Page 22 of 60
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:24 am
by hannlec
Hi! I found a post here about LibreOffice not starting on the Live USB (#141). I can confirm that. The same is going on in my case, too (64bit iso).
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:52 am
by JayM
Thirded (32-bit version.) I just get the LibreOffice splash screen. Running libreoffice %U in a terminal gives
Code: Select all
$ libreoffice %U
Fatal exception: Signal 11
Stack:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x3c635)[0xb41b7635]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x3c851)[0xb41b7851]
linux-gate.so.1(__kernel_rt_sigreturn+0x0)[0xb7f2cd78]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_cppu.so.3(+0x15248)[0xb2306248]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_cppu.so.3(uno_type_any_assign+0x9a)[0xb23055aa]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x25fb2c1)[0xb67d52c1]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x25fbf2d)[0xb67d5f2d]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_ZN3utl10ConfigItemC2ERKN3rtl8OUStringE14ConfigItemMode+0x8c)[0xb67cb17c]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x2659d40)[0xb6833d40]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_ZN19SvtSysLocaleOptionsC1Ev+0x12e)[0xb683532e]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_Z7InitVCLv+0x1b6)[0xb6bd3726]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x29fae07)[0xb6bd4e07]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_Z6SVMainv+0x3d)[0xb6bd4e7d]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(soffice_main+0x94)[0xb5b28344]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin(+0x10ad)[0x42b0ad]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1)[0xb3f9fb41]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin(+0x1101)[0x42b101]
/var/log/messages shows
Code: Select all
Sep 11 15:38:12 mx1 kernel: [ 88.047280] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187492.468:42): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="smbd" name="upper/var/lib/samba/private/msg.sock" pid=5042 comm="lpqd" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:38:21 mx1 kernel: [ 97.032976] fuse init (API version 7.27)
Sep 11 15:43:54 mx1 kernel: [ 430.193427] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
Sep 11 15:43:58 mx1 kernel: [ 433.714240] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187838.137:43): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6046 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:43:58 mx1 kernel: [ 433.733201] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187838.157:44): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6046 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:43:58 mx1 kernel: [ 433.739241] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187838.161:45): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6046 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:43:58 mx1 kernel: [ 433.813226] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187838.237:46): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="upper/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/services" pid=6045 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:45:25 mx1 kernel: [ 521.193229] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187925.618:47): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6223 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:45:25 mx1 kernel: [ 521.211907] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187925.638:48): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6223 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:45:25 mx1 kernel: [ 521.218051] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187925.642:49): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6223 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:45:25 mx1 kernel: [ 521.285305] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187925.710:50): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="upper/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/services" pid=6222 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:45:52 mx1 kernel: [ 548.012260] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187952.438:51): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="capable" profile="libreoffice-oopslash" pid=6230 comm="oosplash" capability=2 capname="dac_read_search"
Sep 11 15:45:52 mx1 kernel: [ 548.012368] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187952.438:52): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" profile="libreoffice-oopslash" name="/home/demo/.Xauthority" pid=6230 comm="oosplash" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=1000
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.131958] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.558:53): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="capable" profile="libreoffice-soffice" pid=6267 comm="soffice.bin" capability=2 capname="dac_read_search"
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.132071] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.558:54): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="/home/demo/.Xauthority" pid=6267 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=1000
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.136530] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.562:55): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="capable" profile="libreoffice-soffice" pid=6266 comm="soffice.bin" capability=2 capname="dac_read_search"
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.136660] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.562:56): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="/home/demo/.Xauthority" pid=6266 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=1000
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.158533] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.582:57): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="capable" profile="libreoffice-soffice" pid=6267 comm="soffice.bin" capability=21 capname="sys_admin"
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.159947] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.586:58): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6267 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.178445] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.602:59): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6267 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0
Sep 11 15:45:53 mx1 kernel: [ 549.184177] audit: type=1400 audit(1568187953.610:60): apparmor="ALLOWED" operation="open" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13 profile="libreoffice-soffice" name="usr/share/drirc.d" pid=6267 comm="soffice.bin" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0
Something to do with AppArmor?
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback MX-Clocky
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:19 am
by toastscraper
WIll we see MX-Clocky in MX19?
Currently the repository contains version 16.11mx17 with a missing dependency of: Depends: python-rsvg but it is not installable
Thank you
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback MX-Clocky
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:53 am
by Jerry3904
toastscraper wrote: Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:19 am
WIll we see MX-Clocky in MX19?
Currently the repository contains version 16.11mx17 with a missing dependency of: Depends: python-rsvg but it is not installable
Thank you
Thanks for the ask, and welcome to the Forum. I copied it to the Package Request forum so they don't miss it.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:22 am
by AK-47
@JayM: does LO run on the installed system? When I tested it it works on the installed system. All lines you posted say that AppArmor allowed the operations, but to test if AppArmor is blocking anything you could reboot and add "apparmor=0" to the kernel command line.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:33 am
by nixy
dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 4:19 pm
nixy wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:34 pm
Matcha theme uses around 100 MB more than default Arc theme, is that expected?
might need to update the icon cache, which I forget how to do at the moment but usually makes a big difference to ram. If that's the problem anyway.
Well on my main machines not but I have some pretty old laptop with MX on it, every byte counts.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:50 am
by JayM
AK-47 wrote: Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:22 am
@JayM: does LO run on the installed system? When I tested it it works on the installed system. All lines you posted say that AppArmor allowed the operations, but to test if AppArmor is blocking anything you could reboot and add "apparmor=0" to the kernel command line.
Adding apparmor=0 at the end of the live USB's boot parameters allows LO to be able to run.
I can't install 19b2 right now because I'm down to just one computer and I don't want to run a beta OS on my daily driver, and I don't have enough free space on the SSD right now to create another partition to install it to without causing out of space issues for 18.3. That's the problem with self-contained computers like netbooks, notebooks and laptops vs. desktops: you can only have one drive.
Anyway, if it doesn't work on a persistent USB that's an issue that needs to be fixed as there are lots of people who run MX on USB sticks.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:03 am
by AK-47
I agree, but what puzzles me is that this issue is only present on the live system and not the installed system even with AppArmor enabled. So the important thing here is to figure out what's going on with the live system that's causing the segfault.
EDIT: LibreOffice 6.3 works on the live system with AppArmor enabled. Probably some bug in LO that got fixed.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:28 am
by Jerry3904
Running live, will this help?
Code: Select all
$ strace libreoffice | tail
<snip>
<last 47 lines>
mprotect(0x7f0f10f16000, 8388608, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
clone(child_stack=0x7f0f11714fb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7f0f117159d0, tls=0x7f0f11715700, child_tidptr=0x7f0f117159d0) = 9271
futex(0x556903588730, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 1
futex(0x556903588780, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 0, NULL) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
futex(0x556903588730, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
futex(0x5569035fb718, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 0, NULL) = 0
futex(0x5569035fb720, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
read(6, "/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd"..., 4096) = 209
close(6) = 0
pipe([4, 5]) = 0
mmap(NULL, 8392704, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_STACK, -1, 0) = 0x7f0f10714000
mprotect(0x7f0f10715000, 8388608, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
clone(child_stack=0x7f0f10f13fb0, flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID, parent_tidptr=0x7f0f10f149d0, tls=0x7f0f10f14700, child_tidptr=0x7f0f10f149d0) = 9274
futex(0x5569035fbe20, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 0, NULL) = 0
futex(0x5569035fbdd0, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
futex(0x5569035fb718, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 0, NULL) = 0
futex(0x5569035fb720, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
close(5) = 0
futex(0x5569035f9318, FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET_PRIVATE|FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, {tv_sec=1568197230, tv_nsec=800819000}, FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY
Fatal exception: Signal 11
Stack:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x3d523)[0x7efe95c77523]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_sal.so.3(+0x3d733)[0x7efe95c77733]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x37840)[0x7efe95a97840]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_cppu.so.3(+0x14b32)[0x7efe92eb5b32]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libuno_cppu.so.3(uno_type_any_assign+0x97)[0x7efe92eb4f27]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x2aac818)[0x7efe98744818]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x2aad4f5)[0x7efe987454f5]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_ZN3utl10ConfigItemC2ERKN3rtl8OUStringE14ConfigItemMode+0x7b)[0x7efe9873a76b]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x2b01fb8)[0x7efe98799fb8]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_ZN19SvtSysLocaleOptionsC1Ev+0x11f)[0x7efe9879b4af]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_Z7InitVCLv+0x1a0)[0x7efe98aef480]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(+0x2e58a1d)[0x7efe98af0a1d]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(_Z6SVMainv+0x30)[0x7efe98af0a70]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so(soffice_main+0x91)[0x7efe97bc2d71]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin(+0x107b)[0x556aed9d207b]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xeb)[0x7efe95a8409b]
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin(+0x10ba)[0x556aed9d20ba]
) = 0
futex(0x5569035f9320, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 0
close(4) = 0
futex(0x7f0f16dfece8, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 1
futex(0x7f0f16dfea60, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 1
munmap(0x7f0f11744000, 65536) = 0
munmap(0x7f0f11f55000, 65536) = 0
exit_group(134) = ?
+++ exited with 134 +++
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:43 am
by chrispop99
dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 4:12 pm
chrispop99 wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:10 am
Installation of a driver using the Nvidia driver installer on a dual graphics laptop fails. It works successfully on the same machine under 18.3.
During installation, accepting all defaults, the following message appears:
Screenshot-1.png
Proceeding with or without the checkbox selected makes no difference. After a reboot attempting to test the Nvida card results in the following:
Code: Select all
chris@mx19b2Nvidia:~/Desktop
$ optirun glxgears
[ 43.535779] [ERROR]No bridge found. Try installing primus or virtualgl.
The graphics specification of the machine is as follows:
Code: Select all
$ inxi -G
Graphics: Device-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics driver: i915 v: kernel
Device-2: NVIDIA GF108GLM [NVS 5200M] driver: N/A
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa
resolution: 1600x900~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ivybridge Mobile v: 4.2 Mesa 18.3.6
Chris
what driver gets installed under 18.3?
Apologies for delay; I only have one of these machines available at the moment, so had to install 18.3 to check.
Code: Select all
$ inxi -G
Graphics: Device-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics driver: i915 v: kernel
Device-2: NVIDIA GF108GLM [NVS 5200M] driver: nvidia v: 390.116
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa
resolution: 1600x900~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ivybridge Mobile v: 4.2 Mesa 18.2.6
Chris