Page 15 of 17
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:00 pm
by KoO
Some thing Different..
Code: Select all
System: Host: debian10 Kernel: 5.0.0-8.1-liquorix-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: i3 4.16.1-169-g60a6d149
Distro: Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid
Machine: Type: Desktop System: ASUS product: All Series v: N/A serial: <root required>
Mobo: ASUSTeK model: H97I-PLUS v: Rev X.0x serial: <root required> UEFI: American Megatrends v: 3602
date: 04/08/2018
CPU: Topology: Quad Core model: Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 bits: 64 type: MT MCP L2 cache: 8192 KiB
Speed: 1256 MHz min/max: 800/3900 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 940 2: 943 3: 940 4: 944 5: 872 6: 969 7: 955 8: 947
Graphics: Device-1: NVIDIA GM204 [GeForce GTX 970] driver: nvidia v: 418.56
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.3 driver: nvidia resolution: 2560x1440~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GTX 970/PCIe/SSE2 v: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 418.56
Audio: Device-1: Intel 9 Series Family HD Audio driver: snd_hda_intel
Device-2: NVIDIA GM204 High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel
Device-3: TEAC type: USB driver: hid-generic,snd-usb-audio,usbhid
Device-4: C-Media type: USB driver: hid-generic,snd-usb-audio,usbhid
Sound Server: ALSA v: k5.0.0-8.1-liquorix-amd64
Network: Device-1: Intel Ethernet I218-V driver: e1000e
IF: eno1 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: 08:62:66:c7:c3:66
Drives: Local Storage: total: 931.52 GiB used: 382.44 GiB (41.1%)
ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Samsung model: SSD 860 EVO 500GB size: 465.76 GiB
ID-2: /dev/sdb vendor: Samsung model: SSD 850 EVO 500GB size: 465.76 GiB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 143.19 GiB used: 26.27 GiB (18.3%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda4
ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.0 MiB used: 3.9 MiB (97.7%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda6
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 33.5 C mobo: 27.8 C gpu: nvidia temp: 52 C
Fan Speeds (RPM): cpu: 2057 fan-1: 916 fan-3: 922 fan-4: 0 fan-5: 0 gpu: nvidia fan: 0%
Info: Processes: 224 Uptime: 8h 15m Memory: 15.61 GiB used: 1.41 GiB (9.0%) Shell: bash inxi: 3.0.32
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:19 pm
by Friedrich
Stevo wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 5:57 pm
caprea wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:39 pm
The patched Nvidia 340xx legacy driver runs well here with 5.0.0-7.1-liquorix
...
Cool! Anti may want to add it to the antiX repos for 5.0 kernels, too. Nvidia may have given up on the 304xx drivers--at least Arch isn't even providing those any longer.
The patched Nvidia 304xx legacy driver also runs well here with 5.0.0-7.1-liquorix.
(And many (all?) other kernels: 4.9;4.15;4.20; only exception: 4.19.0.1)
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:08 pm
by Stevo
We've now added the 5.1-1 (based on the 5.1.6 vanilla) Liquorix kernel, as well as removed all but the last 5.0 packages. The following DKMS drivers will build on it, at least on my tests for 64-bit.
Patched broadcom-sta-dkms in our test repo.
Virtual Box 5.2.30 in the test repo.
Nvidia driver 4.18.74 in the test repo.
Ndiswrapper in the main repo.
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:35 am
by Friedrich
Stevo wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:08 pm
We've now added the 5.1-1 (based on the 5.1.6 vanilla) Liquorix kernel
You chose not to add the headers as a dependency?
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:23 pm
by Head_on_a_Stick
@Stevo: did you know that Liquorix now offer stretch-based kernel versions?
https://liquorix.net/debian/dists/
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:47 pm
by Stevo
Friedrich wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:35 am
Stevo wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:08 pm
We've now added the 5.1-1 (based on the 5.1.6 vanilla) Liquorix kernel
You chose not to add the headers as a dependency?
Yes, I left the dependencies as is; they are not a hard dependency of any Debian type kernel, but the MX Package Installer does automatically install the headers along with the kernel. If you're missing them, module-assistant's "m-a prepare" command is easy enough to run to solve that issue, IMO.
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:50 pm
by Stevo
Yes, perhaps we can switch the package installer to use their repo now. It would save me a couple of hours a week compiling time...
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:48 pm
by Friedrich
Stevo wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:47 pm
.. the MX Package Installer does automatically install the headers along with the kernel.
Seems it does not. That's why I am asking.
Tested on 2 separate PC.
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2019 7:09 pm
by Stevo
Can you enable the MX test repo in the MX repo manager, update the apt database
Then check:
If not installed, run
as above to get them, then disable the test repo in Repo Man.
I'll check to see what's wrong with the package installer, though we are going to switch to the Liquorix repo soon.
Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2019 9:42 am
by mmikeinsantarosa
Your latest liquorix kernel can actually run my mobile broadband card but I did have to upgrade virtualbox to the latest in test to get a /dev/vboxdrv to show up.
