Page 9 of 142
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 6:28 am
by Jerry3904
Very handsome! One of the main attractions of MXFB for me is that the user has nearly complete control.
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 6:36 am
by wdscharff
Current desktop in constant progress

Original
https://web57.ws/test/2020-0628.jpg
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 7:42 am
by Jerry3904
Very nice--love the exit-actions bar!
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 1:04 pm
by AA BB
One of the main attractions of MXFB for me is that the user has nearly complete control.
AMEN Jerry !!
MXFB is the best user interface I've ever used, I personally have no need for MX XFCE anymore.
Can MXFB replace MX 100% or is FB set up so that it must have XFCE in the background ?
The MXFB team has puts lots of development effort into FB, IMHO this team should consider copyrighting MXFB so that big, for-profit corporations can`t snatch it away under the guise of it being in the 'public domain'
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 1:06 pm
by Jerry3904
MXFB needs Xfce beneath it, with which it is "completely integrated"
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2020 3:58 pm
by ceeslans
Hmmmm... MXFB may well need Xfce beneath it - but it is definitely possible to remove Xfce, including most of its components and applications. I have done so - if only to see how 'lean & mean' MX-fluxbox could get.
Replaced Thunar for Xfe, xfce4-terminal for roxTerm, xfce4-screenshooter for antiX-screenshot, xfce4-appfinder for fbmenugen, and xfce4-notify for dunst, just to name a few. With it, most of Xfce's core components could be removed. I kept some specific Xfce core components installed, like exo-utils, which automatically draw in a number of xfce4 dependencies, such as libxfce4util,libxfce4ui, xfconf and related libs. Most of the MX-tools can still be used (only MX-Tweak is really skinny now,,,).
Ultimately I ended up with fluxbox running as default/single session. Right now, the system (with 1-2 scripted conky's running) idles at approx 240-250 mb at bootup, Not bad for an amd64 system with 6gb ram...
Still, I must agree with Jerry that MXFB in its released form needs Xfce as its solid base. MXFB's jewel shines because of the Xfce integration. And I would certainly advise NOT to start hacking away, as you may easily end up with a broken system...
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:35 pm
by PPC

Yes, this is pure MXFB 18.3 , without any dock, just idesk running...
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:26 pm
by ceeslans
my July screenshot.
Am running an mx-dock from startup for the first time :)
It does consume an additional ~30mb.... (but hey, the system can handle that)
note the customized icons - and the non-default background/border colors (using #151515 color) of the dock.

Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:54 pm
by Jerry3904
Great treatment of the dock, glad to see you using it. And what a nice "Exit" icon...
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 1:19 pm
by andyprough
ceeslans wrote: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:26 pm
my July screenshot.
Am running an mx-dock from startup for the first time :)
It does consume an additional ~30mb.... (but hey, the system can handle that)
note the customized icons - and the non-default background/border colors (using #151515 color) of the dock.
Wow, that's really good looking. You could put that up against any major bloated desktop for good looks.