Re: MX-19.2 KDE Beta 1 feedback thread
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:29 am
Ksnip installed it from the stable repository. But it works erratically.
Support for MX and antiX Linux distros
http://www.forum.mxlinux.org/
Ksnip installed it from the stable repository. But it works erratically.
Code: Select all
System: Host: aguador-mx Kernel: 4.19.0-9-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 8.3.0
parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.19.0-9-amd64 root=/dev/sda5
Desktop: Xfce 4.14.2 tk: Gtk 3.24.5 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm4 dm: LightDM 1.26.0
Distro: MX-19.2_x64 patito feo May 31 2020 base: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Machine: Type: Laptop System: Notebook product: W51PU v: N/A serial: <filter> Chassis:
type: 10 serial: <filter>
Mobo: Notebook model: W51PU serial: <filter> UEFI: American Megatrends v: 5.12
date: 11/24/2016
Battery: ID-1: BAT0 charge: 8.6 Wh condition: 22.8/31.1 Wh (73%) volts: 10.6/11.1
model: Notebook BAT type: Li-ion serial: <filter> status: Discharging
CPU: Topology: Quad Core model: Intel Pentium N4200 bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Goldmont
family: 6 model-id: 5C (92) stepping: 9 microcode: 38 L2 cache: 1024 KiB
flags: lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx bogomips: 8755
Speed: 1492 MHz max: 1500 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1492 2: 1492 3: 1492 4: 1492
Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected
Type: l1tf status: Not affected
Type: mds status: Not affected
Type: meltdown status: Not affected
Type: spec_store_bypass status: Not affected
Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Full generic retpoline, IBPB: conditional, IBRS_FW,
STIBP: disabled, RSB filling
Type: srbds status: Not affected
Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics: Device-1: Intel Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor N4200/N3350/E3900 Series Integrated
Graphics
vendor: CLEVO/KAPOK driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:5a84
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa
resolution: 1366x768~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel HD Graphics 505 (Broxton) v: 4.5 Mesa 18.3.6
compat-v: 3.0 direct render: Yes
Audio: Device-1: Intel Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor N4200/N3350/E3900 Series Audio Cluster
vendor: CLEVO/KAPOK driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 00:0e.0
chip ID: 8086:5a98
Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.19.0-9-amd64
Network: Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet vendor: CLEVO/KAPOK
driver: r8169 v: kernel port: e000 bus ID: 01:00.1 chip ID: 10ec:8168
IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
Device-2: Intel Wireless 3165 driver: iwlwifi v: kernel port: e000 bus ID: 02:00.0
chip ID: 8086:3165
IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
This was expressly stated as a known issue in the Beta announcement. I have also mentioned it to another poster in this thread previously.Sparky wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:27 am wifi in the beta kde version doesn't auto connect, I have to manually connect each session....
Yes, i checked iso that downloaded from souceforge, its okasqwerth wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 7:19 am Could you post your qsi, Auro?
Also, did you check the checksums of the downloaded iso?
In your last line, are you saying there is no icon in the panel for WiFi/network Connection?
You need to post your Quick system info (qsi) as stated before, so the experts here can look at your network card and other hardware specs etc.Auro Kumar Sahoo wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 10:46 amYes, i checked iso that downloaded from souceforge, its okasqwerth wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 7:19 am Could you post your qsi, Auro?
Also, did you check the checksums of the downloaded iso?
In your last line, are you saying there is no icon in the panel for WiFi/network Connection?
Please see attache image for detail problemnetwork_icon_notify.tar.gz
Thanks
this particular issue is fixed in an update to plasma-nm but it will only affect new connections, not existing ones.Sparky wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 9:27 am wifi in the beta kde version doesn't auto connect, I have to manually connect each session.
Also it has the same name as the normal regular xfce. I am dual booting and it is confusing with the same name.