Page 1 of 1

MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:18 am
by dolphin_oracle
MX-17 beta 1 images are now available for download and testing.

direct download:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/mx-lin ... X17/beta1/

torrents:
32bit http://linuxtracker.org/download.php?id ... rent&key=0

64bit http://linuxtracker.org/download.php?id ... rent&key=0

The beta 1 features the following :

  • latest live system changes and fixes from the antiX project
  • the latest updates from debian (stretch)
  • 4.9.0-4 kernels (alphas featured 4.9.0-3)
  • the 32 bit iso has a PAE kernel. The non-pae has been removed.
  • updated packages, including libreoffice 5.4.1
  • new and updated mx-apps
  • mx-tweak replaces mx-defaultlook and provides one-stop spot for simple compositor (Xfce or Compton), panel, and other "tweak" type changes
  • mx-conky provides a method for doing simple edits to conky files (color changes, etc...)
  • mx-network-assistanct replaces mx-broadcom-manager as a general purpose network troubleshooting tool.
  • mx-tools now has a larger interface
  • changes to the update mananger (apt-notifier), including new themes available in preferences
  • misc. changes to most of the other mx-apps
  • the applications menu now has a mx-tools submenu to help organize the menu a little bit.
  • gthumb replaces shotwell and mirage (both still available in mx-packageinstaller)
  • featherpad, a qt-based text editor with tabbed interface and code markup, replaces leafpad.
  • new art work and icons (current wallpaper is not final, just being used for beta 1 release)
  • several pre-packaged conky configurations (see conky-manager to change and select)
Known Issues
  • The manual has not yet been updated for MX-17.
  • Translations are not yet complete for the new mx-apps and some are still being updated.
  • Some testers during alpha reported shutdown problems when using the encrypted home option. We have included a fix, but it has received limited testing.

Please post conky comments here: The MX-17 conkies

If posting hardware issues, please post the output of the terminal command "inxi -F" at a minimum.

If posting nvidia-installer issues, please post the contents of /var/log/ddm.log.

If posting remaster issues, please include the contents of /var/log/live/live-remaster.log



Thank you!



Dolphin Oracle (on behalf of the MX dev team).

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:05 am
by stsoh
remastercc can't end, after 100% progress, endless running. i haven't cancel it yet, it is still running for 20 mins as i wrote this. maybe i use becoz yumi multi-boot live on usb but mx16.1 don't have any problem with remastercc.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:13 am
by BitJam
@stsoh, please make a copy of /var/log/live/live-remaster.log and attach it. We had one report of this problem in antiX-17 but the devs were not able to reproduce it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:17 am
by dolphin_oracle
BitJam wrote:@stsoh, please make a copy of /var/log/live/live-remaster.log and attach it. We had one report of this problem in antiX-17 but the devs were not able to reproduce it.
@BitJam - just so you know, the live-remaster script is the same as what's on the antiX github, so hopefully we can solve this for both systems.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:23 am
by stsoh
attached live-remaster.log

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:38 am
by chrispop99
During Alpha testing, there was a problem where installing with 'home' encryption prevented normal shutdown completion, hanging at 'Stopping remaining crypto disks...'.

This was resolved, and I tested the fix successfully. However, I've just installed Beta 1 on two machines, enabling 'home' encryption, and the failure to shutdown has returned.

One of the machines was the one I used to successfully test this in Alpha, so I don't think it's a hardware issue.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:02 pm
by BitJam
@chrispop99, there is a bug in the sendsigs script that was released. Please edit /etc/init.d/sendsigs as root and change line 34 to:

Code: Select all

    for pid in $(pgrep "$PROTECT_LIST"); do
(remove the "-f")

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:16 pm
by dolphin_oracle
dang it, grabbed the wrong ones.... noted for b2.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:52 pm
by entropyfoe
When will beta1 or beta2 be public betas?
Available for download, testing, and reports?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:57 pm
by dolphin_oracle
entropyfoe wrote:When will beta1 or beta2 be public betas?
Available for download, testing, and reports?
its public now, in the wide open.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:02 pm
by entropyfoe
Where to download?
The notice at the top of the board...
MX-17 beta 1 release info hereMX-17 beta 1 release info here
When I click...
Says I am not authorized to view that forum.

Now I have my antix 17 back up and running, I am ready for a new testing session.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:04 pm
by dolphin_oracle
ok that's weird.

Here's the blog post with the announcement info .

https://mxlinux.org/mx-17-beta-1

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:13 pm
by entropyfoe
Thanks, I will download and test.
Hopefully tonight. I have several machines I can test...

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:57 pm
by chrispop99
BitJam wrote:@chrispop99, there is a bug in the sendsigs script that was released. Please edit /etc/init.d/sendsigs as root and change line 34 to:

Code: Select all

    for pid in $(pgrep "$PROTECT_LIST"); do
(remove the "-f")
Yep, that's fixed it!

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:06 pm
by Stevo
This isn't restricted to MX 17, but I scaled up the desktop icon size on the live session to see if the "Installer" text would stop being ellipsisized, plus I have an HDPI 1080 screen and like bigger icons, and the installer icon changed to a generic text icon. So it's not scalable. I don't know what's a better solution, an SVG icon or pngs in a range of sizes.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:13 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Stevo wrote:This isn't restricted to MX 17, but I scaled up the desktop icon size on the live session to see if the "Installer" text would stop being ellipsisized, plus I have an HDPI 1080 screen and like bigger icons, and the installer icon changed to a generic text icon. So it's not scalable. I don't know what's a better solution, an SVG icon or pngs in a range of sizes.
semi-related - mx-tweak now has a function for allowing longer file names on the desktop (no ellipses).

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:14 pm
by dr-kart
:confused: Which way should I look at with my wifi network manager connection failure.
(details are viewtopic.php?f=77&t=43184)
Has new mx-network-assistant anything to do with it?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:19 pm
by Jerry3904
Sorry, we've been pretty busy with the new release and haven't had time to get back to your question.

The MX Network Assistant is not causing it, if that's what you mean. That screenshot was confusing, though, since it showed nothing at all yet you say the hardware is working.

Can you show us a bit more with these as regular user:

Code: Select all

lsusb | grep -i net
lspci | grep -i net 
and this as root:

Code: Select all

iwconfig

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:53 pm
by dr-kart

'dmesg | tail' gives interesting sequence on that issue like
send auth to ...
authenticated
aborting authentication with ... by local choice (Reason: 3=DEAUTH_LEAVING)

Thanks to D_O
it works with workaround https://github.com/qca/open-ath9k-htc-f ... issues/132

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:13 pm
by Jerry3904
That is interesting and, if you do a web search on the error message (3=DEAUTH_LEAVING), there are hits all over on it. Here's a couple to look at:

https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2259037
https://superuser.com/questions/974017/ ... then-drops

I don't know enough about this to help much more, but others here probably do.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:29 pm
by Shay2
Have admit, I have no idea how to fix the error. See attachment.
Installed to a SSD.

Code: Select all

 inxi -Fxz
System:    Host: mx17b1 Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 gcc: 6.3.0
           Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3 (Gtk 2.24.31) Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: Dell product: Latitude E6430 v: 01 serial: N/A
           Mobo: Dell model: 0H3MT5 v: A00 serial: N/A BIOS: Dell v: A17 date: 08/19/2015
Battery    BAT0: charge: 99.9 Wh 145.4% condition: 68.7/99.9 Wh (69%)
           model: LGC-LGC3.0 DELL J7KGM29 status: Full
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core i5-3320M (-HT-MCP-) arch: Ivy Bridge rev.9 cache: 3072 KB
           flags: (lm nx sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx) bmips: 10366
           clock speeds: max: 3300 MHz 1: 1242 MHz 2: 1512 MHz 3: 1392 MHz 4: 1253 MHz
Graphics:  Card-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller bus-ID: 00:02.0
           Card-2: NVIDIA GF108GLM [NVS 5200M] bus-ID: 01:00.0
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 )
           drivers: modesetting,nouveau (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1600x900@59.99hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ivybridge Mobile
           version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6 Direct Render: Yes
Audio:     Card Intel 7 Series/C216 Family High Def. Audio Controller
           driver: snd_hda_intel bus-ID: 00:1b.0
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Intel 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection
           driver: e1000e v: 3.2.6-k port: f060 bus-ID: 00:19.0
           IF: eno1 state: down mac: <filter>
           Card-2: Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 driver: iwlwifi bus-ID: 03:00.0
           IF: wlp3s0 state: up mac: <filter>
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 120.0GB (7.6% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: SSD2SC120G1CS175 size: 120.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 106G used: 4.4G (5%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.69GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 54.0C mobo: N/A gpu: 49.0
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 203 Uptime: 5 min Memory: 956.7/7893.3MB
           Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 6.3.0 Client: Shell (bash 4.4.121) inxi: 2.3.43 

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:38 pm
by BitJam
@Shay2, I'm not certain but there may be a bug in the installer if you pick the user name "demo". It's possible this was fixed a while ago. Or it may just be a figment of my imagination.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:11 pm
by Stevo
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Stevo wrote:This isn't restricted to MX 17, but I scaled up the desktop icon size on the live session to see if the "Installer" text would stop being ellipsisized, plus I have an HDPI 1080 screen and like bigger icons, and the installer icon changed to a generic text icon. So it's not scalable. I don't know what's a better solution, an SVG icon or pngs in a range of sizes.
semi-related - mx-tweak now has a function for allowing longer file names on the desktop (no ellipses).
Yes, I was testing that, but they still get truncated if the icon is too small, so that's why the scaling up.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:13 pm
by Shay2
@ BitJam
Not the name I used. Was sure surprised to see it pop up whenever I boot up or reboot.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:16 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Shay2 wrote:@ BitJam
Not the name I used. Was sure surprised to see it pop up whenever I boot up or reboot.
did you "save home changes" when you installed? and what app is that?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:25 pm
by Adrian
Installer does some string replacements when it renames demo to whatever name the users chooses, I wonder if it fails for blueman-services.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:28 pm
by BitJam
@shay2, in your home directory try running this command and see if anything interesting shows up:

Code: Select all

grep demo $(find . -type f)
My guess is something got configured when you were running live, the configuration hard coded "/home/demo" in a file and now it is giving you trouble. The above command might point us to the configuration file.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:40 pm
by Shay2

Code: Select all

$ grep demo $(find . -type f)
grep: ./.mozilla/firefox/Crash: No such file or directory
grep: Reports/InstallTime20171024165158: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/CPU: No such file or directory
grep: Panel: No such file or directory
grep: (2-core).jpg: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/CPU: No such file or directory
grep: Panel: No such file or directory
grep: (6-core): No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/Process: No such file or directory
grep: Panel.jpg: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/CPU: No such file or directory
grep: Panel: No such file or directory
grep: (6-core).jpg: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/Process: No such file or directory
grep: Panel: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/CPU: No such file or directory
grep: Panel: No such file or directory
grep: (2-core): No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/CPU: No such file or directory
grep: Panel: No such file or directory
grep: (4-core): No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-TeejeeTech/CPU: No such file or directory
grep: Panel: No such file or directory
grep: (4-core).jpg: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/bg.png: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/SysInfo: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/SysInfo.png: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/bg2.png: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/Clock.png: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/fonts/Caviar_Dreams.ttf: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/fonts/Caviar_Dreams_Bold.ttf: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/Clock: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Torn: No such file or directory
grep: Paper: No such file or directory
grep: Clone/source.txt: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Asq/infini/Creative: No such file or directory
grep: Commons: No such file or directory
grep: Attribution-No: No such file or directory
grep: Derivative: No such file or directory
grep: Works.txt: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-Asq/MX-Clock/infini/Creative: No such file or directory
grep: Commons: No such file or directory
grep: Attribution-No: No such file or directory
grep: Derivative: No such file or directory
grep: Works.txt: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-core: No such file or directory
grep: blue/conkyrc2core: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-core: No such file or directory
grep: blue/weather: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-core: No such file or directory
grep: blue/weather_raw: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-core: No such file or directory
grep: blue/conkyrc2core.png: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-core: No such file or directory
grep: blue/clock01_rings.lua: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-core: No such file or directory
grep: blue/fonts/AvantGarde_LT_Medium.ttf: No such file or directory
grep: ./.conky/MX-core: No such file or directory
grep: blue/fonts/Radio_Space.ttf: No such file or directory
Binary file ./.cache/mozilla/firefox/v1ja4c0v.default/cache2/entries/C3BE29F53D0514D14F659CF4CE5E51338BC65568 matches
grep: ./.config/autostart/keyboard: No such file or directory
grep: switcher.desktop: No such file or directory
Binary file ./.config/dconf/user matches

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:54 pm
by BitJam
Opps. I wasn't expecting spaces in file names. That's why there are so many error messages. This command should work better:

Code: Select all

 find .  -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep demo
Coming at it from the other direction, did you ever try to connect a bluetooth device?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:00 pm
by Shay2
Blue tooth, never.

Code: Select all

$  find .  -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep demo
Binary file ./.cache/mozilla/firefox/v1ja4c0v.default/cache2/entries/C3BE29F53D0514D14F659CF4CE5E51338BC65568 matches
./.bash_history:grep demo $(find . -type f)
Binary file ./.config/dconf/user matches

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:24 pm
by Shay2
Started getting more errors, so I re-installed with Time Zone selected and did not save desktop changes.
I see no errors yet, which is nice.

Prefer antix conky. Much prefer it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:47 pm
by Jerry3904
Prefer antix conky. Much prefer it.
You can use it on MX, of course. It'd be kind of interesting to see how it worked.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:35 pm
by CaputAlista
I am using mx 17beta1 LIVE HD in a specific partition. I do not have access as a common user to the folder / Live that is in the partition with a lot of space. The folder /home /demo / Live-usb-storage / is created automatically and is on the ram and is very small.
Please could you make SOMETHING in the iso so that you had permission to write, Thanks.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:41 pm
by Shay2
You can use it on MX, of course. It'd be kind of interesting to see how it worked
It worked great in prior version.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:47 pm
by dolphin_oracle
CaputAlista wrote:I am using mx 17beta1 LIVE HD in a specific partition. I do not have access as a common user to the folder / Live that is in the partition with a lot of space. The folder /home /demo / Live-usb-storage / is created automatically and is on the ram and is very small.
Please could you make SOMETHING in the iso so that you had permission to write, Thanks.
On a live usb, /home/dem/live-usb-storage accesses the remainder of the space on the device that the iso is created on.

How did you make your hd partiton into a live device?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:56 pm
by CaputAlista
title MX
rootnoverify (hd0,7) -----partition in external hd
find --set-root /win81/isos/MX.iso
map /win81/isos/MX.iso (0xff)
map --hook
kernel (hd0,7)/antiX/vmlinuz
initrd (hd0,7)/antiX/initrd.gz
boot

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:58 pm
by CaputAlista
the initrd or vmlinuxz maybe configure the previlges

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:48 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Actually you are booting a readonly file system. Basically a dvd on your disk. I doubt the live-usb storage feature is being enabled this way, which is why it shows up the way it does.

I honestly don't know how to deal with that. A frugal install onto your partition would be closer to what you want i think.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:46 pm
by BitJam
CaputAlista wrote:I am using mx 17beta1 LIVE HD in a specific partition. I do not have access as a common user to the folder / Live that is in the partition with a lot of space. The folder /home /demo / Live-usb-storage / is created automatically and is on the ram and is very small.
Please could you make SOMETHING in the iso so that you had permission to write, Thanks.
We allow you to boot directly from an iso file but as you are seeing, doing so disables almost all of our special features. The same restrictions would occur if you used "dd" to make a live-usb or if you booted from a live-dvd.

As dolphin_oracle said, you may be able to do a frugal install to that partition which would give you easy access to all of that space. If you have a usb stick handy then you should be able to use live-usb-maker (command line or gui) to clone your current live system to that usb stick and make it a live-usb. You will have all of the special features available on that live-usb. If you want them available on the hard drive then boot the live-usb and do a frugal install (via the F5 Persist menu in the legacy bootloader or via a text menu selection in the live uefi bootloader) to that partition. It should put everything it needs in a single directory on that partition with a name like "antiX-Frugal-4.9.0-4-amd64". It will boot directly into the frugal install when you do it. Better still, it will create a file called "grub.entry" in that directory that you can add to your grub.cfg to boot into the frugal install.

Summary:
  1. Boot into your current MX-17.b1 system, insert a usb stick and run live-usb-maker
  2. Boot from the live-usb you just created and do a frugal install to the HD partition.
  3. Copy the file "grub.entry" file into your grub.cfg
You may even be able to do the frugal install directly when you boot your current MX-17.b1 system but we offer no guarantees that it will work.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:49 pm
by Stevo
Used the live-usb-maker in MX 16 to create a live USB from the x64 beta 1 iso.

My Acer E-15 E5-575G-53VG would not boot from this USB until I switched off UEFI and went to legacy boot, in contrast to MX 16, which had the liveUSB boot with both UEFI and Secure Boot enabled.

Once I got it to boot, I got the black error box on the GRUB wallpaper that Jerry showed. Escaping that, I got to the text screen where I could type "live", and then the boot proceeding normally. I installed to a 10 GB scratch partition. The installer icon scaled correctly here when I increased its size, so maybe that was a false alarm. I did not install GRUB, since I will use the GRUB from the main MX 16 install.

After rebooting to MX 16 and running update-grub, I rebooted MX 17 normally. It's running the modesetting driver for the Skylake 520 Intel video. As in stock MX 16, there is some video tearing when scrolling text in Firefox. The compositor makes no difference with this. If I can't get the tearfree option to work with a 20-intel.conf file using the modesetting driver, I'll try with the xorg intel 915 driver that fixed it in MX 16.

I see we are using the same predictable, yet complex, network interface names that standard Stretch is using.

Code: Select all

ifconfig -a
shows them if you have to let something know what interface to monitor.
I ran the Nvidia driver installer for the Optimus Nvidia graphics. After a reboot, "optirun inxi -G" showed that the Bumblebee switching was working (unlike some people on the Debian forum that had to go to a backports kernel to get it to work...maybe the kernel, maybe PEBKAC)

I also saw that the Nvidia settings program now shows up in the XFCE settings manager, and actually opens up without some obscure flags, unlike MX 16. However, if this creates an xorg.conf file that specifies Nvidia, that'll nuke my GUI, since Optimus uses the Intel GPU for display. I haven't tested that yet, but will do so soon.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:29 pm
by BitJam
@stevo, unfortunately, there are two versions of MX-17.b1_x64.iso. The live legacy bootloader (syslinux with gfxboot, not Grub) was fixed in the latest version so it sounds like you used the earlier version. I used live-usb-maker to make a live-usb from this iso file:

Code: Select all

b61af97f7a17032f70fef68a2626fb76  MX-17.b1_x64.iso
I was able to boot UEFI in secure boot mode on a Dell XPS-13 and on an Acer-ES1-511. The legacy syslinux bootloader also worked as expected on both systems.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:25 am
by m_pav
I tested the sendsigs fix on my finniky Lenovo E330 and got a clean shutdown. Before testing, I set my bios to EFI boot only, no legacy and had a blank un-initialised SSD to start with. Created a Beta 1 64-bit flash drive and booted without issue.

Install with auto-partition, encryption selected for /home and swap, grub installed to ESP, installation was very quick and rebooted to a nice clean desktop. Swapped out sendsigs and rebooted, no hanging at shutdown, rebooted cleanly every time. Rechecked 3 more times, no hangs at shutdown. Swapped back to the sendsigs provided with Beta1 and immediate hang on shutdown.

Contents of the diff output between the 2 sendsig files below

Code: Select all

16c16
< PROTECT_LIST="^(mount.|ntfs-3g|wpa_supplicant|udevd|systemd-udevd)"
---
> PROTECT_LIST="^(/sbin/mount.ntfs|mount.ntfs|mount.fuse|mount.cifs|ntfs-3g|/sbin/mount.ntfs-3g|rpcbind|/sbin/wpa_supplicant|udevd|systemd-udevd)"
30,40d29
< 
<     local live_prog full_live live_dir=/live
<     read live_dir 2>/dev/null < /etc/live/live-dir
<     for live_prog in live-umount umount-live; do
<         full_live=$live_dir/bin/$live_prog
<         [ -x $full_live ] || continue
<         # Don't use exec here so the rest of sendsigs code runs
<         $full_live --run-scripts </dev/console >/dev/console
<         break
<     done
< 
43c32
<     #pgrep  "$PROTECT_LIST"
---
>     #pgrep -f "$PROTECT_LIST"
45c34
<     for pid in $(pgrep "$PROTECT_LIST"); do
---
>     for pid in $(pgrep -f "$PROTECT_LIST"); do
48a38,47
>     echo "omit list: " $OMITPIDS
> 
> 	for omitfile in /run/sendsigs.omit; do
> 		if [ -e $omitfile ]; then
> 			for pid in $(cat $omitfile); do
> 				OMITPIDS="${OMITPIDS:+$OMITPIDS }-o $pid"
> 			done
> 		fi
> 	done
> 
89d87
< 

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:30 am
by m_pav
Remaster failure running from live-usb, I was trying to remaster the sendsigs into a bootable USB to see if that would help with accessing encrypted partitions from a live boot device.
I lost my logfile, but kept a screenshot.
Remaster-stall.png

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:35 am
by m_pav
Grab handles on screen borders can be a bit hard to grab. Has the padding been applied as per earlier versions?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:17 am
by stsoh
m_pav wrote:Remaster failure running from live-usb,....
i had the same problem, highlighted earlier. apparently there two versions of mx17-b1 (mentioned by bitjam).
the mx17-b1 version, i downloaded is from sourceforge (had the same md5/sig as bitjam), the other must be either from mxlinux webpage or linuxtracker.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:37 am
by FredBezies
Some feedbacks on MX 17 beta1

I tested quickly MX17 beta1 in VirtualBox, and here are my feedbacks. Not a lot of them, but the ones that jumped to my eyes.

1) There is no icons in LibreOffice by default. When you go to LibreOffice options and appearance section, you can read that icon theme is on "helpimg" by default.

2) I cannot install any single translation package using simplified MX installer applications. Terminal windows is opening, and no matter which repository I select (either stable or mx repo), nothing is done.

I had to use Synaptic and install missing packages by hand.

3) After mx update has finished its work, you can see a menu with all its options. You cannot exit it without clicking on quit option :(

I know this is not a big list, but besides this, I did not see or face any big bugs.

Hope it helps!

Have a good day.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:01 am
by dolphin_oracle
FredBezies wrote:Some feedbacks on MX 17 beta1

I tested quickly MX17 beta1 in VirtualBox, and here are my feedbacks. Not a lot of them, but the ones that jumped to my eyes.

1) There is no icons in LibreOffice by default. When you go to LibreOffice options and appearance section, you can read that icon theme is on "helpimg" by default.

2) I cannot install any single translation package using simplified MX installer applications. Terminal windows is opening, and no matter which repository I select (either stable or mx repo), nothing is done.

I had to use Synaptic and install missing packages by hand.

3) After mx update has finished its work, you can see a menu with all its options. You cannot exit it without clicking on quit option :(

I know this is not a big list, but besides this, I did not see or face any big bugs.

Hope it helps!

Have a good day.
Thanks!

was libreoffice set to "helpimg", or to "(automatic) helpimg"?

the default is supposed to be galaxy, which is what it is on my system here, but you are not the first person to report that particular bug.


***edit*** its a bug in libreoffice 5.4 series. (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/sho ... ?id=108406) helpimg isn't even actually a theme.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:03 am
by CaputAlista
hellow Mr Bit jam. i am the guy that you help directly with initr file custom. In mx15 only create a directory live and the other version create live usb folder and live folder. But live usb folder has permission and live not. usb live folder is small. and if i download file is small.
mx 15 works.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:07 am
by dr-kart
'Edit as Root' option is not working in thunar.
"Open root Thunar here' is functioning.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:34 am
by richb
dr-kart wrote:'Edit as Root' option is not working in thunar.
"Open root Thunar here' is functioning.
Confirmed. An oversight. Go to Edit>Configure Custom actions and double click on Edit as Root. Change leafpad to featherpad.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:38 am
by Jerry3904
Thanks, I confirm that. The custom action needs to be changed. Thunar > Edit > Configure custom actions. Click on the Edit as Root entry and the the pencil icon to edit, change "leafpad" to "featherpad"

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:47 am
by FredBezies
dolphin_oracle wrote:[reports]

Thanks!

was libreoffice set to "helpimg", or to "(automatic) helpimg"?

the default is supposed to be galaxy, which is what it is on my system here, but you are not the first person to report that particular bug.


***edit*** its a bug in libreoffice 5.4 series. (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/sho ... ?id=108406) helpimg isn't even actually a theme.
It is (automatic) helpimg. And also this is not my theme on my archlinux installation. Nasty bug, indeed.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:49 am
by dolphin_oracle
FredBezies wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:[reports]

Thanks!

was libreoffice set to "helpimg", or to "(automatic) helpimg"?

the default is supposed to be galaxy, which is what it is on my system here, but you are not the first person to report that particular bug.


***edit*** its a bug in libreoffice 5.4 series. (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/sho ... ?id=108406) helpimg isn't even actually a theme.
It is (automatic) helpimg. And also this is not my theme on my archlinux installation. Nasty bug, indeed.
thanks for confirming.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:51 am
by cyrilus31
Jerry3904 wrote:Thanks, I confirm that. The custom action needs to be changed. Thunar > Edit > Configure custom actions. Click on the Edit as Root entry and the the pencil icon to edit, change "leafpad" to "featherpad"
And custom actions are untranslated in MX for a long time (translations are available since at least 2015)

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:09 am
by Jerry3904
Other French localization problems (tested LIVE) for the record:

1) during first part of boot, starts in FR but when that switch occurs text goes back to EN
2) FR flag appears in NA, but only one keyboard is activated so it should not appear
3) menu > MX Tools: Tweak has no name or description, Repo Manager no name, and Conky no description
4) the MX Tools Help buttons open the EN version in FF

Some of this we know about already

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:34 am
by dolphin_oracle
For the FR keyboard stuff, output of the following commands would be helpfull.

Code: Select all

cat /etc/default/keyboard

grep XKBLAYOUT /etc/default/keyboard | grep ,

grep XkbDisable /home/$USER/.config/xfce4/xfconf/xfce-perchannel-xml/keyboard-layout.xml |grep false

grep XkbVariant /home/$USER/.config/xfce4/xfconf/xfce-perchannel-xml/keyboard-layout.xml |grep ,

grep XkbLayout /home/$USER/.config/xfce4/xfconf/xfce-perchannel-xml/keyboard-layout.xml |grep ,

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:39 am
by cyrilus31
There are many typos, missing translations (in fact existing but not integrated). I will try to make a summary if that can help.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:47 am
by dolphin_oracle
cyrilus31 wrote:There are many typos, missing translations (in fact existing but not integrated). I will try to make a summary if that can help.
feel free.

I should mention that in the case of the custom actions in thunar, Xfce does not have a built in way to provide localization of those items.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:51 am
by Jerry3904
One other thing on the FR LIVE screen: the menu items under some of the Functions listed at the bottom have "off" or "none" after FR selected and everything else switches.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:20 am
by BitJam
Jerry3904 wrote:Other French localization problems (tested LIVE) for the record:

1) during first part of boot, starts in FR but when that switch occurs text goes back to EN
Which switch? The custom antiX/MX part of the live boot should be translated but the Debian stuff is not. Perhaps this is what you are seeing.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:34 am
by entropyfoe
Looks very good so far ! At the level of a Warren Woodford beta.

I downloaded from source forge, the md5 was good. I then burned to a USB with the Antix tools.
The boot to the live session was smooth. All seemed to be working. eth0 detected and works OTB. Sound works OTB, without having to select the generic. Videos play in youtube. I could access my data drive, so I installed over my MX16.1 . It was fast fromthe USB.

All things above are still working. Samba picked up the window share, and I could log into that (with the windows password).
Sleep mode works and wakes up quickly. I updated grub, and the antix 17 install is picked up correctly, and I can boot to that.
I added a bunch of packages with synaptic, all working so far (audacity, scid, eboard, k3b, ksnip...many more)

As for the big conky, a bit too big for me. I really like the antix conky, off to the side, less intrusive.

Code: Select all

$ inxi -F
System:    Host: Ryzen Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: PRIME X370-PRO v: Rev X.0x serial: N/A
           UEFI [Legacy]: American Megatrends v: 0902 date: 09/08/2017
CPU:       Hexa core AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Six-Core (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           clock speeds: max: 3600 MHz 1: 2200 MHz 2: 2200 MHz 3: 2200 MHz 4: 2200 MHz
           5: 2200 MHz 6: 2200 MHz 7: 2200 MHz 8: 2200 MHz 9: 2200 MHz 10: 2200 MHz 11: 2200 MHz
           12: 2200 MHz
Graphics:  Card: NVIDIA GK208 [GeForce GT 710B]
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 )
           drivers: nouveau (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Gallium 0.4 on NV106 version: 4.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card-1 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device 1457 driver: snd_hda_intel
           Card-2 NVIDIA GK208 HDMI/DP Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network:   Card: Intel I211 Gigabit Network Connection driver: igb
           IF: enp38s0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 2250.5GB (29.4% used)
           ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 model: Samsung_SSD_960_EVO_250GB size: 250.1GB
           ID-2: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD2002FAEX size: 2000.4GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 39G used: 4.7G (13%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/nvme0n1p1
           ID-2: /home size: 73G used: 108M (1%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/nvme0n1p3
           ID-3: swap-1 size: 17.83GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/nvme0n1p2
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: N/A mobo: N/A gpu: 41.0
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: 0
Info:      Processes: 287 Uptime: 11:08 Memory: 1070.0/16048.3MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:11 am
by Jerry3904
As for the big conky, a bit too big for me. I really like the antix conky, off to the side, less intrusive.
You mean we shouldn't use it for default? Just want to make sure that you realize there are over 35 conkies available, some of which are more technical and over to the side (and you can always move them anyway).

We're running a separate thread on the conkies, and would appreciate your input.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:43 am
by entropyfoe
I am still testing the beta 1. More stuff like USB sticks, USB hard disks with ntfs...so far it looks good. [Edited] Checked USB mounting, and external drive ntfs read and write. All were working.

I wonder for the developers, what goes into selecting the kernel version? MX-17 has the 4.9 kernel, while antix has the 4.10. What are the reasons for selecting one over the other? If I install an antix kernel into MX, what do I miss? What are the risks, of broken stuff. I am still testing my hardware, searching for that stability. I don't know if I should install the nvidia driver. In MX 16, that apparantly helped avoid mouse and KB freezes, but I haven't run this MX-17 long enough to see if it is stable under noveau.

<MODERATOR: I removed the conky comments since they have been duplicated in the other thread.>

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:59 pm
by NGIB
Installed on my Thinkpad X230 (all Intel) and it runs well. Added/removed some programs as I always do (all from repos) and then went to make a snapshot. The first time it aborted at about 35% and game a message that there isn't enough space available (there's over 45 GB). The next time it was at the end writing the ISO file when it also aborted due to not enough space.

Palemoon is also acting strange and has suddenly closed a number of times. If I try to import bookmarks from HTML it will close everytime.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:18 pm
by Stevo
BitJam wrote:@stevo, unfortunately, there are two versions of MX-17.b1_x64.iso. The live legacy bootloader (syslinux with gfxboot, not Grub) was fixed in the latest version so it sounds like you used the earlier version. I used live-usb-maker to make a live-usb from this iso file:

Code: Select all

b61af97f7a17032f70fef68a2626fb76  MX-17.b1_x64.iso
I was able to boot UEFI in secure boot mode on a Dell XPS-13 and on an Acer-ES1-511. The legacy syslinux bootloader also worked as expected on both systems.
Ahh, that's why. I used the very first deltas to create the iso files. I'm now using the zsync files to convert those to the standard releases.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:19 pm
by chrispop99
'Snapshot' failed on a legacy machine with the disk space error. (There is plenty of space!)

The last few lines of the output is attached.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:30 pm
by BitJam
chrispop99 wrote:'Snapshot' failed on a legacy machine with the disk space error. (There is plenty of space!)

The last few lines of the output is attached.
Thanks Chris! That log file was extremely useful! The out of disk space error message is bogus.

The problem is in iso-template.tgz. The file /boot/grub/efi.img is missing. It is used for UEFI booting on dd live-usbs. I may need to coordinate with dolphin_oracle (or others) on making iso-template.tgz.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:37 pm
by dolphin_oracle
BitJam wrote:
chrispop99 wrote:'Snapshot' failed on a legacy machine with the disk space error. (There is plenty of space!)

The last few lines of the output is attached.
Thanks Chris! That log file was extremely useful! The out of disk space error message is bogus.

The problem is in iso-template.tgz. The file /boot/grub/efi.img is missing. It is used for UEFI booting on dd live-usbs. I may need to coordinate with dolphin_oracle (or others) on making iso-template.tgz.
yep, I probably made the template wrong. but if that's all it is, we can issue an update for that one.

**edit** looking at things, I most certainly broke it when trying to incorporate that latest initrd. We will get it fixed.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:38 pm
by anticapitalista
Testing the 32 bit version on a Thinkpad laptop and in VBox. Screen is 15'. One I think that may have been missed.

Installer blurb in left hand pane is distorted. Font size too big, perhaps?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:45 pm
by Stevo
m_pav wrote:Grab handles on screen borders can be a bit hard to grab. Has the padding been applied as per earlier versions?
The only "window-managers" I know of on the ISO with fatter borders are the greybird-accessibilty one plus the two default-hdpi ones that are built into xfce-4.12. I'd like to get a few more into the ISO, myself.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:53 pm
by dolphin_oracle
anticapitalista wrote:Testing the 32 bit version on a Thinkpad laptop and in VBox. Screen is 15'. One I think that may have been missed.

Installer blurb in left hand pane is distorted. Font size too big, perhaps?
we've been trying to make the installer window resizable (it wasn't originally), and its caused some problems with that text box. sometimes just resizing the window will snap it back into place.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:55 pm
by Stevo
anticapitalista wrote:Testing the 32 bit version on a Thinkpad laptop and in VBox. Screen is 15'. One I think that may have been missed.

Installer blurb in left hand pane is distorted. Font size too big, perhaps?
Yes, I notice that myself. If I resize the installer window, that gets the text to wrap around correctly, though.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:04 pm
by Shay2
Opened conky manager and unchecked everything.

Copied .conkyrc from Antix to a thumbdrive, then copied to ~/home/my name/
Started it up and

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:27 pm
by richb
No need to double post. The post in the conky thread is sufficient.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 3:28 pm
by Shay2
richb wrote:No need to double post. The post in the conky thread is sufficient.
I goofed and posted here first. Sorry!

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:01 pm
by anticapitalista
Stevo wrote:
anticapitalista wrote:Testing the 32 bit version on a Thinkpad laptop and in VBox. Screen is 15'. One I think that may have been missed.

Installer blurb in left hand pane is distorted. Font size too big, perhaps?
Yes, I notice that myself. If I resize the installer window, that gets the text to wrap around correctly, though.
Yes, I saw that too, but ...

1. how many new users will know that 'trick' when installing MX to hard drive?
2. it shouldn't happen. So, maybe reverting the relevant changes made to the installer would be better.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:05 pm
by Stevo
Yes, something like that would certainly grate on a certain reviewer!

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:18 pm
by dolphin_oracle
anticapitalista wrote:
Stevo wrote:
anticapitalista wrote:Testing the 32 bit version on a Thinkpad laptop and in VBox. Screen is 15'. One I think that may have been missed.

Installer blurb in left hand pane is distorted. Font size too big, perhaps?
Yes, I notice that myself. If I resize the installer window, that gets the text to wrap around correctly, though.
Yes, I saw that too, but ...

1. how many new users will know that 'trick' when installing MX to hard drive?
2. it shouldn't happen. So, maybe reverting the relevant changes made to the installer would be better.
I've got a fix for it.

some of our users have HiDPI screens, and some of the text entry fields are too small unless we can resize the installer.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:36 pm
by richb
dolphin_oracle wrote:
anticapitalista wrote:
Stevo wrote:
Yes, I notice that myself. If I resize the installer window, that gets the text to wrap around correctly, though.
Yes, I saw that too, but ...

1. how many new users will know that 'trick' when installing MX to hard drive?
2. it shouldn't happen. So, maybe reverting the relevant changes made to the installer would be better.
I've got a fix for it.

some of our users have HiDPI screens, and some of the text entry fields are too small unless we can resize the installer.
Good as reverting should not be an option. I found the re-size a good option on the installer.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:56 pm
by Adrian
dolphin_oracle wrote:
anticapitalista wrote:Testing the 32 bit version on a Thinkpad laptop and in VBox. Screen is 15'. One I think that may have been missed.

Installer blurb in left hand pane is distorted. Font size too big, perhaps?
we've been trying to make the installer window resizable (it wasn't originally), and its caused some problems with that text box. sometimes just resizing the window will snap it back into place.
I could not replicate that on the build machine, I will have to test that a bit more, it might be something that show up in the Qt version of the MX17.

It should be something easy to fix once I figure out where the problem is, I appreciate that people are so cavalier with "let's revert", but it was a bit of a pain to make the installer resizeable, so I would not be so quick to revert.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:01 pm
by anticapitalista
cavalier to revert?

You forgot the
perhaps? and maybe

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:30 pm
by Adrian
Yeah, I always forget that.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:38 pm
by dolphin_oracle
chrispop99 wrote:'Snapshot' failed on a legacy machine with the disk space error. (There is plenty of space!)

The last few lines of the output is attached.

Chris
thanks to BJ, we have a updated mx-iso-template heading its way to tim for the repo.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:17 pm
by anticapitalista
Running 32 bit live in VBox, I noticed 2 instances of yad running using 34 MB RAM (root terminal type ps_mem.py). I haven't opened anything except the root terminal to type in ps_mem.py.

32 bit RAM usage is much, much higher than MX-16.1 (c360 MB compared to IIRC an idle of under 200MB for MX-16.1)

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:58 pm
by dolphin_oracle
anticapitalista wrote:Running 32 bit live in VBox, I noticed 2 instances of yad running using 34 MB RAM (root terminal type ps_mem.py). I haven't opened anything except the root terminal to type in ps_mem.py.

32 bit RAM usage is much, much higher than MX-16.1 (c360 MB compared to IIRC an idle of under 200MB for MX-16.1)
Probably the usb-Unmounter notification icon. That's the only yad thing running all the time.

64 bit useage is a lot higher too. although pretty close to what I've seen on debian with similar services running.

there is more stuff running in 17 vs 16.1, but not enough to account for the ram usage. some of this stuff is just heavier this go around.

a5 was worse on 64 bit. the b1 features a slightly newer kernel, and it helped ram usage a little (at least here).

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:20 pm
by dolphin_oracle
FredBezies wrote:Some feedbacks on MX 17 beta1

I tested quickly MX17 beta1 in VirtualBox, and here are my feedbacks. Not a lot of them, but the ones that jumped to my eyes.

2) I cannot install any single translation package using simplified MX installer applications. Terminal windows is opening, and no matter which repository I select (either stable or mx repo), nothing is done.

I had to use Synaptic and install missing packages by hand.


Have a good day.

thanks for trying these! I think its a problem with the libreoffice sets. We will get that updated (they worked with 5.2, but not with 5.3).

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:00 pm
by dolphin_oracle
sent fixed (I hope) language packs up for updates. I may have installed more language packs than the average person tonight.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:02 pm
by Jerry3904
That'll help!

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:50 pm
by Gordon Cooper
dolphin_oracle wrote:
FredBezies wrote:Some feedbacks on MX 17 beta1

thanks for trying these! I think its a problem with the libreoffice sets. We will get that updated (they worked with 5.2, but not with 5.4).
As I understand the present Libre Office situation, 5.3 is the stable version for most users. 5.4 is still being developed and perhaps
not suitable as an MX default application.

However, I am using LO 5.4.2.2 without (yet) any problems.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:44 am
by vamsi
Installed Mx-17 Beta 1 on my system

Code: Select all

System:    Host: cherubim Kernel: 4.9.0-4-686 i686 bits: 32 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_386 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: desktop Mobo: MICRO-STAR model: MS-7507 v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           BIOS: American Megatrends v: V3.1 date: 03/01/2008
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core2 Duo E4500 (-MCP-) cache: 2048 KB
           clock speeds: max: 2218 MHz 1: 2218 MHz 2: 2218 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: intel (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1280x1024@59.89hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel 945G x86/MMX/SSE2 version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Def. Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-686
Network:   Card: Realtek RTL8101/2/6E PCIE Fast/Gigabit Ethernet controller driver: r8169
           IF: ens33 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: 00:1d:92:a2:a1:ee
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 160.0GB (4.4% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD1600AABS size: 160.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 27G used: 4.8G (19%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 2.05GB used: 0.93GB (46%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda1
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 58.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 188 Uptime: 41 min Memory: 463.2/996.6MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40 
Pros i Found during to my observation---

*Excellent theme with beautiful wallpapers i like them
*MX Tweak team is really good for changing some settings it makes things much easier
*Papirus icon theme is really good
*Thanks for adding Numix theme
*Conky is nice with more settings to change the color
*No issues with LIBRE office and GIMP everything is opening well
*Notifications settings are nice and the themes for notifications are really looking good
* Chromium Black Boxes issue solved this time may be it is because of update

Here are the cons i found with my system:----

*Mx apt updater when i click on it nothing is being displayed instead synaptic is opening if i double click
*Found one issue with conky when i drag the conky on to the left the screen the icons on the desktop are disappearing
*Found another issue with conky when i syncronise my clock with internet and after starting system if the time is changed according to my network conky is moving the position on desktop during time change
*advert blocking is not blocking youtube videos ads and some ads are being blocked in the browser however an empty white box with can't connect to the website is being displayed
*The system is slow when compared to MX-16.1 may be my system getting old :-)
*Chromium is updated with this chromium i couldn't understand it is taking time to open newtab whereas in mx-16.1 i didn't found the issue and is fast

Suggestion:-

If possible add startup MX-16 logo instead of normal startup screen if possible
I couldn't understand MX is little bit slowed on my pc may be due to my hard ware or Beta i couldn't understand
If possible add little more themes and remove some XFCE old themes if possible

Thanks for Bringing Beautiful OS i Congratulate those who worked hard for this project from my bottom of my heart :happy: :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:51 am
by tascoast
Wine installation appears unsuccessful via Package Manager or via MX Package Manager testing... wine staging...not usually a problem I experience

Synaptic Package Manager list check boxes lack obvious contrast to the unfamiliar?

Bluetooth error message upon desktop loading as noted in an earlier post/screenshot:
I have been using bluetooth connections a bit lately but find pairing unreliable so far, MX-16 included.

Otherwise, some dialogues (eg, MX Conky) are displaying text in a blurry manner reminiscent of Wine applications.

Wifi dongle requires some unplugging and re-plugging to initiate.


Code: Select all

System:    Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 x86_64 (64 bit) Desktop: Xfce 4.12.2
           Distro: MX-16.1_x64 Metamorphosis 8 June 2017
Machine:   Device: desktop System: LENOVO product: 7522RU3 v: ThinkCentre A58
           Mobo: LENOVO model: N/A BIOS: LENOVO v: 5HKT52AUS date: 07/15/2010
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core2 Duo E7300 (-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB 
           clock speeds: max: 2670 MHz 1: 2136 MHz 2: 2403 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel 4 Series Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1680x1050@59.88hz
           GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel G41 GLX Version: 2.1
Audio:     Card Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Definition Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Marvell 88E8057 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: sky2
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:01:6c:48:1a:77
           Card-2: Realtek RTL8191SU 802.11n WLAN Adapter driver: r8712u
           IF: wlan0 state: N/A mac: N/A
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 1000.2GB (46.1% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD10EZEX size: 1000.2GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 30G used: 7.8G (28%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda9
           ID-2: /home size: 34G used: 8.5G (27%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda8
           ID-3: swap-1 size: 4.29GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda5
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 38.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 196 Uptime: 3:21 Memory: 1186.4/3921.2MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.21 

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:10 am
by chrispop99
Today's update included a fixed mx-iso-template, to allow Snapshot to work properly.

I updated, ran Snapshot, and it successfully created an ISO.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:13 am
by wizd3m
I'm testing the 64bit version in a Vbox. The MX Package Installer generates a "Granted permissions without asking for password" message, the same happens when installing codecs. Is this "normal" behaviour? And if so, how do I change that?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:29 am
by chrispop99
wizd3m wrote:I'm testing the 64bit version in a Vbox. The MX Package Installer generates a "Granted permissions without asking for password" message, the same happens when installing codecs. Is this "normal" behaviour? And if so, how do I change that?
The way MX-Linux is set up is that if needed, it asks for the root password once per session, and allows root operations from then until you logout. (Many other distros do the same; it is considered the most convenient way for desktop systems used primarily in home environs.)

For you to have accessed the Package Installer and received that message means you had already entered the password during that session, and is normal.

What is it you want to change? If you just want to stop that message being shown, there is a check box on the message for that very purpose.

If on the other hand you want to make it necessary to request the root password every time it is needed, you should ask outside this thread.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:31 am
by wizd3m
Thanks Chris, the last option is the one I want.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 6:46 am
by dolphin_oracle
tascoast wrote:Wine installation appears unsuccessful via Package Manager or via MX Package Manager testing... wine staging...not usually a problem I experience
what is the failure. seems to install fine for me here from the "Popular Apps" tab.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:16 am
by tascoast
dolphin_oracle wrote:
tascoast wrote:Wine installation appears unsuccessful via Package Manager or via MX Package Manager testing... wine staging...not usually a problem I experience
what is the failure. seems to install fine for me here from the "Popular Apps" tab.
I tried installing several times with MX Package Manager and it downloaded and installed, according to the terminal window, including a 'Y' conformation to begin the process, but refused to 'go grey' in MX Package Manager. I'll do a fresh install soon enough in any case and hope for better luck.

I am most interested in bluetooth for now and find blueman missing something that has allowed me to pair and stream directly to hearing aids (using MX-16) via an accessory bluetooth device that ultimately sends the sound via FM and an antenna loop, forming a necklace of sorts in close proximity to the aids.

In short, it kinda replaces the function of typical earbud/mic or similar but provides a far superior sound, being direct to ears. Also can be used to watch or listen to other streams on PC, or android phone and music player, for instance. EasyTek ...

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:43 am
by dolphin_oracle
tascoast wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
tascoast wrote:Wine installation appears unsuccessful via Package Manager or via MX Package Manager testing... wine staging...not usually a problem I experience
what is the failure. seems to install fine for me here from the "Popular Apps" tab.
I tried installing several times with MX Package Manager and it downloaded and installed, according to the terminal window, including a 'Y' conformation to begin the process, but refused to 'go grey' in MX Package Manager. I'll do a fresh install soon enough in any case and hope for better luck.

that may be a failure to to grey out in mx-packageinstaller. check

Code: Select all

apt-cache policy wine-staging
to see if its installed. Also, if you use the "Popular Apps" tab, you should get an "other" category in the menu with wine stuff in it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:46 am
by Jerry3904
tascoast wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
tascoast wrote:I am most interested in bluetooth for now and find blueman missing something that has allowed me to pair and stream directly to hearing aids (using MX-16) via an accessory bluetooth device that ultimately sends the sound via FM and an antenna loop, forming a necklace of sorts in close proximity to the aids.

In short, it kinda replaces the function of typical earbud/mic or similar but provides a far superior sound, being direct to ears. Also can be used to watch or listen to other streams on PC, or android phone and music player, for instance. EasyTek ...
Have you paired the device? I just tried pairing with my cellphone's audio, and it was a bit weird. I added the package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth after doing a web search on the problem, and would like you to try that, reboot, and start again.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:38 am
by ferlop
I have installed MX-16.1 (September) and runs pretty well. Indeed, it is a very good distro. Two days ago I tried live MX-17 B1 (and before a4 and a5) and noticed that ram consumption is much higher than MX-16.1 live. Why is that? It can be explained? Thanks.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:42 am
by richb
ferlop wrote:I have installed MX-16.1 (September) and runs pretty well. Indeed, it is a very good distro. Two days ago I tried live MX-17 B1 (and before a4 and a5) and noticed that ram consumption is much higher than MX-16.1 live. Why is that? It can be explained? Thanks.
Not sure how much it consumes on your system ,on mine very little, 4 core AMD, but you can try turning off the conky and see what results. MX Conky and click stop.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:26 pm
by chrispop99
A question; if an install with encryption is done, is the ability to subsequently change a user to autologin using MX User Manager disabled?

I'm guessing this is the case, and it seems sensible to do so. User Manager still toggles the relevant line in /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf, so how is autologin prevented in this case?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:32 pm
by dolphin_oracle
chrispop99 wrote:A question; if an install with encryption is done, is the ability to subsequently change a user to autologin using MX User Manager disabled?

I'm guessing this is the case, and it seems sensible to do so. User Manager still toggles the relevant line in /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf, so how is autologin prevented in this case?

Chris
I think you can actually use autologin, although we disable by default in the installer. I've been meaning to try. My current install has an encrypted home.

Of course, enabling autologin more or less defeats the purpose of encrypting in the first place. but that requires a root level password, so the presumption is that's what you really want to do.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:35 pm
by RobWigham
I've only tested from the DVD - but am expecting a new laptop to arrive tomorrow which will get b1 on it from the outset (I believe there was an upgrade path to final from 16 betas - but no probs if I need to reinstall). From a day's playing around, everything works flawlessly on my 5 or 6 year laptop, with the usual exception of manipulation of my camera. Thunar just doesn't seem to handle cameras but it's easily solved by keeping either PCManFM or Nemo installed and using that for initial import or drag and drop. Apart from being able to report no faults from the DVD, I'm loving the new looks (of all 3 themes in Tweak) and the addition of GThumb. If you'd added the iridium browser you'd have pretty much replicated my normal set-up! Looking forward to installing and I'll let you know how it goes.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:47 pm
by chrispop99
RobWigham wrote:I've only tested from the DVD - but am expecting a new laptop to arrive tomorrow which will get b1 on it from the outset (I believe there was an upgrade path to final from 16 betas - but no probs if I need to reinstall). From a day's playing around, everything works flawlessly on my 5 or 6 year laptop, with the usual exception of manipulation of my camera. Thunar just doesn't seem to handle cameras but it's easily solved by keeping either PCManFM or Nemo installed and using that for initial import or drag and drop. Apart from being able to report no faults from the DVD, I'm loving the new looks (of all 3 themes in Tweak) and the addition of GThumb. If you'd added the iridium browser you'd have pretty much replicated my normal set-up! Looking forward to installing and I'll let you know how it goes.
Thunar connects flawlessly to my Canon Ixus camera, and to my Android phone in order to access the photos on it.

Have you tried Shotwell, available from the MX Package Installer, to connect to your camera, and manage your photos?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:09 pm
by chrispop99
Trivial!

Personal opinion only, but turning on User Image in LightDM Greeter settings makes the login screen look much better.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:16 pm
by RobWigham
I've tried Shotwell, Chris, and it makes download and import from the camera better - if not good. My camera is a Panasonic which is not on the gphoto2 supported cameras list, but what's interesting is that other FMs will do drag and drop flawlessly from and between the camera folders (something I need) but Thunar will not. I can access the camera but it will literally take 5 minutes just to scroll a little down the folder. It's been suggested elsewhere in these forums that it might be a Tumbler issue but I've not had the time to check that out - much easier just to use Nemo. Thanks for the suggestion though!

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:45 pm
by Jerry3904
chrispop99 wrote:Trivial!

Personal opinion only, but turning on User Image in LightDM Greeter settings makes the login screen look much better.

Chris
I agree, and the Art Team has to look at that anyway before Final

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:47 pm
by Gaer Boy
First look live on desktop. UEFI boot, localized. Boot screen appearance good, font for text settings very clear. What does 'Console columns' do? Accepted all other defaults.

Welcome screen layout fine. First ever Conky on my machines - attractive, but DMY & monitor legends are black on dark grey - almost invisible, but bug my eyes as I look around.

LibreOffice - window edges hard to grab, but corner OK. Font rendering in documents (DejaVu Sans) poor - font metrics/kerning wrong. System fonts in applications and on desktop fine.

[13 updates at this point - installed.] Firefox - logged on to Forum. Forum appearance very clear but text in posts poorly rendered. I installed Iridium (I've been using it for about a week) and post text is good.

Installed GnuCash - all OK. Sound and video fine in VLC and all function keys work as they should.

Overall, Beta is good for me. Install and test on other machines will have to wait until next week.

Phil

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:19 pm
by danielson
Just did fresh install and can not see LibreOffice Writer icons https://snag.gy/rQLEJO.jpg but text only.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:27 pm
by Jerry3904
Thanks. I think that's been covered earlier in the post if you want to take a look.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:31 pm
by danielson
My bad. Thank you Jerry.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:33 pm
by Jerry3904
No no, didn't mean it that way. It's very hard to know what is in this long thread.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:49 pm
by BitJam
Gaer Boy wrote: What does 'Console columns' do? Accepted all other defaults.
We will select a console font size so there will be roughly that many columns of console text. The default value is 120 so we select a font size so there are roughly 120 columns of text.

This has several advantages over the tradition method of one-font-size-fits-all, which results in teeny tiny fonts on HDPI displays. Our default of 120 columns works well on resolution from 1024x768 to 1920x1080 and beyond. I believe the console frame buffer is disabled by default in legacy boot on MX so the console font size won't get set until a modesetting driver kicks. For legacy booting in antiX we set the default framebuffer size to 1024x768. For UEFI booting (both antiX and MX), we usually start out at the maximum resolution so you are getting the benefit of reasonably sized fonts from the get-go. This got rid of the need of a bunch of boot loader entries to set the screen resolution. If the screen resolution changes when a mode setting driver kicks in, the font size (on the screen) should stay roughly the same. The selected console font size should carry over to installed systems. If you want to change the console font size, there is a clunky choose-console-width program available in b1. I hope the easier to use select-console-width will make it onto b2.

The goal was to have usable consoles OOTB on a wide range of hardware. The default console font made it very hard to use the consoles on my xps-13. Now they are a joy to use. I don't know of any other distros that do this. We went through three of four iterations of software to improve the console font size. The key concept was to make the number of columns in the console roughly fixed.

I really think we should do something like this for X-windows too and select a reasonable font size/scale/DPI based on the screen resolution. Starting at some resolution, say 1280x1024 (or something larger) we can scale the font size up as the resolution goes up so the size of the fonts on the screen stay relatively constant. This should give users with HDPI displays a very workable system OOTB. When automatically selecting a font size, it is usually better to err on the side of being too big rather than too small. It is a joy to have a usable system boot live OOTB. It is extremely annoying when everything is so teeny tiny it is hard to get to the adjustment to make things bigger.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 6:53 pm
by dr-kart
danielson wrote:can not see LibreOffice Writer icons
Just go to "Options" and change it

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:04 pm
by tascoast
Jerry3904 wrote:
tascoast wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Have you paired the device? I just tried pairing with my cellphone's audio, and it was a bit weird. I added the package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth after doing a web search on the problem, and would like you to try that, reboot, and start again.
Adding pulseaudio-module-bluetooth did make a big difference and I was able to connect previously paired devices.
(it was nice to watch a movie yesterday direct to the ears, with really clear speech being received)

For Wine, I seem to have most things installed but not Wine staging and expected winecfg in a terminal to do the usual things with ms corefonts etc. It mostly seems stuck at the last post as it were, not creating a menu entry, but I'll take others' success as a local glitch for now.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 7:29 pm
by Jerry3904
That's excellent, I'm really glad that worked. We will be sure to add that to the next version.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 9:49 pm
by Stevo
Have we decided against qBittorrent as the included torrent client?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:08 am
by SwampRabbit
I haven’t even had time to download and try the beta yet, but the kernel version does concern me a bit with my Ryzen boards.

What newer alternative kernel should I be trying with them... the antiX 4.10?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:20 am
by dr-kart
Confused which MX repo to choose in mx-repo-manager now? They give different errors in output.

(while yad (0.38.2-1 => 0.38.2-1) is to be updated)
E: Failed to fetch http://iso.mxrepo.com/antix/stretch/dis ... ents-amd64 404 Not Found
E: Failed to fetch http://iso.mxrepo.com/mx/repo/dists/str ... tents-i386 404 Not Found

or
E: Failed to fetch http://it.mxrepo.com/antix/stretch/dist ... ents-amd64 404 Not Found

On the other hand: mxrepo.com shows no fetching errors but there is no update for yad.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 9:42 am
by ldsemerchen
No sound here. It works on MX 16.1.
====================================

System: Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine: Device: desktop Mobo: MICRO-STAR model: MS-7253 v: 1.0 serial: N/A
BIOS: Phoenix v: V1.7 date: 10/23/2007
CPU: Dual core AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (-MCP-) cache: 1024 KB
clock speeds: max: 2200 MHz 1: 1000 MHz 2: 1000 MHz
Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV44 [GeForce 6200 TurboCache]
Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) driver: nvidia Resolution: 1680x1050@59.95hz
OpenGL: renderer: GeForce 6200 TurboCache/PCIe/SSE2 version: 2.1.2 NVIDIA 304.135
Audio: Card VIA VT8237A/VT8251 HDA Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network: Card-1: VIA VT6102/VT6103 [Rhine-II] driver: via-rhine
IF: enp0s18 state: down mac: 00:1d:92:6f:e7:23
Card-2: D-Link System DGE-528T Gigabit Ethernet Adapter driver: r8169
IF: enp4s5 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: e4:6f:13:aa:80:c1
Drives: HDD Total Size: 500.1GB (3.5% used)
ID-1: /dev/sdb model: MAXTOR_STM325031 size: 250.1GB
ID-2: /dev/sda model: ST3250310AS size: 250.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 129G used: 8.7G (8%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdb3
ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.29GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda1
ID-3: swap-2 size: 4.29GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sdb2
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 56.0C mobo: N/A gpu: 52C
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 184 Uptime: 14 min Memory: 927.8/2003.4MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:16 am
by entropyfoe
SwampRabit,

Earlier in the thread I asked about the kernel also.

The antix 17 uses 4.10. Why the difference?
I guess I really don't understand these issues.

In MX 17, what happens if I install the antix 17 4.10 kernel. What happens or won't work?

Or later liquorix 4.13. I had some problems with the antix install with an antix 4.13 kernel attempt, but that is probably my inexperience or something with the nvidia driver selection. I still have not figured it out yet.

But back to MX 17, I had a hard lock up last night as I have observed earlier with this Ryzen board. After 2 days uptime, I came down to the machine and it had a blank screen, no cursor, no log in, just blank. Yet the fans were spinning, LEDs illuminated on the board, but KB and mouse totally unresponsive. So I hit reset and installed the nvidia driver withe the MX tools. It took a loooong time, I was worried, but eventually it completed successfully, so I rebooted. I now have the nvidia driver. This helped with the up time in the antix installation.

We will see how the stability is now.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:21 am
by entropyfoe
ldsemerchen

I am not at my MX machine (on Win 7 professionally now), so I cannot point exactly to where the menues are.

But there is a control panel, where you can select the default sound card. In this beta the install picked up mine correctly, so I did not need to change it, but pole around on the menus to find the control panel ( I am mixing my MX and antix in my mind now, as I am testing both), or look in the MX 16 manual.

Probably Jerry or someone will point you to the right area.

Then you can select the default sound card, and it should work.

Also sometimes check the little speaker icon on the panel, right click it, you might need to increase the volume.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:22 am
by dolphin_oracle
entropyfoe wrote:SwampRabit,

Earlier in the thread I asked about the kernel also.

The antix 17 uses 4.10. Why the difference?
I guess I really don't understand these issues.

In MX 17, what happens if I install the antix 17 4.10 kernel. What happens or won't work?

Or later liquorix 4.13. I had some problems with the antix install with an antix 4.13 kernel attempt, but that is probably my inexperience or something with the nvidia driver selection. I still have not figured it out yet.

But back to MX 17, I had a hard lock up last night as I have observed earlier with this Ryzen board. After 2 days uptime, I came down to the machine and it had a blank screen, no cursor, no log in, just blank. Yet the fans were spinning, LEDs illuminated on the board, but KB and mouse totally unresponsive. So I hit reset and installed the nvidia driver withe the MX tools. It took a loooong time, I was worried, but eventually it completed successfully, so I rebooted. I now have the nvidia driver. This helped with the up time in the antix installation.

We will see how the stability is now.
basically mx17 uses the default debian kernel. the 4.9 kernel series is also the latest LTS kernel series, with the linux kernel devs commited to (6?) several years of updates.

You *should* be able to use the antiX 4.10 kernels as well.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:32 am
by richb
I ran the MX nvidia installer on optimus laptop. During the install a message indicating a conflict with nouveau that would be most likely corrected with a rebbot after install. The install concluded successfully. Rebooted and still no nvidia driver. The nvidia blacklist file in /etc/modprobe.d does have nouveau blacklisted. Do I need a boot cheat?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:39 am
by dolphin_oracle
richb wrote:I ran the MX nvidia installer on optimus laptop. During the install a message indicating a conflict with nouveau that would be most likely corrected with a rebbot after install. The install concluded successfully. Rebooted and still no nvidia driver. The nvidia blacklist file in /etc/modprobe.d does have nouveau blacklisted. Do I need a boot cheat?
post your inxi -F output.

note that by defuault, the intel or modesetting driver should be in place on an optimus machine until you use the primusrun or optirun commands to launch an app.

also, you should NOT have an xorg.conf file.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:48 am
by entropyfoe
Dolphin Oracle and richb,

I did the nvidia install using the MX tool last night.

I also saw the noveau warning, and on reboot I DID get the nvidia driver. I can't remember the number now, I think it was 375.82-1-deb901.

I also saw a warning about no xorg.conf.

After reboot all seems normal.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:54 am
by richb
dolphin_oracle wrote:
richb wrote:I ran the MX nvidia installer on optimus laptop. During the install a message indicating a conflict with nouveau that would be most likely corrected with a rebbot after install. The install concluded successfully. Rebooted and still no nvidia driver. The nvidia blacklist file in /etc/modprobe.d does have nouveau blacklisted. Do I need a boot cheat?
post your inxi -F output.

note that by defuault, the intel or modesetting driver should be in place on an optimus machine until you use the primusrun or optirun commands to launch an app.

also, you should NOT have an xorg.conf file.

Code: Select all

Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: Acer product: Aspire V5-572G v: V2.06 serial: N/A
           Mobo: Acer model: Dazzle_CX v: Type2 - A01 Board Version serial: N/A
           UEFI [Legacy]: Insyde v: V2.06 date: 05/22/2013
Battery    BAT1: charge: 39.2 Wh 89.3% condition: 43.9/53.4 Wh (82%)
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core i5-3337U (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           clock speeds: max: 2700 MHz 1: 2500 MHz 2: 2361 MHz 3: 2582 MHz 4: 2531 MHz
Graphics:  Card-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
           Card-2: NVIDIA GF117M [GeForce 610M/710M/810M/820M / GT 620M/625M/630M/720M]
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@59.99hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ivybridge Mobile version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card Intel 7 Series/C216 Family High Definition Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Qualcomm Atheros AR9462 Wireless Network Adapter driver: ath9k
           IF: wlp3s0 state: up mac: 2c:d0:5a:eb:3e:cc
           Card-2: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
           IF: enp4s0f1 state: down mac: 08:9e:01:a4:28:8e
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 256.1GB (3.2% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: SanDisk_SDSSDP25 size: 256.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 117G used: 5.7G (6%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 2.16GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 51.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 210 Uptime: 1 min Memory: 938.6/11901.0MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40 
On the MX 16.1 install I recall the Graphics info showing the nvidia driver which led me to believe it was not active. Perhaps faulty memory. There is no xorg.conf.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:58 am
by dolphin_oracle
that looks right to me. you can try that

Code: Select all

optirun glxgears
I think to see if it kicks in.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:59 am
by dolphin_oracle
entropyfoe wrote:Dolphin Oracle and richb,

I did the nvidia install using the MX tool last night.

I also saw the noveau warning, and on reboot I DID get the nvidia driver. I can't remember the number now, I think it was 375.82-1-deb901.

I also saw a warning about no xorg.conf.

After reboot all seems normal.
can you post your /var/log/ddm.log file for comparison.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:07 am
by richb
dolphin_oracle wrote:that looks right to me. you can try that

Code: Select all

optirun glxgears
I think to see if it kicks in.
It does kick. But I would expect a faster frame rate than when run without optirun. That has been my experience in the past on this machine.

Code: Select all


 optirun glxgears
298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.530 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.988 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.988 FPS
primus: warning: dropping a frame to avoid deadlock
XIO:  fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0"
      after 32 requests (32 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
primus: warning: dropping a frame to avoid deadlock
primus: warning: timeout waiting for display worker
richard@mx1:~
$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
316 frames in 5.0 seconds = 63.069 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.990 FPS
XIO:  fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0"
      after 702 requests (456 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
richard@mx1:~


Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:12 am
by ldsemerchen
entropyfoe wrote:ldsemerchen

I am not at my MX machine (on Win 7 professionally now), so I cannot point exactly to where the menues are.

But there is a control panel, where you can select the default sound card. In this beta the install picked up mine correctly, so I did not need to change it, but pole around on the menus to find the control panel ( I am mixing my MX and antix in my mind now, as I am testing both), or look in the MX 16 manual.

Probably Jerry or someone will point you to the right area.

Then you can select the default sound card, and it should work.

Also sometimes check the little speaker icon on the panel, right click it, you might need to increase the volume.
I can't hear any sound with my speakers plugged in my PC's backend, it did work without any setting on MX-16.1. By the way, when I plugged my USB earphones, I can switch to it and hear the sound.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:18 am
by ldsemerchen
Another problem on my old laptop. Before the login screen started, I have got a 4'38" black screen. Just the same as my Debian Stretch installation experience. And the conky is unreadable like below:

https://mega.nz/#!wioxmbyQ!IPuKkX4G5c3l ... dl7GMuuZ0k

============
System: Host: mxfuji Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine: Device: laptop System: FUJITSU product: LifeBook T4220 serial: N/A
Mobo: FUJITSU model: FJNB1D4 serial: N/A
BIOS: FUJITSU // Phoenix v: Version 1.18 date: 02/23/2009
Battery CMB1: charge: 31.4 Wh 97.2% condition: 32.3/56.2 Wh (58%)
CPU: Dual core Intel Core2 Duo T8300 (-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
clock speeds: max: 2401 MHz 1: 1600 MHz 2: 2000 MHz
Graphics: Card: Intel Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (primary)
Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: 1024x768@60.00hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel 965GM version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio: Card Intel 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network: Card-1: Marvell 88E8055 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: sky2
IF: enp4s0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: 00:17:42:c1:c5:19
Card-2: Intel PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN [Kedron] Network Connection driver: iwl4965
IF: wlp12s0 state: down mac: f6:77:44:e0:7c:be
Drives: HDD Total Size: 120.0GB (10.7% used)
ID-1: /dev/sda model: FUJITSU_MHY2120B size: 120.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 106G used: 8.2G (9%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.29GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda1
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 60.0C mobo: 26.8C
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 196 Uptime: 9 min Memory: 943.0/1995.2MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:22 am
by kmathern
richb wrote:It does kick. But I would expect a faster frame rate than when run without optirun.
Try:

Code: Select all

optirun vblank_mode=0 glxgears

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:35 am
by ldsemerchen
ldsemerchen wrote:Another problem on my old laptop. Before the login screen started, I have got a 4'38" black screen. Just the same as my Debian Stretch installation experience. And the conky is unreadable like below:

https://mega.nz/#!wioxmbyQ!IPuKkX4G5c3l ... dl7GMuuZ0k
After my post above. I found the conky ran normal after a period of time.

https://mega.nz/#!dzBTmIob!vQzNGtyQegU- ... 9ritUj1J1I

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:41 am
by entropyfoe

Code: Select all

 can you post your /var/log/ddm.log file for comparison.
Yup, tonight when back in front of the machine.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:45 am
by entropyfoe
ldsemerchen

Is there an hdmi sound card or device showing?

Sometimes those need to be turned off or de-selected.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 12:50 pm
by richb
kmathern wrote:
richb wrote:It does kick. But I would expect a faster frame rate than when run without optirun.
Try:

Code: Select all

optirun vblank_mode=0 glxgears

Must be an error in the code

Code: Select all

[ 1939.715915] [ERROR]Error running "vblank_mode=0": No such file or directory

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:26 pm
by jbMacAZ
Finally had a chance to test the liveUSB grub.cfg update on the T100CHI (baytrail mixed-mode UEFI.) and it works great on my troublesome device (see viewtopic.php?f=107&t=42863). I made a stock MX17b1(64 bit) liveUSB with unetbootin. Many thanks for the update. I hope to find some time soon to remaster with a custom kernel and then install.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:16 pm
by kmathern
richb wrote:
kmathern wrote:
richb wrote:It does kick. But I would expect a faster frame rate than when run without optirun.
Try:

Code: Select all

optirun vblank_mode=0 glxgears

Must be an error in the code

Code: Select all

[ 1939.715915] [ERROR]Error running "vblank_mode=0": No such file or directory
The vblank_mode=0 thing works for me without the optirun part (don't have a Nvidia GPU), maybe try putting some quotes around it:

Code: Select all

 optirun 'vblank_mode=0 glxgears'

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:19 pm
by BitJam
The problem is that optirun is looking for a command, not an environment variable. Quotes won't help but this might work:

Code: Select all

vblank_mode=0 optirun  glxgears

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:20 pm
by vamsi
ferlop wrote:I have installed MX-16.1 (September) and runs pretty well. Indeed, it is a very good distro. Two days ago I tried live MX-17 B1 (and before a4 and a5) and noticed that ram consumption is much higher than MX-16.1 live. Why is that? It can be explained? Thanks.
Me too experienced my system is slow after installing mx-17 beta on my pc and reverted back to MX- 16.1 may be due to alpha version i think so or may be my hardware species are becoming old but in mx-16.1 i din't found any lagging :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:47 pm
by richb
kmathern wrote:
richb wrote:
kmathern wrote:
Try:

Code: Select all

optirun vblank_mode=0 glxgears

Must be an error in the code

Code: Select all

[ 1939.715915] [ERROR]Error running "vblank_mode=0": No such file or directory
The vblank_mode=0 thing works for me without the optirun part (don't have a Nvidia GPU), maybe try putting some quotes around it:

Code: Select all

 optirun 'vblank_mode=0 glxgears'
Does not work with optirun but does alone.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 2:52 pm
by kmathern
richb wrote:Does not work with optirun but does alone.
Did you try BitJam's way ?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 3:24 pm
by Stevo
kmathern wrote:
richb wrote:Does not work with optirun but does alone.
Did you try BitJam's way ?
That command to disable the refresh sync only works on xorg drivers like Intel and maybe the xorg AMD drivers. The correct syntax for the Nvidia nonfree driver is

Code: Select all

__GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=1 optirun glxgears
But glxgears is not a good benchmark, and will show a lower rate for the Nvidia card for reasons that seem related to Bumblebee overhead. The Unigine benchmarks show better frame rates for my Nvidia GPU.

One benchmark that works a lot better is to install virtualgl and use glxspheres on 32-bit and glxspheres64 on 64, but I still have to build it for MX 17...the way I quick-check if Bumblebee is working is

Code: Select all

inxi -G
vs

Code: Select all

optirun inxi -G

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 4:43 pm
by richb

Code: Select all

optirun inxi -G
Graphics:  Card-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
           Card-2: NVIDIA GF117M [GeForce 610M/710M/810M/820M / GT 620M/625M/630M/720M]
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@59.99hz
           OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GT 720M/PCIe/SSE2 version: 4.5.0 NVIDIA 375.82
That is what I would expect to see for the OpenGL renderer. So it looks like everything is as expected.
I did not see Bitjam's solution until now. That did indeed work. And the result is an order of magnitude increase in frame rate, from about 60 fps to 1000 fps

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:05 pm
by Stevo
But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU? My Intel GPU shows a 10X better framerate!

Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec

You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit. They show the Nvidia GPU as faster without that VBLANK setting...

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:11 pm
by richb
Stevo wrote:But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU?
No it is 60 for the integrated intel.
Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec

You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit.
Thanks. I am not on the laptop right now. But will get it when I am. By the way I remembered glxspheres is a better comparison. It will be interesting to see how that fares.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:15 pm
by richb
richb wrote:
Stevo wrote:But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU?
No it is 60 for the integrated intel.
Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec

You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit.
Thanks. I am not on the laptop right now. But will get it when I am. By the way I remembered glxspheres is a better comparison. It will be interesting to see how that fares.
Similar numbers with glxspheres64

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:23 pm
by ldsemerchen
entropyfoe wrote:ldsemerchen

Is there an hdmi sound card or device showing?

Sometimes those need to be turned off or de-selected.
No hdmi sound card. I found something strange: Some program (for ex. Telegram) ran but I couldn't change it's output device to USB earphones but some could (for ex. Clementine).
Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:50 pm
by ldsemerchen
ldsemerchen wrote:
entropyfoe wrote:ldsemerchen

Is there an hdmi sound card or device showing?

Sometimes those need to be turned off or de-selected.
No hdmi sound card. I found something strange: Some program (for ex. Telegram) ran but I couldn't change it's output device to USB earphones but some could (for ex. Clementine).
After I install 'volti', do some configuration and remove it, it works now. :confused:

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread ddm.log

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:51 pm
by entropyfoe
To Dolphin Oracle and richb, here is the log file you requested after my successful install last night with the MX tool. Maybe I have slow repos , but it took a long time, I almost thought it was borked or frozen, but it completed successfully as indicated. After the install the relevant section of inxi is

System: Host: Ryzen Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine: Device: desktop Mobo: ASUSTeK model: PRIME X370-PRO v: Rev X.0x serial: N/A
UEFI [Legacy]: American Megatrends v: 0902 date: 09/08/2017
CPU: Hexa core AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Six-Core (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
clock speeds: max: 3600 MHz 1: 2200 MHz 2: 2200 MHz 3: 2200 MHz 4: 2200 MHz
5: 2200 MHz 6: 2200 MHz 7: 2200 MHz 8: 2200 MHz 9: 2200 MHz 10: 2200 MHz 11: 2200 MHz
12: 2200 MHz
Graphics: Card: NVIDIA GK208 [GeForce GT 710B]
Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) driver: nvidia Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz
OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GT 710/PCIe/SSE2 version: 4.5.0 NVIDIA 375.82

And at the end of the file it appears I do have an xorg.conf ! (though it is pretty bare)

Code: Select all

I: Set the RESUME variable to override this.
New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
Finished
Press <Enter> to exit
That's a great code line, Press enter to exit. :happy:
And here is /var/log/ddm.log

Code: Select all

creating lock ...
===================================
Install drivers for: nvidia
Start at (m/d/y): 11/08/2017 22:20:46
===================================
Candidate is:  375.82-1~deb9u1
Installed is:  (none)
Would you like to check debian-backports for a later version?

Yes or No?

1: Yes
2: No

Enter Number of selection
Ok...
Candidate is:  375.82-1~deb9u1
Installed is:  (none)
Need driver: nvidia-driver (375.82-1~deb9u1)
NVIDIA packages to install are  nvidia-driver nvidia-settings nvidia-kernel-dkms libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 nvidia-xconfig
Press <Enter> to continue or Ctrl-c to exitFrontend: 
Nvidia command = apt-get install --reinstall -y --force-yes  $ BP nvidia-driver nvidia-settings nvidia-kernel-dkms libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 nvidia-xconfig
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 471 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 build-essential amd64 12.3 [7,346 B]
Get:2 http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo stretch/non-free amd64 firmware-linux-nonfree all 20170823-1mx17+1 [14.9 kB]
Get:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 linux-headers-4.9.0-4-amd64 amd64 4.9.51-1 [449 kB]
dpkg-preconfigure: unable to re-open stdin: No such file or directory
Fetched 471 kB in 14s (32.0 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 
(Reading database ... 5%
(Reading database ... 10%
(R....
(Reading database ... 95%
(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 231121 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../build-essential_12.3_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking build-essential (12.3) over (12.3) ...
Preparing to unpack .../firmware-linux-nonfree_20170823-1mx17+1_all.deb ...
Unpacking firmware-linux-nonfree (20170823-1mx17+1) over (20170823-1mx17+1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../linux-headers-4.9.0-4-amd64_4.9.51-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking linux-headers-4.9.0-4-amd64 (4.9.51-1) over (4.9.51-1) ...
Setting up build-essential (12.3) ...
Setting up linux-headers-4.9.0-4-amd64 (4.9.51-1) ...
Setting up firmware-linux-nonfree (20170823-1mx17+1) ...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
The following additional packages will be installed:
  gcc-6-base:i386 glx-alternative-mesa glx-alternative-nvidia glx-diversions
  libbsd0:i386 libc6:i386 libegl-nvidia0 libegl-nvidia0:i386
  libegl1-glvnd-nvidia libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libgcc1:i386
  libgl1-nvidia-glx libgldispatch0-nvidia libgldispatch0-nvidia:i386
  libgles-nvidia1 libgles-nvidia1:i386 libgles-nvidia2 libgles-nvidia2:i386
  libgles1-glvnd-nvidia libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libgles2-glvnd-nvidia
  libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libglx-nvidia0 libglx-nvidia0:i386
  libglx0-glvnd-nvidia libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libnvidia-cfg1
  libnvidia-cfg1:i386 libnvidia-eglcore libnvidia-eglcore:i386
  libnvidia-glcore libnvidia-glcore:i386 libnvidia-ml1 libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia
  libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libx11-6:i386 libxau6:i386 libxcb1:i386
  libxdmcp6:i386 libxext6:i386 nvidia-alternative nvidia-driver-bin
  nvidia-driver-libs nvidia-driver-libs:i386 nvidia-driver-libs-i386:i386
  nvidia-egl-common nvidia-egl-icd nvidia-egl-icd:i386
  nvidia-installer-cleanup nvidia-kernel-common nvidia-kernel-support
  nvidia-legacy-check nvidia-modprobe nvidia-persistenced nvidia-support
  nvidia-vdpau-driver update-glx xserver-xorg-video-nvidia
Suggested packages:
  glibc-doc:i386 locales:i386
Recommended packages:
  nvidia-vulkan-icd nvidia-vulkan-icd:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gcc-6-base:i386 glx-alternative-mesa glx-alternative-nvidia glx-diversions
  libbsd0:i386 libc6:i386 libegl-nvidia0 libegl-nvidia0:i386
  libegl1-glvnd-nvidia libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libgcc1:i386
  libgl1-nvidia-glx libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 libgldispatch0-nvidia
  libgldispatch0-nvidia:i386 libgles-nvidia1 libgles-nvidia1:i386
  libgles-nvidia2 libgles-nvidia2:i386 libgles1-glvnd-nvidia
  libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libgles2-glvnd-nvidia libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:i386
  libglx-nvidia0 libglx-nvidia0:i386 libglx0-glvnd-nvidia
  libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libnvidia-cfg1 libnvidia-cfg1:i386
  libnvidia-eglcore libnvidia-eglcore:i386 libnvidia-glcore
  libnvidia-glcore:i386 libnvidia-ml1 libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia
  libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 libx11-6:i386 libxau6:i386 libxcb1:i386
  libxdmcp6:i386 libxext6:i386 nvidia-alternative nvidia-driver
  nvidia-driver-bin nvidia-driver-libs nvidia-driver-libs:i386
  nvidia-driver-libs-i386:i386 nvidia-egl-common nvidia-egl-icd
  nvidia-egl-icd:i386 nvidia-installer-cleanup nvidia-kernel-common
  nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-kernel-support nvidia-legacy-check nvidia-modprobe
  nvidia-persistenced nvidia-settings nvidia-support nvidia-vdpau-driver
  nvidia-xconfig update-glx xserver-xorg-video-nvidia
0 upgraded, 63 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 50.8 MB of archives.
After this operation, 204 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 nvidia-installer-cleanup amd64 20151021+4 [19.3 kB]
Get:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 update-glx amd64 0.7.4 [7,772 B]
Get:3 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 glx-alternative-mesa amd64 0.7.4 [8,184 B]
Get:4 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 glx-diversions amd64 0.7.4 [10.3 kB]
Get:5 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-legacy-check amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [176 kB]
Get:6 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 glx-alternative-nvidia amd64 0.7.4 [9,246 B]
Get:7 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-alternative amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [173 kB]
Get:8 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libnvidia-glcore amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [6,421 kB]
Get:9 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 nvidia-support amd64 20151021+4 [20.1 kB]
Get:10 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libgl1-nvidia-glx amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [574 kB]
Get:11 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 gcc-6-base i386 6.3.0-18 [180 kB]
Get:12 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libgcc1 i386 1:6.3.0-18 [48.0 kB]
Get:13 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libc6 i386 2.24-11+deb9u1 [2,466 kB]
Get:14 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libnvidia-glcore i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [6,834 kB]
Get:15 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libxau6 i386 1:1.0.8-1 [20.9 kB]
Get:16 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libbsd0 i386 0.8.3-1 [86.5 kB]
Get:17 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libxdmcp6 i386 1:1.1.2-3 [26.7 kB]
Get:18 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libxcb1 i386 1.12-1 [138 kB]
Get:19 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libx11-6 i386 2:1.6.4-3 [771 kB]
Get:20 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/main i386 libxext6 i386 2:1.3.3-1+b2 [55.2 kB]
Get:21 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libgl1-nvidia-glx i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [562 kB]
Get:22 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-egl-common amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [172 kB]
Get:23 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libgldispatch0-nvidia amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [214 kB]
Get:24 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libegl1-glvnd-nvidia amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [197 kB]
Get:25 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libnvidia-eglcore amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [6,353 kB]
Get:26 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libegl-nvidia0 amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [336 kB]
Get:27 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-egl-icd amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [171 kB]
Get:28 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-driver-libs amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [171 kB]
Get:29 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libnvidia-ml1 amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [550 kB]
Get:30 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-driver-bin amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [254 kB]
Get:31 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [3,186 kB]
Get:32 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-vdpau-driver amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [699 kB]
Get:33 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 nvidia-kernel-common amd64 20151021+4 [10.3 kB]
Get:34 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 nvidia-modprobe amd64 375.26-1 [16.4 kB]
Get:35 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-kernel-support amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [172 kB]
Get:36 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-kernel-dkms amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [6,763 kB]
Get:37 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 nvidia-driver amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [466 kB]
Get:38 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 nvidia-settings amd64 375.66-1 [882 kB]
Get:39 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 nvidia-xconfig amd64 375.26-1 [82.1 kB]
Get:40 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libnvidia-eglcore i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [6,731 kB]
Get:41 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libegl-nvidia0 i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [302 kB]
Get:42 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libgldispatch0-nvidia i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [209 kB]
Get:43 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libegl1-glvnd-nvidia i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [195 kB]
Get:44 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libgles1-glvnd-nvidia i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [179 kB]
Get:45 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libgles-nvidia1 i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [187 kB]
Get:46 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libgles1-glvnd-nvidia amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [180 kB]
Get:47 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libgles-nvidia1 amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [188 kB]
Get:48 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libgles2-glvnd-nvidia amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [182 kB]
Get:49 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libgles-nvidia2 amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [193 kB]
Get:50 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libgles2-glvnd-nvidia i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [181 kB]
Get:51 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libgles-nvidia2 i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [192 kB]
Get:52 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libglx0-glvnd-nvidia i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [192 kB]
Get:53 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libglx-nvidia0 i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [408 kB]
Get:54 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libglx0-glvnd-nvidia amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [193 kB]
Get:55 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libglx-nvidia0 amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [422 kB]
Get:56 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libnvidia-cfg1 amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [226 kB]
Get:57 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libnvidia-cfg1 i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [227 kB]
Get:58 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [195 kB]
Get:59 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free amd64 libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia amd64 375.82-1~deb9u1 [197 kB]
Get:60 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 nvidia-egl-icd i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [171 kB]
Get:61 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 nvidia-driver-libs i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [171 kB]
Get:62 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/non-free i386 nvidia-driver-libs-i386 i386 375.82-1~deb9u1 [171 kB]
Get:63 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stretch/contrib amd64 nvidia-persistenced amd64 375.26-2 [20.5 kB]
dpkg-preconfigure: unable to re-open stdin: No such file or directory
Fetched 50.8 MB in 22min 26s (37.7 kB/s)
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-installer-cleanup.
(Reading database ... 
(Reading database ... 5%
(Reading database ... 10%
(Reading database ... 15%
(....
(Reading database ... 95%
(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 231121 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../nvidia-installer-cleanup_20151021+4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-installer-cleanup (20151021+4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package update-glx.
Preparing to unpack .../update-glx_0.7.4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking update-glx (0.7.4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package glx-alternative-mesa.
Preparing to unpack .../glx-alternative-mesa_0.7.4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking glx-alternative-mesa (0.7.4) ...
Setting up nvidia-installer-cleanup (20151021+4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package glx-diversions.
(Reading database ... 
(Reading database ... 5%
(...
(Reading database ... 95%
(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 231236 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../glx-diversions_0.7.4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking glx-diversions (0.7.4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-legacy-check.
Preparing to unpack .../nvidia-legacy-check_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-legacy-check (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package glx-alternative-nvidia.
Preparing to unpack .../glx-alternative-nvidia_0.7.4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking glx-alternative-nvidia (0.7.4) ...
Setting up nvidia-legacy-check (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-alternative.
(Reading database ... 
(Reading database ... 5%
...
(Reading database ... 90%
(Reading database ... 95%
(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 231266 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../00-nvidia-alternative_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-alternative (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package gcc-6-base:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../01-gcc-6-base_6.3.0-18_i386.deb ...
Unpacking gcc-6-base:i386 (6.3.0-18) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgcc1:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../02-libgcc1_1%3a6.3.0-18_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libgcc1:i386 (1:6.3.0-18) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libc6:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../03-libc6_2.24-11+deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libc6:i386 (2.24-11+deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-glcore:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../04-libnvidia-glcore_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-glcore:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-support.
Preparing to unpack .../05-nvidia-support_20151021+4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-support (20151021+4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libxau6:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../06-libxau6_1%3a1.0.8-1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libxau6:i386 (1:1.0.8-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libbsd0:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../07-libbsd0_0.8.3-1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libbsd0:i386 (0.8.3-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libxdmcp6:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../08-libxdmcp6_1%3a1.1.2-3_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libxdmcp6:i386 (1:1.1.2-3) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libxcb1:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../09-libxcb1_1.12-1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libxcb1:i386 (1.12-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libx11-6:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../10-libx11-6_2%3a1.6.4-3_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libx11-6:i386 (2:1.6.4-3) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libxext6:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../11-libxext6_2%3a1.3.3-1+b2_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libxext6:i386 (2:1.3.3-1+b2) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../12-libgl1-nvidia-glx_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-glcore:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../13-libnvidia-glcore_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-glcore:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../14-libgl1-nvidia-glx_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-egl-common.
Preparing to unpack .../15-nvidia-egl-common_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-egl-common (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgldispatch0-nvidia:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../16-libgldispatch0-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgldispatch0-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../17-libegl1-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-eglcore:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../18-libnvidia-eglcore_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-eglcore:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libegl-nvidia0:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../19-libegl-nvidia0_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libegl-nvidia0:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-egl-icd:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../20-nvidia-egl-icd_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-egl-icd:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-driver-libs:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../21-nvidia-driver-libs_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-driver-libs:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-ml1:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../22-libnvidia-ml1_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-ml1:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-driver-bin.
Preparing to unpack .../23-nvidia-driver-bin_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-driver-bin (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package xserver-xorg-video-nvidia.
Preparing to unpack .../24-xserver-xorg-video-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking xserver-xorg-video-nvidia (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-vdpau-driver:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../25-nvidia-vdpau-driver_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-vdpau-driver:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-kernel-common.
Preparing to unpack .../26-nvidia-kernel-common_20151021+4_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-kernel-common (20151021+4) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-modprobe.
Preparing to unpack .../27-nvidia-modprobe_375.26-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-modprobe (375.26-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-kernel-support.
Preparing to unpack .../28-nvidia-kernel-support_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-kernel-support (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-kernel-dkms.
Preparing to unpack .../29-nvidia-kernel-dkms_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-kernel-dkms (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-driver.
Preparing to unpack .../30-nvidia-driver_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-driver (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-settings.
Preparing to unpack .../31-nvidia-settings_375.66-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-settings (375.66-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-xconfig.
Preparing to unpack .../32-nvidia-xconfig_375.26-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-xconfig (375.26-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-eglcore:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../33-libnvidia-eglcore_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-eglcore:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libegl-nvidia0:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../34-libegl-nvidia0_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libegl-nvidia0:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgldispatch0-nvidia:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../35-libgldispatch0-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libgldispatch0-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../36-libegl1-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../37-libgles1-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles-nvidia1:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../38-libgles-nvidia1_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libgles-nvidia1:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../39-libgles1-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles-nvidia1:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../40-libgles-nvidia1_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgles-nvidia1:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../41-libgles2-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles-nvidia2:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../42-libgles-nvidia2_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgles-nvidia2:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../43-libgles2-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libgles-nvidia2:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../44-libgles-nvidia2_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libgles-nvidia2:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../45-libglx0-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libglx-nvidia0:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../46-libglx-nvidia0_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libglx-nvidia0:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../47-libglx0-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libglx-nvidia0:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../48-libglx-nvidia0_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libglx-nvidia0:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-cfg1:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../49-libnvidia-cfg1_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-cfg1:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-cfg1:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../50-libnvidia-cfg1_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-cfg1:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../51-libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../52-libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia_375.82-1~deb9u1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-egl-icd:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../53-nvidia-egl-icd_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-egl-icd:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-driver-libs:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../54-nvidia-driver-libs_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-driver-libs:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-driver-libs-i386:i386.
Preparing to unpack .../55-nvidia-driver-libs-i386_375.82-1~deb9u1_i386.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-driver-libs-i386:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-persistenced.
Preparing to unpack .../56-nvidia-persistenced_375.26-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-persistenced (375.26-2) ...
Setting up nvidia-kernel-common (20151021+4) ...
Processing triggers for mime-support (3.60) ...
Setting up libnvidia-eglcore:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgldispatch0-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils (0.23-1) ...
Setting up nvidia-support (20151021+4) ...
Setting up update-glx (0.7.4) ...Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread
Setting up gcc-6-base:i386 (6.3.0-18) ...
Setting up libnvidia-glcore:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Processing triggers for menu (2.1.47+b1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-11+deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-xconfig (375.26-1) ...
Setting up nvidia-egl-common (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-modprobe (375.26-1) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.6.1-2) ...
Setting up glx-alternative-mesa (0.7.4) ...
Setting up libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up glx-diversions (0.7.4) ...
Processing triggers for glx-alternative-mesa (0.7.4) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/lib/mesa-diverted to provide /usr/lib/glx (glx) in auto mode
Setting up glx-alternative-nvidia (0.7.4) ...
Processing triggers for glx-alternative-nvidia (0.7.4) ...
Setting up nvidia-alternative (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Processing triggers for nvidia-alternative (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/lib/nvidia/current to provide /usr/lib/nvidia/nvidia (nvidia) in auto mode
Setting up libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
[?1049h[1;24r[4l[?25l(B[m[37m[40m[1;24r[H[2J[1;1H[97m[44m[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K
[K[1;1H[37mPackage configuration[6;3H[30m[47m┌─────────────────┤ [31mConfiguring libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64[30m ├─────────────────┐[7;3H│                                                                         │[97m[40m [8;3H[30m[47m│ Conflicting nouveau kernel module loaded                                │[97m[40m [9;3H[30m[47m│                                                                         │[97m[40m [10;3H[30m[47m│ The free nouveau kernel module is currently loaded and conflicts with   │[97m[40m [11;3H[30m[47m│ the non-free nvidia kernel module.                                      │[97m[40m [12;3H[30m[47m│                                                                         │[97m[40m [13;3H[30m[47m│ The easiest way to fix this is to reboot the machine once the           │[97m[40m [14;3H[30m[47m│ installation has finished.                                              │[97m[40m [15;3H[30m[47m│                                                                         │[97m[40m [16;3H[30m[47m│                                 [37m[41m<Ok>[30m[47m                                    │[97m[40m [17;3H[30m[47m│                                                                         │[97m[40m [18;3H[30m[47m└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘[97m[40m [19;4H                                                                           [16;38H[?12l[?25h[24;1H[37m(B[m[39;49m
[K
[?1049lSetting up libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-kernel-support (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-settings (375.66-1) ...
Setting up nvidia-vdpau-driver:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libegl-nvidia0:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libnvidia-cfg1:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libnvidia-ml1:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgles-nvidia1:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up xserver-xorg-video-nvidia (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-driver-bin (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-persistenced (375.26-2) ...
Setting up libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libglx-nvidia0:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-egl-icd:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgles-nvidia2:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-driver-libs:amd64 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Processing triggers for nvidia-alternative (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
update-alternatives: updating alternative /usr/lib/nvidia/current because link group nvidia has changed slave links
Setting up nvidia-kernel-dkms (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Loading new nvidia-current-375.82 DKMS files...
Building for 4.9.0-4-amd64
Building initial module for 4.9.0-4-amd64
Done.

nvidia-current:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
   - No original module exists within this kernel
 - Installation
   - Installing to /lib/modules/4.9.0-4-amd64/updates/dkms/

nvidia-current-modeset.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
   - No original module exists within this kernel
 - Installation
   - Installing to /lib/modules/4.9.0-4-amd64/updates/dkms/

nvidia-current-drm.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
   - No original module exists within this kernel
 - Installation
   - Installing to /lib/modules/4.9.0-4-amd64/updates/dkms/

nvidia-current-uvm.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
   - No original module exists within this kernel
 - Installation
   - Installing to /lib/modules/4.9.0-4-amd64/updates/dkms/

depmod...

DKMS: install completed.
Setting up nvidia-driver (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libc6:i386 (2.24-11+deb9u1) ...
Setting up libbsd0:i386 (0.8.3-1) ...
Setting up libnvidia-cfg1:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libxdmcp6:i386 (1:1.1.2-3) ...
Setting up libxau6:i386 (1:1.0.8-1) ...
Setting up libgcc1:i386 (1:6.3.0-18) ...
Setting up libnvidia-eglcore:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgldispatch0-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libnvidia-glcore:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libegl1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libegl-nvidia0:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgles-nvidia2:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libgles-nvidia1:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libxcb1:i386 (1.12-1) ...
Setting up libopengl0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libx11-6:i386 (2:1.6.4-3) ...
Setting up nvidia-egl-icd:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libxext6:i386 (2:1.3.3-1+b2) ...
Setting up libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libglx0-glvnd-nvidia:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-driver-libs:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up libglx-nvidia0:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Setting up nvidia-driver-libs-i386:i386 (375.82-1~deb9u1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-11+deb9u1) ...
Processing triggers for update-glx (0.7.4) ...
Processing triggers for glx-alternative-nvidia (0.7.4) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/lib/nvidia to provide /usr/lib/glx (glx) in auto mode
Processing triggers for menu (2.1.47+b1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-11+deb9u1) ...
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.130) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-4-amd64
cryptsetup: WARNING: failed to detect canonical device of /dev/sda7
I: The initramfs will attempt to resume from /dev/nvme0n1p2
I: (UUID=4ce88423-c5cf-4a69-b6d4-1d9fcafa7353)
I: Set the RESUME variable to override this.
New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
Finished
Press <Enter> to exit

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:40 pm
by Stevo
richb wrote:
Stevo wrote:But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU?
No it is 60 for the integrated intel.
Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec

You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit.
Thanks. I am not on the laptop right now. But will get it when I am. By the way I remembered glxspheres is a better comparison. It will be interesting to see how that fares.
You also have to run the test for the Intel GPU with this command so you won't get 60 fps:

Code: Select all

vblank_mode=0 glxgears

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 11:22 pm
by SwampRabbit
Glmark2 can help with some quick GPU testing too, it “was” in the testing repo if I remember right.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 4:17 am
by Gaer Boy
BitJam wrote:
Gaer Boy wrote: What does 'Console columns' do? Accepted all other defaults.
We will select a console font size so there will be roughly that many columns of console text. The default value is 120 so we select a font size so there are roughly 120 columns of text....
Thanks for the detailed explanation. The default worked fine for me.

Phil

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 5:39 am
by richb
You also have to run the test for the Intel GPU with this command so you won't get 60 fps:
Indeed, about 7800 fps

Found this explanation on an Ubuntu site. Accurate?
vblank_mode=0 tells the graphic card to ignore the refresh rate of your monitor and just try to reach the maximux fps it's capable off.

You usually don't want this, because it causes tearing and wastes battery life without any benefits (you can't view more then, in your case, 60fps because your monitor isn't able to change what's displaying more than 60 times every second).

You might sometimes want this (in online shooters such as cs:go for example) because otherwise you will have a lot of input lag. It's a trade-off, input lag vs. screen tearing.

I think optirun sets vblank_mode=0 by default, so it doesn't change whether you specify it or not. primusrun doesn't and it too caps at 60 fps without vblank_mode=0.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:57 am
by peregrine
MX17 b1 is working very nicely out of the box on my laptop - much better than 16 was.
As I reported with MX17 a5 the server in the MX Package Installer does not work. It opens momentarily then asks if you want to exit. MX16 had php5.6.x MX17 has php7.x

Code: Select all

$ inxi -F
System:    Host: Loretta Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: ASUSTeK product: X550LA v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           Mobo: ASUSTeK model: X550LA v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           UEFI: American Megatrends v: X550LA.403 date: 11/26/2013
Battery    BAT0: charge: 33.1 Wh 97.2% condition: 34.1/37.8 Wh (90%)
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core i5-4200U (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           clock speeds: max: 2600 MHz 1: 1041 MHz 2: 897 MHz 3: 972 MHz 4: 897 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Haswell-ULT Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@60.06hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Haswell Mobile version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card-1 Intel 8 Series HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Card-2 Intel Haswell-ULT HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
           IF: enp2s0f1 state: down mac: e0:3f:49:d6:e7:7d
           Card-2: Ralink RT3290 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe driver: rt2800pci
           IF: wlp3s0f0 state: up mac: 54:35:30:21:fa:95
           Card-3: Atmel
           IF: null-if-id state: N/A speed: N/A duplex: N/A mac: N/A
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 500.1GB (3.8% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: HGST_HTS545050A7 size: 500.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 39G used: 5.7G (16%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda11
           ID-2: /home size: 58G used: 1019M (2%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda12
           ID-3: swap-1 size: 12.58GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda8
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 30.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: 0
Info:      Processes: 209 Uptime: 2 min Memory: 484.3/5855.9MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40 

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:09 am
by dolphin_oracle
peregrine wrote:MX17 b1 is working very nicely out of the box on my laptop - much better than 16 was.
As I reported with MX17 a5 the server in the MX Package Installer does not work. It opens momentarily then asks if you want to exit. MX16 had php5.6.x MX17 has php7.x

Code: Select all

$ inxi -F
System:    Host: Loretta Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: ASUSTeK product: X550LA v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           Mobo: ASUSTeK model: X550LA v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           UEFI: American Megatrends v: X550LA.403 date: 11/26/2013
Battery    BAT0: charge: 33.1 Wh 97.2% condition: 34.1/37.8 Wh (90%)
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core i5-4200U (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           clock speeds: max: 2600 MHz 1: 1041 MHz 2: 897 MHz 3: 972 MHz 4: 897 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Haswell-ULT Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@60.06hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Haswell Mobile version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card-1 Intel 8 Series HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Card-2 Intel Haswell-ULT HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
           IF: enp2s0f1 state: down mac: e0:3f:49:d6:e7:7d
           Card-2: Ralink RT3290 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe driver: rt2800pci
           IF: wlp3s0f0 state: up mac: 54:35:30:21:fa:95
           Card-3: Atmel
           IF: null-if-id state: N/A speed: N/A duplex: N/A mac: N/A
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 500.1GB (3.8% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: HGST_HTS545050A7 size: 500.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 39G used: 5.7G (16%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda11
           ID-2: /home size: 58G used: 1019M (2%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda12
           ID-3: swap-1 size: 12.58GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda8
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 30.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: 0
Info:      Processes: 209 Uptime: 2 min Memory: 484.3/5855.9MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40 
got it, thanks!

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:10 am
by dolphin_oracle
dolphin_oracle wrote:
peregrine wrote:MX17 b1 is working very nicely out of the box on my laptop - much better than 16 was.
As I reported with MX17 a5 the server in the MX Package Installer does not work. It opens momentarily then asks if you want to exit. MX16 had php5.6.x MX17 has php7.x

Code: Select all

$ inxi -F
System:    Host: Loretta Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: ASUSTeK product: X550LA v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           Mobo: ASUSTeK model: X550LA v: 1.0 serial: N/A
           UEFI: American Megatrends v: X550LA.403 date: 11/26/2013
Battery    BAT0: charge: 33.1 Wh 97.2% condition: 34.1/37.8 Wh (90%)
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core i5-4200U (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           clock speeds: max: 2600 MHz 1: 1041 MHz 2: 897 MHz 3: 972 MHz 4: 897 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Haswell-ULT Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@60.06hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Haswell Mobile version: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card-1 Intel 8 Series HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Card-2 Intel Haswell-ULT HD Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
           IF: enp2s0f1 state: down mac: e0:3f:49:d6:e7:7d
           Card-2: Ralink RT3290 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe driver: rt2800pci
           IF: wlp3s0f0 state: up mac: 54:35:30:21:fa:95
           Card-3: Atmel
           IF: null-if-id state: N/A speed: N/A duplex: N/A mac: N/A
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 500.1GB (3.8% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: HGST_HTS545050A7 size: 500.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 39G used: 5.7G (16%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda11
           ID-2: /home size: 58G used: 1019M (2%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda12
           ID-3: swap-1 size: 12.58GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda8
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 30.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: 0
Info:      Processes: 209 Uptime: 2 min Memory: 484.3/5855.9MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40 
got it, thanks!
by the way, if you are up to day, there should be a /var/log/mxpi.log file with all the info from your session. if you could post that, it will save me a lot of time.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:24 am
by peregrine
I will be glad to help. I have MX17b1 installed on two laptops. On the HP I tried the MXPI unsuccessfully and on the ASUS I manually installed the server. I do not see a /var/log/mxpi.log file.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:26 am
by dolphin_oracle
peregrine wrote:I will be glad to help. I have MX17b1 installed on two laptops. On the HP I tried the MXPI unsuccessfully and on the ASUS I manually installed the server. I do not see a /var/log/mxpi.log file.
ok, the version on b1 didn't originally have a log, so maybe the updated one hasn't landed yet. I've got it installed on my system at home, testing out the logging feature.


Don't worry about it for this one...you gave me enough to track it down easy enough.

:happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:40 am
by peregrine
I thought this info might be useful from my server install
MariaDB is recommended over MySQL. As a matter of fact, if you try to install MySQL on Debian 9 using the following command, it will install MariaDB and set MariaDB as the default database server.

Code: Select all

apt install mysql-server mysql-client
Be glad to test when the time comes

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 9:56 am
by dolphin_oracle
peregrine wrote:I thought this info might be useful from my server install
MariaDB is recommended over MySQL. As a matter of fact, if you try to install MySQL on Debian 9 using the following command, it will install MariaDB and set MariaDB as the default database server.

Code: Select all

apt install mysql-server mysql-client
Be glad to test when the time comes
ok, so should we go ahead and change the file to MariaDB then? Probably, or the uninstall info might not work correctly. But does that make sense on your end?

Here's the current list (corrected for php 7) that "local web server" installs. Could you provide any comment?

Code: Select all

apache2
apache2-utils
apache2-mpm-prefork
php7.0
php7.0-common
mysql-server
mysql-common
libapache2-mod-php7.0
php7.0-mysqll
phpmyadmin 

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 10:27 am
by peregrine
replied in dev forum

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:04 pm
by Jerry3904
Screenfetch not installed by default, huh? And when it is, we get the Debian logo. We've talked about this in the past, I remember, but I don't recall if we ever ended up with anything definite.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:38 pm
by Stevo
Jerry3904 wrote:Screenfetch not installed by default, huh? And when it is, we get the Debian logo. We've talked about this in the past, I remember, but I don't recall if we ever ended up with anything definite.
Most of the discussion in the past has been about Neofetch...I don't think we did a custom version for Mx 17 yet.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:42 pm
by Jerry3904
Does any user know about neofetch? Screenfetch is pretty widely known IMO

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:56 pm
by Stevo
Yes, but Neofetch is actively developed and shows the MX logo...at least with the version I just backported from Buster: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1C2ReX ... E8wIwyIPSY

I think that Neofetch also is getting better known. Maybe we could add something that runs neofetch when they invoke screenfetch.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 8:42 pm
by Paul..
here 'tis on MX17b1
ScreenshotEDIT.png

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:03 am
by berlin59
I installed 17beta1 on my Toshiba-Satellite Laptop, which is UEFI .
Sorry to say, after the successfull installation, the grub-menu (some call it boot-menu) takes about 45 seconds to appear.
( I have other distros on the laptop and win10 too, so I need the grub-menu to select the OS I want to start )

Before this installation, when I pressed the power-button of the laptop to start it, there appeared the toshiba screen for about 2 seconds, then the grub-menu appeared instantly.

Now I press the power-button and the toshiba screen appears for about 2 seconds, then for a split second there seems to be happening something which normally shows the grub-menu, but now nothing happens, the screen remains grey for about 45 seconds and only then the grub-menu appears.

I am afraid something is messed up and I must wipe the harddrive and format it in order to make completely new installations of win10 and the linux distros. This would take many hours.

I hope you can help me to avoid this. Thank you.

The inxi -F is from MX-16.1 which I installed too, hoping the new installed grub from it would fix the problem, but it didn't fix it.
Anyways, the info about this laptop is the same as it would be with mx-17

Code: Select all

inxi -F
System:    Host: laptop Kernel: 4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 x86_64 (64 bit) Desktop: Xfce 4.12.2
           Distro: MX-16.1_x64 Metamorphosis 8 June 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: TOSHIBA product: SATELLITE C850-19D v: PSCBWE-03200WGR
           Mobo: Intel model: PLCSF8 v: Type2 - Board Version
           UEFI: Insyde v: 6.80 date: 10/01/2013
CPU:       Dual core Intel Celeron B830 (-MCP-) cache: 2048 KB 
           clock speeds: max: 1800 MHz 1: 799 MHz 2: 799 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@60.07hz
           GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Sandybridge Mobile GLX Version: 3.0 Mesa 12.0.3
Audio:     Card Intel 7 Series/C210 Series Family High Definition Audio Controller
           driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL8188CE 802.11b/g/n WiFi Adapter driver: rtl8192ce
           IF: wlan0 state: down mac: 20:16:d8:65:02:84
           Card-2: Realtek RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller driver: r8169
           IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: 70:54:d2:47:e1:f0
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 320.1GB (7.5% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: TOSHIBA_MQ01ABD0 size: 320.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 26G used: 6.0G (25%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda8
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 5.12GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 50.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 185 Uptime: 1:38 Memory: 718.6/3836.2MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.11 

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:35 am
by Jerry3904
Did Grub work correctly when you were running Live?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:23 am
by dolphin_oracle
If you are booting uefi, them the former grub installs and windows bootloader should still be present in the esp partition. You can use your uefi setup (bios) to choose which one to boot. Oldmlinux grubs will only work if the former linux installs are still present but the windows ones should work.

It is also sometimes beneficial to remove bootloader you arent using.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:34 am
by monsieurzik
Will this beta will receive future updates ? I'm interested in being à tester but a bit lazy to install again each Times.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:42 am
by chrispop99
monsieurzik wrote:Will this beta will receive future updates ? I'm interested in being à tester but a bit lazy to install again each Times.
There may be updates for a given test release, but there will not be an upgrade path from one version to the next.

Don't install unless you are prepared for things to break, and are prepared to reinstall when the next beta comes out.

You can still help by testing live however.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:47 am
by dolphin_oracle
monsieurzik wrote:Will this beta will receive future updates ? I'm interested in being à tester but a bit lazy to install again each Times.
its actually received several already. However, some of the live features and some odds and ends might not be in an update without getting the next beta iso.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:13 am
by berlin59
dolphin_oracle wrote:If you are booting uefi, them the former grub installs and windows bootloader should still be present in the esp partition. You can use your uefi setup (bios) to choose which one to boot. Oldmlinux grubs will only work if the former linux installs are still present but the windows ones should work.

It is also sometimes beneficial to remove bootloader you arent using.
Sorry, it must be because I am not english, but I don't grasp what you are trying to tell me.

During installation of MX-17 and later MX-16.1 on this uefi-laptop, the installer asked me where I want the grub to be installed. It had 3 options. MBR , Root and esp.
Since I installed about 100 different distros on this laptop in order to test them, I know that grub must go into esp, therefore I chose that.
The installation ended successfully.

In the boot-menu which appears after start, I can chose which OS I want to boot.
There is Win10, LinuxMint 17.3, LinuxMint 18.2, Peppermint-8, MX-16.1 and MX-17beta-1 .

Each does start correctly when I chose it.

The problem is that it takes about 45 seconds until the boot-menu appears.
The installer of MX-17beta-1 ruined something in my laptop.
Because before I installed it, the boot-menu appeared after 2 seconds since I press the power-button.
The first 2 seconds, the logo screen from Toshiba appeared, then immediately the boot-menu.
Now it is not immediately, but takes 45 seconds.
That is my problem.

I hope that I expressed it in an understandable way because in the past I ran into problems because of the words I used.
boot-menu, grub-menu or something and that caused misunderstandings.
Somewhere in a tutorial of Toshiba they used the name "GNU GRUB menu", maybe that is the correct word, I don't know.

I made a screenshot from the Toshiba tutorial which shows the grub-boot-menu which in my case appears much too late.
Image

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:38 am
by asqwerth
When you installed MX, did you format swap partition or select the "no swap or using existing swap" option?
In your boot or grub menu, which distro/OS is listed first?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:45 am
by berlin59
I selected the "no swap or using existing swap" option.

In the grub menu MX16.1 is listed first because I installed it after the installation of MX17beta-1.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:50 am
by richb
The /var/log/boot file may tell you something. You can post it here and perhaps someone will see an anomaly.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 12:11 pm
by berlin59
Here is the /var/log/boot file.
Never saw that file before.
From what I understand of it, the log is started when I select an OS from the grub-boot-menu and press "Enter", because from there to the login-screen it takes 25 seconds on my laptop.
So the big lag of more than 40 seconds happens before the log is started and therefore not recorded.
Maybe there is a log somewhere for that gap ?

Code: Select all

Sat Nov 11 08:52:22 2017: [....] Setting parameters of disc: (none)^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:22 2017: [....] Setting preliminary keymap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:24 2017: [....] Activating swap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:24 2017: [....] Checking root file system...fsck from util-linux 2.25.2
Sat Nov 11 08:52:24 2017: rootMX16: clean, 195378/1708784 files, 1254692/6833152 blocks
Sat Nov 11 08:52:24 2017: ^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:24 2017: [....] Cleaning up temporary files... /tmp^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:24 2017: [....] Starting early crypto disks...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module lp.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module ppdev.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module parport_pc.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module loop.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module ecryptfs.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module fuse.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Setting up LVM Volume Groups...  No volume groups found
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: ^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Starting remaining crypto disks...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Activating lvm and md swap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Checking file systems...fsck from util-linux 2.25.2
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: ^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Mounting local filesystems...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Activating swapfile swap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Cleaning up temporary files...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Skip starting firewall: ufw (not enabled)...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:25 2017: [....] Setting kernel variables ...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:26 2017: Running 0dns-down to make sure resolv.conf is ok...done.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:26 2017: [....] Configuring network interfaces...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:26 2017: [....] Starting rpcbind daemon...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:27 2017: [....] Starting NFS common utilities: statd idmapd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:27 2017: [....] Cleaning up temporary files...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:27 2017: [....] Setting up ALSA...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:27 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Setting console screen modes.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:27 2017: ^[[9;30]^[[14;30][....] Setting up console font and keymap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:28 2017: [....] Setting up X socket directories... /tmp/.X11-unix /tmp/.ICE-unix^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:28 2017: [....] Setting sensors limits^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:28 2017: INIT: Entering runlevel: 5
Sat Nov 11 08:52:28 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Using makefile-style concurrent boot in runlevel 5.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:29 2017: Setting battery charge thresholds...done.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:29 2017: [....] Not starting NFS kernel daemon: no exports. ...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[33mwarn^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c ^[[33m(warning).^[[39;49m
Sat Nov 11 08:52:29 2017: [....] Starting acpi_fakekey daemon...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:29 2017: [....] Starting enhanced syslogd: rsyslogd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:29 2017: [....] Starting anac(h)ronistic cron: anacron^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:29 2017: [....] Starting ACPI services...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:29 2017: [....] Starting deferred execution scheduler: atd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:30 2017: [....] Starting periodic command scheduler: cron^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:30 2017: [....] Starting cgroup management daemon: cgmanager[....] Starting cgroup management proxy daemon: cgproxy^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:30 2017: [....] Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:31 2017: [....] Starting CUPS Bonjour daemon: cups-browsed^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:32 2017: [....] Starting system message bus: dbus^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:32 2017: [....] Starting bluetooth: bluetoothd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:32 2017: [....] Starting Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD Daemon: avahi-daemon^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:32 2017: [....] Starting Light Display Manager: lightdm^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:32 2017: [....] Starting NTP server: ntpd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:33 2017: [....] Starting network connection manager: NetworkManager^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:33 2017: [....] Loading cpufreq kernel modules...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone (acpi-cpufreq).
Sat Nov 11 08:52:37 2017: [....] CPUFreq Utilities: Setting ondemand CPUFreq governor...disabled, governor not available...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:37 2017: [....] Starting NetBIOS name server: nmbd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:37 2017: [....] Starting virtual private network daemon:^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:37 2017: [....] saned disabled; edit /etc/default/saned^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 08:52:37 2017: SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: disabled, see /etc/default/spamassassin
Sat Nov 11 08:52:38 2017: [....] Starting SMB/CIFS daemon: smbd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:31 2017: [....] Setting parameters of disc: (none)^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:31 2017: [....] Setting preliminary keymap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:35 2017: [....] Activating swap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:35 2017: [....] Checking root file system...fsck from util-linux 2.25.2
Sat Nov 11 18:19:35 2017: rootMX16: clean, 230287/1708784 files, 1953572/6833152 blocks
Sat Nov 11 18:19:35 2017: ^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:36 2017: [....] Cleaning up temporary files... /tmp^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:36 2017: [....] Starting early crypto disks...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module lp.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module ppdev.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module parport_pc.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module loop.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module ecryptfs.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Loading kernel module fuse.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Setting up LVM Volume Groups...  No volume groups found
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: ^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Starting remaining crypto disks...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Activating lvm and md swap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Checking file systems...fsck from util-linux 2.25.2
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: ^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Mounting local filesystems...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Activating swapfile swap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Cleaning up temporary files...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Skip starting firewall: ufw (not enabled)...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: [....] Setting kernel variables ...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:37 2017: Running 0dns-down to make sure resolv.conf is ok...done.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:38 2017: [....] Configuring network interfaces...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:38 2017: [....] Starting rpcbind daemon...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [....] Starting NFS common utilities: statd idmapd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [....] Cleaning up temporary files...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [....] Setting up ALSA...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Setting console screen modes.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: ^[[9;30]^[[14;30][....] Setting up console font and keymap...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [....] Setting up X socket directories... /tmp/.X11-unix /tmp/.ICE-unix^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [....] Setting sensors limits^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: INIT: Entering runlevel: 5
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [^[[36minfo^[[39;49m] Using makefile-style concurrent boot in runlevel 5.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [....] Starting acpi_fakekey daemon...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: [....] Not starting NFS kernel daemon: no exports. ...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[33mwarn^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c ^[[33m(warning).^[[39;49m
Sat Nov 11 18:19:39 2017: Setting battery charge thresholds...done.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:40 2017: [....] Starting enhanced syslogd: rsyslogd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:40 2017: [....] Starting cgroup management daemon: cgmanager[....] Starting ACPI services...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:41 2017: [....] Starting anac(h)ronistic cron: anacron^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:42 2017: [....] Starting deferred execution scheduler: atd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:42 2017: [....] Starting cgroup management proxy daemon: cgproxy^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:43 2017: [....] Starting periodic command scheduler: cron^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:43 2017: [....] Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:43 2017: [....] Starting CUPS Bonjour daemon: cups-browsed^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:44 2017: [....] Starting system message bus: dbus^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:44 2017: [....] Starting bluetooth: bluetoothd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:45 2017: [....] Starting Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD Daemon: avahi-daemon^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:45 2017: [....] Starting NetBIOS name server: nmbd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:45 2017: [....] Starting Light Display Manager: lightdm^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:46 2017: [....] Starting network connection manager: NetworkManager^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:46 2017: [....] Loading cpufreq kernel modules...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone (acpi-cpufreq).
Sat Nov 11 18:19:46 2017: [....] Starting NTP server: ntpd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:46 2017: [....] CPUFreq Utilities: Setting ondemand CPUFreq governor...disabled, governor not available...^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0cdone.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:46 2017: [....] Starting virtual private network daemon:^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:46 2017: [....] saned disabled; edit /etc/default/saned^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.
Sat Nov 11 18:19:47 2017: SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: disabled, see /etc/default/spamassassin
Sat Nov 11 18:19:47 2017: [....] Starting SMB/CIFS daemon: smbd^[[?25l^[[?1c^[7^[[1G[^[[32m ok ^[[39;49m^[8^[[?25h^[[?0c.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 12:30 pm
by richb
I do not see anything untoward in there, but thinking about it that logs after the grub screen,

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:20 pm
by dolphin_oracle
berlin59 wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:If you are booting uefi, them the former grub installs and windows bootloader should still be present in the esp partition. You can use your uefi setup (bios) to choose which one to boot. Oldmlinux grubs will only work if the former linux installs are still present but the windows ones should work.

It is also sometimes beneficial to remove bootloader you arent using.
Sorry, it must be because I am not english, but I don't grasp what you are trying to tell me.

During installation of MX-17 and later MX-16.1 on this uefi-laptop, the installer asked me where I want the grub to be installed. It had 3 options. MBR , Root and esp.
Since I installed about 100 different distros on this laptop in order to test them, I know that grub must go into esp, therefore I chose that.
The installation ended successfully.

In the boot-menu which appears after start, I can chose which OS I want to boot.
There is Win10, LinuxMint 17.3, LinuxMint 18.2, Peppermint-8, MX-16.1 and MX-17beta-1 .

Each does start correctly when I chose it.

The problem is that it takes about 45 seconds until the boot-menu appears.
The installer of MX-17beta-1 ruined something in my laptop.
Because before I installed it, the boot-menu appeared after 2 seconds since I press the power-button.
The first 2 seconds, the logo screen from Toshiba appeared, then immediately the boot-menu.
Now it is not immediately, but takes 45 seconds.
That is my problem.

I hope that I expressed it in an understandable way because in the past I ran into problems because of the words I used.
boot-menu, grub-menu or something and that caused misunderstandings.
Somewhere in a tutorial of Toshiba they used the name "GNU GRUB menu", maybe that is the correct word, I don't know.

I made a screenshot from the Toshiba tutorial which shows the grub-boot-menu which in my case appears much too late.
Image
With uefi, grub gets installed to the esp, as you've noted. However, unlike with legacy boots, the old grubs are NOT overwritten, just the latest grub is given boot priority. All the little grub efi files aRe still present on the esp partiton unused but taking up space. The boot priority is stored in what's call nvram or non-volatile ram.

The esp partition is typically between 100 amd 250 mbs. If you've been distro hopping and installing many many distros, as you seem to indicate, it is very possibe that the partition is full or that the nvram is full, which can cause very bizarre boot issues before grub even launches. (I had a kernel crash flood my nvram with jibberrish so I know).

I don't know if either is your problem, but it is worth a try to use your uefi-bios-setup to remove the old unsed bootloader entries that you aren't using.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:41 pm
by berlin59
it is worth a try to use your uefi-bios-setup to remove the old unsed bootloader entries that you aren't using.
Thank you very much for the help.

The question for me is: how to do it ?
A link to a tutorial would be enough and I will try everything I can.

In the meanwhile I had the idea to install Peppermint-8 on the partition where I have LinuxMint 17.3 installed.
Why ?
Because usually when doing a new install of an OS, later at start of the laptop, this new installed OS is on top of all others in the grub-boot-menu and therefore is the default OS which will boot after 5 seconds (MX distros), others have 10 seconds.

But strange enough, the new installed Peppermint-8 , although the installation went through without any errors, is not on top of the grub-menu. And even more strange, P-8 was for some reason not able to install it's own grub-menu, but still the MX-16.1 grub menu is there and still MX-16.1 is on top and starts after 5 seconds if I do not select another OS.

Something is wrong, because such a behavior I had only when I installed Solus-3 distro. It grabbed the whole startup process and did not allow anything else to select than itself and Win10.
It was a long fight to get rid of Solus-3.

Another special distro is Deepin from China. A nice distro, but it grabs the boot-procedure in a similar way and keeps its own grub-menu although I installed several other distros to get it straightened out.

I cannot tell you how often I had to use the boot-repair-disk on this uefi-laptop.

Maybe it is about a big difference in Ubuntu-based distros and Debian based ones ?
I think so because problems with booting and grub-menu happened only with Debian-distros like Sparky, Deepin and now MX. (Solus-3 is different because it is coded on its own as far as I understand)

All the Ubuntu-based distros managed the uefi-architecture without problems. When I installed a new distro, it got its own grub-menu to be the one which appears and it is the default OS.

Just to inform you about my experiences.
Anyway, maybe the bug this time is caused by what you say. Some overflow of space in the esp.
I am curious now to find the fault.

Otherwise I am afraid I have to zero the harddrive and begin from scratch. A long journey.

Just in case it might help, I used efibootmgr.
It shows that even after the installation of P-8, somehow MX did not allow P-8 to change the boot sequence.
It occupies the first 2 places and keeps Ubuntu on the 3rd place.
I know that all Ubuntu-based distros write their info into that Ubuntu-efi-entry.

Code: Select all

sudo efibootmgr -v
BootCurrent: 0007
Timeout: 0 seconds
BootOrder: 0007,0006,0001,0004,0000,0005,2003,2001,2002
Boot0000* Windows Boot Manager	HD(1,800,100000,577f146a-067a-4454-8c62-4cd08e9d7677)File(\EFI\Microsoft\Boot\bootmgfw.efi)RC
Boot0001* ubuntu	HD(1,800,100000,577f146a-067a-4454-8c62-4cd08e9d7677)File(\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi)
Boot0002* EFI Network 0 for IPv6 (70-54-D2-47-E1-F0) 	ACPI(a0341d0,0)PCI(1c,2)PCI(0,0)MAC(MAC(7054d247e1f0,0)030d3c000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000000000000000000000000000RC
Boot0003* EFI Network 0 for IPv4 (70-54-D2-47-E1-F0) 	ACPI(a0341d0,0)PCI(1c,2)PCI(0,0)MAC(MAC(7054d247e1f0,0)RC
Boot0004  Windows Boot Manager	HD(1,800,100000,577f146a-067a-4454-8c62-4cd08e9d7677)File(\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi)WINDOWS.........x...B.C.D.O.B.J.E.C.T.=.{.9.d.e.a.8.6.2.c.-.5.c.d.d.-.4.e.7.0.-.a.c.c.1.-.f.3.2.b.3.4.4.d.4.7.9.5.}...a................
Boot0005* Ubuntu	HD(1,800,100000,577f146a-067a-4454-8c62-4cd08e9d7677)File(\EFI\ubuntu\grubx64.efi)RC
Boot0006* MX17	HD(1,800,100000,577f146a-067a-4454-8c62-4cd08e9d7677)File(\EFI\MX17\grubx64.efi)
Boot0007* MX16	HD(1,800,100000,577f146a-067a-4454-8c62-4cd08e9d7677)File(\EFI\MX16\grubx64.efi)
Boot2001* EFI USB Device	RC
Boot2002* EFI DVD/CDROM	RC
Boot2003* EFI Network	RC
With the efibootmgr I changed the boot-sequence.
Made the Ubuntu boot-entry the default one.
Then sudo update-grub and restart.
Now the laptop shows the Peppermint-8 grub-menu as desired.

But still it takes more than 40 seconds until the grub-menu appears on the screen.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:42 pm
by Jerry3904
Do the usual solutions not work when uefi is involved? 1) boot to a Linux distro and run update-grub as root; 2) boot to the live USB and use Boot Repair.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:53 pm
by berlin59
Jerry3904 wrote:Do the usual solutions not work when uefi is involved? 1) boot to a Linux distro and run update-grub as root; 2) boot to the live USB and use Boot Repair.
The boot sequence is now fixed.

With boot-repair there is nothing to fix anymore except maybe removing all installed linux distros.
But I am afraid that will not help me much.
I predict that after a new installation of MX or an ubuntu-based distro, my problem will not be solved.
Because the problem is the gap of 45 seconds from seeing the Toshiba screen to the grub-menu.

I intend to use tomorrow to clean the harddrive and format it as gpt with the needed esp, then installing win10 and then a linux distro. Spent already too many hours today on this, I am tired.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:28 pm
by dolphin_oracle
berlin59 wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:Do the usual solutions not work when uefi is involved? 1) boot to a Linux distro and run update-grub as root; 2) boot to the live USB and use Boot Repair.
The boot sequence is now fixed.

With boot-repair there is nothing to fix anymore except maybe removing all installed linux distros.
But I am afraid that will not help me much.
I predict that after a new installation of MX or an ubuntu-based distro, my problem will not be solved.
Because the problem is the gap of 45 seconds from seeing the Toshiba screen to the grub-menu.

I intend to use tomorrow to clean the harddrive and format it as gpt with the needed esp, then installing win10 and then a linux distro. Spent already too many hours today on this, I am tired.
Its not likely your entire harddrive. the esp is a actual fat formatted partition, usually hidden but it is there. you really owe it to your self to see if its full, or if you can remove the old entries from inside the bios setup program of your pc. this will be different for each pc, but likely accessed by hitting either some key while the "Toshiba" is visible before the grub boot menu, or if you run "update-grub" after an mx install, there might be a "setup" entry in your grub menu.

if the nvram is full, formatting and reinstalling WILL NOT FIX IT. if its just the esp, reformating the entire drive is still overkill. Use your PC's bios-setup utility first to try to remove old grub bootloaders efi files before taking those drastic steps.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 5:37 pm
by berlin59
dolphin_oracle,
I agree. It would be overkill.
I installed the gnome-disk-utility and there I can see the efi partition.
537 MB — 416 MB frei (22,4% belegt)
So the esp is not full.

About removing old grub bootloaders I will try to do that now.
Since I am familiar with the Bios-setup screen on my laptop, I rather think there is no way to change something from there.
I will try to google "nvram full" or something similar and give feedback about it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 5:48 pm
by dolphin_oracle
berlin59 wrote:dolphin_oracle,
I agree. It would be overkill.
I installed the gnome-disk-utility and there I can see the efi partition.
537 MB — 416 MB frei (22,4% belegt)
So the esp is not full.

About removing old grub bootloaders I will try to do that now.
Since I am familiar with the Bios-setup screen on my laptop, I rather think there is no way to change something from there.
I will try to google "nvram full" or something similar and give feedback about it.
on my laptop, the feature is something in the "boot order" area, and I just hit the "delete" key to remove both the entry from the list, which also removes it from nvram and the esp for that matter.

If this isn't the problem, then you aren't out anything. If this fixes your issue, then you've saved yourself a lot of headache.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 6:19 pm
by richb
dolphin_oracle wrote:
berlin59 wrote:dolphin_oracle,
I agree. It would be overkill.
I installed the gnome-disk-utility and there I can see the efi partition.
537 MB — 416 MB frei (22,4% belegt)
So the esp is not full.

About removing old grub bootloaders I will try to do that now.
Since I am familiar with the Bios-setup screen on my laptop, I rather think there is no way to change something from there.
I will try to google "nvram full" or something similar and give feedback about it.
on my laptop, the feature is something in the "boot order" area, and I just hit the "delete" key to remove both the entry from the list, which also removes it from nvram and the esp for that matter.

If this isn't the problem, then you aren't out anything. If this fixes your issue, then you've saved yourself a lot of headache.
The other way yo remove them is with efibootmanager. In a root terminal. The delete key in the bios screen did not work for me.

Code: Select all

efibootmgr
It will list all the bootable systems. The first column is the boot number
Then

Code: Select all

efibootmgr -b x -B
Where x is the number of the entry you want to delete. Be careful and make sure you are deleting the right one.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 6:47 pm
by berlin59
richb,
I already used efibootmgr to delete some of the entries. It worked fine, I hit the correct ones.

I am experimenting with the boot-repair-disk right now. If that doesn't solve my problem, I will go the hard way and format the whole harddisk and install everything from scratch.
If that doesn't help, I am done and will let go. :happy:

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:25 pm
by berlin59
With boot-repair-disk I first tried to remove all Kernels and reinstall the latest Kernel for the Peppermint-8 OS on sda6.
It never finished, so I closed the program and used the OS-remover for Peppermint-8 on sda4.
That installed the grub new into the esp I hope.

After restart, the gap of 45 seconds was gone.
The Toshiba screen appeared and after 2 seconds, within a split-second the grub-menu appeared.
It says GNU GRUB Version 2.02 beta2-36ubuntu3.9
The menu was a big surprise because there are old and rotten entries from Solus-3. The entry for Peppermint is missing

What else is there ?
- Windows UEFI bootmgfw.efi
- Windows Boot UEFI loader
- EFI/goofiboot/goofibootx64.efi
- EFI/ubuntu/fbx64.efi
- EFI/ubuntu/fwupx64.efi
- EFI/ubuntu/mmx64.efi
- EFI/ubuntu/MokManager.efi
- Windows Boot Manager (on /dev/sda1)
- MX-16.1 Metamorphosis (16.1) (on /dev/sda8)
Advanced options for ...
and MX 17 Horizon ... with advanced options

I thought I had cleaned the goofiboot entry long time ago, it is from Solus-3, but now it shows up again ?

And all the ubuntu-entries ?

Do you have an idea how to clean this mess up ?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:56 pm
by richb
I cannot vouch for this but it sounds like this is what happened to you.
Now you should also delete the ubuntu subdirectory in the EFI partition to prevent the UEFI firmware from restoring the entry into the BootOrder.
Procedure is in the second post.

https://askubuntu.com/questions/63610/h ... -menu-uefi

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:36 pm
by berlin59
Thank you very much to all who helped me.

I don't know how and why I got to the solution, but it is there.
richb, your comment came too late, sorry.

I googled and found somebody who said I should edit the files in /etc/grubd .
I found the file "25_custom" there where I deleted the entries which did not work in the grub-menu. entries like goofibootx64.efi
or fbx64.efi etc.

Then after sudo update-grub and restart, they were gone in the grub-menu.

If you ask me why they weren't there not before I asked for help ( they were not present in the MX-16 nor in the MX-17 grub-menu ), I think I know the answer.
These old entries were on the partition where LinuxMint 18.2 is installed, they sat there in that grubd-folder inside the 25_custom file all the time. But this OS was not the default OS from which the grub-menu was displayed, therefore it only showed up after I experimented with boot-repair-disk, not knowing exactly what it did.

Obviously not the way others than me should experiment on their machines.

But the laptop is not my production machine, for that I have the PC which has the old fashioned MBR and not Uefi.
No distro ever caused problems on that PC, they all manage the grub perfectly.

Thanks again for your kind help.
I appreciate it very much.

For me this problem is solved now.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:54 am
by ferlop
richb wrote:
ferlop wrote:I have installed MX-16.1 (September) and runs pretty well. Indeed, it is a very good distro. Two days ago I tried live MX-17 B1 (and before a4 and a5) and noticed that ram consumption is much higher than MX-16.1 live. Why is that? It can be explained? Thanks.
Not sure how much it consumes on your system ,on mine very little, 4 core AMD, but you can try turning off the conky and see what results. MX Conky and click stop.

Hello.

My computer is a very old one: desktop Dell Optiplex 5200 with a 3,4 GHZ Dual Core Processor, 4 GB Ram.

The MX16.1 live session and the HDD installation: flows between 230-240 MB of ram after starting.

The MX-17 testing (alphas and beta 1): more than 600 MB of ram. Even when conky is disabled it never reaches that low value of ram consumption as the 16.1 does.

MX-17 is not so fast and smooth oppening applications as MX-16.1.

I've got a laptop Lenovo T61 (very old one as well): I am going to do the same job to verify the performance.

Thanks for your answer

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 12:07 pm
by richb
ferlop wrote:
richb wrote:
ferlop wrote:I have installed MX-16.1 (September) and runs pretty well. Indeed, it is a very good distro. Two days ago I tried live MX-17 B1 (and before a4 and a5) and noticed that ram consumption is much higher than MX-16.1 live. Why is that? It can be explained? Thanks.
Not sure how much it consumes on your system ,on mine very little, 4 core AMD, but you can try turning off the conky and see what results. MX Conky and click stop.

Hello.

My computer is a very old one: desktop Dell Optiplex 5200 with a 3,4 GHZ Dual Core Processor, 4 GB Ram.

The MX16.1 live session and the HDD installation: flows between 230-240 MB of ram after starting.

The MX-17 testing (alphas and beta 1): more than 600 MB of ram. Even when conky is disabled it never reaches that low value of ram consumption as the 16.1 does.

MX-17 is not so fast and smooth oppening applications as MX-16.1.

I've got a laptop Lenovo T61 (very old one as well): I am going to do the same job to verify the performance.

Thanks for your answer
The devs have been looking at this. More to follow.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 12:36 pm
by chrispop99
There has been some discussion here and elsewhere about the default image viewer. This is important to me as it's something I use a lot. I don't like gThumb at all, for numerous reasons, and I don't like Mirage (MX-16 default) because it has no print facility. The best I had come up with was the Gnome Image Viewer (EOG), but that has no resizing option.

I've spent some time this weekend testing a number of image viewers, and unless I've missed something obvious, I've found one that I think does pretty much everything.

It's 'Nomacs', and it's in the Testing repo.

It has printing capability, does cropping, resizing, and a reasonably comprehensive amount of image manipulation. It will also open PSD files (native Photoshop), something few other viewers do. It has been stable during my limited testing. In spite of how comprehensive it is, speed is very good. It is much faster at opening an image on an ancient Pentium M laptop than gThumb.

It would be great if others could test this, and offer their opinions.

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:03 pm
by richb
Could not find Nomacs in the test repo, but found it in the default repo.

Just too a quick look. I particularly like the scroll wheel zoom feature. It looks like more of an image manipulation program rather than an image viewer. I do not find that a negative.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:29 pm
by stsoh
does anyone notice this or not;
open any apps and close it, does not stay at it's last closed location.
turn off conky, apps will then opens at it's last closed location.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:13 pm
by berlin59
richb wrote:I cannot vouch for this but it sounds like this is what happened to you.
Now you should also delete the ubuntu subdirectory in the EFI partition to prevent the UEFI firmware from restoring the entry into the BootOrder.
Procedure is in the second post.

https://askubuntu.com/questions/63610/h ... -menu-uefi
richb,
sorry for giving another feedback after telling everybody that the old uefi-entries are gone.
They are not gone, it only seemed to be so.

After using boot-repair-disk (of course from an usb-live-stick) to remove an OS from my Toshiba uefi-laptop, the new grub-menu showed all the old entries again.

So I followed exactly the procedure you suggested.
I definitely was able to delete the old entries in the efi-partition.

Later on I used boot-repair-disk again and after that the new grub-menu has them all back.
I wonder where these old entries are stored.
Somewhere the update-grub after a new grub-install into the esp must grab them.

Edit: I think I got it now.
Not with a live-usb linux, but from within LinuxMint. Although efi-partition is mounted, with sudo I was able to make a directory and mount sda1 there, sda1 = my esp.
Then I removed everything which looked nasty to me. In strange folders I found the solus3-files again and other files which I removed.
After the final sudo update-grub and restart, the grub-menu now is clean. All the old entries are gone.
Mission accomplished.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:00 am
by Jerry3904
This post in the Italian forum raises a question (G trans):
For pure curiosity I tested live version 17 beta. I would like to point out this anomaly: in the launch of the MX-16 live, the presence of wifi networks was immediately reported, so that time before, I could install the distro with the wifi connection only. It should be kept in mind that I have the b43 card, which has always caused problems with various distro. When launching the live MX-17 beta, however, wifi is not detected, although b43-fwcutter has already been installed. I should have connected to the ethernet network for installation. Of course I let it go because I did not care to waste time. I bring anomaly to developers' attention for any controls.
I will test on my only laptop later todeay that has b43 (and b44).

EDIT: works fine on my Dell 700m

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:50 am
by dolphin_oracle
if the user has used a usb w/persistence on a different computer, the broadcom driver might not switch.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:24 am
by stsoh
how to downgrade kodi version 17 to 16?
new kodi version, freeze all videos, can't play any video either streaming or on the hd.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:14 am
by Shay2
Where would one add a key combination?
I am trying to add " Ctrl+Alt+s " screenshot.sh
as that is the combo I like and have used for years.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:21 am
by dolphin_oracle
Shay2 wrote:Where would one add a key combination?
I am trying to add " Ctrl+Alt+s " screenshot.sh
as that is the combo I like and have used for years.
Xfce Settings->Keyboard>Shoructs tab.

the screenshooter is currently on PrtSc

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 10:38 am
by Shay2
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Shay2 wrote:Where would one add a key combination?
I am trying to add " Ctrl+Alt+s " screenshot.sh
as that is the combo I like and have used for years.
Xfce Settings->Keyboard>Shoructs tab.

the screenshooter is currently on PrtSc
Thank you. I know that PrtScn is set, the only rig I have that is set to that. So I added it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:55 pm
by Stevo
stsoh wrote:how to downgrade kodi version 17 to 16?
new kodi version, freeze all videos, can't play any video either streaming or on the hd.
There are presently no Kodi 16 versions in either the Debian Stretch or the MX 17 repos. We should try and get Kodi 17 working, instead. Let's get an output of "inxi -F" for your machine, for starters. Your sig says you're running a Jessie-based kernel on MX 17, but I hope that's wrong.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:35 am
by spsf64
I noticed the included gscan2pdf is outdated (1.6.0), latest version is 1.8.8.
I tried to install 1.8.8 from the author's site but there are missing dependencies, any workaround for this?
TIA

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:39 am
by chrispop99
Is there anything specific that has yet to be tested, or that requires additional feedback?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:44 am
by dolphin_oracle
chrispop99 wrote:Is there anything specific that has yet to be tested, or that requires additional feedback?

Chris
we've got an updated remaster coming but its not in our repo yet.

still trying to work out how to automatically have firefox and thunderbird language packs picked up and follow the locale, as if they are default installed rather after the fact.

I think there is still some stuff going on with conky.

its getting there...

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:52 am
by Jerry3904
We are just finishing a revised MXC that includes

--launch button for CM
--notification if data updates are available
--additional drag entry
--minor aesthetic changes

No time for changes to the data package before B2 ...

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 11:39 am
by stsoh
Stevo wrote:
stsoh wrote:how to downgrade kodi version 17 to 16?
new kodi version, freeze all videos, can't play any video either streaming or on the hd.
There are presently no Kodi 16 versions in either the Debian Stretch or the MX 17 repos. We should try and get Kodi 17 working, instead. Let's get an output of "inxi -F" for your machine, for starters. Your sig says you're running a Jessie-based kernel on MX 17, but I hope that's wrong.
on the mx16.1 with the old version kodi run smooth no problems at all. the new version kodi unable to run any video. googled n tried every settings to prevent video freeze, still can't run video.

Code: Select all

System:    Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.13.0-11.1-liquorix-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: desktop Mobo: MSI model: G41M-P33 Combo(MS-7592) v: 7.0 serial: N/A
           BIOS: American Megatrends v: V32.13 date: 11/06/2014
CPU:       Dual core Pentium E5400 (-MCP-) cache: 2048 KB
           clock speeds: max: 3145 MHz 1: 3145 MHz 2: 3145 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel 4 Series Integrated Graphics Controller
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel G41 version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card-1 Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Def. Audio Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Card-2 GYROCOM C&C driver: USB Audio
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.13.0-11.1-liquorix-amd64
Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL8101/2/6E PCIE Fast/Gigabit Ethernet controller driver: r8169
           IF: enp2s0 state: down mac: 44:8a:5b:91:69:6c
           Card-2: Realtek RTL8169 PCI Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
           IF: enp3s0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: 64:70:02:00:71:f9
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 4120.8GB (68.2% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: TOSHIBA_Q300 size: 120.0GB
           ID-2: /dev/sdb model: TOSHIBA_DT01ACA2 size: 2000.4GB
           ID-3: /dev/sdc model: TOSHIBA_DT01ACA2 size: 2000.4GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 55G used: 4.8G (10%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 0.54GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/zram0
           ID-3: swap-2 size: 0.54GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/zram1
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 43.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 159 Uptime: 14 min Memory: 1206.8/7951.5MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43 

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2017 3:38 pm
by Stevo
Kodi works fine on with my Skylake 520 intel video on a real install of MX 17, and fails to play (as expected) in a Virtual Box install, since that provides no 2D openGL acceleration.

Kodi uses openGL 2D video output to display video, unlike most other video players that currently try and use xv output by default. So if this is the case, another Kodi version would have the same issues, and we haven't seen them with 17.3 in MX 15/16. If you set VLC to use openGL output, is that also broken? Try it from the command line:

Code: Select all

vlc <filename> -V opengl
I suspect that it could be due to MX 17 assigning your video card to use the kernel modesetting video driver by default, instead of the "intel" driver that MX 16 used. You can switch to the intel driver by creating a 20-intel.conf text file with this in it:

Code: Select all

Section "Device"
        Identifier  "Device0"
        Driver      "intel"
#       BusID       "PCI:0:2:0"
#       Option      "AccelMethod" "sna"
        Option      "DRI"    "true"
#       Option      "TearFree"  "true"
#       Option "DRI" "3"
EndSection
I have commented out some options that I use, but left them in there for experimentation if you wish.

Copy the file to the correct location, then reboot:

Code: Select all

sudo cp 20-intel.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/
Try VLC to see if openGL now works if it was broken before.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:29 am
by asinoro
Pay attention to this tool works fine on MX with panel shortcut and full alsa configuration. You can find at synaptic.
qasmixer
ALSA mixer for the desktop

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:39 am
by stsoh
Stevo wrote:... If you set VLC to use openGL output, is that also broken? Try it from the command line:

Code: Select all

vlc <filename> -V opengl
i'm not sure this 'failed to open' help or not, vlc can play video on my hd.

Code: Select all

$ vlc fixation.2012.480p.web.dl.x264.rmteam.mkv -Vopengl
VLC media player 2.2.6 Umbrella (revision 2.2.6-0-g1aae78981c)
[0000559b9c449148] core libvlc: Running vlc with the default interface. Use 'cvlc' to use vlc without interface.
Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_va_gl.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Failed to open VDPAU backend libvdpau_va_gl.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
installed libvdpau_va_gl1.so, kodi still can't play video.
I suspect that it could be due to MX 17 assigning your video card to use the kernel modesetting video driver by default, instead of the "intel" driver that MX 16 used. You can switch to the intel driver by creating a 20-intel.conf text file with this in it:

Code: Select all

Section "Device"
        Identifier  "Device0"
        Driver      "intel"
#       BusID       "PCI:0:2:0"
#       Option      "AccelMethod" "sna"
        Option      "DRI"    "true"
#       Option      "TearFree"  "true"
#       Option "DRI" "3"
EndSection
I have commented out some options that I use, but left them in there for experimentation if you wish.

Copy the file to the correct location, then reboot:

Code: Select all

sudo cp 20-intel.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/
Try VLC to see if openGL now works if it was broken before.
did as your suggestions, still kodi didn't work.
VLC can play videos on my hd.
kodi can't play any videos on my system.
remove/purge vlc, replace with mpv.
finally remove/purge kodi, gave up on desktop, use my tv-box.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:08 am
by BitJam
FWIW, it appears that the modesetting driver does support OpenGL: Intel vs. Modesetting X.Org DDX Performance Impact but I don't know how well this support spans the wide range of Intel hardware in the field.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:49 pm
by Stevo
I've made some preliminary packages of arc-theme-hdpi for HDPI screens. There are a couple of missing pixels in each corner, but the titlebar and buttons are embiggened and the borders are about 6 pixels instead of 1, making them much easier to grab. Maybe I can fix those "corner cases" with some editing of the source svg like I did to help the other elements, which is hard because I really don't see how they fit together, but it's a big improvement as is: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wYE2C ... 75Qee3ym-U

I can also use this as a base to make an xhdpi version, using 180 dpi instead of the 140 I used for this. Perhaps we can also modify the standard Arc theme with its one-pixel borders...

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:57 pm
by richb
That is a big improvement. On a 1920x1280 display it looks OK with the 140 you used, 160 would be better. Grabs are quite good.

EDIT: The close symbol looks large enough. The others are still quite small.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 1:24 pm
by Stevo
I redid them to make them native packages and added a 180 dpi -xhdpi package which will appear bigger, but getting it in the Goldilocks zone for a paticular dpi and monitor size is just going to be throwing darts blindfolded. But the procedure to make a custom dpi version is now not too difficult...could whip up a 160 dpi mhdpi version pretty quick. :happy: I couldn't find a lot about other hdpi themes on the xfce forums---I guess they recommend scaling everything up with xrandr instead. I think there is at least one GUI front end to it someplace...

New themes: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WbZ8n ... ysxhBse0N3

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 1:56 pm
by tradonal
hello all
-) je suis francais, ce post est traduit par google
je ne suis pas un expert, mais assidu .....
utilisateur de antix et ensuite MX depuis deja plusieurs années....
-) I'm french, this post is translated by google
I am not an expert, but diligent .....
antix user and then MX for several years now ....

information
-) 1 disque dur
-) 1 partition primaire sda1
-) grub2 dans mbr
-) boot iso avec grub2

information
-) 1 hard drive
-) 1 primary partition sda1
-) grub2 in mbr
-) boot iso with grub2

Code: Select all

menuentry "MX-17.b1 386 (November 6, 2017)" {
set root='hd0,msdos1'		
set isofile="/isos/MX-17.b1_386.iso"
loopback loop (hd0,msdos1)$isofile
linux (loop)/antiX/vmlinuz fromiso=${isofile} bootdev=sda1 quiet lang=fr kbd=be tz=Europe/Paris xres=1280x800 hwclock=utc 
initrd (loop)/antiX/initrd.gz
}
Boot menuentry "MX-17.b1 386 (November 6, 2017)"
-) everything is ok lang ect ....
but why always hold this?
We chose to not let the user install on the drive used to boot the live system
viewtopic.php?f=97&t=41097#p401364
it is not possible to install on sda6 logical partition without editing the file / sbin / partition-info and modify the line 169
viewtopic.php?f=97&t=41097&start=10#p401431

Code: Select all

[ "$EX_BOOT" ] && test -r $LIVE_CONFIG && eval $(grep ^BOOT_UUID= $LIVE_CONFIG)
by this

Code: Select all

#[ "$EX_BOOT" ] && test -r $LIVE_CONFIG && eval $(grep ^BOOT_UUID= $LIVE_CONFIG)
without modification of this line the installer does not see the hard disk
end information

MX in general and MX-17.b1 386 is a very good coder because it works very well on old pc ....
congratulations to you and thank you for this distribution

Code: Select all

$ inxi -F
System:    Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.9.0-4-686 i686 bits: 32 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
           Distro: MX-17.b1_386 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine:   Device: laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: Pavilion zv6000 (PZ989EA#UUG) v: F.08 serial: N/A
           Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 3085 v: 42.24 serial: N/A
           BIOS: Hewlett-Packard v: F.08 date: 03/22/2005
CPU:       Single core AMD Sempron 3000+ (-UP-) cache: 128 KB speed/max: 1000/1800 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] RS480M [Mobility Radeon Xpress 200]
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 )
           drivers: ati,radeon (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1280x800@60.12hz
           OpenGL: renderer: Gallium 0.4 on ATI RS480 version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio:     Card Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] IXP SB400 AC'97 Audio Controller
           driver: snd_atiixp
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-686
Network:   Card-1: Broadcom Limited BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller
           driver: b43-pci-bridge
           Card-2: Realtek RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter driver: 8139too
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 60.0GB (8.4% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: IC25N060ATMR04 size: 60.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 23G used: 4.8G (22%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda6
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 36.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 164 Uptime: 21 min Memory: 702.5/1257.8MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43 
cardou@mx1:~
$ 
:yay:

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:08 pm
by Jerry3904
on te remercie pour ces infos

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:25 pm
by Mauser
I was just looking at MX-17 on my desktop running it as a live USB and it looks like many bugs to be worked out especially with the panel not being visible at first until I switched it to the bottom and everything was way off to the left. When I would open programs they would off the left side of the screen as I could see just the shadow with compton enabled. It's like everything is way off to the left off the screen except for the wall paper. I guess it will be a while till all the bugs get worked out.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:21 am
by dolphin_oracle
Mauser wrote:I was just looking at MX-17 on my desktop running it as a live USB and it looks like many bugs to be worked out especially with the panel not being visible at first until I switched it to the bottom and everything was way off to the left. When I would open programs they would off the left side of the screen as I could see just the shadow with compton enabled. It's like everything is way off to the left off the screen except for the wall paper. I guess it will be a while till all the bugs get worked out.
This is a new one.

inxi -F.

Please plus a screenshot if you can.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:15 am
by masinick
I was able to grab the ISO image overnight and I hope to have the opportunity to try it out this weekend. I usually have very good success, even with early builds; hope the great track record of the team continues. Meanwhile most of my working hours are spent testing financial services software and I've been working hard lately, hence very little experimentation with software on my own time. But since MX is my "go-to" home system, I'll be checking it out ASAP.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:21 am
by Jerry3904
The B2 will be available very soon and you would do better to jump in then.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:24 am
by entropyfoe
Jerry, thanks for the tip on the up coming B2.

For me the 4.9 kernel is unstable on my new hardware, spontaneously rebooting every day or two often at idle, without much going on.

In contrast the 4.10 kernel in antix 17 rc1 was been stable, first uptime (after the 0906 BIOS and the nvidia driver- noveau locks keyboard and mouse every 1-2 days) was 8 1/2 days. Now a second test with antix 17 final, fully updated has been up with no crashes or lockups for >5 days.

I will certainly install the b2 of MX, and may then explore (again) updating kernels , maybe trying the antix 4.10 on MX b2.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:44 am
by Mauser
dolphin_oracle wrote:.
This is a new one.

inxi -F.

Please plus a screenshot if you can.[/quote] I can't take a screenshot because when I click on Screenshot the program is not visible when or if it opens. I never had this issue with previous versions of MX Linux. I did notice that I would see the Antec design wallpaper and in about 30 seconds it went to the Xfce wallpaper that has the mouse in the middle.
System: Host: MX16 Kernel: 4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.2
Distro: MX-16_x64 Metamorphosis 12 December 2016
Machine: Device: desktop System: HP product: 510-p026 serial: N/A
Mobo: HP model: 81B4 v: 00 serial: N/A UEFI [Legacy]: AMI v: F.13 date: 08/02/2016
CPU: Quad core Intel Core i5-6400T (-MCP-) cache: 6144 KB
clock speeds: max: 2800 MHz 1: 900 MHz 2: 905 MHz 3: 1024 MHz 4: 1241 MHz
Graphics: Card: Intel Device 1912
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz, 1920x1080@60.00hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) version: 4.3 Mesa 12.0.3
Audio: Card Intel Device a170 driver: snd_hda_intel Sound: ALSA v: k4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Network: Card-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: ec:8e:b5:d8:80:88
Card-2: Intel Device 3165 driver: iwlwifi
IF: wlan0 state: down mac: 84:ef:18:57:29:2f
Drives: HDD Total Size: 4000.8GB (23.2% used)
ID-1: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD4003FZEX size: 4000.8GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 3.6T used: 858G (25%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
ID-2: swap-1 size: 8.60GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda1
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 30.0C mobo: 27.8C
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 237 Uptime: 11:03 Memory: 1693.6/11881.4MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:46 am
by dolphin_oracle
Mauser wrote:
dolphin_oracle wrote:.
This is a new one.

inxi -F.

Please plus a screenshot if you can.
I can't take a screenshot because when I click on Screenshot the program is not visible when or if it opens. I never had this issue with previous versions of MX Linux.
System: Host: MX16 Kernel: 4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.2
Distro: MX-16_x64 Metamorphosis 12 December 2016
Machine: Device: desktop System: HP product: 510-p026 serial: N/A
Mobo: HP model: 81B4 v: 00 serial: N/A UEFI [Legacy]: AMI v: F.13 date: 08/02/2016
CPU: Quad core Intel Core i5-6400T (-MCP-) cache: 6144 KB
clock speeds: max: 2800 MHz 1: 900 MHz 2: 905 MHz 3: 1024 MHz 4: 1241 MHz
Graphics: Card: Intel Device 1912
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz, 1920x1080@60.00hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) version: 4.3 Mesa 12.0.3
Audio: Card Intel Device a170 driver: snd_hda_intel Sound: ALSA v: k4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Network: Card-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: ec:8e:b5:d8:80:88
Card-2: Intel Device 3165 driver: iwlwifi
IF: wlan0 state: down mac: 84:ef:18:57:29:2f
Drives: HDD Total Size: 4000.8GB (23.2% used)
ID-1: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD4003FZEX size: 4000.8GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 3.6T used: 858G (25%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda2
ID-2: swap-1 size: 8.60GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda1
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 30.0C mobo: 27.8C
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 237 Uptime: 11:03 Memory: 1693.6/11881.4MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.43[/quote]


more more:

Code: Select all

xrandr
Do you have 2 monitors? because it looks like the system thinks you have 2 monitors.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:52 am
by Mauser
I have one monitor and I have an HDMI cable going to my LCD TV that I use for watching KODI. I tried opening Display and I couldn't see it opened. xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 32767 x 32767
DP1 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 509mm x 286mm
1920x1080 60.00*+
1280x1024 75.02 60.02
1152x864 75.00
1024x768 75.03 60.00
800x600 75.00 60.32
640x480 75.00 59.94
720x400 70.08
HDMI1 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 820mm x 460mm
1366x768 59.81 +
1920x1080 60.00* 60.00 50.00 59.94 24.00 23.98
1920x1080i 60.00 50.00 59.94
1280x720 60.00 50.00 59.94
1024x768 75.03 70.07 60.00
800x600 72.19 75.00 60.32
720x576 50.00
720x576i 50.00
720x480 60.00 59.94
640x480 75.00 60.00 59.94
720x400 70.08
VIRTUAL1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:00 am
by dolphin_oracle
yeah, I think the TV is being picked up as primary. I would try unplugging and rebooting. Or turning on the TV.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:01 am
by Mauser
dolphin_oracle wrote:yeah, I think the TV is being picked up as primary. I would try unplugging and rebooting. Or turning on the TV.
OK. It's strange that it does that. I will give that a try.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:54 am
by Paul..
Umm...@Mauser...you appear to be using MX-16
Distro: MX-16_x64 Metamorphosis 12 December 2016

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:58 am
by Mauser
dolphin_oracle wrote:yeah, I think the TV is being picked up as primary. I would try unplugging and rebooting. Or turning on the TV.
That's what it was. It worked fine. I like that the Conky got fixed and works correctly. I also like that the scaling got fixed with higher DPI settings. Themeing is nicer. Great work by the MX team.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:01 pm
by Mauser
Paul.. wrote:Umm...@Mauser...you appear to be using MX-16
Distro: MX-16_x64 Metamorphosis 12 December 2016
No, I am using MX-16.1. But I had an issue with MX-17 that was resolved by dolphin_oracle.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:46 pm
by stsoh
i find it is odd that mx-linux didn't provide any optimizer like stacer or beachbit. any reason why? or there is one that i missed.
i installed stacer to get rid off thumbnails/logs/residues to clean up.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:46 pm
by richb
One could easily ask, why wasn't application x, y or z included. The simple answer is, developer's decision. In any case it is easily added from the Debian repos.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:28 pm
by Stevo
Did we use to include bleachbit? Maybe we thought it was a bit too dangerous for absolute beginners.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:30 pm
by richb
Stevo wrote:Did we use to include bleachbit? Maybe we thought it was a bit too dangerous for absolute beginners.
I think we did, and that was why it was removed.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 3:19 pm
by Mauser
richb wrote:
Stevo wrote:Did we use to include bleachbit? Maybe we thought it was a bit too dangerous for absolute beginners.
I think we did, and that was why it was removed.
Rightfully so if it works anything like diskcleaner in Windows. When I used Windows that was the worst thing I clicked on.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:19 pm
by Max17
Wireless will not connect. This seams to be an issue with all Debian Stretch based distributions. I'm in hopes that there will be a fix come through the pipe for this. I do not have a wired connection available to do an addition to or an update. I'm sure I am not the only one it this grand world of ours that will see this related issue. Thank you all for your great work! =-)

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:23 pm
by dolphin_oracle
Max17 wrote:Wireless will not connect. This seams to be an issue with all Debian Stretch based distributions. I'm in hopes that there will be a fix come through the pipe for this. I do not have a wired connection available to do an addition to or an update. I'm sure I am not the only one it this grand world of ours that will see this related issue. Thank you all for your great work! =-)
please post the terminal output of "inxi -F" output please for hardware bug reports.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:47 pm
by Max17
See below.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:52 pm
by Max17
dolphin_oracle wrote:
Max17 wrote:Wireless will not connect. This seams to be an issue with all Debian Stretch based distributions. I'm in hopes that there will be a fix come through the pipe for this. I do not have a wired connection available to do an addition to or an update. I'm sure I am not the only one it this grand world of ours that will see this related issue. Thank you all for your great work! =-)
please post the terminal output of "inxi -F" output please for hardware bug reports.
System: Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.9.0-4-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3
Distro: MX-17.b1_x64 Horizon November 6, 2017
Machine: Device: desktop System: Dell product: OptiPlex 980 serial: N/A
Mobo: Dell model: 0C522T v: A01 serial: N/A BIOS: Dell v: A17 date: 05/10/2017
CPU: Dual core Intel Core i5 660 (-HT-MCP-) cache: 4096 KB
clock speeds: max: 3326 MHz 1: 1463 MHz 2: 1596 MHz 3: 2660 MHz 4: 1463 MHz
Graphics: Card: Intel Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) driver: intel Resolution: 1920x1080@60.00hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ironlake Desktop version: 2.1 Mesa 13.0.6
Audio: Card Intel 5 Series/3400 Series High Def. Audio driver: snd_hda_intel
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.9.0-4-amd64
Network: Card-1: Intel 82578DM Gigabit Network Connection driver: e1000e
IF: eno1 state: down mac: 84:2b:2b:9f:78:00
Card-2: Ralink RT5372 Wireless Adapter driver: rt2800usb
IF: wlx9cefd5fe660e state: N/A mac: N/A
Drives: HDD Total Size: 250.0GB (3.1% used)
ID-1: /dev/sda model: ST3250310NS size: 250.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 6.1G used: 14M (1%) fs: overlay dev: N/A
ID-2: swap-1 size: 8.00GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda1
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 32.0C mobo: N/A
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 195 Uptime: 3 min Memory: 622.5/7786.0MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.40

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:29 am
by chrispop99
@Max17:

It would appear you are using a desktop system with a USB wireless device. These generally work with Linux, but those that don't are tricky to fix.

Can you say if this same machine and USB wireless device has worked with another version of Linux please?

Chris

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 8:26 am
by Paul..
@Max17

You have the right driver installed for that chipset (rt2800usb)...see this listing https://wiki.debian.org/rt2800usb

The required firmware is included by default in the b1 build (see link above)...so don't know why your usb wifi dongle is not firing up.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:40 pm
by Max17
chrispop99 wrote:@Max17:

It would appear you are using a desktop system with a USB wireless device. These generally work with Linux, but those that don't are tricky to fix.

Can you say if this same machine and USB wireless device has worked with another version of Linux please?

Chris
Yes it has worked with all distributions that I have installed or tried. Arch distros, Linux Mint, Ubuntu distros, MX 16.1, PCLinuxOS, Sparky, Sabayon. I'm currently using Antergos Plasma. No problems.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:47 pm
by Max17
Paul.. wrote:@Max17

You have the right driver installed for that chipset (rt2800usb)...see this listing https://wiki.debian.org/rt2800usb

The required firmware is included by default in the b1 build (see link above)...so don't know why your usb wifi dongle is not firing up.
It may seam that with the info in the link I may have to update for Stretch? I ran into the same issue with Netrunner and SolydK. It is an issue with me as I do not have access to connect with ethernet/wired connection. Dangit and I have been waiting on this release with great enthusiasm. :frown:

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:47 pm
by Jerry3904
Could you open up Network Assistant and check what the first team reports? Maybe a screen capture would help.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:48 pm
by Jerry3904
Also as Root

Code: Select all

iwconfig

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:51 pm
by kmathern
@Max17,

Could you post the output of this:

Code: Select all

 inxi -Nxxx
We can check the Chip-ID it will print out against the list of supported devices here: https://wiki.debian.org/rt2800usb#Supported_Devices, though I think it should come back as supported.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:59 pm
by i_ri
hello dolphin_oracle
b2. just downloaded beta2_x64.iso; have no match on md5sum. two downloads same mismatch result.
hashfile =... .. reported need ... Nov 19 edited this to remove/delete incorrect md5sum . it is replaced.
?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:12 pm
by dolphin_oracle
i_ri wrote:hello dolphin_oracle
b2. just downloaded beta2_x64.iso; have no match on md5sum. two downloads same mismatch result.
hashfile = eff8fed576aa19c52296c15bb9cac397 reported need 1bbe7b27fb711468c611bdd5f16c2a9d for iso _x64.b2
?
mine match here: two possibilities.

1. incomplete or corrupted upload on our end.

2. incomplete or corrupted download on your end.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:49 pm
by asinoro
I just downloaded the iso MX-17.b1_x64.iso from sourceforge and it is ok the md5.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:57 pm
by Stevo
Since it's beta 2, I would bet the upload hadn't finished yet--the iso should be 1.3 GiB 1,428,160,512 bytes. Plus beta 2 should be in another thread...

FWIW, I used the delta to create the new ISO and get the correct md5 sum.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:13 pm
by GuiGuy
Where is beta 2 and where is its announcement?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:18 pm
by dolphin_oracle
GuiGuy wrote:Where is beta 2 and where is its announcement?
its not announced yet.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:43 pm
by entropyfoe
I am trying to get the beta1 to beta2 delta to work.

my xdelta looks like this

Code: Select all

music@Ryzen:/media/2TB_backup/Downloads
$ xdelta patch MX-17_b1_to_b2_x64.delta [MX-17.b1_x64.iso [MX-17.b2_x64.iso]]
xdelta: MX-17_b1_to_b2_x64.delta: bad magic number: not a valid delta
Or is there a full iso soon to be posted?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:45 pm
by Jerry3904
Hey guys: it's not announced yet for a reason! We'll let you know when it's all set, but no support beforehand.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:12 pm
by dr-kart
Jerry3904 wrote:Hey guys: it's not announced yet for a reason! We'll let you know when it's all set, but no support beforehand.
sure thing :lipsrsealed:

btw there's no issue with usb wifi stick connection in b2 anymore! (Like I had in viewtopic.php?f=77&t=43184 )
Is the new 4.13 kernel to blame for that?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:19 pm
by Stevo
The correct syntax for the delta file would be

Code: Select all

xdelta3 -d -s fromfile patchname.delta tofile
"tofile" is optional, if you leave it off it will use the default new file name. But this is not a release, we are still testing it internally.

The 4.9 kernel had some problems with certain Realtek wi-fi drivers, so the new kernel is probably what fixed it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 8:43 pm
by entropyfoe
Sorry to jump the gun...
I am excited to hear of a newer kernel.

What kernel is it?

Is the post of dr-kart, is it 4.13? Wow, that is pretty new, newer than antix 17 with 4.10.

This is better I believe for the Ryzen chips and boards, newer kernels are better. With 4.10 (antix 17 final) my system is stable, but with 4.9 , spontaneous reboots every day or two.

I know it is an endless treadmill of new kernels, but 4.14 is going to be a long term support kernel I read.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 10:26 pm
by Max17
Jerry3904 wrote:Could you open up Network Assistant and check what the first team reports? Maybe a screen capture would help.
Just got in from work. Give me a few. Thanks =-)

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 10:30 pm
by Max17
kmathern wrote:@Max17,

Could you post the output of this:

Code: Select all

 inxi -Nxxx
We can check the Chip-ID it will print out against the list of supported devices here: https://wiki.debian.org/rt2800usb#Supported_Devices, though I think it should come back as supported.
Where would I find the chip ID? Okay got it.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:02 pm
by Max17
Jerry3904 wrote:Also as Root

Code: Select all

iwconfig
This is what I get when running 1wconfig in the terminal

eno1 no wireless extensions.
lo no wireless extensions.
wlx9cefd5fe660e IEEE 802.11 ESSID:off/any
Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Tx-Power=20 dBm
Retry short limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Power Management:off

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:04 pm
by Max17
Max17 wrote:
kmathern wrote:@Max17,

Could you post the output of this:

Code: Select all

 inxi -Nxxx
We can check the Chip-ID it will print out against the list of supported devices here: https://wiki.debian.org/rt2800usb#Supported_Devices, though I think it should come back as supported.
Where would I find the chip ID? Okay got it.
This is what I ger when running inxi -Nxxx in the terminal

Network: Card-1: Intel 82578DM Gigabit Network Connection
driver: e1000e v: 3.2.6-k port: ecc0 bus-ID: 00:19.0 chip-ID: 8086:10ef
Card-2: Ralink RT5372 Wireless Adapter
driver: rt2800usb v: 2.3.0 usb-ID: 002-003 chip-ID: 148f:5372

Is this what we should be looking for?

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 5:54 am
by asinoro
This command will show many info:

Code: Select all

sudo nmcli radio wifi on ; rfkill list all ; lshw -c network ; lspci -nnk | grep -A2 0280 ; lsmod ; modinfo rt2800usb

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 3:34 pm
by asinoro
I have an issue where not with antix 17 or MX 16.1, when I start MX 17 beta 1 on vbox after when loads desktop stuck and not respond with high cpu.
Some times opens firefox or synaptic and cpu is 99%.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:09 pm
by Stevo
entropyfoe wrote:Sorry to jump the gun...
I am excited to hear of a newer kernel.

What kernel is it?

Is the post of dr-kart, is it 4.13? Wow, that is pretty new, newer than antix 17 with 4.10.

This is better I believe for the Ryzen chips and boards, newer kernels are better. With 4.10 (antix 17 final) my system is stable, but with 4.9 , spontaneous reboots every day or two.

I know it is an endless treadmill of new kernels, but 4.14 is going to be a long term support kernel I read.
Yes, currently beta2 has the 4.13.4 kernel that's in stretch-backports. I just uploaded a backport of the 4.13.13 kernel in Sid that has amdgpu video driver support for more AMD GPUs than the backports one, plus has a faster kernel frequency setting (1000 Hz) than the stock Debian 250 Hz. That will be in testing to see how it updates and possibly could be the stock kernel in future revisions.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:11 pm
by Max17
asinoro wrote:This command will show many info:

Code: Select all

sudo nmcli radio wifi on ; rfkill list all ; lshw -c network ; lspci -nnk | grep -A2 0280 ; lsmod ; modinfo rt2800usb
Okee Doakee! Here it is.

Code: Select all

0: phy0: Wireless LAN
	Soft blocked: no
	Hard blocked: no
  *-network                 
       description: Ethernet interface
       product: 82578DM Gigabit Network Connection
       vendor: Intel Corporation
       physical id: 19
       bus info: pci@0000:00:19.0
       logical name: eno1
       version: 05
       serial: 84:2b:2b:9f:78:00
       capacity: 1Gbit/s
       width: 32 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
       configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=e1000e driverversion=3.2.6-k firmware=0.12-2 latency=0 link=no multicast=yes port=twisted pair
       resources: irq:27 memory:f7be0000-f7bfffff memory:f7bdc000-f7bdcfff ioport:ecc0(size=32)
  *-network
       description: Wireless interface
       physical id: 1
       bus info: usb@2:1.2
       logical name: wlx9cefd5fe660e
       serial: d2:c4:4c:89:7b:78
       capabilities: ethernet physical wireless
       configuration: broadcast=yes driver=rt2800usb driverversion=4.9.0-4-amd64 firmware=0.36 link=no multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11
Module                  Size  Used by
ext4                  585728  1
jbd2                  106496  1 ext4
fscrypto               28672  1 ext4
ecb                    16384  0
mbcache                16384  2 ext4
fuse                   98304  3
bnep                   20480  2
bluetooth             552960  7 bnep
cpufreq_userspace      16384  0
cpufreq_powersave      16384  0
cpufreq_conservative    16384  0
crc16                  16384  2 bluetooth,ext4
uinput                 20480  1
nfsd                  327680  2
auth_rpcgss            61440  1 nfsd
oid_registry           16384  1 auth_rpcgss
nfs_acl                16384  1 nfsd
nfs                   249856  0
lockd                  90112  2 nfsd,nfs
grace                  16384  2 nfsd,lockd
fscache                61440  1 nfs
sunrpc                344064  6 auth_rpcgss,nfsd,nfs_acl,lockd,nfs
ecryptfs               98304  0
cbc                    16384  0
encrypted_keys         20480  1 ecryptfs
lp                     20480  0
dm_crypt               24576  0
dm_mod                118784  1 dm_crypt
arc4                   16384  2
rt2800usb              28672  0
rt2x00usb              24576  1 rt2800usb
rt2800lib              94208  1 rt2800usb
rt2x00lib              53248  3 rt2800lib,rt2800usb,rt2x00usb
mac80211              671744  3 rt2800lib,rt2x00lib,rt2x00usb
intel_powerclamp       16384  0
coretemp               16384  0
kvm_intel             192512  0
i915                 1232896  8
cfg80211              589824  2 rt2x00lib,mac80211
crc_ccitt              16384  1 rt2800lib
rfkill                 24576  4 bluetooth,cfg80211
kvm                   589824  1 kvm_intel
snd_hda_codec_hdmi     49152  1
snd_hda_codec_realtek    90112  1
snd_hda_codec_generic    69632  1 snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hda_intel          36864  3
snd_hda_codec         135168  4 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hda_core           81920  5 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_codec_realtek
snd_hwdep              16384  1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm               110592  4 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_core,snd_hda_codec_hdmi
irqbypass              16384  1 kvm
crct10dif_pclmul       16384  0
crc32_pclmul           16384  0
crc32c_intel           24576  0
ghash_clmulni_intel    16384  0
aesni_intel           167936  0
aes_x86_64             20480  1 aesni_intel
lrw                    16384  1 aesni_intel
gf128mul               16384  1 lrw
glue_helper            16384  1 aesni_intel
drm_kms_helper        155648  1 i915
ablk_helper            16384  1 aesni_intel
cryptd                 24576  3 ablk_helper,ghash_clmulni_intel,aesni_intel
intel_cstate           16384  0
intel_uncore          118784  0
snd_timer              32768  1 snd_pcm
iTCO_wdt               16384  0
iTCO_vendor_support    16384  1 iTCO_wdt
snd                    86016  14 snd_hda_intel,snd_hwdep,snd_hda_codec,snd_timer,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_pcm
e1000e                245760  0
ppdev                  20480  0
drm                   360448  9 i915,drm_kms_helper
dell_wmi               16384  0
sparse_keymap          16384  1 dell_wmi
dell_smbios            16384  1 dell_wmi
mei_me                 36864  0
video                  40960  2 dell_wmi,i915
evdev                  24576  19
mei                   102400  1 mei_me
dcdbas                 16384  1 dell_smbios
psmouse               135168  0
parport_pc             28672  1
i2c_i801               24576  0
lpc_ich                24576  0
sg                     32768  0
serio_raw              16384  0
mfd_core               16384  1 lpc_ich
parport                49152  3 lp,parport_pc,ppdev
soundcore              16384  1 snd
i2c_algo_bit           16384  1 i915
i2c_smbus              16384  1 i2c_i801
wmi                    16384  1 dell_wmi
button                 16384  1 i915
ptp                    20480  1 e1000e
pps_core               16384  1 ptp
acpi_cpufreq           20480  0
hid_generic            16384  0
usbhid                 53248  0
hid                   122880  2 hid_generic,usbhid
squashfs               53248  1
loop                   28672  2
nls_utf8               16384  1
isofs                  40960  1
sr_mod                 24576  1
cdrom                  61440  1 sr_mod
sd_mod                 45056  3
ata_generic            16384  0
ehci_pci               16384  0
ahci                   36864  3
libahci                32768  1 ahci
libata                249856  3 ahci,libahci,ata_generic
scsi_mod              225280  4 sd_mod,libata,sr_mod,sg
shpchp                 36864  0
mmc_block              40960  0
mmc_core              147456  1 mmc_block
crc32c_generic         16384  0
overlay                49152  1
battery                20480  0
ehci_hcd               81920  1 ehci_pci
usbcore               249856  5 usbhid,rt2800usb,rt2x00usb,ehci_hcd,ehci_pci
usb_common             16384  1 usbcore
filename:       /lib/modules/4.9.0-4-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800usb.ko
license:        GPL
firmware:       rt2870.bin
description:    Ralink RT2800 USB Wireless LAN driver.
version:        2.3.0
author:         http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
srcversion:     79C8FF0D61161719C1D2E53
alias:          usb:v20F4p724Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp5572d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v043Ep7A13d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C21d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C1Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p0253d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p0241d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v057Cp8501d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v043Ep7A32d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp5372d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp5370d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0471p2182d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0471p2181d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0471p2180d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0471p2126d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0471p2104d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04DAp23F6d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04DAp1800d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04DAp1801d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v043Ep7A42d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v043Ep7A22d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C23d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C22d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C20d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C1Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C1Dd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C1Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C19d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C15d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13D3p3365d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13D3p3329d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p17E8d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v043Ep7A32d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v043Ep7A12d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0586p3421d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p006Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p006Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0067d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp3573d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2019pED19d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0846p9019d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0846p9013d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0846p9012d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0789p016Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13B1p003Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04BBp094Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0021d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0020d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v7392p7733d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C1Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148FpF301d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp1103d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p17ADd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p17BCd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1B75p7733d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v5A57p0284d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0930p0A07d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0068d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0066d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0065d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0062d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0041d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp3572d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0789p0170d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1737p0079d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13B1p002Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04BBp0944d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9801d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v167Bp4001d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p179Dd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1690p0764d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1690p0761d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1690p0744d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v8516p3572d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0165d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0163d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0050d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp8070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp3370d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0471p20DDd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083ApB511d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C17d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp945Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0586p343Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0586p341Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0586p341Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0586p3418d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0586p3416d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v5A57p5257d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v5A57p0283d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v5A57p0282d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v5A57p0280d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0CDEp0025d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0CDEp0022d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v157Ep3013d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v157Ep300Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0324d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0323d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0313d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0302d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0164d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v177Fp0153d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v15A9p0006d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083ApB522d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083ApA703d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083ApA702d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083ApA701d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083ApA618d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083Ap8522d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083Ap7522d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083Ap7512d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083Ap7511d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v083Ap6618d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0060d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p005Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0051d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0048d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0047d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0042d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0040d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p003Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p003Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p003Dd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p003Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0039d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p002Dd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p002Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p002Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DF6p0017d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v129Bp1828d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04E8p2018d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp3072d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp3071d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp3070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp2870d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp2770d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v148Fp2070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1A32p0304d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2019pED06d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2019pAB25d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2019p5201d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0471p200Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1D4Dp0011d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1D4Dp000Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1D4Dp000Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1D4Dp0002d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v20B8p8888d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1B75pA200d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1B75p3072d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1B75p3071d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1B75p3070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p899Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p871Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p871Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p871Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p870Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p822Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p822Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p822Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p821Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p6899d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p3871d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p3870d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p3822d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p3821d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0DB0p3820d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v100Dp9031d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0789p0166d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0789p0164d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0789p0163d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0789p0162d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1737p0078d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1737p0077d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1737p0071d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1737p0070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13B1p0031d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04BBp0948d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04BBp0947d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v04BBp0945d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0018d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0017d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0013d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p000Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0009d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0003d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0E66p0001d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1044p800Dd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1044p800Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v15A9p0012d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9709d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9708d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9707d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9706d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9705d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9703d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9702d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1740p9701d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v203Dp14A9d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v203Dp1480d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v7392p7722d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v7392p7718d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v7392p7717d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v7392p7711d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v7392p4085d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0FE9pB307d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07FAp7712d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C25d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3C1Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v2001p3317d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C17d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C16d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C15d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C13d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C11d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C0Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C0Ed*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C0Dd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C0Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07D1p3C09d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v18C5p0012d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07AAp003Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07AAp003Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07AAp002Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p01FDd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p01A8d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p01EEd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p01A2d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p016Fd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p015Dd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p0158d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0411p00E8d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp935Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp935Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp825Bd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp825Ad*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp815Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp805Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v050Dp8053d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13D3p3321d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13D3p3307d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13D3p3305d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13D3p3273d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v13D3p3247d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1761p0B05d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p1784d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p1742d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p1732d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v0B05p1731d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1690p0740d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v15C5p0008d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C2Cd*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C28d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C27d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C25d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C23d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C12d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C09d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C07d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v14B2p3C06d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v8516p3072d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v8516p3071d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v8516p3070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v8516p2870d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v8516p2770d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v8516p2070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1EDAp2310d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1EDAp2210d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1EDAp2012d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v1482p3C09d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07B8p3072d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07B8p3071d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07B8p3070d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07B8p2770d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
alias:          usb:v07B8p2870d*dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*in*
depends:        rt2x00lib,rt2800lib,rt2x00usb,usbcore
intree:         Y
vermagic:       4.9.0-4-amd64 SMP mod_unload modversions 
parm:           nohwcrypt:Disable hardware encryption. (bool)

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:18 pm
by Jerry3904
I put it inside code tags--please use those next time, or dump into a txt file (by adding something like "> info.txt" at the end) that can be attached.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:59 pm
by Stevo
At least one user has reported that a Realtek device using the 2800usb driver would not work with the 4.9 kernel but would with the 4.13 kernel. That's worth testing when beta 2 with the 4.13 kernel is released very soon.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:03 am
by m_pav
Looks like a tumbler type daemon is hogging resources again. I had an issue un-mounting a USB device with a large 1.8GB car audio firmware file after copying its contents to my SSD. Copy process happened at 95MBPS, so it was over in moments, but after leaving it for 6-7 minutes while taking a phone call, when I tried to umount the device from Thunar which was only reading from the device, not writing to it, the following displayed.

I found the old tumbler script, copied it to /usr/local/bin, set permissions to root and marked it executable, added it to startup, rebooted and no more issues.
Screenshot.png

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:41 am
by stsoh
any kind soul, pls explain how/instruction to using delta3 to upgrade 17b1 to 17b2. thanks from a newbie.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:54 am
by richb
stsoh wrote:any kind soul, pls explain how/instruction to using delta3 to upgrade 17b1 to 17b2. thanks from a newbie.
From the wiki https://mxlinux.org/wiki/system/xdelta

Code: Select all

xdelta3 -d -s fromfile patchname.delta tofile

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:03 am
by stsoh
does it upgrade 17b1 on my hd to 17b2?
i'm try to use the MX-17_b1_to_b2_x64_mark_2.delta file to upgrade.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:16 am
by Jerry3904
No, it upgrades the B1 ISO to the B2 ISO. With so many changes from Beta 1 to Beta 2, including a new kernel, there is no easy upgrade path.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:28 am
by richb
I am not recommending this, but it worked for me. I used xdelta to create the b2 ISO from the b1 ISO. I then installed to SSD with b1 installed saving home. All my config files hence were available in b2. Any apps you added will have to be reinstalled, but will pick up their config files already on disk. For example I had compiz installed on bi and configured. Of course it was not installed on b2, Installing compiz picked up its config file and operated as it was in b1.
I have used this procedure starting at a5 going to b2. I give no guarantee and some anomaly may exist that I have not found. So user beware. The safest way is to install from scratch. That is the recommend procedure.

EDIT: This procedure may also invalidate any b2 testing. So as a tester one should verify results in a fresh install, say in a virtual machine before posting any issues.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:44 am
by stsoh
thanks for all the feedback.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:45 am
by richb
This thread is being closed since Beta 2 has been released.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:46 am
by Jerry3904
And thanks to everybody who contributed!

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread - 2 screens?

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 11:14 am
by JackC
My first effort on the forum; apologies in advance for beginners' blunders.

Paste of the machine in question :
System: Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Xfce 4.12.2
Distro: MX-16_x64 Metamorphosis 12 December 2016
Machine: Device: laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: HP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC v: 048E100000242B10000020000 serial: N/A
Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 146A v: 58.28 serial: N/A
BIOS: Hewlett-Packard v: F.26 date: 02/14/2011
Battery BAT0: charge: 45.4 Wh 100.0% condition: 45.4/45.4 Wh (100%)
CPU: Dual core Intel Core i5 M 430 (-MT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
clock speeds: max: 2267 MHz 1: 1333 MHz 2: 1466 MHz 3: 2267 MHz 4: 1466 MHz
Graphics: Card: Intel Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: modesetting,fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: 1024x768@60.00hz, 1440x900@60.02hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ironlake Mobile version: 2.1 Mesa 12.0.3
Audio: Card Intel 5 Series/3400 Series High Def. Audio driver: snd_hda_intel
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.7.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Network: Card-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCIE Gigabit Ethernet Controller driver: r8169
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: d8:d3:85:36:1d:ae
Card-2: Broadcom BCM4313 802.11bgn Wireless Network Adapter driver: wl
IF: wlan0 state: down mac: 00:26:82:8d:e2:d6
Drives: HDD Total Size: 320.1GB (1.9% used)
ID-1: /dev/sda model: Hitachi_HTS72503 size: 320.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 20G used: 5.6G (31%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda8
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 41.0C mobo: 39.0C
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 193 Uptime: 1:10 Memory: 650.1/2809.3MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.3.54

End of paste of the machine in question.

The problem:
When I try to boot into MX-17 64-bit (from a USB key, which has worked fine on other machines), I get a result pretty much identical to Mauser, with the XFCE wallpaper with the mouse (animal!) on it. Printscreen shows me a wide image which has the good MX-17 screen on the left, and attached on its right the XFCE wallpaper - I can't attach the screenimage here, because I have no way of saving it. My machine is a portable from which the original (broken) screen has been removed, and I use it with a screen attached to the VGA plug. Can it be that MX-17 is seeing a phantom screen where the original broken screen was, like people who feel pain 'in' an amputated limb??
The machine works fine with MX-16 (currently installed). It also works fine with Antix-17. Also, on a whim, I just tried MX-17 32-bit; same result as with the 64-bit version, but when I tried with 'Failsafe', 'Safe video' or 'nomodeset' from the boot menu, it worked OK. (The same experiments with the 64-bit version did not work.)

The question:
Generally, what's going on? And, specifically, can I safely install, say, the 32-bit version with 'nomodeset', or is this risky?

Thanks in advance for any info.

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:11 pm
by richb
An oversight. It should have been locked.

JackC, Please repost in the Mepis help thread.If you are using a beta you really should upgrade to a released version and preferably MX 17 which is the latest. If you wait a short time a point release is being prepared.