Page 38 of 59

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:55 am
by andy
Of course I will provide every info, I will be asked for. Just waiting for orders of you, real programmers. But please, do fix it. :number1:
Screenshot_20230629_085906.png
Screenshot_20230629_090051.png
Edit: My reasoning why asking to repair this bug:
For me encryption is crucial, and as I want to stay with MX Linux, I am forced to use EXT4.
But as BTRFS matures and offers nice functionality like instant snapshots, it is a welcome replacement to RSYNC.
I would like to use this nice feature, at least on my stronger machine with SSD with TBW large enough.
(in the past I have used BTRFS on LinuxMint, without encryption. After some years I have watched more closely whats going on on I/O side, and was shocked by continuous write traffic. So I stopped using BTRFS to save my SSDs. Years have passed. Then later I switched to MX-Linux, and now, after another four years, the TBW on large disks is big enough to withstand BTRFS write amplification).

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:11 am
by fehlix
andy wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:55 am Of course I will provide every info, I will be asked for. Just waiting for orders of you, real programmers. But please, do fix it. :number1:

Screenshot_20230629_085906.png
Screenshot_20230629_090051.png
Thanks, yes indeed this gives us a clue.
The reason is kind of simple: MX Linux uses the /@ subvolume for root as required by timeshift (which was originally developed for Ubuntu's /@-root layout). But MX Linux is also using /@-as default mount-subvol, which Ubuntu is not using and timeshift simply assumes to always mount by default at top-subvol. We had a similare fix for non-encrypted and may need to find the place to apply this fix also for encrypted-btrfs.
You can test-breaking timeshift on Ubuntu by simply settings the default-mount subvol to /@
and Ubuntu and friends would still work, but timeshift may stop to work on btrfs.

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:23 am
by andy
@fehlix ,
is this issue related?
https://github.com/linuxmint/timeshift/issues/131
edit: there is reference to issue #90, which seems exactly spot on.
https://github.com/linuxmint/timeshift/issues/90

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:19 am
by fehlix
andy wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:23 am @fehlix ,
is this issue related?
https://github.com/linuxmint/timeshift/issues/131
edit: there is reference to issue #90, which seems exactly spot on.
https://github.com/linuxmint/timeshift/issues/90
Good found. Maybe someone send a MX-patch to Linux Mint.
The reason we haven't done so, is also simple: The original version we applied the default-subvol patch
was an older version. Meanwhile Linux Mint took over the maintenance and we currently using
Debian's provided version based on Linux Mint - so we may send the patch if it works to Linux Mint.

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:36 pm
by HausiMX
CaputAlista wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 7:33 am
HausiMX wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:32 am I am trying the following:
as the last line in /etc/sudoers:
%sudo ALL=(ALL:ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/gparted
but it still asks me for the password :confused:
try this
sudo visudo
root ALL=(ALL:ALL)
%sudo ALL=(ALL:ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
thanks for replying, but it still does not work as expected. My "workaround" is deleting my password :rolleyes:

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 2:35 pm
by Danathar
This may be pretty esoteric, and I don't know if this is the case on the last version of MX since I'm running currently on the beta, but I enabled zram and noticed on shutdown with the live USB with persistence that an error trying to unload the zram kernel module (too early)? I have zram enabled for swap.

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 3:40 pm
by dolphin_oracle
HausiMX wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:32 am I am trying the following:
as the last line in /etc/sudoers:
%sudo ALL=(ALL:ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/gparted
but it still asks me for the password :confused:
gparted launches from the menu with pkexec. you could likely launch with "sudo gparted" from the cli with what you've indicated.

either way, not likely to actually be a beta issue.

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 4:04 pm
by CaputAlista
dolphin_oracle wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 3:40 pm
HausiMX wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:32 am I am trying the following:
as the last line in /etc/sudoers:
%sudo ALL=(ALL:ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/gparted
but it still asks me for the password :confused:
gparted launches from the menu with pkexec. you could likely launch with "sudo gparted" from the cli with what you've indicated.

either way, not likely to actually be a beta issue.
direct acces in kde gparted, dolphin etc
sudo pkexec env DISPLAY=$DISPLAY XAUTHORITY=$AUTHORITY KDE_SESSION_VERSION=5 KDE_FULL_SESSION=true gparted

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:41 pm
by Stevo
:frown: I don't know if anyone has reported VLC losing hardware accelerated decoding and encoding in Bookworm, but that seems to be unavoidable with the Debian packages.
5.2.3. Limited hardware-accelerated video encoding/decoding support in VLC

The VLC video player supports hardware-accelerated video decoding and encoding via VA-API and VDPAU. However, VLC's support for VA-API is tightly related to the version of FFmpeg. Because FFmpeg was upgraded to the 5.x branch, VLC's VA-API support has been disabled. Users of GPUs with native VA-API support (e.g., Intel and AMD GPUs) may experience high CPU usage during video playback and encoding.

Users of GPUs offering native VDPAU support (e.g., NVIDIA with non-free drivers) are not affected by this issue.

Support for VA-API and VDPAU can be checked with vainfo and vdpauinfo (each provided in a Debian package of the same name).

Re: MX-23 beta 2 feedback thread

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 2:52 am
by Eadwine Rose
@Stevo
I reported in about Kodi a bit ago, which I found also (when googling) seemed to affect VLC. Post 54. Did include a solution that I was unable to test.

viewtopic.php?p=729379#p729379


Maybe that downgrade they mention will sort it?