is it possible that in qjackctl the displayed ms of latency is not accurate?
I've just tried a live stream with the periods/buffer set to (default) and frames at 128, it said the latency was down to 2.9ms, but it was definitely higher than that.
I tried it at 2 periods/buffer and (can't remember the value) frames, it said the ms was 5.8, but the actual latency audibly less than the 2.9 setting i had.
latency display in jack not accurate?
Help on all MX Re-spins
Message
Author
Jump to
- News/Announcements
- ↳ MX News and Announcements
- ↳ antiX News and Announcements
- ↳ Site Announcements
- MX - ACTIVELY DEVELOPED AND SUPPORTED
- ↳ MX Help
- ↳ Bugs and Non-Package Requests Forum
- ↳ Installation
- ↳ Security
- ↳ Tips & Tricks by users (not for help)
- ↳ General
- ↳ XFCE Desktop Environment
- ↳ Documentation and videos
- ↳ Themes and Screenshots
- ↳ MX Art
- ↳ User contributed icons
- ↳ User contributed Wallpaper
- ↳ MX Linux Official Blog
- ↳ Hardware /Configuration
- ↳ Software / Configuration
- ↳ Older Versions
- ↳ MX Fluxbox Official Release
- ↳ MX KDE Official Release
- MX MODIFIED - CONDITIONALLY SUPPORTED BY FORUM MEMBERS
- ↳ MX Modified
- ↳ MX Respins
- antiX - MX COLLABORATOR, ACTIVELY DEVELOPED AND SUPPORTED
- ↳ antiX
- Development
- ↳ General
- ↳ Website
- ↳ Torrent Team
- ↳ Art Discussion
- ↳ Translations
- ↳ MX Repositories
- ↳ General
- ↳ Package Requests / Status
- ↳ Package Requests - MX-23
- ↳ Package Status - MX-23
- ↳ Package Requests - MX-21
- ↳ Package Status - MX-21
- ↳ Package Requests/Status - MX-19
- ↳ Package Requests/Status - MX 17/18
- Community
- ↳ Chat
- ↳ General
- ↳ Community Fun
- ↳ Success Stories
- ↳ Testimonials
- ↳ Other Languages
- ↳ Forum en Español
- ↳ Forum Français
- ↳ Forum Italiano
- ↳ Deutsches Forum
- ↳ المنتدي العربي
- ↳ 中文論壇
- ↳ Other Languages Forum
- ↳ Community Submissions
- ↳ Package Sharing
- ↳ Scripts
- Administration
- ↳ Rules and Forum How-Tos
- ↳ Rules
- ↳ Forum How-to's
- ↳ Site Help