For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.
No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.
Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.
You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Moltke wrote: Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:09 am
Yes, you're right, however, most "lightweigh" distros won't run or run poorly with 512MB of RAM from what I could see.
This is why I said "above"
My P4 laptop was almost happy with 1 go of ram and MX16. But it's too much for an old processor. Feasible but not so pleasant.
You're right yet again guess I misread that part
Without each other's help there ain't no hope for us
@cyrilus31... I guess than with a P4 laptop 32bits, you needs 2 times less memory than a laptop 64bits (with software coded in 64bits) for the same "smoother behavior".
Pour les nouveaux utilisateurs: Alt+F1 pour le manuel, ou FAQS, MX MANUEL, et Conseils MXConseils Debian - Info. système “quick-system-info-mx” (QSI) ... Ici: System: MX-19-23_x64 & antiX23_x32 runit
I came to MX from a distro that sells itself as "Lite," but it's got all kindsa extra stuff and it's very slow compared with MX on the same machine. It also lacks MX's supercool tools! I wrote about it on my blog (see my signature tagline).
