>>> Correct: I do not get the "interactive text-menus" for customization: https://youtu.be/DJmukS-bSxw&t=53s << UEFI not legacy boot >>fehlix wrote: Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:49 amHmmm... so you don't get the interactive text-menus displayed, but it would boot without trying to go through the text menus.
>>> When booting from the first menu entry, I see six dots ("udev done"): https://youtu.be/kGi9jd1qW8g&t=16m55sfehlix wrote: Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:49 amDo you actually see the text-splash screen, when booting from the first menu entry (the one without text menu)?
>>> I never see three dots ("run live script"): https://youtu.be/kGi9jd1qW8g&t=16m47s
>>> I never see four dots ("start init"): https://youtu.be/kGi9jd1qW8g&t=16m50s
>>> If I remove 'splasht' parameter (while retaining quiet and nosplash), then the listing of boot processes appear, and furthermore the six dot-udev done screen part of text-splash (that I was getting) no longer appears.fehlix wrote: Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:49 amCould you also try to just disable text-splash screen, with adjusting boot parameter
to either
splasht=
or
just remove splasht.
And would it display something during boot-up?
>>> If I remove 'splasht' and 'nosplash' parameters (while retaining quiet), then the same thing happens ((the boot processes appear, and the six dot-udev done screen part of text-splash no longer appears)).
*** *** *** *** ***
>>> In addition to my SanDisk thumb drives, I have tried a Samsung 32gb (3.1) USB and a Kingston Kyson 64gb (3.2). No change in result, sadly and unfortunately for me. I have been trialing my Samsung and Kyson sticks (see my rabbit hole reference), and they behave the same way as my SanDisk USBs.JayM wrote: Wed Jul 21, 2021 4:11 amTry a different USB stick. Some of the SanDisks contain firmware that doesn't work with the MX/antiX Live USB system.
I appreciate your feedback and advice and thank you for your time. I am enjoying my non-persistent MX on a stick, and am looking forward to getting it to persist. With kindest regards.
Sincerely,
MX321
P.S. I also have learned that there is some degree of community preference in naming the Grub menu something else like 'Syslinux boot options.' Forgive me if I bastardized it before. Please correct me of my poor word choices.