Even easier, great!Stevo wrote:We do have a md5 file for download in the repo with the md5sum for each ISO, so I think we can take that out of the wiki.Jerry3904 wrote:That's great, Stevo! Are you going to update the md5 in the Wiki when you put up new versions?
http://www.mepiscommunity.org/wiki/syst ... d-versions
Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
Netrunner is Plasma 5, but I believe the sid package runs on KDE 4 as one of the depends is dep: kde-runtime (>> 4:4.10).Stevo wrote:I haven't played with it at all...is kde-connect in Sid and Netrunner using the Plasma 5 KDE?richb wrote:Stevo, Have you tried to get KDE Connect to work? I installed it from the default repos in my KDE install on MX-15 but it will not connect to my Android Phone, Samsung S5. It is a nice app. I was able to see what it can do in Netrunner 17.
I looked at the sid version, but too many dependencies for me to deal with, and I am not sure that would be any easier to get working.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
The version in sid also seems to depend on alot of kf5 libs and various other aspects of plasma5. Curious to know if version 0.8 would work better. Will look into this tonight.
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/kdeconnect/
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/kdeconnect/
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
I think the Sid version's build-depends might be changed back to the KDE 4/Qt 4 versions in 0.8 and still build, according to what's in the changelog:v3g4n wrote:The version in sid also seems to depend on alot of kf5 libs and various other aspects of plasma5. Curious to know if version 0.8 would work better. Will look into this tonight.
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/kdeconnect/
* New upstream release.
* Switch to KF5.
- Remove all Qt4/Plasma 4 related packages from build dpendencies and
dependencies.
- Add new build dependencies and dependencies as required. Thanks to the
Ubuntu folks for they work! I have taken most of the correct build deps
names from your packaging.
- Remove unnecessary removals in debian/rules.
* Update README.md installation.
* Disable NetworkPackageTests::networkPackageIdentityTest as it seems to
run fine with network access but fail without it (and thus on sbuild).
* Add libqca-qt5-2-plugins as a build dependency, it is needed by the tests.
* Update lintian overrides.
* Update and simplify debian/copyright.
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
Is that the changelog from sid? If so doesn't that say they switched to KF5 and removed all QT4/Plasma 4 related packages from build dependencies and dependencies?Stevo wrote:I think the Sid version's build-depends might be changed back to the KDE 4/Qt 4 versions in 0.8 and still build, according to what's in the changelog:
* New upstream release.
* Switch to KF5.
- Remove all Qt4/Plasma 4 related packages from build dpendencies and
dependencies.
- Add new build dependencies and dependencies as required. Thanks to the
Ubuntu folks for they work! I have taken most of the correct build deps
names from your packaging.
- Remove unnecessary removals in debian/rules.
* Update README.md installation.
* Disable NetworkPackageTests::networkPackageIdentityTest as it seems to
run fine with network access but fail without it (and thus on sbuild).
* Add libqca-qt5-2-plugins as a build dependency, it is needed by the tests.
* Update lintian overrides.
* Update and simplify debian/copyright.
Edit: just checked the sid changelog and is the same as posted above so I'm not seeing where they changed back to KDE 4/QT 4.


Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
I meant that you yourself would change those build-deps back to the older versions from 0.8 as an experiment. Sometimes that also needs a change in the rules file to tell it to use qt4, which also might be in the older version's rules file. Sometimes a newer package will want to use qt5 by default, and you have to add an explicit instruction to use qt4.* Usually reading the build log will show this if it errors out.
And sometimes it just needs those newer libraries.
*Qbittorrent did this lately, but the qt5 version (which Debian has upstream) has a bug in that the icon doesn't show up in xfce's taskbar, so we have to make sure it builds with qt4.
And sometimes it just needs those newer libraries.
*Qbittorrent did this lately, but the qt5 version (which Debian has upstream) has a bug in that the icon doesn't show up in xfce's taskbar, so we have to make sure it builds with qt4.
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot


Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
So I tried to build the sid version of kdeconnect with changing the depends in the control file and the rules to reflect the 0.8 version and that was a flop. Fail, fail, fail.
Stevo I'm sure you can do that, but I'm not there.
I then backported the 0.8 version and it built fine without issue, but when I try to install it screems about a dependency issue with libqca2-plugin. I checked and anything with libqca2 was installed and then I went and searched for a libqca2 to backport, but came up with nada.
I'm probably just sleepy so will try more this weekend.


I'm probably just sleepy so will try more this weekend.
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
Downloaded the ISO twice and it doesn't match the checksum. I'm getting the same checksum with both downloads.
$ md5sum MX15-x64_KDE_added-16Mar2016.iso
72e55b9f6bc8c0e48cb5b4cbb5380d5a MX15-x64_KDE_added-16Mar2016.iso
$ md5sum MX15-x64_KDE_added-16Mar2016.iso
72e55b9f6bc8c0e48cb5b4cbb5380d5a MX15-x64_KDE_added-16Mar2016.iso
Mike P
Regd Linux User #472293
(Daily) Lenovo T560, i7-6600U, 16GB, 2.0TB SSD, MX_ahs
(ManCave) AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 32G, 8TB mixed, MX_ahs
(Spare)2017 Macbook Air 7,2, 8GB, 256GB SSD, MX_ahs
Regd Linux User #472293
(Daily) Lenovo T560, i7-6600U, 16GB, 2.0TB SSD, MX_ahs
(ManCave) AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 32G, 8TB mixed, MX_ahs
(Spare)2017 Macbook Air 7,2, 8GB, 256GB SSD, MX_ahs
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:04 am
Re: Unofficial MX 15-64 KDE snapshot
First, can I thank Stevo and others for this interesting addition to the MX stable.
I too have had problems with the checksums.Yesterday evening here in the UK I tried between 8pm and 10.30pm to download the version shown in the MX repository.
The version I downloaded from Stevo's Google came in at 1.3G, but did not match the midsum, however it ran successfully from a USB on my laptop alongside the previous version and its midsum was :72E55B9F6BC8C0E48CB5B4CBB5380D5A
The file showing on the MX showcase "last night" varied for some reason? between 500MB+ to 1.3G(at which it did not complete the download).
Today in UK time, it shows a size of 800MB which I have downloaded and shows a midsum of:AC35CEF556D1BC80ADA2EA925255686D
Is there a reason for the difference in file size?
Thanks again for sharing your skills and knowledge.
I too have had problems with the checksums.Yesterday evening here in the UK I tried between 8pm and 10.30pm to download the version shown in the MX repository.
The version I downloaded from Stevo's Google came in at 1.3G, but did not match the midsum, however it ran successfully from a USB on my laptop alongside the previous version and its midsum was :72E55B9F6BC8C0E48CB5B4CBB5380D5A
The file showing on the MX showcase "last night" varied for some reason? between 500MB+ to 1.3G(at which it did not complete the download).
Today in UK time, it shows a size of 800MB which I have downloaded and shows a midsum of:AC35CEF556D1BC80ADA2EA925255686D
Is there a reason for the difference in file size?
Thanks again for sharing your skills and knowledge.