On my system partprobe does not trigger automount, when nothing has changed. Only when kernel signals some changes,partpobe seems to triggers automount. The above example "hides" the changes hence at least on my system I get not automount triggered, even with having added partitions.dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:01 amfehlix wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:42 amThe closest to the mentioned requirement I can get with something like to "ignore" those which are going to be added or re-partitioned. E.g. for new or recreaterd sda4, sdas5 sda6 creating such ruledolphin_oracle wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:00 pm
what do you think of something like this, if it even still works. got it out of the depths of stackoverflow.
supposedly that disables automounting. it certainly leaves the list in place in thunar.Code: Select all
echo 'SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{UDISKS_AUTO}="0"' > /run/udev/rules.d/90-udisks-inhibit.rules
i tried with gparted in my test suite with some success, but I need more data points.
**never mind, didn't work in practice **
seems to not trigger any automount. Perhaps also related to udev polling time. After removing later that rule devies are shown but automount is not triggered.Code: Select all
echo 'KERNEL=="sda[456]", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{UDISKS_IGNORE}="1", ENV{UDISKS_AUTO}="0"' > /run/udev/rules.d/00-udisk2-ignore-block.rules udevadm control --reload; udevadm trigger --subsystem-match=block
that's close. but the ones that I get asked to automount aren't the ones we are installing to anyway (there are already mounted), its other partitions and especially partitions on other devices.
MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
I need to think about that one. I'm not sure where such a rule would be included, and how we deal with things before we know what devices are changed (in otherwords, when the user runs gparted from the installer).fehlix wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:27 amOn my system partprobe does not trigger automount, when nothing has changed. Only when kernel signals some changes,partpobe seems to triggers automount. The above example "hides" the changes hence at least on my system I get not automount triggered, even with having added partitions.dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:01 amfehlix wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 9:42 am
The closest to the mentioned requirement I can get with something like to "ignore" those which are going to be added or re-partitioned. E.g. for new or recreaterd sda4, sdas5 sda6 creating such rule
seems to not trigger any automount. Perhaps also related to udev polling time. After removing later that rule devies are shown but automount is not triggered.Code: Select all
echo 'KERNEL=="sda[456]", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{UDISKS_IGNORE}="1", ENV{UDISKS_AUTO}="0"' > /run/udev/rules.d/00-udisk2-ignore-block.rules udevadm control --reload; udevadm trigger --subsystem-match=block
that's close. but the ones that I get asked to automount aren't the ones we are installing to anyway (there are already mounted), its other partitions and especially partitions on other devices.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
If the above could be proved is working ( means hiding partitions changes made by minstall), we could regard the gparted-call to be identical as when called from the menu. So the user would have identical "gparted" experiences.dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:39 amI need to think about that one. I'm not sure where such a rule would be included, and how we deal with things before we know what devices are changed (in otherwords, when the user runs gparted from the installer).fehlix wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:27 amOn my system partprobe does not trigger automount, when nothing has changed. Only when kernel signals some changes,partpobe seems to triggers automount. The above example "hides" the changes hence at least on my system I get not automount triggered, even with having added partitions.dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:01 am
that's close. but the ones that I get asked to automount aren't the ones we are installing to anyway (there are already mounted), its other partitions and especially partitions on other devices.
The above "hide" rules would only need to be added as soon as we know what partitions are involved ( i.e. before re-creation/re-formatting), e.g. just before that action and only at the end to be removed (if at all).
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
so maybe hide everything until the installer actually launches, then remove the rule that hides everything and then put in place the new rule above, reload the rules, partprobe, and see what happens.fehlix wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:56 amIf the above could be proved is working ( means hiding partitions changes made by minstall), we could regard the gparted-call to be identical as when called from the menu. So the user would have identical "gparted" experiences.dolphin_oracle wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:39 amI need to think about that one. I'm not sure where such a rule would be included, and how we deal with things before we know what devices are changed (in otherwords, when the user runs gparted from the installer).fehlix wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:27 am
On my system partprobe does not trigger automount, when nothing has changed. Only when kernel signals some changes,partpobe seems to triggers automount. The above example "hides" the changes hence at least on my system I get not automount triggered, even with having added partitions.
The above "hide" rules would only need to be added as soon as we know what partitions are involved ( i.e. before re-creation/re-formatting), e.g. just before that action and only at the end to be removed (if at all).
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
The orage preferences that I set (from the whisker menu) seem to have no influence at all at the layout of the calendar that I see when I click on the clock in the panel.
Any idea how to fix this? I would like to remove the week numbers.
Any idea how to fix this? I would like to remove the week numbers.
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22089
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
are you using the orage clock plugin? by default, we are not.phykris wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 12:04 pm The orage preferences that I set (from the whisker menu) seem to have no influence at all at the layout of the calendar that I see when I click on the clock in the panel.
Any idea how to fix this? I would like to remove the week numbers.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Yes, bc the default clock/calendar in the panel is not the orage calender/clock but the xfce4-datetime-plugin.phykris wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 12:04 pm The orage preferences that I set (from the whisker menu) seem to have no influence at all at the layout of the calendar that I see when I click on the clock in the panel.
Any idea how to fix this? I would like to remove the week numbers.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
The calendar is a gtk widget. Looking at the documentation here, I see there is a way to hide the week numbers, but the method would take some snooping around. You can use the Orage Panel Clock plugin instead.
I made a request on the Xfce Forum where you can keep track of responses.
I made a request on the Xfce Forum where you can keep track of responses.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
- Eadwine Rose
- Administrator
- Posts: 14473
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
On a fresh install of beta 2.1 here, I decided to first test out the vsync thing in mx tweak - compositor because my second monitor is not displaying correctly (resolution is correct but it is smaller in size than the screen itself) and AK-47 told me to try that. Well, it doesn't help that bit, however as soon as I changed it a second volume icon popped up right above the other one (or below).
One on top has the slider all the way up, the other one has it all the way down.
I don't think that is supposed to happen?
One on top has the slider all the way up, the other one has it all the way down.
I don't think that is supposed to happen?
MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-34amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
- Eadwine Rose
- Administrator
- Posts: 14473
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am
Re: MX-19 Beta 2.1 Feedback
Another thingie is going on: gdebi isn't behaving like it should. Noticed this on the earlier install but went meh. Want to report it anyway.
I wanted to install the .deb for Slack-desktop (that thing is not in the repos), so I right click it to open with Gdebi and it just sits there doing nothing, so it seems, indefinitely. Screen empty and all:
Now, if I go to file - open and navigate to the .deb it WILL call in what I want to see:
I wanted to install the .deb for Slack-desktop (that thing is not in the repos), so I right click it to open with Gdebi and it just sits there doing nothing, so it seems, indefinitely. Screen empty and all:
Now, if I go to file - open and navigate to the .deb it WILL call in what I want to see:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
MX-23.6_x64 July 31 2023 * 6.1.0-34amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.20.0 * 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030
Asus TUF B450-Plus Gaming UEFI * Asus GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia 535.216.01 * 2x16Gb DDR4 2666 Kingston HyperX Predator
Samsung 870EVO * Samsung S24D330 & P2250 * HP Envy 5030