MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#421 Post by JayM »

I'm talking about the change from 18.3 being now totally unable to install 19b3 snapshots created from other machines
If it helps, I've found that if I boot a snapshot USB and try to install it the Next button remains greyed out. If I open a root Thunar, show hidden files. navigate to / then delete .minstall, then close my root Thunar and run the installer again, it works normally. This is when trying to install a snapshot created on a particular machine onto a different machine. This is also on MX-18.3.
Last edited by JayM on Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
Paul..
Posts: 1782
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:34 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#422 Post by Paul.. »

bpr323 wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:05 am I'm talking about the change from 18.3 being now totally unable to install 19b3 snapshots created from other machines and unable to install a "fresh" copy of 19b3 over the existing installation on the same machine.
You sound like you haven't even looked at the s/shots and logs I posted all over this thread.
And before rolling your eyes and lecturing me that Calamares is a "Debian installer for Buster", please do yourself a favor and read up here - https://calamares.io/about/
MX (Antix) installer is far too over-engineered "old school" swiss-knife installer for otherwise brilliant and excellent distro like MX
Mod Comment: Please tone it down...You have provided input on the installer to the dev team...and they have made changes accordingly...we are about to release MX-19 RC...If you want to continue to be useful, testing and commenting on that release would be more appropriate.

Asus Prime X570-Pro | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
16 Gig DDR4 3600 | Radeon RX 5600 XT Graphics
Samsung 860 500GB SSDs (2)

User avatar
AK-47
Developer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:04 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#423 Post by AK-47 »

bpr323 wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:13 am Is it possible for MX to have 2 install options:
1) straight Calamares with "use the entire disk" auto-install, OR
2) minstall with "live kernel update", "fugal" / "persistence" and any other fancy bells & whistles for the "fork in the toaster" crowd?
This minstall saga is really not worth it for 80% of home users who just wantr a beautiful, stable debian distro with the snapshot.iso for recovery and distribution that really makes it stand out
So for MX to be useful for 80% of home users who just want a beautiful distro with snapshots, we need two installers. No worries.
bpr323 wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:13 amThe MX-19 is pretty much done for the final release, bar some minor cosmetic glitches. Slap the Calamares on it and tinker with the minstall in the background - no?
bpr323 wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:05 amAnd before rolling your eyes and lecturing me that Calamares is a "Debian installer for Buster", please do yourself a favor and read up here - https://calamares.io/about/
MX (Antix) installer is far too over-engineered "old school" swiss-knife installer for otherwise brilliant and excellent distro like MX
Thanks for volunteering to do all of the installer stuff for us.

If the calamares stuff doesn't quite work out, you're more than welcome to unoverengineer our installer. You will need the qt5-defaults packages to build it:

Code: Select all

$ git clone https://github.com/gazelle-installer/gazelle-installer.git
$ cd gazelle-installer
$ qmake && make
For development I recommend using Qt Creator, and it helps to install qt-docs too.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22088
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#424 Post by dolphin_oracle »

FWIW, we looked at calamares at one time, before we started the installer overhauls before MX17, and we would need to write a whole new modules for it because calamares isn't set up to deal with the antiX live system.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
bpr323
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:17 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#425 Post by bpr323 »

JayM wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:14 am If it helps, I've found that if I boot a snapshot USB and try to install it the Next button remains greyed out. If I open a root Thunar, show hidden files. navigate to / then delete .minstall, then close my root Thunar and run the installer again, it works normally. This is when trying to install a snapshot created on a particular machine onto a different machine. This is also on MX-18.3.
Good catch! That's exactly what I suspected. And then that corrupted .minstall gets written back to the installation boot USB!
My caveman solution was to re-image the install USB with factory ISO - then you have a chance to pull through with auto-install.

Charon
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 9:22 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#426 Post by Charon »

BitJam wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:16 amIn the first MX installation was /home a separate partition or was /home part of the root partition?
I described the installation order - the partition "home" was separate and created by the 16th Lubuntu time. He survived all Xubuntu until 18.04.3, 8 and 9 Debian, last Mint (mate&cinnamon separately) and the first(!) MX installation. During the repeated (!) Installation of the MX, the section becomes inaccessible to the installer. With this, I can put any *buntu again without problems (it’s exactly what I have now (xubuntu 18) - the MX have problems with my sound card).The problem only appears when reinstalling with LiveCD and I always did the installation with LiveCD right after launch, using the desktop icon - as I usually do in other LiveCD-systems.
That is I never do markup at all - only formatting section ("/boot" (1024 Mb) and "/" (42Gb)) on the first partition, with reconnecting all section labels.

But if necessary - I can reinstall it twice (for the first time it is installed guaranteed normally) - all backups I have :happy:

User avatar
bpr323
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:17 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#427 Post by bpr323 »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:31 am FWIW, we looked at calamares at one time, before we started the installer overhauls before MX17, and we would need to write a whole new modules for it because calamares isn't set up to deal with the antiX live system.
Cheers mate, appreciate your patience with me!
I'm just curious - when you say "to deal with antix live system", do you mean some constraints in replicating the snapshot ISO to target system disk (NVMe/SSD), or is this about somehow enabling various "frugal" features of the live desktop while it's on USB? These are two completely different use-cases, I'm not a developer, but to me it sounds like sitting on two chairs.

User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#428 Post by JayM »

Maybe this will help to explain what the "antiX magic" live USB system is all about:
https://antixlinux.com/the-most-extensi ... he-planet/
Cheers!
Last edited by JayM on Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#429 Post by asqwerth »

From my simplistic understanding, the reason antix/MX's installer can save live desktop changes when carrying out the installation is because it is actually imaging the actual live desktop you are running and writing that to your hard drive or media.

All other installers just write the pre-existing/already-created image on the iso to the hard drive.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
bpr323
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2019 10:17 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 3 Feedback

#430 Post by bpr323 »

AK-47 wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 8:27 am So for MX to be useful for 80% of home users who just want a beautiful distro with snapshots, we need two installers. No worries.
Yes, we need a simple, robust, uncomplicated installation routine for the un-initiated home users trying to migrate from Windows.
If the other 20% of hard-core CLI-loving enthusiasts want a "fancy" installer - give it to them as an option.
Ie. pop up a question on the 1st splash-screen "Do you know how to use Gparted - Y/N" - if the answer is No - have mercy on them and kick off a no-brainer installer. ;)

Locked

Return to “General”