Page 1 of 1

MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 1:34 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Feedback for beta 3 here please.

Please post conky comments here: The MX-17 conkies

If posting hardware issues, please post the output of the terminal command "inxi -F" at a minimum.

If posting nvidia-installer issues, please post the contents of /var/log/ddm.log.

If posting remaster issues, please include the contents of /var/log/live/live-remaster.log

If posting issues with MX-PackeageInstaller "Popular Apps", please post contents of /var/log/mxpi.log or /var/log/mxpi.log.old (whichever contains the log of your issue).

We expect a somewhat shorter test cycle for this release, as we move toward release-canditate (RC) status.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:03 pm
by Jerry3904
First quick look: very nice!

Some minor items that caught my eye:
1) Live boot screen: "Press F1 for Help" is not localized, and the use of that font (which I like very much) looks very muddy. Maybe instead: "F1 = Help" (understood by almost everybody?)
2) the login box looks much better with the face enabled, as we have noted during earlier testing: line 11 in /etc/lightdm/mx17/lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf has to read

Code: Select all

hide-user-image=false
3) the default for png images is feh, though nomacs is installed. Don't have jpg to test but suspect it is the same.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:07 pm
by dolphin_oracle
The "Press F1 for Help" can't be localized because its part of the graphic. That's the same text as antiX uses, but we can do whatever.

as for the font...I'm got someone looking at the bootloader graphic but I really wanted to get this b3 out of the way. FWIW, thats a 1024x768 graphic and its stretches to whatever you have.

So open to suggestions on font and such.

3. I probably forgot to update the mimelist. We have that stuff hardcoded, and it probably still points to gthumb, so feh gets used as a default. same thing happened with leafpad_to_featherpad.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:37 pm
by Paul..
Installed fine to BIOS/HDD machine in sig. Looks great. No issues so far.

email me when you're ready for torrents.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:49 pm
by zebedeeboss
WOW!!! What a difference from Beta1 - Truly awesome work - well done to all concerned.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:58 pm
by Paul..

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:02 pm
by dolphin_oracle
zebedeeboss wrote:WOW!!! What a difference from Beta1 - Truly awesome work - well done to all concerned.

thanks zeb!

everyone has been working real hard on it. Not to mention all the work gone into populating our repos with stretch packages! I think I saw kdenlive 17 in the test repo.

and translations keep coming in!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:05 pm
by Jerry3904
iPhone Mounter works again, though the dialog box stays on top of Thunar instead of disappearing (we know this already, just logging it).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:11 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Jerry3904 wrote:iPhone Mounter works again, though the dialog box stays on top of Thunar instead of disappearing (we know this already, just logging it).

Out of curiosity, did you start with thunar already running, or did you allow the iDevice-mounter tool to launch it?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:18 pm
by Jerry3904
iDevice called it

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:37 pm
by Jerry3904
Want a really small annoyance? The items in the Favorites menu are not in alphabetical order--or any other order AFAIK.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:54 pm
by zebedeeboss
Note:
If anyone has a problem with a HUGE mouse cursor due to 4k resolution

add a file called .gtkrc-2.0 to your home folder and the contents need to be

Code: Select all

gtk-cursor-theme-name="Adwaita"
gtk-cursor-theme-size=22
You pick the theme-name and you pick the cursor-theme-size

Apologies if this is not the correct way or there is a better way - but it works for me here.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:57 pm
by richb
The Debian backports repo is hanging for me when called from MXPI. When enabled in Synaptic it does refresh. Anyone else seeing this. It did the same in b2.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:08 pm
by Adrian
richb wrote:The Debian backports repo is hanging for me when called from MXPI. When enabled in Synaptic it does refresh. Anyone else seeing this. It did the same in b2.
I had problems with that, I think it might be because it downloads packages in quick succession maybe there's a timeout for this kind of downloads, not sure, somebody who knows more about websites should tell me what's best to use to download the packages I use something like this:

Code: Select all

wget ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/" + ver_name + "-backports/main/binary-" + arch + "/Packages.gz -O mainPackages.gz"
And then I download contribPackages.gz and nonfreePackages.gz, I put a 3 second delay between the downloads but it doesn't seem to help.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:36 pm
by richb
All Users not checked in Network Manager, I thought this was required to auto-connect to wlan upon booting. Currently it does not connect.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:38 pm
by dolphin_oracle
richb wrote:All Users not checked in Network Manager, I thought this was required to auto-connect to wlan upon booting. Currently it does not connect.
it does here.

however, you have to set it up after each user is created. or check the box. there is no way to ship with the box checked.

incidentally, this configuration has not changed since early alpha.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:47 pm
by richb
dolphin_oracle wrote:
richb wrote:All Users not checked in Network Manager, I thought this was required to auto-connect to wlan upon booting. Currently it does not connect.
it does here.

however, you have to set it up after each user is created. or check the box. there is no way to ship with the box checked.

incidentally, this configuration has not changed since early alpha.
It does for me too, when the box is checked. Hard to remember all the default settings through 4 per-releases.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:51 pm
by dolphin_oracle
richb wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
richb wrote:All Users not checked in Network Manager, I thought this was required to auto-connect to wlan upon booting. Currently it does not connect.
it does here.

however, you have to set it up after each user is created. or check the box. there is no way to ship with the box checked.

incidentally, this configuration has not changed since early alpha.
It does for me too, when the box is checked. Hard to remember all the default settings through 4 per-releases.
generally you set up a connection twice.

1. on the live media, (if you bother to do so, I usually don't unless I'm using a live stick).
2. again after initial reboot.

If its not working as above (which has been the same for every release except alpha 1, which I messed up with some interfaces stuff), then we need more info.

Install methodolgy
type of network
vpns?
inxi -n
is this after a hibernate or a cold restart?

and so forth.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:59 pm
by richb
generally you set up a connection twice.

1. on the live media, (if you bother to do so, I usually don't unless I'm using a live stick).
2. again after initial reboot.

If its not working as above (which has been the same for every release except alpha 1, which I messed up with
some interfaces stuff), then we need more info.

Install methodolgy
type of network
vpns?
inxi -n
is this after a hibernate or a cold restart?

and so forth.
I did not set it up in live,

And did not check the box until after several boots, some cold some restarts. Once checked it auto-connects. Si it is working as expected.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:01 pm
by Stevo
Jerry3904 wrote:Want a really small annoyance? The items in the Favorites menu are not in alphabetical order--or any other order AFAIK.
I always put my most frequent favorites at the top or bottom of the list anyway--easy to drag and drop them there. We have to give those that suffer from OCD something to do, eh?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:13 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Stevo wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Want a really small annoyance? The items in the Favorites menu are not in alphabetical order--or any other order AFAIK.
I always put my most frequent favorites at the top or bottom of the list anyway--easy to drag and drop them there. We have to give those that suffer from OCD something to do, eh?
I don't think the list has changed, except for adding the conky toggle and task manager since mx15 and that was only the manual link.

What order do you want?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:27 pm
by Stevo
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Stevo wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Want a really small annoyance? The items in the Favorites menu are not in alphabetical order--or any other order AFAIK.
I always put my most frequent favorites at the top or bottom of the list anyway--easy to drag and drop them there. We have to give those that suffer from OCD something to do, eh?
I don't think the list has changed, except for adding the conky toggle and task manager since mx15 and that was only the manual link.

What order do you want?
One that will please everyone. :hell:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:31 pm
by dolphin_oracle
:hitmyhead:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:37 pm
by Jerry3904
I said it was really small...alphabetical would be what I would think would work best myself.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 8:46 pm
by Stevo
Jerry3904 wrote:I said it was really small...alphabetical would be what I would think would work best myself.
Tell the suckers that whatever order random order they are in was determined by careful studies of feng shui to make them harmonize...wait, is this a public thread? DELETE DELETE DELETE

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:34 pm
by nathan2423
Just installed tonight on my Lenovo SL510. Generally running great, but I have started running into the problem I have seen mentioned earlier that on reboot, the display brightness is being set very low by default, and it's necessary to turn it up every time I start the computer.

Code: Select all

$ inxi -F
System:    Host: lenovosl510 Kernel: 4.13.0-1-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b3_x64 Horizon November 29, 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: LENOVO product: 2847CZU v: ThinkPad SL510 serial: N/A
           Mobo: LENOVO model: 2847CZU serial: N/A
           BIOS: LENOVO v: 6JET85WW (1.43 ) date: 12/24/2010
Battery    BAT1: charge: 32.6 Wh 96.4% condition: 33.8/47.5 Wh (71%)
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core2 Duo T6670 (-MCP-) cache: 2048 KB
           clock speeds: max: 2201 MHz 1: 1200 MHz 2: 1200 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Mobile 4 Series Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@59.64hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Mobile Intel GM45 Express version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card Intel 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.13.0-1-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1000 [Condor Peak] driver: iwlwifi
           IF: wlan0 state: up mac: 8c:a9:82:3d:d1:2a
           Card-2: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: 60:eb:69:d9:a0:71
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 250.1GB (7.2% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD2500BEVT size: 250.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 20G used: 6.6G (35%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
           ID-2: /home size: 20G used: 6.8G (37%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
           ID-3: swap-1 size: 3.83GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda3
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 47.0C mobo: 0.0C
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A fan-1: 0
Info:      Processes: 188 Uptime: 4 min Memory: 631.3/3794.7MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43 

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:44 pm
by Stevo
nathan2423 wrote:Just installed tonight on my Lenovo SL510. Generally running great, but I have started running into the problem I have seen mentioned earlier that on reboot, the display brightness is being set very low by default, and it's necessary to turn it up every time I start the computer.
...
[/code]
Does the brightness-controller program do anything to help?

This: http://www.webupd8.org/2014/10/fix-brig ... -very.html may also help.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:08 pm
by nathan2423
I am sorry - the "brightness controller program"? What I have done each time so far is simply rightclick on the power icon and then slide the brightness to the right, which works fine but is a pain. I will test the settings on the ubuntu page that you referenced, but I don't recall this same unit having any such problems on MX16 (recently it had been running Manjaro without this issue either, but I am switching it back to MX) ;-)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:09 pm
by golden45
mx 17 beta 3 on 32 bit still stops at cli-installer

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:28 pm
by danielson
Although not specifically MX-Linux 17 b3 issue - thought i'd share that i managed to install Vivaldi 1.14.1030.3 (Official Build) snapshot (64-bit) which now has (as of today) sync option (bookmarks, p.w.,notes, extensions) and was just thrilled to try a first sync here and to see that everything seems to be syncing just fine with the version i had previously setup on Windows!

Vivaldi has made history in a big way today!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:53 pm
by entropyfoe
Feedback :happy: ... Wow, looks great. Down loaded and checked md5, all good. Burn to USB, and did a fast install. From pressing install, to rebooting after nvidia driver, it was all of 14 minutes, and the install was only 4 minutes.
From the first boot screen with the dark blue and stars to the demo wall paper, it is the best I have ever seen on a demo, looks very professional. Praise to the artists and designers, good colors on my monitor.
Did the default install.
Used the MX tool to install nvidia, chose the backport version of 375,82
Rebooted fine.
auto eth0 works
sound- had to use the sound card selector, go with the generic, works well.
Synaptic updates plus 100 packages installed.
enable data drive sda1 with the disk manager
enable compositor
Reboot for good measure.
Changed conky to mx-ko0/mx-full- easy, maybe something to play around with
updated the wallpaper anyway, did theme tweaks, widened panel, changed clock a bit, added panel shortcuts
usb thumb drive mounts, plays video, and unmounts all as normal
samba works, it looked better, but worked as usual, enabling me to supply credentials and log onto my wife's win7 machine.
suspend works, with a resume in 6-8 seconds (sound first)

All in all, fast, clean, everything works so far. A great beta so far I would say. Now to check stability.

Code: Select all

System:    Host: Ryzen Kernel: 4.13.0-1-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b3_x64 Horizon November 29, 2017
Machine:   Device: desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: PRIME X370-PRO v: Rev X.0x serial: N/A
           UEFI [Legacy]: American Megatrends v: 0902 date: 09/08/2017
CPU:       Hexa core AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Six-Core (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           clock speeds: max: 3600 MHz 1: 2200 MHz 2: 2200 MHz 3: 2200 MHz 4: 2200 MHz
           5: 2200 MHz 6: 2200 MHz 7: 2200 MHz 8: 2200 MHz 9: 2200 MHz 10: 2200 MHz 11: 2200 MHz
           12: 2200 MHz
Graphics:  Card: NVIDIA GK208 [GeForce GT 710B]
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) driver: nvidia Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz
           OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GT 710/PCIe/SSE2 version: 4.5.0 NVIDIA 375.82
Audio:     Card-1 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device 1457 driver: snd_hda_intel
           Card-2 NVIDIA GK208 HDMI/DP Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.13.0-1-amd64
Network:   Card: Intel I211 Gigabit Network Connection driver: igb
           IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex:
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 2250.5GB (29.8% used)
           ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 model: Samsung_SSD_960_EVO_250GB size: 250.1GB
           ID-2: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD2002FAEX size: 2000.4GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 39G used: 5.1G (14%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/nvme0n1p1
           ID-2: /home size: 73G used: 101M (1%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/nvme0n1p3
           ID-3: swap-1 size: 17.83GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/nvme0n1p2
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: N/A mobo: N/A gpu: 36C
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: 0
Info:      Processes: 254 Uptime: 9 min Memory: 496.6/16047.5MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43 

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:44 pm
by Stevo
nathan2423 wrote:I am sorry - the "brightness controller program"? What I have done each time so far is simply rightclick on the power icon and then slide the brightness to the right, which works fine but is a pain. I will test the settings on the ubuntu page that you referenced, but I don't recall this same unit having any such problems on MX16 (recently it had been running Manjaro without this issue either, but I am switching it back to MX) ;-)
Brightness-controller is not on the default install, but it's in the repository. It's a tiny python application that also allows you to set the brightness and color temperature. Perhaps when you save a setting, it will remember the brightness.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:49 am
by skidoo
(as previously reported to dev during b2, not yet fixed)

BootScreen F1 ---} dialog titled "F4: Miscellaneious Options"
Clicking the hyperlink displayed here, titled "See Options Details Two for LiveUSB-only options", kicks user back to F1 MainMenu.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:55 am
by skidoo
MX Welcome ---} Contribute
Clicking opens an MX Viewer instance displaying a wiki page.
Because no address bar is visible, it seems inappropriate to present a "Click Here" (leading to a PayPal form)
in a context where the user is unable to see https:// plus secure lock icon.

Also, the PayPal form indicates "purpose: antiX" (which, given the context, seems incorrect)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:00 am
by skidoo
Related to the above, MX Welcome ---} Forums
same observation applies to ---} Wiki
clicking really should launch a traditional browser instance (IMO) rather than dumping the user into a context lacking urlbar (and ability to create bookmarks while traversing the forum and/or wiki)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:09 am
by skidoo
Noticed in MX Tweaks:
The as-shipped default is enabled for "Single-click in Thunar File Manager"

This default is dangerous, is noob-unfriendly; y'all can expect that reviewers will notice, and berate, this detail.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:15 am
by skidoo
MX Package Installer:
click "full app catalog"
click "stable repo"

I experienced an intolerable (in excess of 4 minutes) delay, progressbar dialog waiting for the list to populate.
After successfully testing, by installing "ncdu" package (86kb)... another damned 4+ minute wait until the list was refreshed.
-=-
This excessive delay was absent when choosing "testing" or "debian backports".
Whatever the cause (intermittent server lag?), 250+ seconds is way too long to leave the user hanging, wondering whether the app has become unresponsive.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:20 am
by skidoo
MX Codecs Installer:
The dialog text mentions legalese... responsibility... and user wonders "What codecs? Which ones, exactly?!?"

The exact details are presented in the linked wiki page.
Toward precluding worry/confusion and toward accomplishing informed consent, I'm just suggesting revision of the dialog text, coaching the user to click the Help button to read the details.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:27 am
by skidoo
MX Menu Editor:

Point of confusion ~~ the editor presents "categories" which are absent from the menu (and cannot be added to the menu)
screensavers, personal, hardware, education, development

I clicked "Help" to look for an explanation.
D'oh! user finds sparse text stating "it's basically, mostly self-explanatory" (thanks for makin' me feel stoopid, eh)

If the linked wiki page is to remain sparse, should at least provide hyperlinked "SeeAlso" citations.

[x] Notify Startup
^------- that's self-explanatory? (not even an onhover hint is provided)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:31 am
by skidoo
MX Tools ---} Live USB Maker

The popup dialog begs inclusion of a Help button, leading to wikiwiki page or section of the UserManual.

verbiage: "Select ISO"
???
"Select an ISO" or "Select a source (ISO)"

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:40 am
by skidoo
(although the status quo "default" startup/shutdown are tooooo lennnnnnghty IMO)
consider:
Setting all sounds enabled, by default, including event sounds...
would provide immediate first-run feedback to the user, indicating "Hey, sound is working, right outa the box!"

ya only gits one chance to make a first impression

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:41 am
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:Noticed in MX Tweaks:
The as-shipped default is enabled for "Single-click in Thunar File Manager"

This default is dangerous, is noob-unfriendly; y'all can expect that reviewers will notice, and berate, this detail.
Its not that dangerous, and has been the default for 3 years. Plus antiX single-clicks as well.

But I don't like the default, hence the inclusion of the checkbox to change it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:44 am
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:MX Tools ---} Live USB Maker

The popup dialog begs inclusion of a Help button, leading to wikiwiki page or section of the UserManual.

verbiage: "Select ISO"
???
"Select an ISO" or "Select a source (ISO)"

there is a help button. Or is it a different pop up you are referring to.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:45 am
by chrispop99
skidoo wrote:Noticed in MX Tweaks:
The as-shipped default is enabled for "Single-click in Thunar File Manager"

This default is dangerous, is noob-unfriendly; y'all can expect that reviewers will notice, and berate, this detail.
Isn't single-click the usual Linux default, with double-click a nod to Windows refugees?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:47 am
by dolphin_oracle
good stuff skiddoo. thanks!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:56 am
by skidoo
MX Tools ---} Live-usb Kernel

Because it requires explanation (and prerequisite remastering), seems wrong to present it first in the list of "Live" tools.
Click, and the MX Tools window disappears, replaced by a scary terminal window... and (oops) by clicking I've made it create some bargledonf.conf file???
Help, please.
^----- At the very least, the first line output by the script could direct the user to read file:///uber/share/doc/suchandsuch.html (or to consult manpage, or???)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:58 am
by skidoo
.
Upon clicking "Live-usb Maker" within MX Tools, here's what I see:

Image

Similarly, clicking the MX Tools button labeled "Snapshot" dumps the user into a window stating "Calculating...."
The help button therein is enabled, and if the user clicks before waiting 2minutes for Calculating to finish,
window disappears, replaced by "MX Snapshot help" (and, we notice in conky, background process races(?) for another 3-4 minutes, consuming 100% CPU).
That "calculating" operation should not autostart; it would be better as a user-initiated Step1, with user able to read help before deciding whether to proceed.

A reordering of the entries within "Live" section seems advisable.
remasterCC /// Live-usb Maker /// LiveTools Help
Snapshot /// spacer (or another help link) /// Live-usb kernel updater

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:02 am
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:MX Tools ---} Live-usb Kernel

Because it requires explanation (and prerequisite remastering), seems wrong to present it first in the list of "Live" tools.
Click, and the MX Tools window disappears, replaced by a scary terminal window... and (oops) by clicking I've made it create some bargledonf.conf file???
Help, please.
^----- At the very least, the first line output by the script could direct the user to read file:///uber/share/doc/suchandsuch.html (or to consult manpage, or???)
just to note, the output of the terminal file does indicate to press 'h' from help, which gives a man page.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:03 am
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:.
Upon clicking "Live-usb Maker" within MX Tools, here's what I see:

Image

Gotcha, thanks. That is what you'll see first when running live.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:15 am
by skidoo
Put on naive user hat, visit MX Tools and click "Snapshot", mutter "Oops, durn, wrong thang" and close the window.
For me, the result is: background process racing several minutes 100% CPU load

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:24 am
by stsoh
kodi works on 17b3. :popcorn:
it failed on 17b1 n 17b2, unknown fault(s) which only works after upgrade to kodi 17.5 n 'install -f'.

Code: Select all

$ apt policy kodi ffmpeg
kodi:
  Installed: 2:17.3+dfsg1-1mx17+1
  Candidate: 2:17.3+dfsg1-1mx17+1
  Version table:
 *** 2:17.3+dfsg1-1mx17+1 500
        500 http://iso.mxrepo.com/mx/repo stretch/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2:17.1+dfsg1-3 500
        500 http://ftp.hk.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages
ffmpeg:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 7:3.3.4-1mx17+1
  Version table:
     7:3.3.4-1mx17+1 500
        500 http://iso.mxrepo.com/mx/repo stretch/main amd64 Packages
     7:3.2.9-1~deb9u1 500
        500 http://security.debian.org stretch/updates/main amd64 Packages
     7:3.2.7-1~deb9u1 500
        500 http://ftp.hk.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:44 am
by skidoo
MX Tools ---} Snapshot

Snapshot "calcutatimates" free space on /home...
and, using a 2GB RAM testing machine, I've learned to expect that a user is "screwed, snapshot is doomed to fail, right from the starting gate".

Even if I _know_ to choose another device for the working directory, even if I attempt to workaround by uninstalling buncha stuffs + remaster prior to attempting snapshot... snapshot will still often (race the CPU 20+ minutes, and then ultimately) puke due to insufficient memory.

This is not a newly-introduced problem, and I cannot understand why it hasn't been mentioned by other testers.
A year back, during MX16 betatesting, I even added RAM (to 3GB) and retested. Same (failed) result, unless a considerable amount of pre-installed content was uninstalled prior to attempting a snapshot operation.

I'm testing on real hardware, but what I'm describing here should be reproduceable on a VM apportioned with 2GB RAM (or 3).
Fresh iso, perform apt update & apt upgrade then immediately (optionally, live-remaster and) attempt to perform a snapshot operation.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:54 am
by skidoo
MX Tools ---} MX Boot Repair

Click "Help" and (as with the other tools + associated help) the "MX Boot Repair" dialog window disappears, replaced by the MX Viewer instance.
Read that help page, now close it and return to "MX Boot Repair" dialog window. Do you recall whatall you just read in the Help?
Wait, there's FOUR options here? Dint muh helptext only mention 3? Better recheck...

The status quo expects (demands) the user to memorize, or have a clear takeaway upon first reading of the help content.
Isn't it reasonable to expect the user will want/need to have the helptext window remain open throughout the workflow?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:00 am
by skidoo
Across the MX Tools, users face an inbuilt "gotcha":
The tools close blissfully, ignoring the eventuality where I've changed a setting but have forgotten to click the APPLY button
( the prospect of forgetting to do so is especially likely in a multi-tabbed tool, e.g. MX Tools ---} User Manager )

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:10 am
by skidoo
.
MX Tools ---} NVidia Driver Installer

No help for the wicked, eh. I (seriously) don't know whether this tool works in Livesession.
Let's clicky and

Image

So, like, i still dunno whether it works in live session, not gonna go check the wiki right this moment
and so I Press <Enter>
and da joke's on me, eh?
(instead of exiting, it tells me my password failed)


edit:
before chalking it up to user error (screenshot shows "user pressed ^C)
I retried.
Didn't see a helplink, unsure whether to proceed, yes, it TELLS me to press control C, then to press enter
then (still) barks about incorrect password and invites another go'round
Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:22 am
by skidoo
This default is dangerous, is noob-unfriendly; y'all can expect that reviewers will notice, and berate, this detail.
Isn't single-click the usual Linux default, with double-click a nod to Windows refugees?
and double-chins might be the Mac default, and but all the other kids were playing with matches so...

:hot:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:34 am
by chrispop99
Hibernation tests

Eight machines with different hardware were tested, with fresh installs of b3. Details of machines are in attached files.

Each machine had the following code run:

Code: Select all

sudo update-initramfs -u -k all
They were then rebooted. MX Tweak was used to enable the Hibernate button. A random Featherpad file was created, and left open on the desktop. The machine was hibernated, and then resume was attempted.

Machine A
After hibernation, when attempting to resume, machine would sometimes lock up or spontaneously reboot. When it did reboot to the desktop, the open file was missing.

Machine B
After hibernation, when attempting to resume, machine would sometimes lock up or spontaneously reboot. When it did reboot to the desktop, the open file was missing.

Machine C
Sometimes resumed successfully, other times after a long delay would boot to desktop, but the open file was missing.

Machine D
Resumed successfully several times.

Machine E
Resumed successfully several times.

Machine F
Resumed successfully several times.

Machine G
Resumed successfully several times.

Machine H
Resumed successfully several times.

My conclusion would be that if we go with the option to include Hibernation enabling, it should be with the caveat that it may not work on lower end machines.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:37 am
by skidoo
MX Tools ---} MX Conky

Yay! The help window remains open
but... oops

Image

.
.
(same glitch)
MX Tools ---} MX System Sounds
Image

.
MX Tools ---} iDevice Mounter
Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:51 am
by skidoo
I clicked "Hide...tools"
and now (because I decline "don't ever display this root without password warning again") it's stuck in a loop

Dude!
Still stuck in a loop after xkilling the MX Tools window AND attempting to xkill the "Granted Permissions" dialog afterward.

Finally, after visiting terminal and "sudo killall mx-tools", I was able to RedX to close and dismiss the permissions dialog.
Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:10 am
by Jerry3904
skidoo wrote:MX Welcome ---} Contribute
Also, the PayPal form indicates "purpose: antiX" (which, given the context, seems incorrect)
The page has two links,one for antiX above another for MX, and the Purpose entry changes. I'm not sure whether most users see the difference, but from actual donations I have the impression that they are navigating that for the most part. On security: not sure, PayPal is pretty clear about its security. The trade-off on all these is that if the new user clicks on a Welcome icon that leads to a web page, there is a very long wait while Firefox sets everything up for the first time.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:13 am
by Jerry3904
Thanks for the careful look at the Tools.
skidoo wrote:MX Package Installer:
click "full app catalog"
click "stable repo"

I experienced an intolerable (in excess of 4 minutes) delay, progressbar dialog waiting for the list to populate.
After successfully testing, by installing "ncdu" package (86kb)... another damned 4+ minute wait until the list was refreshed.
-=-
This excessive delay was absent when choosing "testing" or "debian backports".
Whatever the cause (intermittent server lag?), 250+ seconds is way too long to leave the user hanging, wondering whether the app has become unresponsive.
Agreed--which is why I never use it.
skidoo wrote:MX Codecs Installer:
I'm just suggesting revision of the dialog text, coaching the user to click the Help button to read the details.
Maybe, but we do that with every single MX Tool to keep the screen uncluttered and to reduce the load on the translators.
Point of confusion ~~ the editor presents "categories" which are absent from the menu (and cannot be added to the menu)
screensavers, personal, hardware, education, development

I clicked "Help" to look for an explanation.
D'oh! user finds sparse text stating "it's basically, mostly self-explanatory" (thanks for makin' me feel stoopid, eh)
Yup, needs improvement. We have an entry in Tracker for updating the Help files, and I will give a stern warning to the fool who is supposed to be doing that, a Jerry somebody...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 6:25 am
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:MX Tools ---} Snapshot

Snapshot "calcutatimates" free space on /home...
and, using a 2GB RAM testing machine, I've learned to expect that a user is "screwed, snapshot is doomed to fail, right from the starting gate".

Even if I _know_ to choose another device for the working directory, even if I attempt to workaround by uninstalling buncha stuffs + remaster prior to attempting snapshot... snapshot will still often (race the CPU 20+ minutes, and then ultimately) puke due to insufficient memory.

This is not a newly-introduced problem, and I cannot understand why it hasn't been mentioned by other testers.
A year back, during MX16 betatesting, I even added RAM (to 3GB) and retested. Same (failed) result, unless a considerable amount of pre-installed content was uninstalled prior to attempting a snapshot operation.

I'm testing on real hardware, but what I'm describing here should be reproduceable on a VM apportioned with 2GB RAM (or 3).
Fresh iso, perform apt update & apt upgrade then immediately (optionally, live-remaster and) attempt to perform a snapshot operation.
Maybe we need a ram check while running live.

Likely the whole snapshot process is taking place in ram when running live.

Note snapshot routinely works in small amounts of ram when running from installed base, so the above makes some sense.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 6:51 am
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:.
MX Tools ---} NVidia Driver Installer

No help for the wicked, eh. I (seriously) don't know whether this tool works in Livesession.
Let's clicky and

Image

So, like, i still dunno whether it works in live session, not gonna go check the wiki right this moment
and so I Press <Enter>
and da joke's on me, eh?
(instead of exiting, it tells me my password failed)
I'll check out that message, thanks.

I actually don't know if it works on live or not. If someone could try I would be obliged (I don't have any nvidia cards).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 6:57 am
by chrispop99
I actually don't know if it works on live or not. If someone could try I would be obliged (I don't have any nvidia cards).
I don't think it can; a re-boot is suggested:
Screenshot.png
Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 6:59 am
by richb
Not germane feedback, but I have to say that background is stunning. I modified it to a teal and it is gorgeous. It also works very well desaturated for lightdm and boot menu.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:04 am
by chrispop99
Just a reminder - we still have the situation where preventing Conky from starting using Conky Manager leaves a non-functional Whisker menu item.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:16 am
by Jerry3904
Do you mean: if no conky is selected to run the Toggle doesn't work? If yes, don't see a problem with that. I do see a good change where when a conky has been selected and neither CM nor MXC is open, it is not a true toggle (both directions).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:31 am
by dolphin_oracle
chrispop99 wrote:Just a reminder - we still have the situation where preventing Conky from starting using Conky Manager leaves a non-functional Whisker menu item.

Chris

Have you checked on b3? I thought I updated the script but maybe I left it off the iso.

***dangnubit*** I left it off the iso. Will update for RC.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:51 am
by dolphin_oracle
golden45 wrote:mx 17 beta 3 on 32 bit still stops at cli-installer

can you elaborate? Do you mean you don't get an XFCE desktop?

can you post inxi -F for your machine?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:53 am
by dolphin_oracle
richb wrote:generally you set up a connection twice.

1. on the live media, (if you bother to do so, I usually don't unless I'm using a live stick).
2. again after initial reboot.

If its not working as above (which has been the same for every release except alpha 1, which I messed up with
some interfaces stuff), then we need more info.

Install methodolgy
type of network
vpns?
inxi -n
is this after a hibernate or a cold restart?

and so forth.
I did not set it up in live,

And did not check the box until after several boots, some cold some restarts. Once checked it auto-connects. Si it is working as expected.
no I don't think it is working as expected. I don't have to check the box.

Does anyone else?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:54 am
by nathan2423
In MX17 how is the user to add a logo or photo for his user image, especially in the Whisker menu? I don't see that mugshot is included - is there another way?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:01 am
by richb
@D_O re Network Manager: Yes I should have said it is working as I expected, not imply as it should be working.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:05 am
by dolphin_oracle
skiddoo, do those graphical problems all result after running mx-viewer? and are they running in a virtual machine or on actual hardware (I think hardware is what you said but confirming)?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:33 am
by Jerry3904
nathan2423 wrote:In MX17 how is the user to add a logo or photo for his user image, especially in the Whisker menu? I don't see that mugshot is included - is there another way?
Check Users Manual, Section 3.8.7. IIRC Whisker then picks that up .face image, would have to check if not

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:54 am
by entropyfoe
In post 31 of this thread last night I posted my b3 results.

Stability testing...not so good.
I went down this morning to the machine and faced a log in.
Last night after the post, I left the desk top open (not hibernated), and came down to see a log in prompt.

So, I logged in, and checked the uptime, it was 7 hours something.

So, the machine had auto logged out, or crashed and rebooted at midnight last night.

Anything I can check?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:55 am
by dolphin_oracle
entropyfoe wrote:In post 31 of this thread last night I posted my b3 results.

Stability testing...not so good.
I went down this morning to the machine and faced a log in.
Last night after the post, I left the desk top open (not hibernated), and came down to see a log in prompt.

So, I logged in, and checked the uptime, it was 7 hours something.

So, the machine had auto logged out, or crashed and rebooted at midnight last night.

Anything I can check?
might be something in the /var/log/syslog* files.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:10 am
by richb
Jerry3904 wrote:
nathan2423 wrote:In MX17 how is the user to add a logo or photo for his user image, especially in the Whisker menu? I don't see that mugshot is included - is there another way?
Check Users Manual, Section 3.8.7. IIRC Whisker then picks that up .face image, would have to check if not
You also need to upload the image in lightdm greeter. Just putting it in .face does not work. Also it does not show in the whisker menu.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:17 am
by Jerry3904
Is that a correction or an addition to what we have in the Manual Section i referred to:
You can have the login greeter show an image as follows:
• Create or select an image, and use gthumb or another photo editor to resize it to about 96x96 pixels
• Save that image in your home folder as .face (make sure to include the dot and do not add any extension such as jpg or png).
• Click All Settings > LightDM GTK+ Greeter Settings, Appearance tab: turn on the User image switch.
• Log out, and you will see the image next to the login box; it will also show up in Whisker menu.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:26 am
by richb
Hold on I screwed up and created a .face folder not a .face image

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:26 am
by chrispop99
Jerry3904 wrote:
nathan2423 wrote:In MX17 how is the user to add a logo or photo for his user image, especially in the Whisker menu? I don't see that mugshot is included - is there another way?
Check Users Manual, Section 3.8.7. IIRC Whisker then picks that up .face image, would have to check if not
The procedure in the manual is correct.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:33 am
by richb
chrispop99 wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:
nathan2423 wrote:In MX17 how is the user to add a logo or photo for his user image, especially in the Whisker menu? I don't see that mugshot is included - is there another way?
Check Users Manual, Section 3.8.7. IIRC Whisker then picks that up .face image, would have to check if not
The procedure in the manual is correct.

Chris
Confirmed.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:00 am
by nathan2423
Thanks for the responses on this. If mugshot also creates an image that gets into the lightdm greeting, might it not be a good idea to include mugshot?

https://smdavis.us/2013/07/27/mugshot-q ... er-config/

(but I don't see on first glance that the greeter would pick it up)
Supported Applications
Currently, LibreOffice and Pidgin are the only supported external applications. Other applications that retrieve user information from /etc/passwd will also be updated (including Abiword and Gnumeric). This ultimately provides a wide coverage of desktop and terminal Linux applications.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:04 am
by nathan2423
nathan2423 wrote:Thanks for the responses on this. If mugshot also creates an image that gets into the lightdm greeting, might it not be a good idea to include mugshot?

https://smdavis.us/2013/07/27/mugshot-q ... er-config/

(but I don't see on first glance that the greeter would pick it up)
Supported Applications
Currently, LibreOffice and Pidgin are the only supported external applications. Other applications that retrieve user information from /etc/passwd will also be updated (including Abiword and Gnumeric). This ultimately provides a wide coverage of desktop and terminal Linux applications.
But i see mugshot is referenced in Whisker documentation - http://www.webupd8.org/2015/02/whisker- ... it-in.html
Most important changes in the latest Whisker Menu 1.5.0:
added option to set background opacity;
added profile picture and a command which allows editing the profile picture (via Mugshot);
added customizable limit for recently used;
added support for non-square panel button icon;
added items of Xfce settings manager to allow searching;

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:20 am
by Jerry3904
Mugshot has never worked during testing, so we don't include it. Not totally sure it still doesn't work, however, so we should test it now on B3. Thanks.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:22 am
by Jerry3904
Installed it and got an error when I ran it

Code: Select all

$ mugshot
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/mugshot", line 36, in <module>
    mugshot.main()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mugshot/__init__.py", line 47, in main
    window = MugshotWindow.MugshotWindow()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mugshot_lib/Window.py", line 52, in __new__
    new_object.finish_initializing(builder)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mugshot/MugshotWindow.py", line 228, in finish_initializing
    self.init_user_details()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mugshot/MugshotWindow.py", line 271, in init_user_details
    user_details = self.get_user_details()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mugshot/MugshotWindow.py", line 654, in get_user_details
    as_data = self.get_accounts_service_data()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mugshot/MugshotWindow.py", line 706, in get_accounts_service_data
    name = self.split_name(name)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/mugshot/MugshotWindow.py", line 686, in split_name
    parts = name.split()
AttributeError: 'bool' object has no attribute 'split'
Also no menu entry. Tried rebooting, no change. Lots of complaints in a web search on "mugshot fails," and there is recent detail in the Arch Wiki.

That is why we came up with an alternative method in the first place.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:51 am
by chrispop99
Do we normally ship with PCManFM installed? I was surprised to see it!

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:57 am
by anticapitalista
chrispop99 wrote:Do we normally ship with PCManFM installed? I was surprised to see it!

Chris
It isn't on the 32 bit beta3.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:57 am
by dolphin_oracle
anticapitalista wrote:
chrispop99 wrote:Do we normally ship with PCManFM installed? I was surprised to see it!

Chris
It isn't on the 32 bit beta3.
not on 64 bit either, at least I don't think so. (just realized the live-USB in my pocket is still b2).

anybody else got it?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:01 am
by richb
dolphin_oracle wrote:
anticapitalista wrote:
chrispop99 wrote:Do we normally ship with PCManFM installed? I was surprised to see it!

Chris
It isn't on the 32 bit beta3.9/quote]

not on 64 bit either, at least I don't think so. (just realized the live-USB in my pocket is still b2).
anybody else got it?
I do not.

apt-cache policy pcmanfm

Code: Select all

pcmanfm:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.2.5-3
  Version table:
     1.2.5-3 500
        500 http://debian.mirror.frontiernet.net/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:39 am
by Jerry3904
nope

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:45 am
by chrispop99
It was brought in when I test-installed LXDE to help someone else - sorry!

I blame the cold meds I'm taking, and the cough that forced me out of bed at 5am today.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:42 pm
by timkb4cq
Jerry3904 wrote:Mugshot has never worked during testing, so we don't include it. Not totally sure it still doesn't work, however, so we should test it now on B3. Thanks.
I installed it, and per feedback in the Arch community discussion, installed accountsservice as well
It shows up in the Settings Menu with the title About Me and it works fine.
In order for it to be picked up by WhiskerMenu you need to right-click on WhiskerMenu -> Properties -> Commands (tab) and check the Edit Profile box.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:29 pm
by spsf64
Just downloaded Beta 3 and during live usb boot I noticed the intel microcode msg still appears as I reported in beta2 (viewtopic.php?f=94&t=43278&start=160#p427207)

Some suggestions:
1 Add pcmanfm in order to Baobab (disk usage analyzer) be able open directories (it does not work with thunar, at least I can't make it work...)
2 Enable sound events by default (as suggest in a previous post)
3 Consider replacing Clementine by Guayadeque (it has a great online radio support and many other functionalities, also GTK based)
4 Mugshot would be a great addition...
5 Add templates to "Templates" folder; as MX comes with libreoffice installed I think it is good to improve user experince (see attached image)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:33 pm
by skidoo
I actually don't know if it works on live or not. If someone could try I would be obliged (I don't have any nvidia cards).
I don't think it can; a re-boot is suggested:

Screenshot.png
Yes, failure due to reboot (and the script isn't aware of the need to repack live-initramfs).
My most recent attempt (probably sgfxi, back around antiX15-b3) failed, and ingrained a "gun shy" outlook.
At the time, IIRC someone posted to insist "is possible" but I don't recall the details/workaround.
Now am wondering: install driver, immediately followed by live-remaster during the same session, would workaround?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:35 pm
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:
I actually don't know if it works on live or not. If someone could try I would be obliged (I don't have any nvidia cards).
I don't think it can; a re-boot is suggested:

Screenshot.png
Yes, failure due to reboot (and the script isn't aware of the need to repack live-initramfs).
My most recent attempt (probably sgfxi, back around antiX15-b3) failed, and ingrained a "gun shy" outlook.
At the time, IIRC someone posted to insist "is possible" but I don't recall the details/workaround.
Now am wondering: install driver, immediately followed by live-remaster during the same session, would workaround?
possibly. the nvidia driver loads as a kms driver module. In most cases, you don't even need the xorg.conf.

maybe we should have some sort of limit, to install only if persistence file is found. If that works. If it doesn't, we can set it to only work in an installed case. Its relatively easy to detect the live system.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:49 pm
by skidoo
do those graphical problems all result after running mx-viewer? and are they running in a virtual machine or on actual hardware
(I think hardware is what you said but confirming)?
Yes, my testing is always performed on actual hardware.

Yes, launching mx-viewer was the common ingredient across that batch of tests ~~ during that batch of tests, I was assessing the availability of per-item help.
Isn't it easily reproduceable? Both the tool window and the mx-viewer window are positioned, auto-centered. The artifacting appears in parent window as soon as you drag the mx-viewer window (intending to place it side-by-side with its overlapped parent window).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:50 pm
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:
do those graphical problems all result after running mx-viewer? and are they running in a virtual machine or on actual hardware
(I think hardware is what you said but confirming)?
Yes, my testing is always performed on actual hardware.

Yes, launching mx-viewer was the common ingredient across that batch of tests ~~ during that batch of tests, I was assessing the availability of per-item help.
Isn't it easily reproduceable? Both the tool window and the mx-viewer window are positioned, auto-centered. The artifacting appears in parent window as soon as you drag the mx-viewer window (intending to place it side-by-side with its overlapped parent window).
Yeah, I can reproduce it here. At the time, I didn't have a mx machine in front of me. I just checked it at lunch.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:51 pm
by Jerry3904
timkb4cq wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Mugshot has never worked during testing, so we don't include it. Not totally sure it still doesn't work, however, so we should test it now on B3. Thanks.
I installed it, and per feedback in the Arch community discussion, installed accountsservice as well
It shows up in the Settings Menu with the title About Me and it works fine.
In order for it to be picked up by WhiskerMenu you need to right-click on WhiskerMenu -> Properties -> Commands (tab) and check the Edit Profile box.
Good. I meant to follow up on the Arch discussion, but have been diverted. That works great, and I'm good with putting it in the RC as long as we can bring accountsservice in with it during installation.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:00 pm
by chrispop99
timkb4cq wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Mugshot has never worked during testing, so we don't include it. Not totally sure it still doesn't work, however, so we should test it now on B3. Thanks.
I installed it, and per feedback in the Arch community discussion, installed accountsservice as well
It shows up in the Settings Menu with the title About Me and it works fine.
In order for it to be picked up by WhiskerMenu you need to right-click on WhiskerMenu -> Properties -> Commands (tab) and check the Edit Profile box.
Confirmed that procedure worked for me.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:04 pm
by Jerry3904
Great--I put a request into Tracker so DO could follow it

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:10 pm
by spsf64
Realtek Wifi usb dongle not working
I have this setup:

inxi -n
Network: Card-1: Intel Ethernet Connection I217-V driver: e1000e
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: 94:de:80:ba:3f:7e
Card-2: Realtek RTL8188SU 802.11n WLAN Adapter driver: r8712u
IF: wlan0 state: N/A mac: N/A

After booting WIFI won' t work out of the box I had to edit
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf and add the following lines:

[device]
wifi.scan-rand-mac-address=no

After reboot/restart service it works as expected.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:30 pm
by Jerry3904
Thanks for the feedback.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:47 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Jerry3904 wrote:Thanks for the feedback.
is that something that can be by default?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:56 pm
by Jerry3904
I took a note about it b/c I had the same question. Kent hasn't been on the Forum for quite a while, but probably knows best.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:05 pm
by skidoo
Image
https://xfce.space/en/2017/11/mx-linux- ... hgeklickt/
a review/walkthrough, titled "MX Linux 17: the third beta version clicked through"
(like, a paragraph, plus 5 screenshots)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 5:14 pm
by Jerry3904
I read that and thanked him für den schnellen Durchblick when he tweeted a link to @MX_Linux.

Pretty weak complaint IMO, since there is the Help button...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:37 pm
by uncle mark
Impressive. Very good first impression. Running live on an old beater hand-me-down I just got. Vista would barely pull itself; MX is spunky, and thats running from a DVD. Maybe I'll finally update from my old M11...

Code: Select all

demo@mx1:~
$ inxi -F
System:    Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.13.0-1-686-pae i686 bits: 32 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b3_386 Horizon November 28, 2017
Machine:   Device: portable System: Gateway product: MT6705 v: 3408385R serial: N/A
           Mobo: Gateway model: N/A v: 77.09 serial: N/A BIOS: Phoenix v: 77.09 date: 11/27/2006
Battery    BAT1: charge: 39.4 Wh 99.7% condition: 39.5/51.8 Wh (76%)
CPU:       Dual core Intel T2060 (-MCP-) cache: 1024 KB
           clock speeds: max: 1600 MHz 1: 1600 MHz 2: 1600 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: intel (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1280x800@60.00hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel 945GM x86/MMX/SSE2 version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Def. Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.13.0-1-686-pae
Network:   Card-1: Marvell 88E8038 PCI-E Fast Ethernet Controller driver: sky2
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:e0:b8:c4:bc:fe
           Card-2: Realtek RTL8187 Wireless Adapter
           IF: N/A state: N/A mac: N/A
Drives:    HDD Total Size: NA (-)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD1200BEVS size: 120.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 1.6G used: 49M (4%) fs: overlay dev: N/A
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 48.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 170 Uptime: 11 min Memory: 458.5/2009.5MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43 
demo@mx1:~


Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:48 pm
by Jerry3904
Maybe I'll finally update from my old M11...
We'd be glad to have you back in the thick of things.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 7:59 pm
by uncle mark
Jerry3904 wrote:
Maybe I'll finally update from my old M11...
We'd be glad to have you back in the thick of things.
Be careful what you ask for... my reputation precedes me.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:02 pm
by Paul..
@UM...checkin' out your age there...2016...that's very old

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:20 pm
by Stevo
Paul.. wrote:@UM...checkin' out your age there...2016...that's very old
Hmmm....

Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:44 pm
by Jerry3904
And down we go...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:55 pm
by golden45
dolphin_oracle wrote:
golden45 wrote:mx 17 beta 3 on 32 bit still stops at cli-installer

can you elaborate? Do you mean you don't get an XFCE desktop?

can you post inxi -F for your machine?
I'm running an older intel p4 with 3 g of ram - computer with sis drivers.On boot from dvd Everything works well until it tries to boot the display.Then it stops asking for root login and root password to use the cli-installer and follow instructions.No I can't get to the XFCE desktop.thanks john

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:00 pm
by dolphin_oracle
golden45 wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
golden45 wrote:mx 17 beta 3 on 32 bit still stops at cli-installer

can you elaborate? Do you mean you don't get an XFCE desktop?

can you post inxi -F for your machine?
I'm running an older intel p4 with 3 g of ram - computer with sis drivers.On boot from dvd Everything works well until it tries to boot the display.Then it stops asking for root login and root password to use the cli-installer and follow instructions.No I can't get to the XFCE desktop.thanks john
Ok.

Please.try the safe or.failsafe options please.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:02 pm
by golden45
I've had no trouble with MX 16.1 november update It booted to the desktop I then installed the os using the installer and it runs great.Very nice os thanks to all.John

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:06 pm
by golden45
golden45 wrote:I've had no trouble with MX 16.1 november update It booted to the desktop I then installed the os using the installer and it runs great.Very nice os thanks to all.John
There is no safe menu on boot of dvd I will try and download again with a check of the download.Thanks John

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:19 pm
by BitJam
golden45 wrote:There is no safe menu on boot of dvd I will try and download again with a check of the download.Thanks John
This is a bug! Downloading again won't help.

edit: You can type in these boot parameters "nomodeset vga=safe" instead of using the missing F6 menu.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:29 pm
by golden45
I just tried to boot dvd again--It booted fine until it displayed en
en
Localizing thunar custom actions
Welcome To MX 17.b3(Horizon)32 bit pae
For command line install login as root (password root) enter the command cli-installer Follow the instructions.
MX1 Login: It then stops and waits
Thanks John

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:23 am
by Jerry3904
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Thanks for the feedback.
is that something that can be by default?
I have been looking at this. The firmware-realtek package we have installed does not list this. According to a post on the Ubuntu forum there is firmware missing that can be gotten here:

Code: Select all

wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37387612/rtl8192sfw.bin.gz
I was able to download it, so it still exists, but I have no way to test if that would take care of the problem.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 6:09 am
by spsf64
Jerry3904 wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Thanks for the feedback.
is that something that can be by default?
I have been looking at this. The firmware-realtek package we have installed does not list this. According to a post on the Ubuntu forum there is firmware missing that can be gotten here:

Code: Select all

wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37387612/rtl8192sfw.bin.gz
I was able to download it, so it still exists, but I have no way to test if that would take care of the problem.
The only reference I found about this was in archlinux wiki:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ne ... domization
I think its not only related to realtek, not sure though...
This is also referenced in wiki page:
https://blogs.gnome.org/thaller/2016/08 ... ger-1-4-0/

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 6:16 am
by Jerry3904
Thanks again. Not sure atm what we should do about this exactly, but will do some testing.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:35 pm
by darth.severus
Is it working without problems to update from beta 2 to 3 or final after beta 2 has been installed?

I updated from MX-16 to MX-17 (live distro with persistent home) and got some grafical problems (e.g fonts and no transparent background in terminal). I'm not completely happy with the visual options, e.g. in FF the current tab isn't looking well (see Attachment) with MediterranianTributeDark Theme, because it is not in one color. [EDIT: Resolved by reboot] These problem might be related because I was keeping my home dir, which is why I'd like to know if I could install MX-17B2 or B3 now, and then update later.

Thanks for the whole work, of course, I wouldn't use it if I wouldn't like. Had some Windows for some days on my new PC, not generally bad but I'll stick with MX which seems even to start much faster.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:51 pm
by chrispop99
darth.severus wrote:Is it working without problems to update from beta 2 to 3 or final after beta 2 has been installed?

I updated from MX-16 to MX-17 (live distro with persistent home) and got some grafical problems (e.g fonts and no transparent background in terminal). I'm not completely happy with the visual options, e.g. in FF the current tab isn't looking well (see Attachment) with MediterranianTributeDark Theme, because it is not in one color. These problem might be related because I was keeping my home dir, which is why I'd like to know if I could install MX-17B2 or B3 now, and then update later.

Thanks for the whole work, of course, I wouldn't use it if I wouldn't like. Had some Windows for some days on my new PC, not generally bad but I'll stick with MX which seems even to start much faster.
Updating from beta releases is never good practice, and most Linux distributions won't support it.

It is often the case that you can upgrade from a release candidate to final, but as there is usually only a short time between those releases, there seems little point.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:51 pm
by m_pav
I tried to view a heap of pics saved as png files on a test machine and when I went to view them, feh was the default - YUK!. I ended up with over 20 instances of feh in the taskbar that had to be closed individually, a task not made easy on a laptop when no external mouse is available. Having the default set to feh needs to be a users choice, not a default, especially when it's 1000 times easier to open one image with nomacs and then arrow through all other images in the directory.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:53 pm
by chrispop99
m_pav wrote:I tried to view a heap of pics saved as png files on a test machine and when I went to view them, feh was the default - YUK!. I ended up with over 20 instances of feh in the taskbar that had to be closed individually, a task not made easy on a laptop when no external mouse is available. Having the default set to feh needs to be a users choice, not a default, especially when it's 1000 times easier to open one image with nomacs and then arrow through all other images in the directory.
It's already been reported as an oversight. The default will be Nomacs, and the next release will have that pre-set as the default.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 3:47 pm
by m_pav
Cool.

I saw a post on the MX facebook page from a user who complained about our GRUB and whether the user is right or wrong, I have to say I have experienced an issue with GRUB on not a few occasions when using my ageing Lenovo E330 laptop. This model is known for having some issues with the bios, however, the repeated failures of GRUB to "work" after installation under a certain process validate the facebook users complaint.

Here's the condition:
boot from LiveUSB, use the partitioner in the installer to blank the disk, create a new MS-DOS partition table and create 3 new partitions, 20G /, 80G /home and 3G swap. Install to existing partitions and install GRUB to MBR. On reboot without the LiveUSB, nothing, BIOS is looking for a bootable device. re-insert liveUSB, boot live and set about repairing GRUB, result = status quo, it reports nothing to repair and testing via reboot confirms nothing has changed.

This I repeated 2x last night with the same result, however, on the 3rd attempt, I let the installer use the whole drive and auto-partition it, GRUB to MBR, rebooted to GRUB and onto the fresh installation without a problem.

I repeated this procedure on 2 other machines with no issues, custom partitioning et al, boots to grub without an issue, but on my little Lenovo, nothing whatsoever.

In my opinion, this is a hardware combination issue where a number of factors determine the outcome. Lenovos shonky BIOS doesn't help, but as an aside, I'm using a M.2 128GB SSD hosted in an adapter to fit into a standard SATA port within the machine. At the time, it was the cheapest way for me to get this thing sped up and we pay more than double what other larger countries pay for their hardware while our incomes are much the same or less in dollar value.

I've had this laptop for about 4 years since new and I did not have this type of problem when I had a 2.5" 250GB SSD installed in the machine, firstly running Linux only, and secondly with with a dual boot installation with Windows7 and Linux.

In my experience, the issue reported by the facebook user is directly related to hardware and BIOS combinations and how our installer operates, NOT installed operating systems. It's no secret that in an effort to keep prices down, OEM's try to cut corners and in doing so, cater only for Microsofts products with no regard whatsoever for users choice, thereby distancing themselves from "industry standards". Claiming Ubuntu as the benchline for operations is a misnomer because they have gotten into bed with Microsoft and are therefore partially aided by the same, so it comes as no surpirse the ewwbuntu works in the fringe areas whereas ours fails.

I write all of this because we need to 1, try to find a way to make it work in the fringe area, or 2, be fully aware of it and deal with it appropriately.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 3:53 pm
by dolphin_oracle
that is a rather exhaustive write up.

out of curiosity, when you did the manual partitioning, did you set a boot flag? I think the auto-partitioner does this.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 4:01 pm
by m_pav
Boot flag should not be necessary with GRUB to MBR as evidenced by my other install tests to different hardware.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 4:06 pm
by dolphin_oracle
m_pav wrote:Boot flag should not be necessary with GRUB to MBR as evidenced by my other install tests to different hardware.
maybe not, but its a difference between the auto-install and possibly manual install.

we use this:

parted -s $dev set 1 boot on

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 6:35 pm
by m_pav
OK, I've checked the other laptop I test installed onto and there are no partitions marked with the boot flag, yet it still boots. I checked the current installation and sure enough, the / partition had been marked as bootable, so I reset my E330, installed as before to manual partitions and achieved the same no-boot result. I set the boot flag and it booted to t fresh manual partition install, so it seems to me, the way forward with this on MBR drives with manual or existing partitions to set have the installer set the boot flag on the partition used for the / install, however, with efi installations, it may be a totally different matter as I have experienced the same non-boot issue there.

I'll have to spend some time on my E330 to check it further with an EFI installation, but i have family stuff to do for the rest of the day, so will try to have a go tonight.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:29 pm
by Stevo
chrispop99 wrote:
darth.severus wrote:Is it working without problems to update from beta 2 to 3 or final after beta 2 has been installed?

I updated from MX-16 to MX-17 (live distro with persistent home) and got some grafical problems (e.g fonts and no transparent background in terminal). I'm not completely happy with the visual options, e.g. in FF the current tab isn't looking well (see Attachment) with MediterranianTributeDark Theme, because it is not in one color. These problem might be related because I was keeping my home dir, which is why I'd like to know if I could install MX-17B2 or B3 now, and then update later.

Thanks for the whole work, of course, I wouldn't use it if I wouldn't like. Had some Windows for some days on my new PC, not generally bad but I'll stick with MX which seems even to start much faster.
Updating from beta releases is never good practice, and most Linux distributions won't support it.

It is often the case that you can upgrade from a release candidate to final, but as there is usually only a short time between those releases, there seems little point.

Chris
The Mediterranean themes have been removed from beta 3 along with many others that don't work right on the new platform.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:33 pm
by Stevo
dolphin_oracle wrote:
golden45 wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:

can you elaborate? Do you mean you don't get an XFCE desktop?

can you post inxi -F for your machine?
I'm running an older intel p4 with 3 g of ram - computer with sis drivers.On boot from dvd Everything works well until it tries to boot the display.Then it stops asking for root login and root password to use the cli-installer and follow instructions.No I can't get to the XFCE desktop.thanks john
Ok.

Please.try the safe or.failsafe options please.
I'm sure the culprit is that SIS graphics. I have to wonder if that antiX sis driver is going to work with the newer xorg stack in MX 17.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:36 pm
by nathan2423
Is it correct that not even the generic CUPS pdf printer is set up in a default install?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:52 pm
by Paul..
nathan2423 wrote:Is it correct that not even the generic CUPS pdf printer is set up in a default install?
It's there in my install to HDD.
Cups.png

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:09 pm
by nathan2423
Hmm - I went to Print .. Settings.. using the Whisker menu and it was not there on mine (I installed beta 3 to hard disk about two days ago)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:35 pm
by Paul..
nathan2423 wrote:Hmm - I went to Print .. Settings.. using the Whisker menu and it was not there on mine (I installed beta 3 to hard disk about two days ago)
It's installed by default...Just right-click on a web page and select Print...then you will see the preview page with "save as PDF" as the default on left.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:02 pm
by tascoast
All installed well here. I note that https://mxlinux.org/wiki/system/wine may need revision to note that winetricks is included in MX-17 when installed via Package Manager and need not be obtained separately, as the wiki advises in previous versions of MX.

Used MX-17 Grub for MBR amd customised with MX GC without any issues. Conky default looks fine on 1680x1050 display.
Bluetooth functionality checks out good, along with wifi dongle (this can be slow to initialise but networking is activated late in startup services anyway these days I believe).
Google Chrome doesn't import FF settings. Used saved 'bookmark.html ' to import favorites.
Checked/unchecked Power Manager Panel icon in settings to remove.

Code: Select all

System:    Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.13.0-1-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b3_x64 Horizon November 29, 2017
Machine:   Device: desktop System: LENOVO product: 7522RU3 v: ThinkCentre A58 serial: N/A
           Mobo: LENOVO model: N/A serial: N/A BIOS: LENOVO v: 5HKT52AUS date: 07/15/2010
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core2 Duo E7300 (-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           clock speeds: max: 2670 MHz 1: 2136 MHz 2: 2136 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel 4 Series Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1680x1050@59.88hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel G41 version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Def. Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.13.0-1-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Marvell 88E8057 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: sky2
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:01:6c:48:1a:77
           Card-2: Realtek RTL8191SU 802.11n WLAN Adapter driver: r8712u
           IF: wlan0 state: N/A mac: N/A
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 1000.2GB (44.0% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD10EZEX size: 1000.2GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 49G used: 7.1G (16%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda13
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.29GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda5
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 38.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 170 Uptime: 8 min Memory: 1077.2/3920.8MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43 

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:05 pm
by richb
tascoast, Thanks for the feedback.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:07 am
by vamsi
I can only say one thing MX is improving from version to version the conkys are good and all the features are awesome
1) However i couldn't find anything like themes in MX package installer i think some one in the dev team told me that we will include them :happy:

Removed themes in the appearance tab this is actually very good got rid of ugly themes :p :p (Thanks for considering my suggestion)
2) My suggestion regarding MX package installer that change the interface as that of settings manager in XFCE as attached in the screenshot so that it will be much easier to access :happy: :happy:

Thanks when we can expect the Final Version approximately .. :happy: :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:13 am
by Jerry3904
However i couldn't find anything like themes in MX package installer i think some one in the dev team told me that we will include them :happy:
Just hasn't happened yet...a lot is going on.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:26 am
by vamsi
Jerry3904 wrote:
However i couldn't find anything like themes in MX package installer i think some one in the dev team told me that we will include them :happy:
Just hasn't happened yet...a lot is going on.
Thanks Jerry :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:29 am
by Jerry3904
Working on the Manual, saw this for the umpteenth time: the dialog box for pkexec is extremely wide (it overwhelms my testing machine). I can't find a config file for it, but it would be preferable to shrink the length in half, or so.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:03 pm
by chrispop99
Arista Multimedia Transcoder does not install from MXPI.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:13 pm
by timkb4cq
Jerry3904 wrote:Working on the Manual, saw this for the umpteenth time: the dialog box for pkexec is extremely wide...
As far as I can determine, the basic layout is determined by polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1. It is hard-coded in src/polkitgnomeauthenticationdialog.c
It's probably not a package I should try to modify and rebuild, and we are a bit late in the process to switch to another authentication agent.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:31 pm
by Jerry3904
ok, thanks

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 3:15 pm
by skidoo
vamsi wrote:i couldn't find anything like themes in MX package installer i think some one in the dev team told me that we will include them
opendesktop.org 800+ XFCE themes

Would be helpful to split this from the beta-testing topic, into a topic dedicated to reporting:

themes folks have test-installed (to confirm working) and that they recommend for inculsion within a future curated collection.
(and, for each recommended candidate, the url of its screenshots+download page)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:02 pm
by Stevo
skidoo wrote:
vamsi wrote:i couldn't find anything like themes in MX package installer i think some one in the dev team told me that we will include them
opendesktop.org 800+ XFCE themes

Would be helpful to split this from the beta-testing topic, into a topic dedicated to reporting:

themes folks have test-installed (to confirm working) and that they recommend for inculsion within a future curated collection.
(and, for each recommended candidate, the url of its screenshots+download page)
We also seemed to have dropped the greybird themes ported over from Debian that provided greybird-accessability and -compact window decorations.

Scratch that---I was looking in the wrong settings, they are there.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:06 pm
by skidoo
hard-coded in src/polkitgnomeauthenticationdialog.c
It's probably not a package I should try to modify and rebuild
Please do (and post to xfce.org to announce its availability)
It's a several-years-long outstanding bug, and affects all of debian downstream XFCE, Cinnamon, and Unity (as acknowledged by debian here)

The package is (has been) seldom updated, so shouldn't need frequent followup attention.
I'm suggesting (but haven't tested) the following quick modifications:

gtk_window_set_resizable (GTK_WINDOW (dialog), TRUE);
. . .
gtk_widget_show_all (dialog->priv->table_alignment);
gtk_window_resize (dialog, 600, 480); /** TBD (blind to length of translation strings, I can't guess the ideal dimensions) **/
response = gtk_dialog_run (GTK_DIALOG (dialog));

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:08 pm
by Jerry3904
Interesting, skidoo.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:11 pm
by Stevo
chrispop99 wrote:Arista Multimedia Transcoder does not install from MXPI.

Chris
No doubt that is because it's not in any of the repos. I'll see if we can add it. But Ubuntu also dropped it after 14.04, so there may be something wrong with it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:18 pm
by chrispop99
Stevo wrote:
chrispop99 wrote:Arista Multimedia Transcoder does not install from MXPI.

Chris
No doubt that is because it's not in any of the repos. I'll see if we can add it. But Ubuntu also dropped it after 14.04, so there may be something wrong with it.
It also seems to have not been updated for some years, so maybe remove it?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:22 pm
by skidoo
mentioning because audacity seems to me like a high-profile {didn't check popcon stats} application

Installed via MX PackageInstaller, no audacity entry appears in the XFCE menu. (tested: same result if installed via synaptic)
a .desktop file is installed, an associated imagefile icon is installed, and MenuEditor recognizes the category assignments
...so, it's a headscratcher

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:41 pm
by Stevo
chrispop99 wrote:
Stevo wrote:
chrispop99 wrote:Arista Multimedia Transcoder does not install from MXPI.

Chris
No doubt that is because it's not in any of the repos. I'll see if we can add it. But Ubuntu also dropped it after 14.04, so there may be something wrong with it.
It also seems to have not been updated for some years, so maybe remove it?

Chris
Yes, it requires gstreamer-0.10, which isn't in Debian Stretch, so it needs to be removed. Perhaps to be replaced with qwinff, if I can port that up to MX 17.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:44 pm
by mx65
another very good alternative is Selene, but it is not in the repositories or in MX PackageInstaller

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:48 pm
by Stevo
skidoo wrote:mentioning because audacity seems to me like a high-profile {didn't check popcon stats} application

Installed via MX PackageInstaller, no audacity entry appears in the XFCE menu. (tested: same result if installed via synaptic)
a .desktop file is installed, an associated imagefile icon is installed, and MenuEditor recognizes the category assignments
...so, it's a headscratcher
It appears in the menu on my installed 64-bit b3. :confused:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:18 pm
by entropyfoe
skidoo, I installed audacity with synaptic.

I have an entry for audacity under the multimedia sub menu.
You were looking in the multimedia tab?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 6:36 pm
by dr-kart
Repo manager. When I "Select fastest Debian repo for me" it doesn't change security and backports repos. Right? and Why? Thanks.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 8:47 pm
by Paul..
Stevo wrote:
chrispop99 wrote:
Stevo wrote:
No doubt that is because it's not in any of the repos. I'll see if we can add it. But Ubuntu also dropped it after 14.04, so there may be something wrong with it.
It also seems to have not been updated for some years, so maybe remove it?

Chris
Yes, it requires gstreamer-0.10, which isn't in Debian Stretch, so it needs to be removed. Perhaps to be replaced with qwinff, if I can port that up to MX 17.
I will remove Arista from MXPI.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:54 pm
by timkb4cq
skidoo wrote:
Timkb4cq wrote:hard-coded in src/polkitgnomeauthenticationdialog.c
It's probably not a package I should try to modify and rebuild
Please do (and post to xfce.org to announce its availability)
It's a several-years-long outstanding bug, and affects all of debian downstream XFCE, Cinnamon, and Unity...
OK, you talked me into it. policykit-1-gnome_0.105-6mx17 is now available in the Testing repository. The suggested patch wasn't quite correct but was very helpful (I really don't know gtk and am not very good at C). In any case it was only 2 lines changed in the dialog window settings so it shouldn't affect anything else.

It looks better here, but I'd like some people to test it (maybe with different locales) before announcing it to XFCE.
It takes a logout/login to take effect.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:49 am
by richb
It does look much better.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:05 am
by chrispop99
timkb4cq wrote:
skidoo wrote:
Timkb4cq wrote:hard-coded in src/polkitgnomeauthenticationdialog.c
It's probably not a package I should try to modify and rebuild
Please do (and post to xfce.org to announce its availability)
It's a several-years-long outstanding bug, and affects all of debian downstream XFCE, Cinnamon, and Unity...
OK, you talked me into it. policykit-1-gnome_0.105-6mx17 is now available in the Testing repository. The suggested patch wasn't quite correct but was very helpful (I really don't know gtk and am not very good at C). In any case it was only 2 lines changed in the dialog window settings so it shouldn't affect anything else.

It looks better here, but I'd like some people to test it (maybe with different locales) before announcing it to XFCE.
It takes a logout/login to take effect.
Excellent work!

This has irritated me for a long time; I think I mentioned it during one of the Alpha rounds.

Tested on 2x64 machines, and 1x32. It's a great improvement on the lo-res 32-bit machine as the original dialogue went off-screen at each end.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:34 am
by Jerry3904
That's much better, thanks a lot!

On my testing machine, I can shrink the length fine, but there is a gap below the password field that limits shrinking the height

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:37 am
by Jerry3904
A bug and a whine on the Settings screen:

bug: the ADSL/PPPOE entry lacks an icon and does not work, though works fine off the menu << put this in Tracker

whine: the iDevice Mounter is located under System, but really belongs under Hardware where Removable Drives and Media is

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:05 am
by timkb4cq
Jerry3904 wrote:...I can shrink the length fine, but there is a gap below the password field that limits shrinking the height
I tried making it shorter but that's as skinny as it would go. I'm pretty sure that space is reserved for those authentication actions where you have to choose between specific users. It's where their icons go. Don't really want to mess with that in case some programs in the repos use that documented functionality.

When there are translations for MX-iDevice Mounter in github, I'll update the .desktop file to use Hardware instead of System.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:01 pm
by asqwerth
I finally installed B3 on VB as well as on actual hardware, and for the first time in forever, I'm having trouble with the sound in MX Linux. Sound was also non-existent in live mode in VB before installation. I'd installed in the hope the sound would sort itself out but nope.

In both live and installed systems, I tried using MX-select-sound to switch between the HDMI and PCH cards. Neither appear to work - usually PCH is what works on this computer.

I'm wondering if it's a kernel issue because all the earlier versions of MX17 were fine even in VB.

Installation are all old-school MBR/Grub.


inxi below for the real metal install:

Code: Select all

System:    Host: mx17b3 Kernel: 4.13.0-1-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b3_x64 Horizon November 29, 2017
Machine:   Device: desktop Mobo: MSI model: H97M-G43(MS-7924) v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           BIOS: American Megatrends v: V2.4 date: 07/22/2014
CPU:       Quad core Intel Core i5-4460 (-MCP-) cache: 6144 KB
           clock speeds: max: 3400 MHz 1: 3199 MHz 2: 3199 MHz 3: 3199 MHz 4: 3199 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Haswell Desktop version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card-1 Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor HD Audio Controller
           driver: snd_hda_intel
           Card-2 Intel 9 Series Family HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.13.0-1-amd64
Network:   Card: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
           IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: d8:cb:8a:12:38:3e
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 6129.2GB (0.3% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: ADATA_SP900 size: 128.0GB
           ID-2: /dev/sdb model: WDC_WD30EZRX size: 3000.6GB
           ID-3: /dev/sdc model: WDC_WD30EZRX size: 3000.6GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 21G used: 4.5G (24%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdb1
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 16.00GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 29.8C mobo: 27.8C
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 187 Uptime: 9 min Memory: 721.9/15921.5MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:05 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Occasionally sound in virtualbox routes thru the surround sound channel instead of the regular master.

There is a link to alsamixer in the xfce settings manager
Make sure the volumes are turned up. I have to do this with antix.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:11 pm
by asqwerth
dolphin_oracle wrote:Occasionally sound in virtualbox routes thru the surround sound channel instead of the regular master.

There is a link to alsamixer in the xfce settings manager
Make sure the volumes are turned up. I have to do this with antix.
Real metal install also has no sound. But I'll go check on the alsamixer thingy.

After I sort out why the latest Manjaro updates has led to a grub menu with half of my distros missing from the list.

[UPDATED POST]
OK, tried "surround" and PCM (latter of which worked in the past with other distros), no success.

Ran alsamixer and turned vol to 100%. No change.
Screenshot.png
Argh.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:50 pm
by Jerry3904
Still going through Section 4 of the Manual, slow checking validity. Just discovered that indicator-keylock is not in our repos--Stevo needs to move it over from his build that is successful on Debian 9

https://software.opensuse.org//download ... or-keylock

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:54 pm
by asqwerth
The following MX Conkys:
1. geeky tower logo
2. Asq-clock
3. Asq-clock-new

all need to change the line referring to /etc/antix-version file, because in beta 3 the OS details are now in the /etc/mx-version file.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:05 pm
by timkb4cq
asqwerth wrote: Real metal install also has no sound. But I'll go check on the alsamixer thingy.
Use F6 in AlsaMixer to select your real soundcard and look for the AutoMut setting.
It ends up being enabled on about half my installs & I need to disable it for my sound to work. Once disabled it stays disabled.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:07 pm
by Jerry3904
asqwerth wrote:The following MX Conkys:
1. geeky tower logo
2. Asq-clock
3. Asq-clock-new

all need to change the line referring to /etc/antix-version file, because in beta 3 the OS details are now in the /etc/mx-version file.
Thanks. In spite of my declaration that I was done, I will put together one more revision for Final.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:41 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Is there anything else.looking for antix-version? We can put it back, or have both.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:55 pm
by asqwerth
timkb4cq wrote:
asqwerth wrote: Real metal install also has no sound. But I'll go check on the alsamixer thingy.
Use F6 in AlsaMixer to select your real soundcard and look for the AutoMut setting.
It ends up being enabled on about half my installs & I need to disable it for my sound to work. Once disabled it stays disabled.
AutoMut was indeed enabled. However, after disabling, I still can't get any sound.

Time to sleep now, so I'll reboot and try again tomorrow.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:24 pm
by vamsi
How about replacing Orage calander with date and time gadgets on xfce and Orage calander when we click on it is poping on the middle of the screen which is not that effective whereas date and time gadget when we click on it it shows small area with the month and date which is cool. Ofcourse this is my suggestion

Thanks.. :happy: :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:27 pm
by richb
I prefer orage. It is more configurable. Of course one realizes this is a personal preference.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:47 pm
by skidoo
entropyfoe wrote:skidoo, I installed audacity with synaptic.

I have an entry for audacity under the multimedia sub menu.
You were looking in the multimedia tab?
oops? idunno. {blush} It was a late, late night testing session.

Yeah... what he said -----v

Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:06 pm
by Stevo
Jerry3904 wrote:Still going through Section 4 of the Manual, slow checking validity. Just discovered that indicator-keylock is not in our repos--Stevo needs to move it over from his build that is successful on Debian 9

https://software.opensuse.org//download ... or-keylock
OK, will see if I can fix up what I can now recognize as a now outdated build system while I'm at it, too. Oh, wait, that's already done in the OBS 3.0.2 version, so I'll just rebuild for MX 15 & 17.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:09 pm
by Jerry3904
Thanks.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:16 pm
by chrispop99
richb wrote:I prefer orage. It is more configurable. Of course one realizes this is a personal preference.
Me too.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:07 pm
by golden45
golden45 wrote:I've had no trouble with MX 16.1 november update It booted to the desktop I then installed the os using the installer and it runs great.Very nice os thanks to all.John
I did a fresh install of 16.1 and did a full dist-upgrade after changing to stretch repos.All went well.How do I change the background grub menu to the horizon background.Thanks john
It is running very well.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:15 pm
by tascoast
A quick intro to the MX-17 beta3 desktop and Thunar settings, highlighting some of the tools and versatility of xfce for the newer user
http://mxlinuxguide.blogspot.com.au/p/blog-page_64.html

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:07 am
by zebedeeboss
Hi

I Never noticed this before but why is there a right click menu in Thunar that says "Ownership to Root". Surely this is incredibly dangerous to new users. Especially if they use it on their Home Folder ? I won't try it as I am pretty sure I won't be able to login in again as I will no longer own my own Home Folder.

If someone wants to use such a powerful command then they should have to learn how to do it via terminal and all the learning that goes along with that.

Apologies if this is in the wrong thread. Please move as needed.

ps please don't say - no one would be that stupid - lol - we are talking new users here and never underestimate the power of stupidity.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:19 am
by Jerry3904
If someone wants to use such a powerful command then they should have to learn how to do it via terminal and all the learning that goes along with that.
That is not the position that MX Linux takes on the issue, and in 4 years of existence we have never had a user complain that s/he has run into trouble because of this shortcut.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:29 am
by zebedeeboss
Jerry3904 wrote:
If someone wants to use such a powerful command then they should have to learn how to do it via terminal and all the learning that goes along with that.
That is not the position that MX Linux takes on the issue, and in 4 years of existence we have never had a user complain that s/he has run into trouble because of this shortcut.
That's cool, but I felt I had to mention it :) I am not someone who generally says rtfm, I am all for giving new users a helping hand. It's just such a powerful command.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:56 am
by Paul..
zebedeeboss wrote:That's cool, but I felt I had to mention it :) I am not someone who generally says rtfm, I am all for giving new users a helping hand. It's just such a powerful command.
No worries, zebedeeboss. Mention to your heart's content.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:05 am
by richb
tascoast wrote:A quick intro to the MX-17 beta3 desktop and Thunar settings, highlighting some of the tools and versatility of xfce for the newer user
http://mxlinuxguide.blogspot.com.au/p/blog-page_64.html
Nice job tascoast.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:33 am
by asqwerth
zebedeeboss wrote:That's cool, but I felt I had to mention it :) I am not someone who generally says rtfm, I am all for giving new users a helping hand. It's just such a powerful command.
You have a point.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:39 am
by richb
The manual is one of the premier features of MX. It is not unwarranted to ask users to consult the manual, especially for more complex procedures, and phrasing it in friendly terms.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:47 am
by Jerry3904
Don't know how the Manual got into this...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:02 am
by Paul..
Microsoft's official release of Skype for Linux has been added to the b3 MX Package-Installer. Please test!!

EDIT: Skype is located in Package-Installer under Messaging

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:13 am
by Jerry3904
Thanks--installed and launched fine, mic and cam recognized.. Hope users know to not enter a password in the Gnome Keyring dialog box.

I put in the wrong password first, and somehow ended up with Skype hung. Logged out and back in, then everything went correctly.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:17 am
by Paul..
Jerry3904 wrote:.. Hope users know to not enter a password in the Gnome Keyring dialog box.

I put in the wrong password first, and somehow ended up with Skype hung. Logged out and back in, then everything went correctly.
For that reason, I'd like to know how to keep Skype from calling Gnome Keyring. Don't know if it's possible, though.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:21 am
by Jerry3904

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:48 am
by BitJam
Jerry3904 wrote:Don't know how the Manual got into this...
Lots of dedication and hard work. ;-)

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:53 am
by richb
Don't know how the Manual got into this...
It was mentioned in a post regarding "Ownership to Root" I should have quoted it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 2:59 pm
by dr-kart
live-usb-maker-gui
1.is not able to see usb stick plugged. Whether it's formatted or not.
2.can be found in whisker twice with different titles though. 'mx tools' and 'system' sections.

# dd-live-usb
works fine in terminal.

And let me ask 2nd time about mx repo manager --> debian repos tab --> select fastest mx repo for me button. Why it won't affect security and backports repos location. It's security.debian.org and deb.debian.org correspondingly always.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:13 pm
by dolphin_oracle
dr-kart wrote:
And let me ask 2nd time about mx repo manager --> debian repos tab --> select fastest mx repo for me button. Why it won't affect security and backports repos location. It's security.debian.org and deb.debian.org correspondingly always.
deb.debian.org is a redirector type site, so they do the choosing on their end.

not sure about security.debian.org. It may be similar.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:44 pm
by BitJam
dr-kart wrote:live-usb-maker-gui
1.is not able to see usb stick plugged. Whether it's formatted or not.
2.can be found in whisker twice with different titles though. 'mx tools' and 'system' sections.

# dd-live-usb
works fine in terminal.
That's strange. I thought they used the same algorithm to determine if a drive is usb/removable or not. Anyway, that test is not perfect. I suggest you try using live-usb-maker in a terminal and if it doesn't see your usb stick then use the "--force=usb" option. This is a little dangerous because it will let you over-write internal hard drives.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:52 pm
by vamsi
How about replacing qpdfview with evince or Okular in MX Linux

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:59 pm
by dolphin_oracle
vamsi wrote:How about replacing qpdfview with evince or Okular in MX Linux
Okular was seriously considered for a while, and its still many of the dev team members' favorite pdf reader. However, given our non-kde-ness, we stuck with qpdfview for now.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:02 pm
by vamsi
dolphin_oracle wrote:
vamsi wrote:How about replacing qpdfview with evince or Okular in MX Linux
Okular was seriously considered for a while, and its still many of the dev team members' favorite pdf reader. However, given our non-kde-ness, we stuck with qpdfview for now.
Then How about Evince :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:08 pm
by dolphin_oracle
vamsi wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
vamsi wrote:How about replacing qpdfview with evince or Okular in MX Linux
Okular was seriously considered for a while, and its still many of the dev team members' favorite pdf reader. However, given our non-kde-ness, we stuck with qpdfview for now.
Then How about Evince :happy:
I forget what the issue was with evince. We considered it as well.

Thanks for the interest! I'm sure it will be revisited again in the future.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:22 pm
by Jerry3904
Vamsi can, of course, install his own personal preference. We have lots of users who think such-and-such a package would be better than what we ship...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:40 pm
by entropyfoe
Jerry,

...and that is the beauty and power of Linux, choices and synaptic !

After a fresh install, I usually install 100 packages !

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 4:57 pm
by Jerry3904
Ha--amen to that!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:40 pm
by vamsi
entropyfoe wrote:Jerry,

...and that is the beauty and power of Linux, choices and synaptic !

After a fresh install, I usually install 100 packages !
Lol 100 :happy: :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:47 am
by Ghost67
Just a tiny thing I've noticed. Super Tux Kart didn't install for me using MX Package Installer. It did however install from Synaptic ...and that seems to be the only problem for me so far :) Beta 3 is beautiful!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:22 am
by vamsi
When can we expect final version of MX Linux approximately..?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:55 am
by chrispop99
vamsi wrote:When can we expect final version of MX Linux approximately..?
The official answer as always is 'when its ready', but previous versions have always managed to be finished before year-end, which is the target.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:57 am
by tascoast
Could there have been any updates in the last day or so that might have disabled my desktop wifi dongle? It's fine on MX-16.

$ inxi -n
Network: Card-1: Marvell 88E8057 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: sky2
IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:01:6c:48:1a:77
Card-2: Realtek RTL8191SU 802.11n WLAN Adapter driver: r8712u
IF: wlan0 state: N/A mac: N/A

*sudo service network-manager restart indicates this part is working. Replugging the dongle in has no effect. No Wifi is detected or trying to detect.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:01 am
by vamsi
chrispop99 wrote:
vamsi wrote:When can we expect final version of MX Linux approximately..?
The official answer as always is 'when its ready', but previous versions have always managed to be finished before year-end, which is the target.

Chris
Some one made video on MX Linux and on comments section one asked question when the final version will be released they didn't mentioned the website..

Any way thanks for the answer.... :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:15 am
by stsoh
deleted.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:25 am
by chrispop99
Ghost67 wrote:Just a tiny thing I've noticed. Super Tux Kart didn't install for me using MX Package Installer. It did however install from Synaptic ...and that seems to be the only problem for me so far :) Beta 3 is beautiful!
Issue with Super TuxKart not installing from the PI confirmed here.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:26 am
by Jerry3904
@stsoh: Please post this in another location--it has nothing to do with what we are discussing here.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:30 am
by stsoh
Jerry3904 wrote:@stsoh: Please post this in another location--it has nothing to do with what we are discussing here.
i'm using mx17b3......not related? then i will delete the post.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:38 am
by chrispop99
The Package Installer is failing on a number of items. As well as those already reported, the Primary and Secondary section of the 'Children' category fail.

I will attempt to work my way through some more of the list. Perhaps if someone else wants to try, they could start at the bottom and work up?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:40 am
by Jerry3904
stsoh wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:@stsoh: Please post this in another location--it has nothing to do with what we are discussing here.
i'm using mx17b3......not related? then i will delete the post.
If you were reporting feedback on the function of the liquorix kernel in 17b3, that would be different.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:41 am
by Jerry3904
chrispop99 wrote:The Package Installer is failing on a number of items. As well as those already reported, the Primary and Secondary section of the 'Children' category fail.

I will attempt to work my way through some more of the list. Perhaps if someone else wants to try, they could start at the bottom and work up?

Chris
Good catch. That app is being worked on now, so the timing is right.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:46 am
by Jerry3904

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:54 am
by Jerry3904
Rebooting into one of my 3 17b3 installations (thanks, DO), I noticed for the first time that we now have 4 memtest entries on the GRUB screen? Titles not particularly self-explanatory IMO.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:58 am
by zebedeeboss
Hi

A quick visual observation on the panel. It would, imho, look better if the notification icons matched the size of the other panel items. It would give it a cleaner look.

ps. I know this is all subjective but it strikes me as odd every time I see it on a new install.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:02 am
by chrispop99
zebedeeboss wrote:Hi

A quick visual observation on the panel. It would, imho, look better if the notification icons matched the size of the other panel items. It would give it a cleaner look.

ps. I know this is all subjective but it strikes me as odd every time I see it on a new install.
You do know you can adjust the size of those icons to suit your own set-up, right?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:04 am
by zebedeeboss
chrispop99 wrote:
zebedeeboss wrote:Hi

A quick visual observation on the panel. It would, imho, look better if the notification icons matched the size of the other panel items. It would give it a cleaner look.

ps. I know this is all subjective but it strikes me as odd every time I see it on a new install.
You do know you can adjust the size of those icons to suit your own set-up, right?

Chris
Yes of course I do :p - it's just that first impression...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 5:52 am
by asqwerth
asqwerth wrote: AutoMut was indeed enabled. However, after disabling, I still can't get any sound.

Time to sleep now, so I'll reboot and try again tomorrow.
No sound, then I installed the latest liquorix kernel from MXPI (4.14), still no sound, and then finally, a discovery: somehow the mute button in pulseaudio under Output Devices tab was on even though I had never muted it and had disabled Automut. Volume slider certainly wasn't muted.

It wasn't very obvious because the mute indicator in pulseaudio is very faint and nondescript - light grey square with the faint icon of a speaker within - I thought it was just an icon rather than an actual toggle switch.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 6:34 am
by dolphin_oracle
Ie package installer: I've installed all the language packs, chrome, kdenlive, vitualbox, filezilla, mirage qt development geany and deb packaging.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 6:48 am
by chrispop99
dolphin_oracle wrote:Ie package installer: I've installed all the language packs, chrome, kdenlive, vitualbox, filezilla, mirage qt development geany and deb packaging.
I've done everything down to the 'Misc' section, and not found anything wrong other than those previously reported.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:00 am
by dolphin_oracle
I've also done steam, simplescreenrecorder, and ksnip. compiz also works.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:04 am
by Paul..
Jerry3904 wrote:Added those to Tracker: https://mxlinux.org/multiple-apps-do-not-install-mxpi
Got it. Thx, Jerry.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:04 am
by richb
Shutter works under Screenshooter.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:30 am
by dolphin_oracle
@Chris

can you post your /var/log/mxpi.log and mxpi.log.old files ( I forget the exact names).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:40 am
by chrispop99
dolphin_oracle wrote:@Chris

can you post your /var/log/mxpi.log and mxpi.log.old files ( I forget the exact names).
I'm assuming you wanted these after failed installs, but I've just done a re-install on that machine!

I'm going out now, but will repeat the process later.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:54 am
by richb
Chris and D_O. I can do those failed installs and post the files. It is not on a fresh but those recent failures should be there.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:54 am
by dolphin_oracle
chrispop99 wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:@Chris

can you post your /var/log/mxpi.log and mxpi.log.old files ( I forget the exact names).
I'm assuming you wanted these after failed installs, but I've just done a re-install on that machine!

I'm going out now, but will repeat the process later.

Chris
no worries, thanks for checking so much!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:59 am
by dolphin_oracle
thanks rich...

Code: Select all

Package celestia-gnome is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

E: Package 'celestia-gnome' has no installation candidate
E: Package 'celestia-gnome' has no installation candidate

Script done on Tue 05 Dec 2017 07:43:47 AM EST
that package is used by both primary and secondary and is not available in stretch.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 8:14 am
by Paul..
dolphin_oracle wrote:thanks rich...

Code: Select all

Package celestia-gnome is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

E: Package 'celestia-gnome' has no installation candidate
E: Package 'celestia-gnome' has no installation candidate

Script done on Tue 05 Dec 2017 07:43:47 AM EST
that package is used by both primary and secondary and is not available in stretch.
Already removed and pushed...SuperTuxKart was problem with script, also fixed and pushed.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 8:14 am
by dolphin_oracle
Sweet! Thanks paul!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 8:17 am
by Paul..
:snoopy2:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:08 am
by asqwerth
Installing virtualbox 5.2 from MXPI, with the liquorix 4.14 kernel running that had been installed earlier today using MXPI as well.

Error message displayed during installation. Text of /var/log/vbox-install.log follows:

Code: Select all

make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.14.0-2.3-liquorix-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/var/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/var/tmp/vbox.0 -j4 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
Makefile:944: *** "Cannot generate ORC metadata for CONFIG_ORC_UNWINDER=y, please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel".  Stop.
/var/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:13 am
by dolphin_oracle
asqwerth wrote:Installing virtualbox 5.2 from MXPI, with the liquorix 4.14 kernel running that had been installed earlier today using MXPI as well.

Error message displayed during installation. Text of /var/log/vbox-install.log follows:

Code: Select all

make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.14.0-2.3-liquorix-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/var/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/var/tmp/vbox.0 -j4 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
Makefile:944: *** "Cannot generate ORC metadata for CONFIG_ORC_UNWINDER=y, please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel".  Stop.
/var/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2

yep...the current virtualbox does not install on 4.14 kernels. same with the antiX 4.14 kernel.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:30 am
by asqwerth
dolphin_oracle wrote:I've also done steam, simplescreenrecorder, and ksnip. compiz also works.
D_O, were you testing ksnip 1.3 series (the stable one) or the 1.4 alpha in MX Test Repo?

If the former, did you test making a screenshot of a selected rectangular area with compositing DISABLED? Was your shot exactly as you had selected or was the screenshot shifted to the right of your actual selected area? I installed and tested ksnip 1.4 alpha in Test Repo and I still have the "shift to the right" problem. Have posted issue at the Dev's github page.

This is a real life install of MX17b3.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:34 am
by dolphin_oracle
asqwerth wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:I've also done steam, simplescreenrecorder, and ksnip. compiz also works.
D_O, were you testing ksnip 1.3 series (the stable one) or the 1.4 alpha in MX Test Repo?

If the former, did you test making a screenshot of a selected rectangular area with compositing DISABLED? Was your shot exactly as you had selected or was the screenshot shifted to the right of your actual selected area? I installed and tested ksnip 1.4 alpha in Test Repo and I still have the "shift to the right" problem. Have posted issue at the Dev's github page.

This is a real life install of MX17b3.
I test the one in stable.

I'll have to check...I've never noticed a shift to right problem. But I usually have compositing enabled. I'll give it a try the other way and let you know. Won't be until tonight.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:49 am
by kmathern
dolphin_oracle wrote:
asqwerth wrote:Installing virtualbox 5.2 from MXPI, with the liquorix 4.14 kernel running that had been installed earlier today using MXPI as well.

Error message displayed during installation. Text of /var/log/vbox-install.log follows:

Code: Select all

make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.14.0-2.3-liquorix-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/var/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/var/tmp/vbox.0 -j4 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
Makefile:944: *** "Cannot generate ORC metadata for CONFIG_ORC_UNWINDER=y, please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel".  Stop.
/var/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2

yep...the current virtualbox does not install on 4.14 kernels. same with the antiX 4.14 kernel.
Virtualbox 5.2.2 is supposed to have added support for 4.14 kernels. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog#2

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 10:53 am
by richb
asqwerth wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:I've also done steam, simplescreenrecorder, and ksnip. compiz also works.
D_O, were you testing ksnip 1.3 series (the stable one) or the 1.4 alpha in MX Test Repo?

If the former, did you test making a screenshot of a selected rectangular area with compositing DISABLED? Was your shot exactly as you had selected or was the screenshot shifted to the right of your actual selected area? I installed and tested ksnip 1.4 alpha in Test Repo and I still have the "shift to the right" problem. Have posted issue at the Dev's github page.



This is a real life install of MX17b3.
No shift in my case.

EDIT: Take that back it does shift. So does the 1.4 version.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:09 am
by dolphin_oracle
kmathern wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
asqwerth wrote:Installing virtualbox 5.2 from MXPI, with the liquorix 4.14 kernel running that had been installed earlier today using MXPI as well.

Error message displayed during installation. Text of /var/log/vbox-install.log follows:

Code: Select all

make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.14.0-2.3-liquorix-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/var/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/var/tmp/vbox.0 -j4 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
Makefile:944: *** "Cannot generate ORC metadata for CONFIG_ORC_UNWINDER=y, please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel".  Stop.
/var/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2

yep...the current virtualbox does not install on 4.14 kernels. same with the antiX 4.14 kernel.
Virtualbox 5.2.2 is supposed to have added support for 4.14 kernels. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog#2
my bad...I tried out guest-additions-dkms package. that fails to build. I haven't installed the virtualbox app on a 4.14 kernel.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:00 pm
by dr-kart
Maybe wrong place to ask, but
regarding vulnerability just discovered https://security-tracker.debian.org/tra ... 17-1000405
it is said there that 4.14.2-1 kernel has already been fixed.
Can we say the same of "our" 4.14.2-antix.1-amd64-smp kernel available in repo now?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:04 pm
by dolphin_oracle
dr-kart wrote:Maybe wrong place to ask, but
regarding vulnerability just discovered https://security-tracker.debian.org/tra ... 17-1000405
it is said there that 4.14.2-1 kernel has already been fixed.
Can we say the same of "our" 4.14.2-antix.1-amd64-smp kernel available in repo now?
anti will have to chime in on the antiX kernel. I'm not sure...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:50 pm
by asqwerth
Could someone check if Nomacs was set up as default app to open .png files?

The first time I double-clicked on a screenshot (png), gthumb opened it. However, gthumb is not installed by default so it could be that it "stole" the right to open png files after it was installed?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 12:58 pm
by dr-kart
dolphin_oracle wrote:
dr-kart wrote:... vulnerability just discovered https://security-tracker.debian.org/tra ... 17-1000405
it is said there that 4.14.2-1 kernel has already been fixed.
Can we say the same of "our" 4.14.2-antix.1-amd64-smp kernel available in repo now?
anti will have to chime in on the antiX kernel. I'm not sure...
Got it. Thanks.
for anyone concerned To mitigate I did this as root

Code: Select all

echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/use_zero_page

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:05 pm
by dolphin_oracle
asqwerth wrote:Could someone check if Nomacs was set up as default app to open .png files?

The first time I double-clicked on a screenshot (png), gthumb opened it. However, gthumb is not installed by default so it could be that it "stole" the right to open png files after it was installed?
this issue has been fixed for RC/final.

we manually set certain apps in a mimelist in ~/.local/shares/applications

I'm not sure that list is really necessary now, but its still there and I forgot to update it on the b3.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:23 pm
by asqwerth
Is dd live-USB supposed to show up in MX-Tools (because it doesn't)?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:26 pm
by richb
asqwerth wrote:Is dd live-USB supposed to show up in MX-Tools (because it doesn't)?
It is an option in a drop down in Live USB Maker. I do not think it was ever intended to stand alone in MX Tools.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:57 pm
by dolphin_oracle
richb wrote:
asqwerth wrote:Is dd live-USB supposed to show up in MX-Tools (because it doesn't)?
It is an option in a drop down in Live USB Maker. I do not think it was ever intended to stand alone in MX Tools.
we actually had it that way initially but backed it out. left it in the menu as per antiX's configuration.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:04 pm
by Stevo
kmathern wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
asqwerth wrote:Installing virtualbox 5.2 from MXPI, with the liquorix 4.14 kernel running that had been installed earlier today using MXPI as well.

Error message displayed during installation. Text of /var/log/vbox-install.log follows:

Code: Select all

make V=1 CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/4.14.0-2.3-liquorix-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/var/tmp/vbox.0 SRCROOT=/var/tmp/vbox.0 -j4 modules
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
Makefile:944: *** "Cannot generate ORC metadata for CONFIG_ORC_UNWINDER=y, please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel".  Stop.
/var/tmp/vbox.0/Makefile.include.footer:101: recipe for target 'vboxdrv' failed
make: *** [vboxdrv] Error 2

yep...the current virtualbox does not install on 4.14 kernels. same with the antiX 4.14 kernel.
Virtualbox 5.2.2 is supposed to have added support for 4.14 kernels. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog#2
That particular error involved with installing the Oracle Virtual Box 5.2.2 on the new Liquorix kernel is probably related to the missing libelf-dev package...it was just added as a build-depend for the 4.14 Liquorix kernel and doesn't seem to be a dependency for the linux-headers package. I'll report that as a bug on the Liquorix forums.

Edit: since there's another update to the kernel out now, I can manually add it to the header template file myself for this version. I'm sure it will be added with the next upstream update, now that I've reported it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 7:22 pm
by asqwerth
Stevo, so I should install the updated liquorix kernel from mxpi in a few days and delete the current one?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 8:44 pm
by Stevo
asqwerth wrote:Stevo, so I should install the updated liquorix kernel from mxpi in a few days and delete the current one?
For the present kernel, just install libelf-dev manually and that should fix the Virtual Box build---it builds on my system, but's that's because I already installed that package ahead of time. The updated kernel will just pull that package automatically.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:55 pm
by vamsi
My suggestions regarding MX Apt-notifier :-

First of all change the name to MX- Updater or MX-Update manager like that apt-notifier seems to be weird name i think

Second in the apt-notifier there is no option to select the updates which only we want to install we were forced to installed all the founded updates i think it is not cool way if we can select the which updates we want it will be much more accessible

Third change the names on apt-notifier i.e. apt-get-dist-upgrade to like upgrade or some thing like that which is under stable to newbie also and change the reload button name to check for updates like that and other one to switch something like that

Fourth when there are no updates when we left click on the apt-notifier synaptic package manager is opening sometimes it is kind of irritating me we can open synaptic package manager directly but some times it is opening like that

Hope you will make some changes in these and make MX- Linux more accessible to the community..

Thanks..
Best Regards,
Vamsi.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 2:11 am
by tascoast
tascoast wrote:Could there have been any updates in the last day or so that might have disabled my desktop wifi dongle? It's fine on MX-16.

$ inxi -n
Network: Card-1: Marvell 88E8057 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: sky2
IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:01:6c:48:1a:77
Card-2: Realtek RTL8191SU 802.11n WLAN Adapter driver: r8712u
IF: wlan0 state: N/A mac: N/A

*sudo service network-manager restart indicates this part is working. Replugging the dongle in has no effect. No Wifi is detected or trying to detect.
For some reason. rechecking 'Automatically connect to this network' in Network Connections for my saved wifi connection (under Edit) and saving forces the dongle to become active and connect each boot. I can't account for why the dongle fails to routinely connect but this might indicate something to someone, for reference. MX-16 remains unaffected.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 4:50 am
by asqwerth
richb wrote:
asqwerth wrote:...D_O, were you testing ksnip 1.3 series (the stable one) or the 1.4 alpha in MX Test Repo? ...
...it does shift. So does the 1.4 version.

Developer has asked if version 1.3 had the same issue running on MX15/16 without compositing. I don't know offhand to be honest since my MX15/16 installs all have either XFCE native compositing or Compiz. I can only test later today or tomorrow. Anyone knows? It's relevant in the sense that we need to figure out if this problem is specific to MX17 (Stretch) or is a general problem without compositing (meaning it's an issue with ksnip itself).

This is his comment from github:
hmm, your user is saying that he has the shift with 1.3 and 1.4 on mx17, but 1.3 was working fine with mx16 for you? I didn‘t have time yet to test it myself but this last feedback points to something specific with mx17. I‘ll try to narrow that down this week.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:33 am
by Jerry3904
vamsi wrote:My suggestions regarding MX Apt-notifier :-

First of all change the name to MX- Updater or MX-Update manager like that apt-notifier seems to be weird name i think

Second in the apt-notifier there is no option to select the updates which only we want to install we were forced to installed all the founded updates i think it is not cool way if we can select the which updates we want it will be much more accessible

Third change the names on apt-notifier i.e. apt-get-dist-upgrade to like upgrade or some thing like that which is under stable to newbie also and change the reload button name to check for updates like that and other one to switch something like that

Fourth when there are no updates when we left click on the apt-notifier synaptic package manager is opening sometimes it is kind of irritating me we can open synaptic package manager directly but some times it is opening like that

Hope you will make some changes in these and make MX- Linux more accessible to the community..

Thanks..
Best Regards,
Vamsi.
Some things to consider here, thanks.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 6:31 am
by richb
Regarding ksnip, I do not have an MX-16 install to test with. If time allows I will have to download the iso and do a VB install or test on Live.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:10 am
by vamsi
Jerry3904 wrote:
vamsi wrote:My suggestions regarding MX Apt-notifier :-

First of all change the name to MX- Updater or MX-Update manager like that apt-notifier seems to be weird name i think

Second in the apt-notifier there is no option to select the updates which only we want to install we were forced to installed all the founded updates i think it is not cool way if we can select the which updates we want it will be much more accessible

Third change the names on apt-notifier i.e. apt-get-dist-upgrade to like upgrade or some thing like that which is under stable to newbie also and change the reload button name to check for updates like that and other one to switch something like that

Fourth when there are no updates when we left click on the apt-notifier synaptic package manager is opening sometimes it is kind of irritating me we can open synaptic package manager directly but some times it is opening like that

Hope you will make some changes in these and make MX- Linux more accessible to the community..

Thanks..
Best Regards,
Vamsi.
Some things to consider here, thanks.
Thanks jerry :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:28 am
by MX<3
Jerry3904 wrote:
vamsi wrote:My suggestions regarding MX Apt-notifier :-

First of all change the name to MX- Updater or MX-Update manager like that apt-notifier seems to be weird name i think

Second in the apt-notifier there is no option to select the updates which only we want to install we were forced to installed all the founded updates i think it is not cool way if we can select the which updates we want it will be much more accessible

Third change the names on apt-notifier i.e. apt-get-dist-upgrade to like upgrade or some thing like that which is under stable to newbie also and change the reload button name to check for updates like that and other one to switch something like that

Fourth when there are no updates when we left click on the apt-notifier synaptic package manager is opening sometimes it is kind of irritating me we can open synaptic package manager directly but some times it is opening like that

Hope you will make some changes in these and make MX- Linux more accessible to the community..

Thanks..
Best Regards,
Vamsi.
Some things to consider here, thanks.

There is something interesting to me here, too. I know we can lock an application version in Synaptic but how about:-

Adding the ability in Apt-Notifier? When we click Apt-Notifier, after being notified of updates, there is a tick box next to non-core applications. If ticked, the version installed will be kept.

Apt-Notifier then remembers this preference and doesn't mention any update for that application again. When other updates are available and Apt-Notifier is opened, those kept back versions are there, with the toggle-tick-box still.

Showing the 'This Version is installed' and 'This Version is available' info. Kinda like in Apt-History:

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau amd64 1:1.0.12-2mx150+1 1:1.0.13-1mx150+1

And then we can keep or install/update applications, however we like, very easily.

There is a Console Command that Force Locks an Application Version, right? Easy enough to add this?

What d'you think?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:31 am
by dolphin_oracle
MX<3 wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:
vamsi wrote:My suggestions regarding MX Apt-notifier :-

First of all change the name to MX- Updater or MX-Update manager like that apt-notifier seems to be weird name i think

Second in the apt-notifier there is no option to select the updates which only we want to install we were forced to installed all the founded updates i think it is not cool way if we can select the which updates we want it will be much more accessible

Third change the names on apt-notifier i.e. apt-get-dist-upgrade to like upgrade or some thing like that which is under stable to newbie also and change the reload button name to check for updates like that and other one to switch something like that

Fourth when there are no updates when we left click on the apt-notifier synaptic package manager is opening sometimes it is kind of irritating me we can open synaptic package manager directly but some times it is opening like that

Hope you will make some changes in these and make MX- Linux more accessible to the community..

Thanks..
Best Regards,
Vamsi.
Some things to consider here, thanks.

There is something interesting to me here, too. I know we can lock an application version in Synaptic but how about:-

Adding the ability in Apt-Notifier? When we click Apt-Notifier, after being notified of updates, there is a tick box next to non-core applications. If ticked, the version installed will be kept.

Apt-Notifier then remembers this preference and doesn't mention any update for that application again. When other updates are available and Apt-Notifier is opened, those kept back versions are there, with the toggle-tick-box still.

Showing the 'This Version is installed' and 'This Version is available' info. Kinda like in Apt-History:

xserver-xorg-video-nouveau amd64 1:1.0.12-2mx150+1 1:1.0.13-1mx150+1

And then we can keep or install/update applications, however we like, very easily.

There is a Console Command that Force Locks an Application Version, right? Easy enough to add this?

What d'you think?

Not particularly easy, especially considering that Synaptic already does all that rather well.

Plus when debian updates you'll be presented with a million options.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 11:39 am
by Jerry3904
I am getting an error when I try to run smxi or any relative:

Code: Select all

url failed with wget error
Is it working for others?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:05 pm
by asqwerth
I think @vamsi's and MX<3's suggestions for more granular control over individual updateable packages in apt-notifier defeats the purpose that it, and MX, is meant to be newcomer-friendly. The whole point of apt-notifier (and I agree with vamsi that the name could be clearer and more obvious for newcomers) is that it is a quick way to update your whole system with a click.

A user knowledgeable enough to choose which packages to update or not, and even which packages to pin to an older version, can do these things from Synaptic or terminal. And Synaptic is accessible from the right click context menu of the Notifier.

I feel the Notifier itself should be kept simple and straightforward. Any improvements should be focused on simplicity and clarity for the newcomer rather than additional complexity (esp when we are referring to functionality that duplicates what can already be done in Synaptic).

This is my own opinion, of course.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:21 pm
by kmathern
Jerry3904 wrote:I am getting an error when I try to run smxi or any relative:

Code: Select all

url failed with wget error
Is it working for others?
That's an error with the smxi/sgfxi/svmi/inxi stub installer (does anyone use svmi ?) in the /usr/sbin folder.

Below are the urls, the smxi.org urls all throw a 403 error, the inxi throws a 404 error.

Code: Select all

    42	DOWNLOAD_URL_INXI='http://inxi.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/'
    43	DOWNLOAD_URL_SGFXI='http://smxi.org/sg/'
    44	DOWNLOAD_URL_SMXI='http://smxi.org/sm/'
    45	DOWNLOAD_URL_SVMI='http://smxi.org/sv/'
How much room are we saving using the stub installer and not having the full scripts loaded on the iso ?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:29 pm
by Jerry3904
I feel the Notifier itself should be kept simple and straightforward.
+1

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:34 pm
by arjaybe
asqwerth wrote:I think @vamsi's and MX<3's suggestions for more granular control over individual updateable packages in apt-notifier defeats the purpose that it, and MX, is meant to be newcomer-friendly. The whole point of apt-notifier (and I agree with vamsi that the name could be clearer and more obvious for newcomers) is that it is a quick way to update your whole system with a click.

A user knowledgeable enough to choose which packages to update or not, and even which packages to pin to an older version, can do these things from Synaptic or terminal. And Synaptic is accessible from the right click context menu of the Notifier.

I feel the Notifier itself should be kept simple and straightforward. Any improvements should be focused on simplicity and clarity for the newcomer rather than additional complexity (esp when we are referring to functionality that duplicates what can already be done in Synaptic).

This is my own opinion, of course.
I agree with this. Keep it simple at the desktop level.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:42 pm
by richb
Jerry3904 wrote:
I feel the Notifier itself should be kept simple and straightforward.
+1
Simple.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:43 pm
by Paul..
Jerry3904 wrote:I am getting an error when I try to run smxi or any relative:

Code: Select all

url failed with wget error
Is it working for others?
working fine here...HDD install fully updated b3

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:51 pm
by Jerry3904
Now an hour later, runs. Some things we might want to change:
Here are your options for your Anti-X system:
1 - continue-no-change ...
2 - antix-sid Adds sid sources to your apt repos, otherwise no change..
3 - quit ...

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:13 pm
by TJ Hoye
Jerry3904 wrote:Want a really small annoyance? The items in the Favorites menu are not in alphabetical order--or any other order AFAIK.
On Favorites, you can drag & drop re-order or right click and sort a-z or z-a.
Most if not all other lists already sorted and fixed, not re-orderable.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:17 pm
by Jerry3904
I know how to do it, thanks. The question is how it should be presented by default on the ISO.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:25 pm
by vamsi
asqwerth wrote:I think @vamsi's and MX<3's suggestions for more granular control over individual updateable packages in apt-notifier defeats the purpose that it, and MX, is meant to be newcomer-friendly. The whole point of apt-notifier (and I agree with vamsi that the name could be clearer and more obvious for newcomers) is that it is a quick way to update your whole system with a click.

A user knowledgeable enough to choose which packages to update or not, and even which packages to pin to an older version, can do these things from Synaptic or terminal. And Synaptic is accessible from the right click context menu of the Notifier.

I feel the Notifier itself should be kept simple and straightforward. Any improvements should be focused on simplicity and clarity for the newcomer rather than additional complexity (esp when we are referring to functionality that duplicates what can already be done in Synaptic).

This is my own opinion, of course.
Agree with you also i think the ability to select the required update packages to be installed is the most important i think in my view for MX- apt notifier and also i agree with that it should be as simple as that that mission makes MX linux to stand out from other distros :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:33 pm
by asqwerth
Vamsi, you misunderstood me. I don't agree with you that apt notifier should have the ability to select the specific packages you wish to update.

My view is that those things should be done in synaptic.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:43 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Just to let the public know...we are at feature freeze for mx17. So please keep reporting any bugs, issues, and feature requests, but new any features will be reviewed for the next release.

Thanks!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:45 pm
by kmathern
Paul.. wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:I am getting an error when I try to run smxi or any relative:

Code: Select all

url failed with wget error
Is it working for others?
working fine here...HDD install fully updated b3
I think you should only get the 'url failed with wget error' the first time you try to use inxi|sgfxi|smxi|svmi, in those cases the /usr/sbin/smxi stub installer runs instead of the scripts in the /usr/local/bin folder {they aren't there yet}.

If you've already used those scripts the stub installer doesn't get run.

The best way to test to see if you can reproduce the error Jerry had is in a LiveUSB session (without persistence).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:52 pm
by vamsi
asqwerth wrote:Vamsi, you misunderstood me. I don't agree with you that apt notifier should have the ability to select the specific packages you wish to update.

My view is that those things should be done in synaptic.
I think this it is very much necessary of course in future may be Dev team will think of this

Thanks..

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:57 pm
by richb
vamsi wrote:
asqwerth wrote:Vamsi, you misunderstood me. I don't agree with you that apt notifier should have the ability to select the specific packages you wish to update.

My view is that those things should be done in synaptic.
I think this it is very much necessary of course in future may be Dev team will think of this

Thanks..
It has been discussed and the consensus is not to change it. It adds a complication, violating the simplicity of apt notifier and it is already a feature of synaptic.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 2:00 pm
by vamsi
richb wrote:
vamsi wrote:
asqwerth wrote:Vamsi, you misunderstood me. I don't agree with you that apt notifier should have the ability to select the specific packages you wish to update.

My view is that those things should be done in synaptic.
I think this it is very much necessary of course in future may be Dev team will think of this

Thanks..
It has been discussed and the consensus is not to change it. It adds a complication, violating the simplicity of apt notifier and it is already a feature of synaptic.
hmm.. okay :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:00 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Updates soon to come may affect your lightdm-gtk-greeter (the login screen) settings as well as a few other odds and ends...all in getting ready for rc.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:27 pm
by nathan2423
Probably this is something unique to me but I thought I would report it.

I am currently running: uname -a
Linux LenovoSL410 4.13.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.13.13-1mx17 (2017-11-18) x86_64 GNU/Linux

On the theory that my older Lenovo SL410 might run better with an older kernel, I tried to downgrade using the package manager to the Debian kernel, or to the antix 4.10 kernel (the other option). Both efforts failed with the key language seeming to be:

"Warning: Unable to find an initial ram disk that I know how to handle.
Will not try to make an initrd."

Code: Select all

After this operation, 259 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch stretch/main amd64 linux-headers-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp amd64 4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp-2 [10.7 MB]
Get:2 http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch stretch/main amd64 linux-image-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp amd64 4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp-2 [38.5 MB]
Fetched 49.2 MB in 1min 49s (450 kB/s)                                                             
Selecting previously unselected package linux-headers-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp.
(Reading database ... 434962 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../linux-headers-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp_4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking linux-headers-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp (4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp-2) ...
Selecting previously unselected package linux-image-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp.
Preparing to unpack .../linux-image-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp_4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking linux-image-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp (4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp-2) ...
Setting up linux-image-4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp (4.10.5-antix.3-amd64-smp-2) ...
Warning: Unable to find an initial ram disk that I know how to handle.
Will not try to make an initrd.
After a reboot I run uname -a and I get:

Linux LenovoSL410 4.13.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.13.13-1mx17 (2017-11-18) x86_64 GNU/Linux


I Know you're getting ready to go final but thought I would report this FWIW - that downgrading kernal using the package manager might have issues.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:54 pm
by Stevo
I always get that message when upgrading a kernel, but it goes through anyway. I suspect it's trying something that the rest of the process has not set up yet. Does the upgrade error out, or can you see the additional kernel on the advanced options GRUB menu?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:41 am
by vamsi
Remove some of this in the MX and add them to MX package installer Lucky Backup, Gnome PPP, SM Tube and some of the games that are preinstalled i understand there are users who use them but add them to package installer i know the goal of MX linux is to make as simple and fast os as possible i think it will also reduce the size of iso file or think of that in future if not possible now..

Thanks..

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:40 am
by m_pav
Just because you have broadband doesn't mean the rest of the world does, so removing gnomeppp woiuld be a foolish move. We aim to have a prepacked distro that has enough of the most commonly required features, tools and recreational assists to make it attractive to the widest audience. Your preferences can be integrated into your own personal snapshot ISO once MX 17 goes final, so while we appreciate and welcome your suggestions, you need to recognise we work to a much larger audience and have catered for custom built personal snapshots for those who desire a "personalised" build.

If you haven't already, please acquaint yourself with the various snapshot options. You can run live and save the changes back to the Live-USB in a variety of ways, or you can "remaster" an installed system to a new ISO. It's all in the MX Tools.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:47 am
by chrispop99
vamsi wrote:Remove some of this in the MX and add them to MX package installer Lucky Backup, Gnome PPP, SM Tube and some of the games that are preinstalled i understand there are users who use them but add them to package installer i know the goal of MX linux is to make as simple and fast os as possible i think it will also reduce the size of iso file or think of that in future if not possible now..

Thanks..
Since it became impossible to keep MX (and most other distros) within the size limits suitable for burning to a CD, the ISO size is much less important than it once was.

You could ask 100 users for a 'preferred applications' list. and get 100 different answers. The Dev team form a consensus about what to include, and a lot of discussion goes into that, with a lot of testing of any potential changes or additions. The decisions made are based on both the team's preference, and feedback from users. I doubt that your proposed deletions will be considered appropriate. Incidentally, if you read the short mission statement on the MX Linux home page, you will not see any mention of making MX as simple and fast as possible. That is not its primary purpose.

From my perspective, I use luckyBackup every day, to make a copy of my Home folder on the boot disk, to my data disk. The User Manual also advises its use in section 4.8. A casual user might see its inclusion, and be encouraged to investigate making backups. I also use SMTube sometimes as it's a quick and easy way to view a YouTube video without all the clutter of viewing via a browser.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:50 am
by vamsi
chrispop99 wrote:
vamsi wrote:Remove some of this in the MX and add them to MX package installer Lucky Backup, Gnome PPP, SM Tube and some of the games that are preinstalled i understand there are users who use them but add them to package installer i know the goal of MX linux is to make as simple and fast os as possible i think it will also reduce the size of iso file or think of that in future if not possible now..

Thanks..
Since it became impossible to keep MX (and most other distros) within the size limits suitable for burning to a CD, the ISO size is much less important than it once was.

You could ask 100 users for a 'preferred applications' list. and get 100 different answers. The Dev team form a consensus about what to include, and a lot of discussion goes into that, with a lot of testing of any potential changes or additions. The decisions made are based on both the team's preference, and feedback from users. I doubt that your proposed deletions will be considered appropriate. Incidentally, if you read the short mission statement on the MX Linux home page, you will not see any mention of making MX as simple and fast as possible. That is not its primary purpose.

From my perspective, I use luckyBackup every day, to make a copy of my Home folder on the boot disk, to my data disk. The User Manual also advises its use in section 4.8. A casual user might see its inclusion, and be encouraged to investigate making backups. I also use SMTube sometimes as it's a quick and easy way to view a YouTube video without all the clutter of viewing via a browser.

Chris
Hmm.. Understood :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:36 am
by asqwerth
@vamsi, I appreciate your enthusiasm in bringing up suggestions and ideas. It is always good to have input from the users, and the Dev Team does consider and discuss certain proposals and feedback. Some ideas may eventually be incorporated into the distro at a later date.

However, since there is now a feature freeze (meaning the focus is now on bug quashing the existing build of MX17 instead of discussing which programs should be added or removed from the build), I think this thread is no longer the place to discuss the default selection of programs on the MX iso.

The place to raise your proposals on what should or should not be a default program in MX can be posted in the "Bugs and Non-Package Requests" Sub-Forum here: viewforum.php?f=97

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 7:33 am
by nathan2423
Stevo thank you for your response to my post http://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php? ... 01#p428504 above

I am an idiot - I simply forgot to go into the advance options and pick the older kernel at startup - both of the older ones that I installed were there as they should be.

Thank you.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:07 pm
by mmikeinsantarosa
i just loaded B3 on a 32 bit laptop: 1GHz celeron CPU w/1Gb Ram and everything worked OOTB. Great default desktop too.

Sweet job guys :clap:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:23 pm
by Jerry3904
It's actually an amazing Team, huh?!

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 4:39 pm
by allanveal
Saw the word "warning" so thought you might be interested. (see attached screenshot and photo).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 4:47 pm
by Paul..
allanveal wrote:Saw the word "warning" so thought you might be interested.
That's normal...just telling you that NFS daemon is not starting because no shared volumes are being offered (exported)...been there since MX-15, I think.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:05 pm
by Stevo
nathan2423 wrote:Stevo thank you for your response to my post http://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php? ... 01#p428504 above

I am an idiot - I simply forgot to go into the advance options and pick the older kernel at startup - both of the older ones that I installed were there as they should be.

Thank you.
No problem--I've already encountered the issue when adding older kernels myself. GRUB seems to stick with the latest kernel, but GRUB customizer has some settings to change that, including the one I use, which is to boot from the last one you chose manually.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:12 pm
by Stevo
asqwerth wrote:@vamsi, I appreciate your enthusiasm in bringing up suggestions and ideas. It is always good to have input from the users, and the Dev Team does consider and discuss certain proposals and feedback. Some ideas may eventually be incorporated into the distro at a later date.

However, since there is now a feature freeze (meaning the focus is now on bug quashing the existing build of MX17 instead of discussing which programs should be added or removed from the build), I think this thread is no longer the place to discuss the default selection of programs on the MX iso.

The place to raise your proposals on what should or should not be a default program in MX can be posted in the "Bugs and Non-Package Requests" Sub-Forum here: viewforum.php?f=97
We do consider the size of the apps on the ISO, too. Removing SMTube would reduce the image size by about 300 K and the installed size by about a megabyte, which is not much at all by today's standards. On the other hand, at least one possible icon set for the package installer would be well over 200 MB in the compressed deb format.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:21 am
by vamsi
mmikeinsantarosa wrote:i just loaded B3 on a 32 bit laptop: 1GHz celeron CPU w/1Gb Ram and everything worked OOTB. Great default desktop too.

Sweet job guys :clap:
Wow MX Team is really good at this no distro will run smoothly on 1 GB ram :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:09 am
by stsoh
panel has two synaptic icon after updated.
right click panel > panel preferences > items, can't find any function to remove it.
right click, no deletion for it.
right click to quit one, appears again after reboot.
how to remove one of them?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:24 am
by Jerry3904
Just saw that: it's because we have changed the name of MX Apt-notifier to MX Updater, but MX Apt-notifier is still listed in the Autostart. A temporary bug.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:43 am
by vamsi
And also when there are no updates in MX Updater when we click on the icon it is not opening instead of synaptic package manager is opening why ??

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:48 am
by vamsi
Paul.. wrote:
allanveal wrote:Saw the word "warning" so thought you might be interested.
That's normal...just telling you that NFS daemon is not starting because no shared volumes are being offered (exported)...been there since MX-15, I think.
Yes i too used to get this type of warning i thought there is some problem in my system but now doubt cleared.
Thanks..

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:22 am
by chrispop99
vamsi wrote:And also when there are no updates in MX Updater when we click on the icon it is not opening instead of synaptic package manager is opening why ??
Synaptic opens with left-click when there are no updates by design.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:39 am
by stsoh
Jerry3904 wrote:Just saw that: it's because we have changed the name of MX Apt-notifier to MX Updater, but MX Apt-notifier is still listed in the Autostart. A temporary bug.
ok, thanks.
got rid of one by uncheck mx-apt-notifier from app autostart.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:54 am
by vamsi
chrispop99 wrote:
vamsi wrote:And also when there are no updates in MX Updater when we click on the icon it is not opening instead of synaptic package manager is opening why ??
Synaptic opens with left-click when there are no updates by design.

Chris
Hello Chris we can use right click and open synaptic know then why it is included it in left click if we want to use synaptic we will use it from whisker menu or right click on Mx updater actually i do not think it is much useful actually we click on MX updater to check for updates or some other stuff but in middle synaptic is opening it is not that good. This is my suggestion.( Actually i don't know that Mx updater is programmed to open synaptic i got sick of it at the beginning now you clarified it i think many newbies can't understand this).. :happy: :happy:

Thanks,
Vamsi..

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:38 am
by dolphin_oracle
Jerry3904 wrote:Just saw that: it's because we have changed the name of MX Apt-notifier to MX Updater, but MX Apt-notifier is still listed in the Autostart. A temporary bug.
its because the apt-notifier.desktop in /etc/xdg/autostart isn't removed by the update to mx-updater, so there are 2 autostart entries.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:05 am
by richb
vamsi wrote:
chrispop99 wrote:
vamsi wrote:And also when there are no updates in MX Updater when we click on the icon it is not opening instead of synaptic package manager is opening why ??
Synaptic opens with left-click when there are no updates by design.

Chris
Hello Chris we can use right click and open synaptic know then why it is included it in left click if we want to use synaptic we will use it from whisker menu or right click on Mx updater actually i do not think it is much useful actually we click on MX updater to check for updates or some other stuff but in middle synaptic is opening it is not that good. This is my suggestion.( Actually i don't know that Mx updater is programmed to open synaptic i got sick of it at the beginning now you clarified it i think many newbies can't understand this).. :happy: :happy:

Thanks,
Vamsi..
You may not agree with the outcome but these functions are thoroughly discussed by the Development Team and a decision made. Having said that, the Team is responsive to user suggestions as witnessed by the name change of apt notifier to MX Updater.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:07 am
by stsoh
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Just saw that: it's because we have changed the name of MX Apt-notifier to MX Updater, but MX Apt-notifier is still listed in the Autostart. A temporary bug.
its because the apt-notifier.desktop in /etc/xdg/autostart isn't removed by the update to mx-updater, so there are 2 autostart entries.
great n thanks, this is much better.
deleted apt-notifier.desktop, not in app autostart any more.
is there any more residues left?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:43 am
by vamsi
richb wrote:
vamsi wrote:
chrispop99 wrote: Synaptic opens with left-click when there are no updates by design.

Chris
Hello Chris we can use right click and open synaptic know then why it is included it in left click if we want to use synaptic we will use it from whisker menu or right click on Mx updater actually i do not think it is much useful actually we click on MX updater to check for updates or some other stuff but in middle synaptic is opening it is not that good. This is my suggestion.( Actually i don't know that Mx updater is programmed to open synaptic i got sick of it at the beginning now you clarified it i think many newbies can't understand this).. :happy: :happy:

Thanks,
Vamsi..
You may not agree with the outcome but these functions are thoroughly discussed by the Development Team and a decision made. Having said that, the Team is responsive to user suggestions as witnessed by the name change of apt notifier to MX Updater.
ok Thanks.. :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:45 am
by MX<3
asqwerth wrote:I think @vamsi's and MX<3's suggestions for more granular control over individual updateable packages in apt-notifier defeats the purpose that it, and MX, is meant to be newcomer-friendly. The whole point of apt-notifier (and I agree with vamsi that the name could be clearer and more obvious for newcomers) is that it is a quick way to update your whole system with a click.

A user knowledgeable enough to choose which packages to update or not, and even which packages to pin to an older version, can do these things from Synaptic or terminal. And Synaptic is accessible from the right click context menu of the Notifier.

I feel the Notifier itself should be kept simple and straightforward. Any improvements should be focused on simplicity and clarity for the newcomer rather than additional complexity (esp when we are referring to functionality that duplicates what can already be done in Synaptic).

This is my own opinion, of course.


Of course simple is best. What I meant was: Everything to still remain as is but there be a tick box, just in case a person wants to keep something as it already is.

So there is no need to touch anything initially but a new user, aka me, can stop something like Firefox or Opera or VirtualBox from updating if they like, without having to use Synaptic.

Synaptic is a little overwhelming for a new user, it was for me anyway and I don't know the console commands to lock an app version, so this simple elegant funcionality in Apt-Notifier would be very welcome.

And it would actually make things easier for a new user. No need to touch anything but one click to update still. No need to open Synaptic, click the Reload, find your installed app you want to lock and the click the Force Version, through the Menu Bar or wherever it is.

...Maybe for MX 18... :crossfingers: :puppy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:56 am
by Jerry3904
Synaptic is a little overwhelming for a new user, it was for me anyway and I don't know the console commands to lock an app version
As a new user, you might use the "Synaptic Help" link of Apt-notifier's context menu and read a bit.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:59 am
by MX<3
Jerry3904 wrote:
Synaptic is a little overwhelming for a new user, it was for me anyway and I don't know the console commands to lock an app version
As a new user, you might use the "Synaptic Help" link of Apt-notifier's context menu and read a bit.

...sounds simple.

MX Conky

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:27 am
by mx65
After modifying Conky, when restarting the pc, Conky never starts with the modification made :frown:

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:37 am
by Jerry3904
1) Is that in the collection that was upgraded 2 days ago? Did you launch MX Conky and follow the directions on that pop-updialog box? I ask these questions because we fixed a lot of these issues with those updates.
2) How are you modifying that conky?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:12 pm
by mx65
I was trying the "DRAG" options and Conky never returned to his usual form. I have the updates to date.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:18 pm
by Jerry3904
The drag options only last for the session, as we say right on the MX Conky GUI.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:28 pm
by mx65
The truth, I do not know what to say, I do not know what the problem will be but my conky is no longer like the one I had when installing MX Linux.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:11 pm
by Jerry3904
We don't promise that everything will be perfect, we just try to give the users the tools. The ones we supply for default use are all in the MX-Default folder in ~/.conky/

If you have updated in the last 3 days, please try to use the one there and see what happens.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:38 pm
by skidoo
lowercase, and a less "stylized" font would improve readability
Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:43 pm
by dolphin_oracle
skidoo wrote:lowercase, and a less "stylized" font would improve readability
Image
I've got F1=Help right now...its not bad, but you may be right about the font.

which font did you use in the screenshot?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 9:49 pm
by golden45
Waiting for mx 17 beta 4 to see where we are going seems like there is lots of problems that have to be addressed

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:25 pm
by golden45
The mxlinux 17 beta 3 horizon 64 bit is great but the 32 bit is lagging .thanks john

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:34 pm
by golden45
Really happy that 32 bit is still available older computer like mine really save a lot of money .thanks john

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 12:05 am
by asqwerth
golden45 wrote:The mxlinux 17 beta 3 horizon 64 bit is great but the 32 bit is lagging .thanks john
It would be helpful if you could give more details to the Dev Team about "lagging":

- What is your hardware like? Type "inxi -F" in terminal, or in MX-Tools, click on "Quick System Info".
- What programs were you running?
- What are the things or effects you noticed that make you say that it is lagging?

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:40 am
by chrispop99
golden45 wrote:Waiting for mx 17 beta 4 to see where we are going seems like there is lots of problems that have to be addressed
There are very few bugs in beta 3 compared to what might be normally expected. There has been three alpha versions before even the first beta, so a huge amount of work already done.

There will be no further betas; the next testing release will be the first release candidate.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:15 pm
by golden45
golden45 wrote:System: Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.15.0-041500rc2-generic i686 bits: 32 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
Distro: MX-16.1_386 Metamorphosis 8 June 2017
Machine: Device: desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: P4SP-MX v: REV 1.xx serial: N/A
BIOS: Award v: ASUS P4SP-MX 1006 Beta 002 date: 04/14/2006
CPU: Single core Intel Pentium 4 (-HT-) cache: 1024 KB
clock speeds: max: 1994 MHz 1: 1994 MHz 2: 1994 MHz
Graphics: Card: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 65x/M650/740 PCI/AGP VGA Display Adapter
Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: vesa (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev)
Resolution: 1280x1024@0.00hz
OpenGL: renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.9, 128 bits) version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio: Card Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS7012 AC'97 Sound Controller driver: snd_intel8x0
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.15.0-041500rc2-generic
Network: Card: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 PCI Fast Ethernet driver: sis900
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: 00:11:2f:99:eb:dc
Drives: HDD Total Size: 30.8GB (26.8% used)
ID-1: /dev/sda model: Maxtor_6E030L0 size: 30.8GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 28G used: 7.6G (29%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
ID-2: swap-1 size: 0.10GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2
RAID: No RAID devices: /proc/mdstat, md_mod kernel module present
Sensors: None detected - is lm-sensors installed and configured?
Info: Processes: 162 Uptime: 1:29 Memory: 391.7/1980.4MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43
I'm still running november 16.1 upgrade-which I have installed the 4.15 kernel.
Can this old computer run 17 b3?I've had no success booting from the dvd I have downloaded twice burned to dvd with xburn.
Thanks john
I've also done a complete dist-upgrade to the stretch repos

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 5:57 pm
by darth.severus
Got this error here, Python3 seems generally to be a bit cut down, there's no pip either!
>>> help()
...
To get a list of available modules, keywords, symbols, or topics, type
"modules", "keywords", "symbols", or "topics". Each module also comes
with a one-line summary of what it does; to list the modules whose name
or summary contain a given string such as "spam", type "modules spam".

help> modules

Please wait a moment while I gather a list of all available modules...

Error: Could not import kivy. Please install it using theinstructions mentioned here `http://kivy.org/#download` .

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:50 pm
by timkb4cq
In general, programming languages included in MX only include the core and modules brought in by other packages. The python3-all package doesn't pull in python3-kivy or python3-pip but both are easy to install from the standard repos.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:12 pm
by Stevo
golden45 wrote:
golden45 wrote:System: Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.15.0-041500rc2-generic i686 bits: 32 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
Distro: MX-16.1_386 Metamorphosis 8 June 2017
Machine: Device: desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: P4SP-MX v: REV 1.xx serial: N/A
BIOS: Award v: ASUS P4SP-MX 1006 Beta 002 date: 04/14/2006
CPU: Single core Intel Pentium 4 (-HT-) cache: 1024 KB
clock speeds: max: 1994 MHz 1: 1994 MHz 2: 1994 MHz
Graphics: Card: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 65x/M650/740 PCI/AGP VGA Display Adapter
Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: vesa (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev)
Resolution: 1280x1024@0.00hz
OpenGL: renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.9, 128 bits) version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio: Card Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS7012 AC'97 Sound Controller driver: snd_intel8x0
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.15.0-041500rc2-generic
Network: Card: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 PCI Fast Ethernet driver: sis900
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: 00:11:2f:99:eb:dc
Drives: HDD Total Size: 30.8GB (26.8% used)
ID-1: /dev/sda model: Maxtor_6E030L0 size: 30.8GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 28G used: 7.6G (29%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
ID-2: swap-1 size: 0.10GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2
RAID: No RAID devices: /proc/mdstat, md_mod kernel module present
Sensors: None detected - is lm-sensors installed and configured?
Info: Processes: 162 Uptime: 1:29 Memory: 391.7/1980.4MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43
I'm still running november 16.1 upgrade-which I have installed the 4.15 kernel.
Can this old computer run 17 b3?I've had no success booting from the dvd I have downloaded twice burned to dvd with xburn.
Thanks john
I've also done a complete dist-upgrade to the stretch repos
Can we really call it MX if you're using an Ubuntu kernel? I also suspect that SIS integrated graphics, maybe you can add a dedicated graphics card for next to nothing.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:51 pm
by golden45
Your right I could try a dedicated graphics card.I experimented with mx 16 to show what you can do with such a great distro as mx 16 using my old system and applying packages from other systems.I can boot from 17b3 dvd but it goes to cli-installer then stops.Thanks for your answer john

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 8:53 pm
by golden45
golden45 wrote:Your right I could try a dedicated graphics card.I experimented with mx 16 to show what you can do with such a great distro as mx 16 using my old system and applying packages from other systems.I can boot from 17b3 dvd but it goes to cli-installer then stops.Thanks for your answer john
I have a graphics card I can install and try.

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:08 pm
by dolphin_oracle
golden45 wrote:
golden45 wrote:Your right I could try a dedicated graphics card.I experimented with mx 16 to show what you can do with such a great distro as mx 16 using my old system and applying packages from other systems.I can boot from 17b3 dvd but it goes to cli-installer then stops.Thanks for your answer john
I have a graphics card I can install and try.
with 17, you may want to try the failsafe graphics options. these should be visible on the RC release, coming up very soon (they are missing on b3).

Re: MX-17 Beta 3 Feedback

Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2017 8:26 am
by richb
With MX-17 RC1 released this thread is being closed. Please post bugs and comments in the RC1 Feedback thread.

viewtopic.php?f=94&t=43428