You can have libreoffice as a "recommend", is it a good practice, sure... nothing wrong with that, are there better options... maybe...TimothySimon wrote: Thu Sep 23, 2021 2:22 pm Fact 1: LibreOffice is HUGE.
Fact 2: We need it for document conversion.
What I chose: libreoffice is now "recommended" (is this a good practice ?)
I tried to quickly locate what in libreoffice is actually responsible for the conversions, couldn't find it yet.
If it is just one or two components and libraries that are needed, its better to just have those or use something else to provide this. Edit: yeah it appears to all feed off libreoffice needing installed, could be wrong
One option is to convert using smaller tools OR with libreoffice if its installed.
The reason I say that its better is that for people that don't want or need the whole libreoffice suite, they lose this functionality completely. Plus file-converter goes from a small and portable tool to something requiring massive dependencies with even more dependencies.
Maybe some of the tools needed for converting some file formats are installed OOTB in many distros already?
A good example is the antiX/MX base and MX Workbench, file-converter would be great for those, but they don't come with libreoffice OOTB. Why can't I at least convert something from html to .odf if I have a smaller tool that can do it installed already?
I'm not really familiar with document conversion, but I think there are other options, although it might not be as simple as just requiring libreoffice... but...
I think it makes file-converter more attractive to more users, more modular, more portable, and maybe even more useful in the long run.
Maybe someone (we have people here who know this stuff pretty good) else knows of any of viable options to use?