Page 142 of 147
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:36 pm
by Jerry3904
That is fun, though I think it would destroy my vision if I looked at it for long.
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2025 9:41 am
by ceeslans
My last screenshot for this month.
Fluxbox toolbar in the (usual) top-center position - and 'Nakedeb-OneLine' conky bar in bottom-center.
X-terminal-emulator (urxvt) showing memory consumption at session start-up.
The wonderful
'Round red green berries' wallpaper (thanks @dobbie), nicely saturated to my liking. Background set using Feh.
Leftside slit contains 9 wmalauncher dock items, with some refound/recreated 'crunchbang-faenza' icons
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2025 10:51 am
by Jerry3904
That is a gorgeous wallpaper!
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2025 10:58 am
by rhinomick
Simplicity but speed on my striped MX fluxbox after removing xfce.
Running on a raspberry pi 4 with 8 GB of RAM...very fast!!!
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 2:42 am
by ceeslans
@rhinomick I couldn't help noticing that the ring positions in your CoreBlue conky are off - probably due to editing the conky text section.
You can modify individual
x |
y values in the
coreblue-rings lua file to set related rings to a correct position. And/or play with
${voffset} values in the conky rc file...
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 5:51 am
by Jerry3904
rhinomick wrote: Mon Jun 30, 2025 10:58 am
Simplicity but speed on my striped MX fluxbox after removing xfce.
Running on a raspberry pi 4 with 8 GB of RAM...very fast!!!
Very happy to see MX Fluxbox on the Pi--I run it on a Pi 4b and it's great. Run Xfce on a Pi 5 with a nvme and that blazes too.
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2025 6:33 am
by LinuxBastler
Hi there,
I've ben using MXFB a couple of months now and it's pretty stock. I like the dark theme and its clean look, but that doesn't mean that I'm not changing it in the future
There have been some reasons for choosing MXFB on my Latitude e4310, which I've first cleaned, repasted, changed the HDD into a SSD and upgraded the RAM to 8 GB. I've tried different distros: debian cinnamon, LMDE, MX XFCE, O4OS with TDE, Emmabuntüs (LXQT) and MXFB. The reason why MXFB becomes my daily driver was first of all that everything works out of the box, without changing any settings. Then MXFB is much more snappier than most of the others, except Q4OS wit TDE. But I like the clean look of Fluxbox more than the TDE. And its rock-solid! Only one issue occured two days ago, but with the help of this forum, this minor problem was solved immeaditely.
Cheers!
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2025 7:02 am
by Jerry3904
LinuxBastler wrote: Sun Jul 06, 2025 6:33 am
Hi there,
I've ben using MXFB a couple of months now and it's pretty stock. I like the dark theme and its clean look, but that doesn't mean that I'm not changing it in the future
There have been some reasons for choosing MXFB on my Latitude e4310, which I've first cleaned, repasted, changed the HDD into a SSD and upgraded the RAM to 8 GB. I've tried different distros: debian cinnamon, LMDE, MX XFCE, O4OS with TDE, Emmabuntüs (LXQT) and MXFB. The reason why MXFB becomes my daily driver was first of all that everything works out of the box, without changing any settings. Then MXFB is much more snappier than most of the others, except Q4OS wit TDE. But I like the clean look of Fluxbox more than the TDE. And its rock-solid! Only one issue occured two days ago, but with the help of this forum, this minor problem was solved immeaditely.
Cheers!
Thanks for posting about your MXFB, and welcome to the Community!
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2025 7:10 am
by Melber
yeah, the default setup is pretty sexy. Kudos to those who put it together...
@LinuxBastler are you sure your username shouldn't be LinuxWerkseinstellungen?
Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2025 12:17 pm
by LinuxBastler
@Melber What makes you think that my username is LinuxWerkseinstellungen? During the installation process you've had to chose an username and that's why I'm sure mine is different