Should I switch to MX?

Message
Author
User avatar
asqwerth
Developer
Posts: 7821
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:37 am

Re: Should I switch to MX?

#21 Post by asqwerth »

It's very gently rolling, and I do all my updates via Synaptic without issue.

It's ok generally, but I believe that they have a smaller pool of packages and they aren't currently taking package requests. There have been times when an existing package is no longer maintained and disappears from the repos. For instance I used to have compiz running as WM for my MATE desktop but it's no longer available.

For Libreoffice and Virtualbox respectively, they provide a separate software manager. You run them after your normal apt-get/Synaptic updates, to check if there are LO/VB updates and if yes, to install them.

The basic software (or at least their version of certain applications) should be covered.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400

User avatar
uncle mark
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: Should I switch to MX?

#22 Post by uncle mark »

asqwerth wrote: Sun Jan 03, 2021 2:38 pm It's very gently rolling, and I do all my updates via Synaptic without issue.

It's ok generally, but I believe that they have a smaller pool of packages and they aren't currently taking package requests. There have been times when an existing package is no longer maintained and disappears from the repos. For instance I used to have compiz running as WM for my MATE desktop but it's no longer available.

For Libreoffice and Virtualbox respectively, they provide a separate software manager. You run them after your normal apt-get/Synaptic updates, to check if there are LO/VB updates and if yes, to install them.

The basic software (or at least their version of certain applications) should be covered.
Is Texstar still alive?
Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia circa 2011 -- MX 19.2 KDE
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes

User avatar
andyprough
MX Packager
Posts: 918
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:16 pm

Re: Should I switch to MX?

#23 Post by andyprough »

Yes he posted about the end of flash yesterday - https://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.p ... msg1325377
Primary Computer - Commodore 64: Processor - MOS 6510/8500, 1.023MHz; Memory - 64kb RAM, 20kB ROM - 8k BASIC V2, 8k Kernel, 4k Character ROM; Display output - 320x200, 16 colours; OS - BASIC V2.0; Weight: 1.8kg

User avatar
Ironfighter
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 4:45 am

Re: Should I switch to MX?

#24 Post by Ironfighter »

I would switch if I was you. MX is like having a car that starts first time every time unless you do something stupid (as I have done on occasions😉). I am not a techie but have tried many Linux versions over the years then I came across MX. I dual booted MX 18 from Win 10 at first but after a couple of months I did a full install of MX 19.

I have more software installed than you can poke a stick at.

I run the updates everyday at a time that suits me - might take up to 5 minutes occasionally. I enjoy that - there is something very appealing to me watching text fly up the terminal.

I run FreeCAD 3D modelling appimage which updates no problem.

I use Virtual Box to run Windows 10 for two must have engineering software packages for which there are no Linux equivalents.

The MX Tools and Package Installer are great.

The MX community is very helpful also.

Last but not least 2023 is a long way away😉
"To achieve the greatest result, seek the quintessential"
General Shi Jue, late president of the Tai Chi Chuan Society of the Republic of China

Locked

Return to “General”