Page 55 of 60

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 4:06 am
by Lupin
is it possible to add the Alsamixer-plus equalizer(antiX feature) in the upcoming release?
sorry if im not on the right topic to ask this, is it possible to enable that feature in my current 18.3?

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:09 am
by richb
Coincidence?
The recent kernel upgrade, linux-image-4.19.0-6-amd64, reduced CPU temps by a factor of 4.

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:49 am
by grelos
Pinta is missing from MX19 repo while still present on MX18. What is going to happen after beta? I ask because I find Pinta an good tool for quick photo edits (GIMP is overkill for me..).

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:21 pm
by linuxcolonel
Assuming I have MX 19 Beta running well now, is it reasonable to assume I won’t have to re-install once the RTM release is available?

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:26 pm
by chrispop99
linuxcolonel wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:21 pm Assuming I have MX 19 Beta running well now, is it reasonable to assume I won’t have to re-install once the RTM release is available?
You will have to install the Final version. There will not be an upgrade path from the Betas.

Chris

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:52 pm
by Jerry3904
I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 1:05 pm
by SwampRabbit
grelos wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:49 am Pinta is missing from MX19 repo while still present on MX18. What is going to happen after beta? I ask because I find Pinta an good tool for quick photo edits (GIMP is overkill for me..).
grelos I'll work on getting Pinta into the MX-19 repos

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 1:12 pm
by chrispop99
Jerry3904 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:52 pm I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.
The problem with that approach for users is if they run into problems, and then fail to mention that when asking for help.

Chris

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 pm
by richb
Jerry3904 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:52 pm I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.
I am considering the same approach on my desktop.

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:15 pm
by dreamer
richb wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 pm
Jerry3904 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:52 pm I am starting to wonder if that remains technically true at this point when the new Debian and Xfce have been well integrated. I intend to not reinstall on a laptop, and expect it will work fine but not be identical to Final.
I am considering the same approach on my desktop.
The big visual glitch in beta 2.1 is shutdown/restart that takes you to LightDM for a moment. If this is fixed in final it's a big improvement. If it's not, then running a beta a little longer might not hurt. In any case, when someone posts "Quick System Info" it will probably show if it's a beta install or not. If there is a problem the first suggestion might be: Install final and then come back if problem persists.