I have to agree Shifu
#405 Post by Shifu ยป Sat Jun 10, 2023 11:12 pm
I installed it a week ago on a separate partition and it's running fine. Very good. Flawless. I haven't booted back into my MX21 partition since.
Same here, > 11 days uptime, no crash, no lock-ups. One reboot for bench marking. Taking all synaptic upgrades. Stable in light loads and heavy (Ryzens used to have trouble in idle modes in the bad old days), suspending and waking quickly without issues. Heavy, meaning 10 threads 100% with stockfish. Importing and working with > GB databases, many 100's of GB of data backups and file transfer...Firefox with many windows and hundreds of tabs. All smooth and fast. This is a great beta. Thanks !
For bench-marking, recall this is the same hardware, as with Shifu, just a different partition, on the same drive as MX 21.3 root. So scores on the MX system profiler and bench marking tool are comparable.
I ran twice each on separate days with reboots.]
Test MX 23 beta 1 MX 21.3 units
CPU Blowfish 0.47, 0.47 0.55, 0.47 s=seconds
Cryptohash 5176, 5427 5339, 5556 MB/sec
Fibonacci 0.29, 0.29 0.29, 0.30 s
N Queens 4.64, 4.84 4.62, 4.65 s
CPU zlib 2.57, 2.55 2.92, 2.69 (Highmarks, higher is better, but this seems wrong, as the PowerPC has a very high number?!?!?!)
fft 0.70, 0.71 0.71, 0.70 s
FPU ray tracing 4.04, 4.02 4.20, 4.24 s
So, MX 23 beta1 looks comparable, though the Cryptohash may be lower a bit maybe,needs more sample size to gauge variability. Same for N Queens.