Lightweight music player?

Message
Author
User avatar
RallyDarkstrike
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:51 pm

Lightweight music player?

#1 Post by RallyDarkstrike »

Hi all! Looking for a nice, lightweight recommendation for a music player! I use VLC for video, but am looking for a nice lightweight music play to listen to my tunes while working away on stuff that uses minimal RAM. My laptop is an HP Stream 13, so it has a hard-soldered 2GB of RAM, which isn't a lot in this day and age.

I usually use Clementine as I love it and use it on my HTPC and my other laptop, but was curious if there was anything else out there that was lighter on resources but still has a media library function :)

Cheers and thanks!
Image

Huckleberry Finn

Re: Lightweight music player?

#2 Post by Huckleberry Finn »

You (and most people) won't believe this but Vlc is the lightest of all I tried (both looking at ram and cpu) when playing music. (even tried MPCHC on Win.) (and tried even the terminal ones). I just use the file manager as the playlist and click one by one :) (old fashioned) .. Yes, there's also a playlist feature in Vic..

Also it has a compressor feature that you can only have with 3rd party applications (which are not that simple and light). That's not only to fix loud parts but also makes bad recordings or low sounds more hear-able , vivid (without distorting). So, listening to music with vlc is really more tasteful to me.. No matter classical music or country :)

Meanwhile my ram is also 2GB DDR2 :)
__________________________________________

But if you necessarily want something like Clementine: Deadbeef or Audacious .. I like Deadbeef but it was skipping sound (a long term known bug) in my case ...
Last edited by Huckleberry Finn on Wed May 26, 2021 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22247
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#3 Post by dolphin_oracle »

xmms is stupid light.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

Huckleberry Finn

Re: Lightweight music player?

#4 Post by Huckleberry Finn »

Was that antiX's default one? (I remember trying them)

User avatar
manyroads
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#5 Post by manyroads »

FWIW I use DeadBeef (music) and Celluloid (Youtube Video Music).
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22247
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#6 Post by dolphin_oracle »

Huckleberry Finn wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 9:27 am Was that antiX's default one? (I remember trying them)
yes
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
RallyDarkstrike
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:51 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#7 Post by RallyDarkstrike »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 9:25 am xmms is stupid light.
True, but no Media Library function as far as I know (unless I am misremembering?) which, as I mentioned, I would prefer to have! I used it before on an Intel Atom netbook several years ago though...can confirm it's stupid light!
Image

User avatar
RallyDarkstrike
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:51 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#8 Post by RallyDarkstrike »

manyroads wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 9:29 am FWIW I use DeadBeef (music) and Celluloid (Youtube Video Music).
Sadly, pretty sure that DeedBeef doesn't have a Media Library function either, which I would like to have :(
Image

User avatar
AVLinux
Posts: 2998
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 1:15 am

Re: Lightweight music player?

#9 Post by AVLinux »

How resource heavy is Clementine actually? It may be like the VLC thing that Huck mentioned where you'd assume it's a resource hog because it's so fully featured but may not be..?

It is quite possible for a big and popular fully matured application with a full developer team to have better attention paid to optimization than a tiny single developer app sometimes.. just sayin'

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7930
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: Lightweight music player?

#10 Post by asqwerth »

Pragha?

It's pretty light, has music library function, and I find the default sound (on my humble speakers ) good. I've used it in various of my distros for at least 5 years. Not to say I don't use Clementine as well; the latter is just old reliable and I've never had issues with it.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

Post Reply

Return to “Software / Configuration”