How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

Message
Author
User avatar
Utopia
Administrator
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:53 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#21 Post by Utopia »

The scrolling text only lasts 22 seconds on my computer.
With Plymouth you can't hide it all, instead you get something like 10 seconds of boot messages and 12 seconds of Plymouth.
Besides, scrolling text is an endangered species and ought to be protected.
Henry

User avatar
chrispop99
Global Moderator
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:07 pm

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#22 Post by chrispop99 »

Spin it; list it as an added value feature to help diagnose potential errors.

Chris
MX Facebook Group Administrator.
Home-built desktop - Core i5 9400, 970 EVO Plus, 8GB
DELL XPS 15
Lots of test machines

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#23 Post by Jerry3904 »

Back to my earlier question: what about using a black screen with a simple text or text sequence? I could imagine, for instance, this newbie-friendly sequence:
Off we go...
Wait for it...
Here it comes...
If colors are possible, would be *fun* to go through a stoplight sequence (R-Y-G) or something. Just the middle one could be used if only a single screen were possible. Best would be the ability to escape it .
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
Gaer Boy
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:06 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#24 Post by Gaer Boy »

That would be quite amusing - the first time. I would find it infuriating subsequently, so being able to escape it is essential - either ESC or modify the boot options.

Phil

Gigabyte B550I Aorus Pro AX, Ryzen 5 5600G, 16GB, 250GB Samsung SSD (GPT), 2x1TB HDD (MBR), MX-21-AHS
Lenovo Thinkpad X220, dual-core i5, 4MB, 120GB Samsung SSD (GPT), MX-21

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 23184
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#25 Post by Jerry3904 »

We're talking LIVE here, not installed. Unless I misunderstand something...

On an installed, if my wait-for-it is possible, there might be some options for the user:
--scrolling boot log
--simple black
--any text that s/he wanted to see
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
Gaer Boy
Posts: 862
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:06 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#26 Post by Gaer Boy »

OOps! I knew that, but forgot.

Gigabyte B550I Aorus Pro AX, Ryzen 5 5600G, 16GB, 250GB Samsung SSD (GPT), 2x1TB HDD (MBR), MX-21-AHS
Lenovo Thinkpad X220, dual-core i5, 4MB, 120GB Samsung SSD (GPT), MX-21

User avatar
uncle mark
Posts: 857
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:42 pm

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#27 Post by uncle mark »

BitJam wrote:Is it preventing some people from using MX? If so, what percentage? Was it a factor in that very negative review we got? If it is turning some people away, are we benefiting from this filter?
LOL. I just caught that last little bit.

In my business, sometimes we "fire" customers. They're the ones you can never make happy, no matter how hard you try.
Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia circa 2011 -- MX 19.2 KDE
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes

User avatar
ko
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:43 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#28 Post by ko »

A faster boot of the livecd is (imho) probably more appreciated by users than some bootsplash.
Like said before by chrispop spin the verbose screen output as a feature; don't add more seconds to the bootcycle.

Note:
I have not seen any complaints about 'missing a bootsplash' in the limited number of reviews. Nor any user complaints.
Ko Bros Linux User #312596.  MX14.4, MX14.3, Mepis 12, Debian 7, antiX 15, Peppermint 5...and sometimes Win7

User avatar
topcat
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:55 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#29 Post by topcat »

When I started with Mepis and Linux, it was around version 3.4 and the Mepis-based "Point & Click Linux" book by Robin Miller. I remember around that time running a live-cd of a version +/- 3.4 that had a light blue background graphic that at the center had a large Mepis logo, and the scrolling text was in white if I remember correctly. I recall thinking that was pretty cool and wondered how it was done. Anybody else recall something like that?

It was probably something like the verbose mode on this page:

http://distro.ibiblio.org/vectorlinux/v ... uction.htm

but looked a bit more like this:

Image

using a background looking something like this:

Image
Zotac ZBOX-ID91-U (desktop system)
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB SATA III SSD
G.SKILL 8GB DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)

ZOTAC ZBOX nano ID62-U (media streamer)
Silicon Power Slim S60 120GB SATA III SSD
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4GB DDR3L 1600 (PC3L 12800)

User avatar
zeeone
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:50 am

Re: How important is a live bootsplash or lack thereof?

#30 Post by zeeone »

I like the scrolling text, makes the machine look like it is doing something during start up.

You can add what ever pretty picture that you want but, it will take up space for the CD.

Then there is always someone that will not like it and say something about it(remember the upside down jelly fish?).

There is an old west saying; "There is those who will complain even if you hang them with a new rope". :popcorn:
Research, Research, Research, Before You Walk The Plank.
Registered Linux User # 398829

Post Reply

Return to “General”