No private window link when I right click on firefox

[noesnada]

I'm on the latest version of mx kde.

I've always had the option to open a new private window when right clicking on firefox in the panel, but I don't have it now.

Does anyone know how I can get it back please.

Here's a picture of my right click menu.

[Eadwine Rose]

According to the forum rules (please read): Please provide full Quick System Info, use copy for forum button, no edits.
LiveUSB version is OK if needed.

[noesnada]

According to the forum rules (please read): Please provide full Quick System Info, use copy for forum button, no edits.
LiveUSB version is OK if needed.

System info' below. Can something be gleaned from this to assist with adding a shortcut to the firefox launch menu?

Code: Select all

Snapshot created on: 20241220_1631
System:
  Kernel: 6.1.0-31-amd64 [6.1.128-1] arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 12.2.0
    parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.1.0-31-amd64 root=UUID=<filter> ro
    init=/lib/systemd/systemd
  Desktop: KDE Plasma v: 5.27.5 wm: kwin_x11 vt: 7 dm: SDDM Distro: MX-23.5_KDE_x64 Libretto May
    19 2024 base: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Machine:
  Type: Desktop Mobo: Micro-Star model: MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) v: 1.0
    serial: <superuser required> UEFI: American Megatrends LLC. v: 1.80 date: 10/25/2023
CPU:
  Info: model: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Zen 3+ gen: 4 level: v3 note: check
    built: 2022 process: TSMC n6 (7nm) family: 0x19 (25) model-id: 0x21 (33) stepping: 0
    microcode: 0xA20102B
  Topology: cpus: 1x cores: 16 tpc: 2 threads: 32 smt: enabled cache: L1: 1024 KiB desc: d-16x32
    KiB; i-16x32 KiB L2: 8 MiB desc: 16x512 KiB L3: 64 MiB desc: 2x32 MiB
  Speed (MHz): avg: 2238 high: 2797 min/max: 2200/5083 boost: enabled scaling:
    driver: acpi-cpufreq governor: ondemand cores: 1: 2220 2: 2613 3: 2239 4: 2200 5: 2239 6: 2224
    7: 2239 8: 2239 9: 2200 10: 2200 11: 2200 12: 2200 13: 2200 14: 2200 15: 2196 16: 2200 17: 2200
    18: 2797 19: 2200 20: 2200 21: 2200 22: 2239 23: 2200 24: 2200 25: 2200 26: 2200 27: 2200
    28: 2200 29: 2199 30: 2200 31: 2200 32: 2200 bogomips: 217593
  Flags: avx avx2 ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3 svm
  Vulnerabilities:
  Type: gather_data_sampling status: Not affected
  Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected
  Type: l1tf status: Not affected
  Type: mds status: Not affected
  Type: meltdown status: Not affected
  Type: mmio_stale_data status: Not affected
  Type: reg_file_data_sampling status: Not affected
  Type: retbleed status: Not affected
  Type: spec_rstack_overflow mitigation: safe RET
  Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
  Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
  Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines; IBPB: conditional; IBRS_FW; STIBP: always-on; RSB
    filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected
  Type: srbds status: Not affected
  Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD Navi 21 [Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 XT] vendor: Sapphire driver: amdgpu
    v: kernel arch: RDNA-2 code: Navi-2x process: TSMC n7 (7nm) built: 2020-22 pcie: gen: 4
    speed: 16 GT/s lanes: 16 ports: active: DP-1 empty: DP-2,DP-3,HDMI-A-1 bus-ID: 2f:00.0
    chip-ID: 1002:73bf class-ID: 0300
  Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.7 with: Xwayland v: 22.1.9 compositor: kwin_x11 driver: X:
    loaded: amdgpu unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,radeon,vesa dri: radeonsi gpu: amdgpu display-ID: :0
    screens: 1
  Screen-1: 0 s-res: 5120x1440 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 1354x381mm (53.31x15.00")
    s-diag: 1407mm (55.38")
  Monitor-1: DP-1 mapped: DisplayPort-0 model: LG (GoldStar) ULTRAWIDE serial: <filter>
    built: 2023 res: 5120x1440 hz: 144 dpi: 108 gamma: 1.2 size: 1200x340mm (47.24x13.39")
    diag: 1244mm (49") modes: max: 5120x1440 min: 640x480
  API: OpenGL v: 4.6 Mesa 24.2.2-1~mx23ahs renderer: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (radeonsi navi21 LLVM
    15.0.6 DRM 3.49 6.1.0-31-amd64) direct-render: Yes
Audio:
  Device-1: AMD Navi 21/23 HDMI/DP Audio driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 1-2:3 pcie: gen: 4
    chip-ID: 0db0:419c speed: 16 GT/s class-ID: 0300 lanes: 16 bus-ID: 2f:00.1 chip-ID: 1002:ab28
    class-ID: 0403
  Device-2: AMD Starship/Matisse HD Audio vendor: Micro-Star MSI driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel
    pcie: gen: 4 speed: 16 GT/s lanes: 16 bus-ID: 31:00.4 chip-ID: 1022:1487 class-ID: 0403
  Device-3: Micro Star USB Audio type: USB driver: hid-generic,snd-usb-audio,usbhid
  Device-4: XMOS EDIFIER S880DB type: USB driver: hid-generic,snd-usb-audio,usbhid bus-ID: 5-4:3
    chip-ID: 20b1:30a0 class-ID: 0300
  API: ALSA v: k6.1.0-31-amd64 status: kernel-api tools: alsamixer,amixer
  Server-1: PipeWire v: 1.0.0 status: active with: 1: pipewire-pulse status: active
    2: wireplumber status: active 3: pipewire-alsa type: plugin 4: pw-jack type: plugin
    tools: pactl,pw-cat,pw-cli,wpctl
Network:
  Device-1: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE vendor: Micro-Star MSI driver: r8169 v: kernel pcie: gen: 2
    speed: 5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: f000 bus-ID: 27:00.0 chip-ID: 10ec:8125 class-ID: 0200
  IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
  Device-2: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 160MHz driver: iwlwifi v: kernel modules: wl pcie:
    gen: 2 speed: 5 GT/s lanes: 1 bus-ID: 28:00.0 chip-ID: 8086:2725 class-ID: 0280
  IF: wlan0 state: down mac: <filter>
Bluetooth:
  Device-1: Intel AX210 Bluetooth type: USB driver: btusb v: 0.8 bus-ID: 1-4:6 chip-ID: 8087:0032
    class-ID: e001
  Report: hciconfig ID: hci0 rfk-id: 1 state: down bt-service: enabled,running rfk-block:
    hardware: no software: yes address: <filter>
  Info: acl-mtu: 1021:4 sco-mtu: 96:6 link-policy: rswitch sniff link-mode: peripheral accept
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 4.57 TiB used: 733.89 GiB (15.7%)
  SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required.
  ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 maj-min: 259:0 vendor: Western Digital model: WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0
    size: 465.76 GiB block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 63.2 Gb/s lanes: 4 type: SSD
    serial: <filter> rev: 613000WD temp: 35.9 C scheme: GPT
  ID-2: /dev/nvme1n1 maj-min: 259:3 vendor: Western Digital model: WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0
    size: 1.82 TiB block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 63.2 Gb/s lanes: 4 type: SSD
    serial: <filter> rev: 614600WD temp: 32.9 C scheme: GPT
  ID-3: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 870 QVO 2TB size: 1.82 TiB block-size:
    physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> rev: 2B6Q scheme: GPT
  ID-4: /dev/sdb maj-min: 8:16 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 850 PRO 512GB size: 476.94 GiB
    block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> rev: 2B6Q
    scheme: GPT
  ID-5: /dev/sde maj-min: 8:64 type: USB model: Kindle Internal Storage size: 13.64 GiB
    block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B type: N/A serial: <filter> rev: 0409
  SMART Message: Unknown USB bridge. Flash drive/Unsupported enclosure?
Partition:
  ID-1: / raw-size: 461.1 GiB size: 452.8 GiB (98.20%) used: 22.9 GiB (5.1%) fs: ext4
    dev: /dev/nvme0n1p2 maj-min: 259:2
  ID-2: /boot/efi raw-size: 4.66 GiB size: 4.65 GiB (99.80%) used: 5.6 MiB (0.1%) fs: vfat
    dev: /dev/nvme0n1p1 maj-min: 259:1
  ID-3: /home raw-size: 1.82 TiB size: 1.79 TiB (98.37%) used: 381.33 GiB (20.8%) fs: ext4
    dev: /dev/nvme1n1p1 maj-min: 259:4
Swap:
  Alert: No swap data was found.
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 37.6 C mobo: N/A gpu: amdgpu temp: 47.0 C mem: 46.0 C
  Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A gpu: amdgpu fan: 0
Repos:
  Packages: 3087 pm: dpkg pkgs: 3053 libs: 1704 tools: apt,apt-get,aptitude,nala pm: rpm pkgs: 0
    pm: flatpak pkgs: 34
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ bookworm-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    3: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-backports main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
    1: deb https://mirrors.ukfast.co.uk/sites/MX_antiX_packages/mx/repo/ bookworm main non-free
    2: deb https://mirrors.ukfast.co.uk/sites/MX_antiX_packages/mx/repo/ bookworm ahs
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/nordvpn.list
    1: deb https://repo.nordvpn.com//deb/nordvpn/debian/ stable main
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/steam-beta.list
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/steam-stable.list
    1: deb [arch=amd64,i386 signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/steam.gpg] https://repo.steampowered.com/steam/ stable steam
    2: deb-src [arch=amd64,i386 signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/steam.gpg] https://repo.steampowered.com/steam/ stable steam
Info:
  Processes: 509 Uptime: 3h 37m wakeups: 0 Memory: 125.72 GiB used: 6.81 GiB (5.4%) Init: systemd
  v: 252 target: graphical (5) default: graphical tool: systemctl Compilers: gcc: 12.2.0 alt: 12
  Client: shell wrapper v: 5.2.15-release inxi: 3.3.26
Boot Mode: UEFI

[Eadwine Rose]

That is irrelevant. The forum rules state to share QSI with help requests. 99 out of 100 times we need it.

[noesnada]

That is irrelevant. The forum rules state to share QSI with help requests. 99 out of 100 times we need it.

That's what I thought. Blanket enforcement of rules even when the rule isn't in the least applicable. Forum dictator syndrome.

We've seen a lot of petty dictators since March 2020. Lots of you guys about.

I moved over to Linux because I am a true supporter of freedom, in software and in the real world. I don't like stupid xxxxxxx rules that make no sense.

If I'm banned so be it.

[uncle mark]

That is irrelevant. The forum rules state to share QSI with help requests. 99 out of 100 times we need it.

That's what I thought. Blanket enforcement of rules even when the rule isn't in the least applicable. Forum dictator syndrome.

We've seen a lot of petty dictators since March 2020. Lots of you guys about.

I moved over to Linux because I am a true supporter of freedom, in software and in the real world. I don't like stupid xxxxxxx rules that make no sense.

If I'm banned so be it.

Could be worse. She could have smacked you with her fish.

[DukeComposed]

That's what I thought. Blanket enforcement of rules even when the rule isn't in the least applicable. Forum dictator syndrome.

You aren't the best person to decide if the rules apply to you. I don't ask for you to respect me, but you have to respect the idea that the forum and its rules exist for a reason and the people who enforce them are doing so for a good cause. If you don't like the rules, you don't have to follow them: you are free to leave at any time.

I moved over to Linux because I am a true supporter of freedom, in software and in the real world. I don't like stupid xxxxxxx rules that make no sense.

Two things. (a) Swearing is banned by the forum rules, and (b) freedom, both in software and in reality, does not mean absolute freedom to do anything anywhere at any time. The word for that is "chaos". Your freedom to swing your fist ends at the tip of my nose. Swearing on this forum disrespects the rules, and by extension it disrespects me, and everyone else here, by showing how little appreciation you have for our well-established rules of behavior. I don't need to endure your anarcho-libertarian screeds here, period, full stop. While you can thump your freedom drum all day long, you are not being oppressed here or being denied any freedom whatsoever. You are being asked to follow the rules that everyone else has been asked to follow, and everyone else here has agreed to follow them in order to maintain some reasonable semblance of courtesy.

If the concept of being courteous is too alien of a concept for you, you may need some therapy. Feel free to come back when you're ready to participate in a functional society. The obligation of even the basic pretense of acting polite seems to be something you are not capable of satisfying. I strongly encourage you to meditate on this. Even young children learn to pretend to be polite to get what they want. This seems to be a skill that has been lost on you.

You've asked for help. You've done so on a forum that has concrete rules, clearly posted on every page, and you are pretending to be offended by the idea of being asked to follow them. Grow up.

Either grow up or solve your own problems. I don't care which option you choose.

[Eadwine Rose]

You agreed to following the rules by registering here. You knew they were there, and sharing the QSI is a little thing to do.

If you don't like the rules, or responses on this forum by the MX Team, you are welcome to seek your help elsewhere.





@DukeComposed You might want to dial the personal attacks down a little bit, thanks :)

[noesnada]

That's what I thought. Blanket enforcement of rules even when the rule isn't in the least applicable. Forum dictator syndrome.

You aren't the best person to decide if the rules apply to you. I don't ask for you to respect me, but you have to respect the idea that the forum and its rules exist for a reason and the people who enforce them are doing so for a good cause. If you don't like the rules, you don't have to follow them: you are free to leave at any time.

I moved over to Linux because I am a true supporter of freedom, in software and in the real world. I don't like stupid xxxxxxx rules that make no sense.

Two things. (a) Swearing is banned by the forum rules, and (b) freedom, both in software and in reality, does not mean absolute freedom to do anything anywhere at any time. The word for that is "chaos". Your freedom to swing your fist ends at the tip of my nose. Swearing on this forum disrespects the rules, and by extension it disrespects me, and everyone else here, by showing how little appreciation you have for our well-established rules of behavior. I don't need to endure your anarcho-libertarian screeds here, period, full stop. While you can thump your freedom drum all day long, you are not being oppressed here or being denied any freedom whatsoever. You are being asked to follow the rules that everyone else has been asked to follow, and everyone else here has agreed to follow them in order to maintain some reasonable semblance of courtesy.

If the concept of being courteous is too alien of a concept for you, you may need some therapy. Feel free to come back when you're ready to participate in a functional society. The obligation of even the basic pretense of acting polite seems to be something you are not capable of satisfying. I strongly encourage you to meditate on this. Even young children learn to pretend to be polite to get what they want. This seems to be a skill that has been lost on you.

You've asked for help. You've done so on a forum that has concrete rules, clearly posted on every page, and you are pretending to be offended by the idea of being asked to follow them. Grow up.

Either grow up or solve your own problems. I don't care which option you choose.

Look. I have been a person that questions rules for many years. I am very used to the typical responses. People like me need to get therapy and we need to grow up. In other words, we are children with mental health problems.

At the point of posting my system info' I asked the valid question - what could be gleaned from that information. I am pretty sure that nobody would get anything from my system info' that would help with restoring the private window option to the firefox right click menu. However, I am far from an expert with linux - I may be wrong.

But instead of getting an answer to that question I got the short and peremptory phrase - "That is irrelevant". I took that as not very polite. If you look at my history on this forum you'll see I have never initiated any attack on anyone or been rude to anyone, unless they are impolite to me first.

So I questioned the dogma. I'm a heretic. Sorry. That's kind of how I am.

[noesnada]

You agreed to following the rules by registering here. You knew they were there, and sharing the QSI is a little thing to do.

If you don't like the rules, or responses on this forum by the MX Team, you are welcome to seek your help elsewhere.





@DukeComposed You might want to dial the personal attacks down a little bit, thanks :)

Well thanks for not banning me - yet. I don't want banned but expected to be.

No I don't want to seek help for mxlinux elsewhere. This forum is super helpful. Two of the devs assisted me so much with a problem I had that I donated during the conversation. It's a great forum.

I know I had to agree to the rules to register, and I did (it's like a eula - agree or don't use the thing ) but I'm terrible for pointing out holes in rules when I see them.