Sunflower file manager

User Package Requests for MX-19
Message
Author
User avatar
timkb4cq
Developer
Posts: 3620
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: Sunflower file manager

#11 Post by timkb4cq »

I have a working build of the latest sunflower now in the MX-19 Test repository.
The mirrors won't have updated yet, so here's a direct link to the deb for those in a hurry
http://mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo/pool/test ... 19_all.deb

If you are already using the deb from the author, please purge it before installing this one. His build system & debian's pybuild put a package's local libraries in different places which can cause issues.

Let me know how it works.
HP Pavillion TP01, AMD Ryzen 3 5300G (quad core), Crucial 500GB SSD, Toshiba 6TB 7200rpm
Dell Inspiron 15, AMD Ryzen 7 2700u (quad core). Sabrent 500GB nvme, Seagate 1TB

User avatar
Gabriel_M
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:21 pm

Re: Sunflower file manager

#12 Post by Gabriel_M »

It works very well, thank you very much !!!!.

I started with Norton Commander, so I always used dual screen file managers.

It is a shame that Alexander Schwinn, contrary to the MX Linux developers, excellent and very friendly distribution, does not accept suggestions such as incorporating dual screen to Thunar.
Desktop Mobo: BIOSTAR model: B450MHP
CPU AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
RAM: 8 GiB 2667 MHz DDR4
Device-1: AMD Picasso/Raven 2
STORAGE:Gigabyte model: GP-GSTFS31480GNTD size: 447.13 GiB
DISTRO: MX-23.6_x64 Libretto XFCE 4.20

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 8031
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: Sunflower file manager

#13 Post by asqwerth »

It's now in the Test Repo.

Most things work, except the fast media preview.

In Manjaro, the version installed from AUR has the fast media preview function working fine.

See screenshot below. Usually the first time you select an item in a folder the preview won't show up. If you click the same item again, it will.


Image

https://imgur.com/AsHsIlZ


For the package in Test Repo, I clicked once, twice, etc. No preview appears. Is some dependency or package is missing from the version packaged for Test Repo?

Dependencies listed in AUR page at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunflower/

gtk3 (gtk3-donnatella, gtk3-cosy, gtk3-adwaita-3-32-git, gtk3-ubuntu, gtk3-mushrooms, gtk3-typeahead, gtk3-git, gtk3-classic, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-view, gtk3-cloudproviders)
librsvg (librsvg-git)
python-chardet
python-gobject (python-gobject-git)
vte3 (vte3-ng-emoji-terminix-zsh-notify, vte3-ng-fullwidth-emoji, vte3-git, vte3-tilix, vte3-ng, vte3-notification, vte3-kinetic)
libnotify (libnotify-gtk2, libnotify-id-git, libnotify-id) (make)
gvfs (gvfs-nosystemd, gvfs-git) (optional) – mount-management
libnotify (libnotify-gtk2, libnotify-id-git, libnotify-id) (optional)
python-mutagen (optional) – audio-metadata support
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 8031
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: Sunflower file manager

#14 Post by asqwerth »

Just an update - I tried to compare the dependencies in the AUR list with what's in our stable repos. Not many with exactly the same name. I tried installing a few packages that had similar names, but the image preview function still doesn't work on the sunflower package in Test Repo.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

OKie
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:00 am

Re: Sunflower file manager

#15 Post by OKie »

I'd like to add my thanks for the package. It's version 0.5, which is later than available on the gitlab site. Also, image preview seems to work fine.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 8031
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: Sunflower file manager

#16 Post by asqwerth »

I've found the new gtk3 version in test repo does not mount my synology Nas drive. I used to be able to do it in gtk2 version, compare files and copy over new stuff from data drive to my NAS. now the Nas is unmountable even using its IP location on network. I tried ftp,smb.

Happens with the AUR version in arch/manjaro as well. I made a bug report there but it didn't appear to have been resolved yet. So on mx I'm reverting to and sticking with gtk2 for now.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
Real
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 6:46 pm

Re: Sunflower file manager

#17 Post by Real »

I use thunar first to login to my nas folders, then I open double commander and the folders are mounted. Double commander's method of logging into a network folder is too dissimilar for me to figure out, and I've tried. I also tried spacefm and sunflower and any otherr probable dual pane file manager and none of them do it for me even if I had no nas. I think I actually had that same problem too. Afterwards where now your nas is unreachable? I had to reconfigure my nas adapters and finally got it working again. Weird but I may have a better simpler config now on the nas. Thunar works so well with MX and I find it frustrating that all other file managers just don't have the same level of cohesiveness that thunar does when just trying to do stuff. Double commander is 'bout perfect for me.
Lies are weapons of mass destruction. There are no victims.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 8031
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: Sunflower file manager

#18 Post by asqwerth »

I do mount on thunar first. But the gtk3 version didn't show the mounted Nas in their list of mounted devices.

Maybe I'll check again with the latest sunflower in test repo.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
Real
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 6:46 pm

Re: Sunflower file manager

#19 Post by Real »

That's just it. We want dual pane which thunar doesn't have yet having to use thunar first is something I'd like to not have to do. Not a big deal really. Main thing is being able to move files without using tabs or 2 separate windows. I ran the test sunflower one maybe a couple 3 weeks ago. Did not care for it.
Lies are weapons of mass destruction. There are no victims.

OKie
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:00 am

Re: Sunflower file manager

#20 Post by OKie »

Real wrote: Thu Jun 17, 2021 5:06 am I use thunar first to login to my nas folders, then I open double commander and the folders are mounted. Double commander's method of logging into a network folder is too dissimilar for me to figure out, and I've tried. I also tried spacefm and sunflower and any otherr probable dual pane file manager and none of them do it for me even if I had no nas. I think I actually had that same problem too. Afterwards where now your nas is unreachable? I had to reconfigure my nas adapters and finally got it working again. Weird but I may have a better simpler config now on the nas. Thunar works so well with MX and I find it frustrating that all other file managers just don't have the same level of cohesiveness that thunar does when just trying to do stuff. Double commander is 'bout perfect for me.
Can you say more about your NAS. I don't use one, and I'd like to hear about the details? Is this for a company or university? Also, why are you doing this instead of using a local drive?

Post Reply

Return to “Package Requests/Status - MX-19”