liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles  [Solved]

Report Bugs, Issues and non- package Requests
Message
Author
Charlie Brown

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#51 Post by Charlie Brown »

Yep, I was talking about the "tty" issue :)

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22662
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#52 Post by dolphin_oracle »

Charlie Brown wrote: Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:56 pm Though it says "do not manually edit", does it change if you comment out that line (then reboot) ?
I believe those are compile time options.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Live system help document: https://mxlinux.org/wiki/help-antix-live-usb-system/

Charlie Brown

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#53 Post by Charlie Brown »

Oh la la :hitmyhead: :D

Thank you .

User avatar
AVLinux
Posts: 3157
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:15 am

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#54 Post by AVLinux »

Hi,

To clarify in case I've muddied the water... It's entirely possible X not loading was simply a boot glitch but removing 'quiet' from my boot switches allowed X to start normally on a rebuilt ISO... I suppose we will hear more about this if more issues pop up with people remastering on these newer kernels..

The removal of 'quiet' seemed to only mean an extra couple of milliseconds of code blurting across the screen so not really a vital option anyway, Although boot splashes look very professional I have never minded watching the console output..

Charlie Brown

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#55 Post by Charlie Brown »

What if you just: threadirqs splash ?

At least out of curiosity :)

User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3724
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#56 Post by siamhie »

CharlesV wrote: Wed Jan 03, 2024 11:15 am
This issue of the virtual consoles DOES happen as I explained in post #9 mx21 and 6.6.7 liquorix ( UEFI ) , as well as 6.6.8 as I am on now.

Thanks for pointing out the post @CharlesV . I should go through the thread and make notes as to what does work and what doesn't.

So I think we can now rule out plymouth as there are two versions between MX-21 and MX-23.

MX-21 uses plymouth-0.9.5 version released 2020-07-08 (0.9.5-3)
MX-23 uses plymouth-22.02.122 version released 2022-01-11 (22.02.122-3)
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3724
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#57 Post by siamhie »

Charlie Brown wrote: Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:56 pm Though it says "do not manually edit", does it change if you comment out that line (then reboot) ?

Not entirely sure. I find it easier to just open MX Boot Options and make the changes right there on the kernel parameters line.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

User avatar
siamhie
Global Moderator
Posts: 3724
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 5:45 pm

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#58 Post by siamhie »

AVLinux wrote: Wed Jan 03, 2024 3:32 pm Hi,

To clarify in case I've muddied the water... It's entirely possible X not loading was simply a boot glitch but removing 'quiet' from my boot switches allowed X to start normally on a rebuilt ISO... I suppose we will hear more about this if more issues pop up with people remastering on these newer kernels..

The removal of 'quiet' seemed to only mean an extra couple of milliseconds of code blurting across the screen so not really a vital option anyway, Although boot splashes look very professional I have never minded watching the console output..

From my limited understanding of those two kernel options from this trial and error.

The quiet option just suppresses more of the log messages you'll see on the screen.
The splash/nosplash option just enables or disables the plymouth boot animation.
This is my Fluxbox . There are many others like it, but this one is mine. My Fluxbox is my best friend. It is my life.
I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my Fluxbox is useless. Without my Fluxbox, I am useless.

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12879
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#59 Post by fehlix »

siamhie wrote: Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:34 am Liquorix:

Code: Select all

CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DEFERRED_TAKEOVER=y
# end of Console display driver support
Seems Debian comments out "CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DEFERRED_TAKEOVER" and Liquorix doesn't.
Good findings.
Maybe try this kernel boot parameter:

Code: Select all

fbcon=nodefer
to disabled "deferred takeover" of the framebuffer,
which may help to show the virtual console.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22662
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: liquourix 6.6.8 kernel, virtual consoles

#60 Post by dolphin_oracle »

that does the trick.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Live system help document: https://mxlinux.org/wiki/help-antix-live-usb-system/

Post Reply

Return to “Bugs and Non-Package Requests Forum”