MX XFCE is still the main "middle ground" release. You get 32 and 64 bit versions, standard and ahs kernels.
MX 19.2 KDE
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
I now tested the live image on a 2006 laptop with less than 1gb ram. Of course this setup won't be really usable in practice (I have antix on it), but it boots and I have no screen tearing when playing a video or moving stuff on the desktop.
Amazing actually.
So can someone clear this up for me: can it hurt to use a new kernel on old hardware like this? Or does it just slow down things a bit because the kernel is bigger?
Amazing actually.
So can someone clear this up for me: can it hurt to use a new kernel on old hardware like this? Or does it just slow down things a bit because the kernel is bigger?
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
Manjaro has this. But MX should definitely be more stable than Manjaro.andyprough wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:52 pm And putting the yakuake drop-down terminal in by default is a fantastic design decision. I don't think I've ever seen that on another KDE distro.
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
My post in that thread was specific to the machine in question, and in keeping with another conversation I had with the OP outside of that thread. Yes, you are right in that a larger kernel in terms of lines of code will take longer to read and execute, and the older the hardware is, the more pronounced it will be. Besides that, the old hardware can not use many of the advanced features of the newer kernels, so optimisations designed to increase productivity, security and speed included in newer kernels are lost.
Mike P
Regd Linux User #472293
(Daily) Lenovo T560, i7-6600U, 16GB, 2.0TB SSD, MX_ahs
(ManCave) AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 32G, 8TB mixed, MX_ahs
(Spare)2017 Macbook Air 7,2, 8GB, 256GB SSD, MX_ahs
Regd Linux User #472293
(Daily) Lenovo T560, i7-6600U, 16GB, 2.0TB SSD, MX_ahs
(ManCave) AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, 32G, 8TB mixed, MX_ahs
(Spare)2017 Macbook Air 7,2, 8GB, 256GB SSD, MX_ahs
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
@m_pav: many thanks for clarifying
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
I think yakuake is a pretty standard default on various Plasma distros, apart from not just in Debian.tony37 wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 6:12 amManjaro has this. But MX should definitely be more stable than Manjaro.andyprough wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:52 pm And putting the yakuake drop-down terminal in by default is a fantastic design decision. I don't think I've ever seen that on another KDE distro.
KDE Neon Dev Edition has it,and that comes from KDE itself. Same with Sabayon's Plasma edition. At least the versions I have on my system, installed around 4+ years ago.
I don't change Plasma much from the default setup that comes with the distros, so mostly I use Plasma in a fairly standard state except for icons, kvantum themes, (more recently) blur effects, and ensuring hot corners+windows overview is activated.
I only got into checking out the "blur" effects after seeing some nice screenshots in the Manjaro forum. But I stick to XFCE in Manjaro as I find the active development in Plasma can at times lead to rather turbulent updates on an aggressive rolling system like Arch or Arch derivatives.
Sabayon is much more gently-rolling, so it's fine.
Last edited by asqwerth on Mon Aug 17, 2020 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
Hello,
thank you for this version, the success is there, impossible to obtain the iso or the torrent, it is too much requested !!! So much the better and congratulations.
Yes it's good now!
thank you for this version, the success is there, impossible to obtain the iso or the torrent, it is too much requested !!! So much the better and congratulations.
Yes it's good now!
Aspire 5733 - Mx Linux
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
Have you tried selecting a mirror in the ISO downloads page?
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Re: MX 19.2 KDE
Yes they are overloaded, but I was able to have one. KDE installed and so far everything is working fine.
Aspire 5733 - Mx Linux