Yes, that is the source code, but that nonetheless requires a newer rustc compiler.Ups wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2024 1:46 amMaybe you can find something here, unfortunately I have no idea about this:Stevo wrote: Mon Nov 04, 2024 4:23 pm If it's based on Firefox, then it probably requires a newer rustc compiler to builld it than we can provide. They do have a 64-bit repository, though. Just a single lone deb in it, no source.
https://github.com/mullvad/mullvad-browser
Request MX-23: Mullvad Browser
Re: Request MX-23: Mullvad Browser
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing
Re: Request MX-23: Mullvad Browser
And again, if you're running amd64 (x86-64) MX 21 or 23, they already provide an apt repository: https://repository.mullvad.net/deb/stab ... d-browser/
with directions how how to add it so you get auto-updates: https://mullvad.net/en/help/install-mullvad-app-linux
with directions how how to add it so you get auto-updates: https://mullvad.net/en/help/install-mullvad-app-linux
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing
- DukeComposed
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:57 pm
Re: Request MX-23: Mullvad Browser
We've already had a recent thread where folks waxed philosophical about all the tinfoil hat dangers of being on the Internet and how They could conceivably getcha. If you don't want any government to read your data, don't go online.user101 wrote: Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:22 pm The last I looked, the CIA were involved in running some TOR infrastructure.
I kindly ask that paranoid philosophizing either be restricted to one dedicated thread on conspiracy theories on this forum or none at all, and that forum moderators lock this one pending a decision, presuming the Men In Black allow it.
Re: Request MX-23: Mullvad Browser
I never expected a reaction like this...I guess you don't believe in it. That's fine.DukeComposed wrote: Wed Nov 27, 2024 4:06 amWe've already had a recent thread where folks waxed philosophical about all the tinfoil hat dangers of being on the Internet and how They could conceivably getcha. If you don't want any government to read your data, don't go online.user101 wrote: Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:22 pm The last I looked, the CIA were involved in running some TOR infrastructure.
I kindly ask that paranoid philosophizing either be restricted to one dedicated thread on conspiracy theories on this forum or none at all, and that forum moderators lock this one pending a decision, presuming the Men In Black allow it.
Re: Request MX-23: Mullvad Browser
I tried it and I use their vpn service too but found it to be yet just another firefox, like any other really. If you wanted to integrate their vpn and your browser/browsing then it might fit the bill but I like to keep things separated. Browsers do the browsing, vpn's do their thing. Personally I think librewolf is the least intrusive FF, and I never even use it but keep the appimage just cause I like their style.
As for getting it, it couldn't be any easier than grabbing the tar.xz file, extracting anywhere you like and creating a shortcut to the proper exe. Same way tor-browser works as a matter of fact and I do use that every day.
github.com/mullvad/mullvad-browser/releases
I can't testify to the difference in security between any browser because I am bored of pretending I need to worry about it to begin with. I use the ones that are the lightest on resources but yet give me the most control which is why I love appimages so much. There's even a mullvad-browser docker image I believe.
As for getting it, it couldn't be any easier than grabbing the tar.xz file, extracting anywhere you like and creating a shortcut to the proper exe. Same way tor-browser works as a matter of fact and I do use that every day.
github.com/mullvad/mullvad-browser/releases
I can't testify to the difference in security between any browser because I am bored of pretending I need to worry about it to begin with. I use the ones that are the lightest on resources but yet give me the most control which is why I love appimages so much. There's even a mullvad-browser docker image I believe.
Sys76 LemurPro-mx-23.4, EliteMinis HM90-mx-21.3, Deskmini UM350-phoenixLite win10, Qnap 12tb nas, Protectli FW4C-opnsense(=゜ω゜)
zero privacy = zero security . All MX'd Up
UAP = up above people
zero privacy = zero security . All MX'd Up
UAP = up above people