MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Message
Author
SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros < insert sarcasm >

#1 Post by SwampRabbit »

They're freaking AMAZING! Distros and all the developers, users, and forum lurkers are too! :yourock:

Hope everyone is doing great, sooo missed being on here.
Last edited by SwampRabbit on Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

User avatar
entropyfoe
Posts: 637
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#2 Post by entropyfoe »

Have to agree, the future looks bright.

MX-19 with buster and the new XFCE will be awesome.

The beta of antiX 19, already buster, is looking great and bodes well for the MX instantiation.
MX 23.6 AHS on Asus PRIME B650
Ryzen 9700X (16 threads @ 3.8 GHz)
64 Gig DDR4 6400 (Crucial)
Integrated Radeon graphics
Samsung 970 NVMe nvme0n1 P1-3=MX-23.5, P4=testing
Samsung 980 NVMe =2TB Data, plus 4TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound

Huckleberry Finn

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#3 Post by Huckleberry Finn »

:number1:

User avatar
Richard
Posts: 1590
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:31 am

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#4 Post by Richard »

Great click bait. :)
Thinkpad T430 & Dell Latitude E7450, both with MX-21.3.1
__kernal 5.10.0-26-amd64 x86_64; Xfce-4.18.0; 8 GB RAM
__Intel Core i5-3380M, Graphics, Audio, Video; & SSDs.
HP Ryzen 5 17-cp3xxx with MX23.4 AHS & Liquorix 6.10-12~mx23ahs amd64

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22773
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#5 Post by dolphin_oracle »

lol

thank you.

There are a lot of great folks in the forum these days.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Live system help document: https://mxlinux.org/wiki/help-antix-live-usb-system/

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14888
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#6 Post by Stevo »

Heh...reeled me in too!

(puts troll-smashing hammer carefully back into hammerspace)

turtlebay777
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 2:40 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#7 Post by turtlebay777 »

Stevo wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2019 3:33 pm Heh...reeled me in too!

(puts troll-smashing hammer carefully back into hammerspace)
Anywhere near Hammamet, Tunisia?

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#8 Post by SwampRabbit »

I figured not being on here for a year and a half .... I get a lot of people with that thread title. :laugh:

I may not have been on here in awhile but I've been using MX daily for everything outside of my employer required Windows garbage I've had to do.

Very excited to get my hands on MX-19 beta!
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

turtlebay777
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 2:40 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#9 Post by turtlebay777 »

Out of interest SwampRabbit, amongst the Windows programs you have to use, is there anything that you could not do as well with Linux software, if you had the freedom to use MX at work instead?

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: MX Linux & antiX aren't that good of distros

#10 Post by SwampRabbit »

turtlebay777 wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2019 4:36 pm Out of interest SwampRabbit, amongst the Windows programs you have to use, is there anything that you could not do as well with Linux software, if you had the freedom to use MX at work instead?
Well, outside of the fact that it is a company laptop that I can't play with, not really. Someone can do everything and more in MX Linux and Linux in general.

Maybe MS Office compatibility (formatting, etc, etc) not being that great with LibreOffice is about it, I have to use Word, PowerPoint, Excel, and Visio constantly. I attempted to strictly use the browser based Office 365 to do the work instead from a specific MX laptop for work, but the real problem then became not being able to work on it offline then re upload it without getting messed up.

Showing up at a client and a briefing slide deck being jacked up from incompatibility doesn't help a week long trip start well.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

Post Reply

Return to “General”