Page 27 of 46
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 8:23 am
by OlafD
dolphin_oracle wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 7:58 am
OlafD wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 5:24 am
xfce with btrfs and subvolumes @root and @home: boot-problmes and unable to login
Macbook 11,1 from 2012/2013 8same as in my last post:
viewtopic.php?p=726957#p726957
I can't make QSI because i'm unable to login.
Installed xfce 64 bit UEFI with standard install specs.
Restart after Installing shows prompt with the choice of "maintenance mode". I cancel it with Ctrl+D. Also you can see the slow Boot-Logo live. And i'm not able to Login. After entering password and hit Enter it switched to the Login-Screen back (same as in KDE in my previous post). Here ist a video:
https://cloud.olafdressler.de/index.php ... 7SaisSWppW
Here i've another video with the boot-process after hitting Ctrl+D:
https://cloud.olafdressler.de/index.php ... EQMJmkod55
Moderator: ridiculous formatting removed, use normal size or just bold. SPARINGLY. Thanks.
can you get the /etc/fstab file and the /var/log/minstall.log file from the installed system and post them?
fstab:
Code: Select all
# Pluggable devices are handled by uDev, they are not in fstab
UUID= / btrfs subvol=@,ssd,discard=async,noatime 1 1
UUID= /home btrfs subvol=@home,ssd,discard=async,noatime 1 2
UUID=8292-58C4 /boot/efi vfat noatime,dmask=0002,fmask=0113 0 0
/swapfile swap swap defaults 0 0
to big for forum, therfore an external link:
https://cloud.olafdressler.de/index.php ... wpeL3knCtG
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 8:29 am
by dolphin_oracle
@OlafD ok thanks. the UUID is not being populated. definintly a major bug.
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 9:23 am
by Joseph DeGarmo
monsieurzik wrote: Thu Jun 01, 2023 12:39 am
Joseph DeGarmo wrote: Wed May 31, 2023 7:35 pm
monsieurzik wrote: Wed May 31, 2023 3:23 pm
Mintstick doesn’t make the trick. Failure again. Will try with mx usb maker.
Edit 21:55 : MX USB Maker failed too.
That's weird. Fedora Media Writer worked for me. And it requires Fedora. I'll boot up Linux Mint tomorrow and try it for myself. I'll also try it out on my MX-21 laptop. Have you tried Balena Etcher? I heard it's quite good.
Already tried. In vain.
I can confirm that MX Live USB Maker worked just fine for me. Perhaps you need to try a different USB device.
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 10:20 am
by zebedeeboss
Hi :D
64 bit XFCE - manual partitioning via gparted before starting the installer. This SSD will share more than one Linux OS.
Still no change with Nvidia RTX4070 not being recognised.
Code: Select all
sudo ddm-mx -i nvidia -f nvidia-driver
works to install nvidia-525
Will continue testing the rest of the system for general day to day and game use via steam.
Code: Select all
System:
Kernel: 6.1.0-9-amd64 [6.1.27-1] arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 12.2.0
parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.1.0-9-amd64
root=UUID=<filter> ro quiet splash
Desktop: Xfce v: 4.18.1 tk: Gtk v: 3.24.36 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm v: 4.18.0 vt: 7
dm: LightDM v: 1.26.0 Distro: MX-23_beta1_x64 Libretto May 28 2023 base: Debian GNU/Linux 12
(bookworm)
Machine:
Type: Desktop System: PC Specialist product: Amd X399 Overclocked v: N/A
serial: <superuser required>
Mobo: ASUSTeK model: PRIME X399-A v: Rev 1.xx serial: <superuser required>
UEFI: American Megatrends v: 1203 date: 10/09/2019
CPU:
Info: model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X bits: 64 type: MT MCP MCM arch: Zen+ gen: 2 level: v3
note: check built: 2018-21 process: GF 12nm family: 0x17 (23) model-id: 8 stepping: 2
microcode: 0x800820D
Topology: cpus: 1x cores: 8 tpc: 4 threads: 32 dies: 2 smt: enabled cache: L1: 1.5 MiB
desc: d-16x32 KiB; i-16x64 KiB L2: 8 MiB desc: 16x512 KiB L3: 32 MiB desc: 4x8 MiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 2182 high: 2250 min/max: 2200/4000 boost: disabled scaling:
driver: acpi-cpufreq governor: ondemand cores: 1: 2200 2: 2250 3: 1687 4: 2200 5: 2200 6: 2200
7: 2198 8: 2194 9: 2200 10: 2200 11: 2200 12: 2200 13: 2200 14: 2200 15: 2200 16: 2200 17: 2200
18: 2200 19: 2200 20: 2200 21: 2118 22: 2198 23: 2201 24: 2200 25: 2200 26: 2198 27: 2200
28: 2200 29: 2200 30: 2200 31: 2200 32: 2200 bogomips: 255962
Flags: avx avx2 ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3 svm
Vulnerabilities:
Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected
Type: l1tf status: Not affected
Type: mds status: Not affected
Type: meltdown status: Not affected
Type: mmio_stale_data status: Not affected
Type: retbleed mitigation: untrained return thunk; SMT vulnerable
Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines, IBPB: conditional, STIBP: disabled, RSB filling,
PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected
Type: srbds status: Not affected
Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics:
Device-1: NVIDIA AD104 [GeForce RTX 4070] vendor: ZOTAC driver: nvidia v: 525.105.17
non-free: N/A status: unknown device ID pcie: gen: 1 speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 16 link-max: gen: 4
speed: 16 GT/s bus-ID: 42:00.0 chip-ID: 10de:2786 class-ID: 0300
Device-2: YGTek Webcam type: USB driver: snd-usb-audio,uvcvideo bus-ID: 7-1:2
chip-ID: 1d6c:1278 class-ID: 0102 serial: <filter>
Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.7 compositor: xfwm v: 4.18.0 driver: X: loaded: nvidia
gpu: nvidia display-ID: :0.0 screens: 1
Screen-1: 0 s-res: 5120x1440 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 1355x381mm (53.35x15.00")
s-diag: 1408mm (55.42")
Monitor-1: DP-0 pos: primary,left res: 2560x1440 dpi: 55 size: 1193x336mm (46.97x13.23")
diag: 1239mm (48.8") modes: N/A
Monitor-2: DP-2 pos: right res: 2560x1440 dpi: 55 size: 1193x336mm (46.97x13.23")
diag: 1239mm (48.8") modes: N/A
API: OpenGL v: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 525.105.17 renderer: NVIDIA Graphics Device/PCIe/SSE2
direct-render: Yes
Audio:
Device-1: AMD Family 17h HD Audio vendor: ASUSTeK driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 5-4:3
chip-ID: 0951:16ad pcie: class-ID: 0300 gen: 3 serial: <filter> speed: 8 GT/s lanes: 16
bus-ID: 0c:00.3 chip-ID: 1022:1457 class-ID: 0403
Device-2: NVIDIA vendor: ZOTAC driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel pcie: gen: 3 speed: 8 GT/s
lanes: 16 link-max: gen: 4 speed: 16 GT/s bus-ID: 42:00.1 chip-ID: 10de:22bc class-ID: 0403
Device-3: Kingston HyperX Cloud Revolver S type: USB driver: hid-generic,snd-usb-audio,usbhid
Device-4: YGTek Webcam type: USB driver: snd-usb-audio,uvcvideo bus-ID: 7-1:2
chip-ID: 1d6c:1278 class-ID: 0102 serial: <filter>
API: ALSA v: k6.1.0-9-amd64 status: kernel-api tools: alsamixer,amixer
Server-1: PipeWire v: 0.3.65 status: active with: 1: pipewire-pulse status: active
2: wireplumber status: active 3: pipewire-alsa type: plugin 4: pw-jack type: plugin
tools: pactl,pw-cat,pw-cli,wpctl
Network:
Device-1: Intel I211 Gigabit Network vendor: ASUSTeK driver: igb v: kernel pcie: gen: 1
speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: 2000 bus-ID: 05:00.0 chip-ID: 8086:1539 class-ID: 0200
IF: eth1 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
Device-2: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet driver: r8169 v: kernel pcie:
gen: 1 speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: 1000 bus-ID: 0a:00.0 chip-ID: 10ec:8161 class-ID: 0200
IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
Drives:
Local Storage: total: 5.49 TiB used: 8.03 GiB (0.1%)
SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required.
ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 maj-min: 259:0 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB size: 931.51 GiB
block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 31.6 Gb/s lanes: 4 type: SSD serial: <filter>
rev: 2B2QEXM7 temp: 34.9 C scheme: GPT
ID-2: /dev/nvme1n1 maj-min: 259:5 vendor: Kingston model: SNV2S1000G size: 931.51 GiB
block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 63.2 Gb/s lanes: 4 type: SSD serial: <filter>
rev: SBM02103 temp: 24.9 C scheme: GPT
ID-3: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 860 QVO 1TB size: 931.51 GiB block-size:
physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> rev: 2B6Q scheme: GPT
ID-4: /dev/sdb maj-min: 8:16 vendor: Crucial model: CT2000MX500SSD1 size: 1.82 TiB block-size:
physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> rev: 043 scheme: GPT
ID-5: /dev/sdc maj-min: 8:32 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 860 EVO 1TB size: 931.51 GiB
block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> rev: 4B6Q
scheme: GPT
ID-6: /dev/sdd maj-min: 8:48 type: USB vendor: SanDisk model: Ultra USB 3.0 size: 28.64 GiB
block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B type: N/A serial: <filter> rev: 1.00 scheme: MBR
SMART Message: Unknown USB bridge. Flash drive/Unsupported enclosure?
Partition:
ID-1: / raw-size: 300 GiB size: 294.23 GiB (98.08%) used: 8.03 GiB (2.7%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdc3
maj-min: 8:35
ID-2: /boot/efi raw-size: 600 MiB size: 598.8 MiB (99.80%) used: 288 KiB (0.0%) fs: vfat
dev: /dev/sdc1 maj-min: 8:33
Swap:
Kernel: swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache-pressure: 100 (default)
ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 16 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: -2 dev: /dev/sdc2
maj-min: 8:34
Sensors:
System Temperatures: cpu: 38.0 C mobo: 26.0 C gpu: nvidia temp: 44 C
Fan Speeds (RPM): cpu: 774 case-1: 0 case-2: 0 case-3: 0 gpu: nvidia fan: 0%
Power: 12v: 12.10 5v: N/A 3.3v: N/A vbat: 3.14
Repos:
Packages: pm: dpkg pkgs: 2152 libs: 1120 tools: apt,apt-get,aptitude,nala,synaptic pm: rpm
pkgs: 0 pm: flatpak pkgs: 0
No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
1: deb http://mxlinux.mirrors.uk2.net/packages/mx/repo/ bookworm main non-free
Info:
Processes: 467 Uptime: 9m wakeups: 1 Memory: 62.64 GiB used: 2.98 GiB (4.8%) Init: SysVinit
v: 3.06 runlevel: 5 default: graphical tool: systemctl Compilers: gcc: 12.2.0 alt: 12
Client: shell wrapper v: 5.2.15-release inxi: 3.3.26
Boot Mode: UEFI
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 11:52 am
by zebedeeboss
Hi,
any idea why
https://imgur.com/SJdVVuR.png it auto picks 3840x1080 screen res when native is 5120x1440.
Could it be that the monitor is set to 240Hz and this is the highest res Linox can cope with. Manually pick 5120x1440 and it works fine but drops down to 120Hz
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 12:12 pm
by markol
Plasma 5.27.5 !!! Thank you!
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 12:23 pm
by dolphin_oracle
zebedeeboss wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 11:52 am
Hi,
any idea why
https://imgur.com/SJdVVuR.png it auto picks 3840x1080 screen res when native is 5120x1440.
Could it be that the monitor is set to 240Hz and this is the highest res Linox can cope with. Manually pick 5120x1440 and it works fine but drops down to 120Hz
could be. xfce usually picks whatever X thinks is the default state for the monitor, or the limit for the driver (usually only applies to vesa, but I guess could be any xorg driver). you can see the modes with xrandr.
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 12:24 pm
by OlafD
xfce 64bit
Fresh install, first start. Some Buttons have no distance to the window frame.
Image:
https://cloud.olafdressler.de/index.php ... N3eMAatdbE
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 12:27 pm
by zebedeeboss
dolphin_oracle wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 12:23 pm
zebedeeboss wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 11:52 am
Hi,
any idea why
https://imgur.com/SJdVVuR.png it auto picks 3840x1080 screen res when native is 5120x1440.
Could it be that the monitor is set to 240Hz and this is the highest res Linux can cope with. Manually pick 5120x1440 and it works fine but drops down to 120Hz
could be. xfce usually picks whatever X thinks is the default state for the monitor, or the limit for the driver (usually only applies to vesa, but I guess could be any xorg driver). you can see the modes with xrandr.
indeed
Code: Select all
zebedee@mx23-2950x:~
$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 8960 x 2160, maximum 32767 x 32767
HDMI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-0 connected 5120x1440+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 1mm x 1mm
3840x1080 59.97 + 239.97 119.97
5120x1440 120.00* 59.98
2560x1440 239.90 120.00 59.95
2560x1080 119.88 60.00 59.94
1920x1080 119.88 60.00 59.94
1680x1050 59.95
1600x900 60.00
1440x900 59.89
1280x1024 75.02 60.02
1280x800 59.81
1280x720 60.00
1152x864 75.00
1024x768 75.03 70.07 60.00
800x600 75.00 72.19 60.32 56.25
640x480 75.00 72.81 59.94
DP-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-3 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-4 connected 3840x2160+5120+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 708mm x 399mm
3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.94 50.00 29.98 29.97 25.00 23.98
2560x1440 59.95
1920x1080 60.00 59.94 50.00 29.97 25.00 23.98
1680x1050 59.95
1600x900 60.00
1280x1024 75.02 60.02
1280x800 59.81
1280x720 60.00 59.94 50.00
1024x768 75.03 60.00
800x600 75.00 60.32
720x576 50.00
720x480 59.94
640x480 75.00 59.94 59.93
DP-5 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
zebedee@mx23-2950x:~
$
Re: MX-23 beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2023 1:11 pm
by dolphin_oracle
zebedeeboss wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 12:27 pm
dolphin_oracle wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 12:23 pm
zebedeeboss wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2023 11:52 am
Hi,
any idea why
https://imgur.com/SJdVVuR.png it auto picks 3840x1080 screen res when native is 5120x1440.
Could it be that the monitor is set to 240Hz and this is the highest res Linox can cope with. Manually pick 5120x1440 and it works fine but drops down to 120Hz
could be. xfce usually picks whatever X thinks is the default state for the monitor, or the limit for the driver (usually only applies to vesa, but I guess could be any xorg driver). you can see the modes with xrandr.
indeed
Code: Select all
zebedee@mx23-2950x:~
$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 8960 x 2160, maximum 32767 x 32767
HDMI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-0 connected 5120x1440+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 1mm x 1mm
3840x1080 59.97 + 239.97 119.97
5120x1440 120.00* 59.98
2560x1440 239.90 120.00 59.95
2560x1080 119.88 60.00 59.94
1920x1080 119.88 60.00 59.94
1680x1050 59.95
1600x900 60.00
1440x900 59.89
1280x1024 75.02 60.02
1280x800 59.81
1280x720 60.00
1152x864 75.00
1024x768 75.03 70.07 60.00
800x600 75.00 72.19 60.32 56.25
640x480 75.00 72.81 59.94
DP-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-3 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
DP-4 connected 3840x2160+5120+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 708mm x 399mm
3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.94 50.00 29.98 29.97 25.00 23.98
2560x1440 59.95
1920x1080 60.00 59.94 50.00 29.97 25.00 23.98
1680x1050 59.95
1600x900 60.00
1280x1024 75.02 60.02
1280x800 59.81
1280x720 60.00 59.94 50.00
1024x768 75.03 60.00
800x600 75.00 60.32
720x576 50.00
720x480 59.94
640x480 75.00 59.94 59.93
DP-5 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
zebedee@mx23-2950x:~
$
yep, the higher refresh rate one is marked as preferred by X, so that's why.
