Re: Brave or any other browser besides Firefox....
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 12:55 pm
Awww...not much love for Pale Moon, for which I maintain the MX packages from source with increasing difficulty.
Support for MX and antiX Linux distros
http://www.forum.mxlinux.org/
I don't really use Pale Moon anymore. Nothing wrong with the browser, but they had some problems with Cloudflare tightening the screws and thus making life more difficult for small browsers.Stevo wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 12:55 pm Awww...not much love for Pale Moon, for which I maintain the MX packages from source with increasing difficulty.
Keep the good work mate, I find Pale Moon one of the few corners of sanity in today's digital.Stevo wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 12:55 pm Awww...not much love for Pale Moon, for which I maintain the MX packages from source with increasing difficulty.
Since I compile Pale Moon from source code for our repositories, the packages in MX main are all SSE2. You have to upgrade to the AVX build in the test repo to get that feature (i.e., just upgrade the amd64 palemoon from test). This also means I have been able to provide i386, armhf, and arm64 native builds, which are no longer supported by the official Pale Moon binaries.dreamer wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 3:40 pmI don't really use Pale Moon anymore. Nothing wrong with the browser, but they had some problems with Cloudflare tightening the screws and thus making life more difficult for small browsers.Stevo wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 12:55 pm Awww...not much love for Pale Moon, for which I maintain the MX packages from source with increasing difficulty.
I didn't like their move to AVX, because I think their biggest strength is low-end computers. They have a unique advantage being single process and consuming less RAM because of it. Now, because of AVX they have higher minimum required specs than Chrome and company. Doesn't make sense to me. I'll keep it installed as long as SSE2 builds are available.
Thank you for the links.Pretty Vacant wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:34 amBetter not believe that info. When using Brave use these settings https://www.privacyguides.org/en/deskto ... ers/#brave and UBO and a whole lot of crap wont be downloaded.django013 wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:59 pm respect to resource hog:
When I start brave, it tells me, that it saved me 6,6 GB downloading rubbish and saved me 3,5 hours waiting for bull.sh.it ...
And https://www.kuketz-blog.de/einstellungen/#brave-desktop
UBO https://www.privacyguides.org/en/browse ... ock-origin
For FF https://www.privacyguides.org/en/deskto ... s/#firefox
https://www.kuketz-blog.de/brave-und-fi ... er-teil-2/
https://www.deepl.com/en/translator
Better not use Bleachbit.
Looking for privacy safety and at the same time use all that google crap??? Not sure what you are about!?danux wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:44 am Mybe the following question relates also to this topic of Browsers:
What and how many browsers to use for privacy compartmentalization? For example
- Chromium for gmail, google translate, youtube
...
Don't you use Youtube, or Gmail? Maybe one can get rid of Gmail, but Youtube? This is a hard one.Pretty Vacant wrote: Mon Apr 28, 2025 6:19 amLooking for privacy safety and at the same time use all that google crap??? Not sure what you are about!?danux wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:44 am Mybe the following question relates also to this topic of Browsers:
What and how many browsers to use for privacy compartmentalization? For example
- Chromium for gmail, google translate, youtube
...