MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

Message
Author
User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7789
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#41 Post by asqwerth »

Cool. Thanks.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23093
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#42 Post by Jerry3904 »

This posted as a comment:
LMCE 19 19.1 19.2 as well as LM xfce introduced a vertical dark strip when using my Canolide 100 scanner. This was blamed on Ubuntu. I switched to LMDE and the strip ceased to exist. One up for Debian.
Then I experimented with MX 18 and again no vertical strip. However when MX 19 beta became available the strip re-appeared.
So much for blaming Ubuntu. Debian now shares the scanner fault.
I have become used to Linux MX 18 and 19 (don’t see much difference) but I hope this scanner problem can be eliminated.
I went to the Canon site for CanoLide and selected Linux 64bit, and got the message that the device was no longer supported. End of the story?
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
KBD
Posts: 959
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#43 Post by KBD »

Looking very good. Just want to compliment you guys for the work on the installer. I didn't mind the old MX installer, but a linear experience that doesn't require the user to wait around for the next thing to happen, and then the next, really makes the installer much more user friendly.
Also wondering what magic you worked to get MX 19 beta 2 to boot on my Lenovo 11e? No version of Debian Buster or based on Debian Buster will boot on that machine. Even the first MX beta refused to do so, but this 2nd beta booted up without issue--very nice. I also had no issue with my Lenovo X220 with a full install from a separate drive.

User avatar
ChrisUK
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:04 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#44 Post by ChrisUK »

OK, ignore my last few posts... installed as expected to USB HDD - booted OK and saved live settings as wanted. Maybe I knocked the USB lead or it was a race condition, either way it's fine now ;)

Will try with AMD laptop tomorrow
Chris

MX 18 MX 19 - Manjaro

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7789
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#45 Post by asqwerth »

There were 3 virtualbox module updates: virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-utils virtualbox-guest-x11

I updated and this was part of the text in terminal: [relevant bit is about not being booted into systemd init]
depmod...
System has not been booted with systemd as init system (PID 1). Can't operate.
Failed to connect to bus: Host is down...
The whole section of text in which the above appears:

Code: Select all

Unpacking virtualbox-guest-dkms (6.0.12-dfsg-1~mx19+1) over (6.0.10-dfsg-1~mx19+1) ...
Setting up virtualbox-guest-dkms (6.0.12-dfsg-1~mx19+1) ...
Loading new virtualbox-guest-6.0.12 DKMS files...
Building for 4.19.0-6-amd64
Building initial module for 4.19.0-6-amd64
Done.

vboxguest.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
   - Found /lib/modules/4.19.0-6-amd64/updates/vboxguest.ko
   - Storing in /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox-guest/original_module/4.19.0-6-amd64/x86_64/
   - Archiving for uninstallation purposes
 - Installation
   - Installing to /lib/modules/4.19.0-6-amd64/updates/

vboxsf.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
 - Installation
   - Installing to /lib/modules/4.19.0-6-amd64/updates/

vboxvideo.ko:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
   - Found /lib/modules/4.19.0-6-amd64/updates/vboxvideo.ko
   - Storing in /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox-guest/original_module/4.19.0-6-amd64/x86_64/
   - Archiving for uninstallation purposes
 - Installation
   - Installing to /lib/modules/4.19.0-6-amd64/updates/

depmod...
System has not been booted with systemd as init system (PID 1). Can't operate.
Failed to connect to bus: Host is down

DKMS: install completed.
Setting up virtualbox-guest-utils (6.0.12-dfsg-1~mx19+1) ...
Setting up virtualbox-guest-x11 (6.0.12-dfsg-1~mx19+1) ...
Processing triggers for systemd (1:241-5+mx19+2) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.5-2) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.28-10) ...
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23093
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#46 Post by Jerry3904 »

I saw that too, but it's not wrong b/c it says very helpfully that systemd was not the init.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7789
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#47 Post by asqwerth »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 12:01 pm
asqwerth wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:58 am I just realised that matcha theme isn't on the beta 2.1 iso by default, even though it was on the superceded beta 2.

Sorry, didn't have time to test until now.
whoops....I'll bring it in as a temporary depend to mx-system. just for beta purposes.
I went ahead to install matcha theme.

Matcha-azul's theming for the top-right notification popup is nicer than greybird's, IMO (the pics below are for the volume slider's notification popup).
ksnip_20190909-012906.png
But even though I had applied matcha, the notification popup was still on greybird-mx-bright theme, which isn't very nice.

WHen I opened the settings for Notifications, I found that the theming dropdown menu had been set to blank (which presumably means the original theme the iso was shipped with?) instead of "Default", which would follow the gtk theme applied to the desktop by the user.
ksnip_20190909-013218.png

Perhaps notifications theming should be set to "Default" by default? Is that possible?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22089
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#48 Post by dolphin_oracle »

asqwerth wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2019 1:48 pm
I just realised that matcha theme isn't on the beta 2.1 iso by default, even though it was on the superceded beta 2.


Perhaps notifications theming should be set to "Default" by default? Is that possible?
very likely. will give it a go.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22089
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#49 Post by dolphin_oracle »

good catch on the notificqtions. the theme was set to "Greybird-mx17" which doesn't exist. will update to "Default".
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23093
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback

#50 Post by Jerry3904 »

Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

Locked

Return to “General”