Re: MX Fluxbox Screenshots
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:51 pm
@Melber
That's a great cohesive look!
That's a great cohesive look!
Support for MX and antiX Linux distros
http://www.forum.mxlinux.org/
Materia is a very nice theme, sadly discontinued and as I recall it behaves badly with certain apps on occasion (I think I had menu issues with Ardour a while back) I'm sure something that could be fixed in CSS but I didn't dig that deep. Materia and Arc are two 'greatest hits' GTK themes, maybe somebody will fork and continue them if they haven't already...Melber wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 6:34 pm @AVLinux thanks, glad you like it.
Pretty much just based on stuff from the default install; style is just recolored MX-Comfort, panel is a reworking of the mx-workspaces tint2. Only new things are the close-active button and the wallpaper.
In case someone's interested, the Materia theme can be installed directly from MXPI,
It looks nice, fresh and modern.Melber wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:49 pm First fiddlings with mxfb 23.
I am really liking the Materia gtk theme at the moment, so took that as inspiration for a flat look.
![]()
I'm the opposite. While dark themes can look great I find them too visually oppressive to use for any length of time.kobaian wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2023 4:48 am In spite of that I still prefer dark themes or a little bit darker grey themes for my everyday work.
MX-Comfort tool...kobaian wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2023 4:48 am I think it will be great having the accent color alternatives for MX-Comfort and MX-Comfort dark in the MX-repo in the future.
So Great.Melber wrote: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:49 pm First fiddlings with mxfb 23.
I am really liking the Materia gtk theme at the moment, so took that as inspiration for a flat look.
![]()
Code: Select all
OS: MX x86_64
Kernel: 6.4.11-x64v3-xanmod1
Locale: de_DE.UTF-8
WM: Fluxbox
WM Theme: BlueNight
Theme: mx-comfort-dark [GTK2/3]
Icons: gnome [GTK2/3]
Packages: 2163 (dpkg), 6 (flatpak)
Host: B550M S2H
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (12) @ 3.8GHz [54.7°C]
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GPU Driver: nouveau
Resolution: 3840x2160 @ 60.00Hz, 2560x1440 @ 120.00Hz
Memory: 2208MiB / 31991MiB (6%)
Song: Dougie Maclean - The Origin - The Search
Music Player: mocp
Disk (/): 28G / 243G (12%)
Disk (/media/evo850): 464G / 916G (54%)
Disk (/media/crux2tb): 934G / 1.8T (54%)
Disk (/media/qvo): 337G / 916G (39%)
Disk (/media/evo500): 343G / 458G (79%)
For me conky is only a nice looking toy and executors are useful tools in a large variety of situations. When I commit some problems, I'd like to solve, for example I'd like to decrease the resources-consumption while playing YouTube videos by changing the browser settings, I need to have executors on the panel that don't hide under maximized windows. I don't have any idea, how conky could replace the executors.wdscharff wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2023 8:01 am Executors, funny, makes no sense to my eyes, I prefer conky when I want to look at workloads and technical values.
Not really, just a different approach. Your focus is taking and presenting great photos, I'm more into fiddling config files to complement an abstracted graphic image. Both are valid ways of doing a desktop.
Circles are just ellipses with no imagination...wdscharff wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2023 8:44 am I live in a world of ellipses, because there are no circles