MX-Fluxbox

Help for MX Fluxbox
When asking for help, use Quick System Info from MX Tools. It will be properly formatted using the following steps.
1. Click on Quick System Info in MX Tools
2. Right click in your post and paste.
Message
Author
User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#31 Post by JayM »

One niggle was that the announcement in the blog says
Once that installation finishes, the user clicks an entry in the 'MX-flux' menu to initiate the second step - moving a few small files and folders to the user's Home directory once permission has been given.
but there is no MX-flux menu. Instead there's an MX-flux menu item under System within the Whisker menu. That took me a moment to figure out and could be confusing to newbies. If instructions aren't perfectly clear forum posts will be generated. :smile:

(Edit: yes, I could have just typed flux into the search field in Whisker but I wanted to see where it was, so I explored the various categories until I found it.)
Last edited by JayM on Tue Dec 17, 2019 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
figueroa
Posts: 1104
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:20 pm

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#32 Post by figueroa »

manyroads wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 8:01 pm
figueroa wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 7:17 pm What is the perceived advantage from installing Fluxbox? What is gained? Is RAM saved? How much? What functionality is lost? Does Fluxbox do anything better than XFWM4/XFCE4?
My guess is that someone will have fun using Fluxbox... and I think that is what it's all about.
Based on the replies, fun seems to be the main answer. I'm not much into different desktops and distributions for fun anymore. MX Linux out-of-the-box is my fun. But, if I were to become weary of Gentoo someday, I think MX (or antiX) could become my main thing. In the meantime, I'll concentrate on deploying MX for other users as I convert them.
Andy Figueroa
Using Unix from 1984; GNU/Linux from 1993

User avatar
figueroa
Posts: 1104
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:20 pm

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#33 Post by figueroa »

Jerry3904 wrote: Mon Dec 16, 2019 8:32 pm Bring it! I'm hoping we can do another version before the end of time that is more of a group effort.
If you do another, I'd suggest LXDE (not LXQt). I'm some eight years into using LXDE over OpenBox on my main desktop (though I use XFCE on everything else), and I'm very happy with the snail pace development, stability, and ease of use. Then whatever investment has been made in using lxappearance will be well invested.
Andy Figueroa
Using Unix from 1984; GNU/Linux from 1993

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23316
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#34 Post by Jerry3904 »

Have to be somebody else, sorry.
Production: MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3374
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#35 Post by chrispop99 »

Some of the apparent 'pilot errors' might be menu problems. In addition to the Browser item pointing to Opera, which may not be installed, Music points to DeadBeef, and YouTube points to SMTube, neither of which are installed by default.

Those things are dead easy to correct, either by installing the missing programs, or following the FAQ to edit the menu to point to an installed program of your choice.

I found the File item, and the F3 keybinding, pointed to /home/$USER/.fluxbox, which meant Thunar opened in the hidden configuration folder. This may or may not have been by intent; it's easy to change by editing both the menu-mx and the keys files, and removing the .fluxbox part. I have also set F7 to open a browser by adding it to the keys file.

Only real bug I have found relates to the FAQ icon. I think it should be possible to drag it to a new location, but when I have tried that, it disappears without trace!

Things I am going to try when time permits (Christmas is apparently inescapable in the UK!) are creating a means of shutting down without logging out first, setting the Super key to open the Application Finder, and creating a 'live with persistence' USB on an old Pentium M 32-bit laptop. That might take a while...

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

User avatar
genericmeatsack
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 1:23 am

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#36 Post by genericmeatsack »

What makes the Fluxbox experience different from Openbox? On my older machines years ago, I was a HUGE fan of #! Crunchbang, and was sad when it was abandoned. This may be the go-to environment for my EeePc, and I plan on giving it a spin over the holidays.
Asus eeePC 1005ha N280 Atom 2gb ram. MX19 Asus K53 i5, 8gb ram MX19. Asus X200CA Celeron, 4gb ram MX19. Dell Latitude E5440 i5 16gb ram MX19.

User avatar
jeffreyC
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 10:39 am

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#37 Post by jeffreyC »

Wouldn't it be better to have the F4 key open the terminal in MX Fluxbox as it does in MX Xfce?

Having the same keys do the same things would make the experience more cohesive, I think.

User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#38 Post by JayM »

chrispop99 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:44 am Some of the apparent 'pilot errors' might be menu problems. In addition to the Browser item pointing to Opera, which may not be installed, Music points to DeadBeef, and YouTube points to SMTube, neither of which are installed by default.

Those things are dead easy to correct, either by installing the missing programs, or following the FAQ to edit the menu to point to an installed program of your choice.

I found the File item, and the F3 keybinding, pointed to /home/$USER/.fluxbox, which meant Thunar opened in the hidden configuration folder. This may or may not have been by intent; it's easy to change by editing both the menu-mx and the keys files, and removing the .fluxbox part. I have also set F7 to open a browser by adding it to the keys file.

Only real bug I have found relates to the FAQ icon. I think it should be possible to drag it to a new location, but when I have tried that, it disappears without trace!

Things I am going to try when time permits (Christmas is apparently inescapable in the UK!) are creating a means of shutting down without logging out first, setting the Super key to open the Application Finder, and creating a 'live with persistence' USB on an old Pentium M 32-bit laptop. That might take a while...

Chris
Add

Code: Select all

[exec] (Reboot) {sudo /sbin/reboot} 
[exec] (Shutdown) {sudo /sbin/halt}
to menu-mx just above

Code: Select all

[end]
https://www.linux.com/tutorials/fluxbox-menu-setup/

(That's what I meant about "pilot error." I only fooled with fluxbox for a few minutes this morning and was trying to figure out how to add these to the menu on my own without reading the manual or doing a web search. I didn't know what I was doing. I still don't but at least I have a few resources at my disposal now that I've had a chance to play with it longer.)
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3374
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#39 Post by chrispop99 »

jeffreyC wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 4:59 am Wouldn't it be better to have the F4 key open the terminal in MX Fluxbox as it does in MX Xfce?

Having the same keys do the same things would make the experience more cohesive, I think.
It does!

It actually opens the drop-down terminal in both of them, although I personally change that to a 'real' terminal.

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3374
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: MX-Fluxbox 1.0 released

#40 Post by chrispop99 »

JayM wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 5:16 am
chrispop99 wrote: Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:44 am Some of the apparent 'pilot errors' might be menu problems. In addition to the Browser item pointing to Opera, which may not be installed, Music points to DeadBeef, and YouTube points to SMTube, neither of which are installed by default.

Those things are dead easy to correct, either by installing the missing programs, or following the FAQ to edit the menu to point to an installed program of your choice.

I found the File item, and the F3 keybinding, pointed to /home/$USER/.fluxbox, which meant Thunar opened in the hidden configuration folder. This may or may not have been by intent; it's easy to change by editing both the menu-mx and the keys files, and removing the .fluxbox part. I have also set F7 to open a browser by adding it to the keys file.

Only real bug I have found relates to the FAQ icon. I think it should be possible to drag it to a new location, but when I have tried that, it disappears without trace!

Things I am going to try when time permits (Christmas is apparently inescapable in the UK!) are creating a means of shutting down without logging out first, setting the Super key to open the Application Finder, and creating a 'live with persistence' USB on an old Pentium M 32-bit laptop. That might take a while...

Chris
Add

Code: Select all

[exec] (Reboot) {sudo /sbin/reboot} 
[exec] (Shutdown) {sudo /sbin/halt}
to menu-mx just above

Code: Select all

[end]
https://www.linux.com/tutorials/fluxbox-menu-setup/

(That's what I meant about "pilot error." I only fooled with fluxbox for a few minutes this morning and was trying to figure out how to add these to the menu on my own without reading the manual or doing a web search. I didn't know what I was doing. I still don't but at least I have a few resources at my disposal now that I've had a chance to play with it longer.)
Thanks Jay; I would have tried something like that first. I have spent a bit of time with an Openbox distro, and a lot of it is the same. In fact both Openbox and Fluxbox are derived from Blackbox.

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

Post Reply

Return to “MX Fluxbox Official Release”