Page 3 of 29

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 6:46 pm
by Jerry3904
Nice! If you use neofetch instead, the logo will be correct.

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:22 pm
by Atlanelan
This is my simple set up of MX19-Mate.
Image

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:00 am
by Jerry3904
My main screen on my personal laptop, with a modified MX-Semplice_sys conky:
Image

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 6:53 am
by darknetmatrix
Image

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 12:51 pm
by oops
Nice MX19 versions ...

DM=XFCE4 _ MX19x32 (almost by default) = RAM 286MB
Image

WM=IceWM _ MX19x32 = RAM only 163MB
Image

... and with compiz:
viewtopic.php?f=97&t=54521&start=10
Image

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:45 pm
by junoluna
Image

i like this conky ...

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:32 pm
by manyroads
For those who might be interested... here's a quick snapshot of my desktop. MX19 running bspwm with kitty (terminal), a rofi menu, conky and polybar...

Image

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:54 pm
by oops
manyroads wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:32 pm For those who might be interested... here's a quick snapshot of my desktop. MX19 running bspwm with kitty (terminal), a rofi menu, conky and polybar...
... Interesting ... For the memory consumption, it is a alternative to "i3" ?

Image

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2019 1:25 pm
by manyroads
Personally I like it better than either hlwm or i3-wm. On my laptops it consumes almost exactly the same size foot print.

My favorite tilers are (in order):
1. bspwm
2. hlwm
3. i3-wm

I have some images of bspwm, hlwm, and xfce with zentile posted here:
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=54302#p543280

Re: MX-19 screenshots

Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:41 am
by junoluna
Image

just switched to KDE ... dislike marvel but like the colors
.........


by the way ... that screenshot a few posts back regarding DE resources is not what i am seeing with KDE .... quite the opposite
i am finding that it is considerably less resource heavy than xfce ... maybe a vagary of my machine but i am collecting data and will do a thread tomorrow

has me proper confused, which is a semi-permanent state to be fair