: gen: 4 speed: 16 GT/s lanes: 16 bus-ID: 2f:00.4 chip-ID: 1022:1487 class-ID: 0403
  API: ALSA v: k6.8.7-siamhie status: kernel-api tools: alsactl,alsamixer,amixer
  Server-1: PipeWire v: 1.0.0 status: active with: 1: pipewire-pulse status: active
    2: wireplumber status: active 3: pipewire-alsa type: plugin 4: pw-jack type: plugin
    tools: pactl,pw-cat,pw-cli,wpctl
Network:
  Device-1: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 160MHz driver: iwlwifi v: kernel pcie: gen: 2
    speed: 5 GT/s lanes: 1 bus-ID: 05:00.0 chip-ID: 8086:2725 class-ID: 0280
  IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
  Device-2: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet vendor: Micro-Star MSI
    driver: r8169 v: kernel pcie: gen: 1 speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: f000 bus-ID: 2a:00.0
    chip-ID: 10ec:8168 class-ID: 0200
  IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
  Info: services: NetworkManager,wpa_supplicant
Bluetooth:
  Device-1: Intel AX210 Bluetooth driver: btusb v: 0.8 type: USB rev: 2.0 speed: 12 Mb/s lanes: 1
    mode: 1.1 bus-ID: 1-2.3:4 chip-ID: 8087:0032 class-ID: e001
  Report: rfkill ID: hci0 rfk-id: 1 state: down bt-service: N/A rfk-block: hardware: no
    software: no address: see --recommends
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 8.64 TiB used: 902.83 GiB (10.2%)
  SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required.
  ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 maj-min: 259:4 vendor: Western Digital model: WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0
    size: 465.76 GiB block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 63.2 Gb/s lanes: 4 tech: SSD
    serial: <filter> fw-rev: 613000WD temp: 37.9 C scheme: GPT
  ID-2: /dev/nvme1n1 maj-min: 259:0 vendor: Western Digital model: WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0
    size: 465.76 GiB block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 31.6 Gb/s lanes: 4 tech: SSD
    serial: <filter> fw-rev: 102000WD temp: 33.9 C scheme: GPT
  ID-3: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: SanDisk model: ST8000DM004-2CX188 size: 7.28 TiB
    block-size: physical: 4096 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s tech: HDD rpm: 5425 serial: <filter>
    fw-rev: 0001 scheme: GPT
  ID-4: /dev/sdb maj-min: 8:16 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 870 EVO 500GB size: 465.76 GiB
    block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s tech: SSD serial: <filter>
    fw-rev: 1B6Q scheme: GPT
Partition:
  ID-1: / raw-size: 465 GiB size: 456.63 GiB (98.20%) used: 13.72 GiB (3.0%) fs: ext4
    dev: /dev/nvme0n1p2 maj-min: 259:6
  ID-2: /boot/efi raw-size: 128 MiB size: 126 MiB (98.45%) used: 419 KiB (0.3%) fs: vfat
    dev: /dev/nvme0n1p1 maj-min: 259:5
Swap:
  Kernel: swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache-pressure: 100 (default) zswap: no
  ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 64 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: -2 dev: /dev/sdb2
    maj-min: 8:18
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 41.0 C mobo: N/A gpu: amdgpu temp: 47.0 C mem: 48.0 C
  Fan Speeds (rpm): N/A gpu: amdgpu fan: 816
Repos:
  Packages: pm: dpkg pkgs: 2172 libs: 1161 tools: apt, apt-get, aptitude, nala, synaptic pm: rpm
    pkgs: 0
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/librewolf.list
    1: deb [arch=amd64] http://deb.librewolf.net bookworm main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
    1: deb http://la.mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ bookworm main non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/nordvpn.list
    1: deb https://repo.nordvpn.com/deb/nordvpn/debian stable main
Info:
  Memory: total: 32 GiB available: 31.27 GiB used: 2.99 GiB (9.6%)
  Processes: 517 Power: uptime: 12h 58m states: freeze,mem,disk suspend: deep avail: s2idle
    wakeups: 0 hibernate: platform avail: shutdown, reboot, suspend, test_resume image: 12.3 GiB
    Init: systemd v: 252 target: graphical (5) default: graphical tool: systemctl
  Compilers: gcc: 12.2.0 Client: shell wrapper v: 5.2.15-release inxi: 3.3.33
Boot Mode: UEFI
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22483
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#2 Post by dolphin_oracle »

repo has not changed. they just haven't updated their repo yet.

so you'll have to ask librewolf project.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Live system help document: https://mxlinux.org/wiki/help-antix-live-usb-system/

User avatar
DukeComposed
Posts: 1459
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#3 Post by DukeComposed »

siamhie wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:17 am Firefox released version 125 on April 15th, so LibreWolf usually releases their version within two or three days but I'm still on 124.

How would I go about updating the repo?
The first step in updating software to a new release: Verify if the software has a new release.

User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3491
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Re: Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#4 Post by siamhie »

DukeComposed wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:04 pm
siamhie wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:17 am Firefox released version 125 on April 15th, so LibreWolf usually releases their version within two or three days but I'm still on 124.

How would I go about updating the repo?
The first step in updating software to a new release: Verify if the software has a new release.

I did verify that there is a new release. My second link pointed to it.


I guess I'll just have to wait until the gitlab repo is updated.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22483
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#5 Post by dolphin_oracle »

they describe that second link as an unofficial repository building on debian unstable. I don't think that qualifies as a release, according to librewolf's website.

again, you'll need to ask the librewolf guys. Its their repo.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Live system help document: https://mxlinux.org/wiki/help-antix-live-usb-system/

User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3491
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Re: Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#6 Post by siamhie »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 1:18 pm they describe that second link as an unofficial repository building on debian unstable. I don't think that qualifies as a release, according to librewolf's website.

again, you'll need to ask the librewolf guys. Its their repo.

I noticed the second link (125.0.1-1) points to an opensuse repository and the main repository (deb.librewolf.net) is only up to the 124.0.1-1 version.

On the gitlab page I downloaded the LibreWolf bsys5 Release v125.0.2-1 and upgraded to that until the actual repo catches up.

update1.jpg
update2.jpg
update3.jpg

I'll go ahead and consider this closed for now.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

User avatar
indielinuxpower
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2022 12:14 pm

Re: Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#7 Post by indielinuxpower »

I know this is closed, but thought I would quickly mention that the librewolf stable version flatpak has been updated, and that their flatpaks tend to be updated more quickly than their other repos. Only mentioned in case you want something now to fix things until librewolf gets the main .deb repo fixed/updated/corrected/whatever.

User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3491
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Re: Has LibreWolf's repo changed?

#8 Post by siamhie »

indielinuxpower wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2024 5:58 am I know this is closed, but thought I would quickly mention that the librewolf stable version flatpak has been updated, and that their flatpaks tend to be updated more quickly than their other repos. Only mentioned in case you want something now to fix things until librewolf gets the main .deb repo fixed/updated/corrected/whatever.

Thanks for the suggestion but flatpak packages are too large for my liking.

flatpak.jpg

I already mentioned that I upgraded to the Bsys5 version (125.0.2-1/74MB) until the main repo (deb.librewolf.net) catches up.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

Post Reply

Return to “MX Help”