Lightweight music player?

Message
Author
User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14567
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#11 Post by Stevo »

There's also a fork of Clementine called Strawberry with the library features, though I don't know if it's lighter. We have it in the main MX repos.

imschmeg
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:32 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#12 Post by imschmeg »

If you don't mind using a CLI instead of a GUI, cmus is extremely lightweight.

User avatar
wdscharff
Posts: 1106
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2020 1:07 am

Re: Lightweight music player?

#13 Post by wdscharff »

cmus is only very lightweight if you use xterm instead of the xfce terminal.
With xterm around 40mb with xfce terminal around 80mb
Pragha on the other hand is a full featured Gui music player, easy to use and requires only 105-110mb of ram at startup. This is on par with VLC (which can also play video, but I don't think it has a library).
Pragha is a bit "outdated" in MXPI, but since it works, I wouldn't worry about it.
For comparison, because I prefer it to VLC, QMPlay2 is around 200mb.

All values for required RAM taken from the task manager, ahs_64bit. on a 32bit system the ressurcen requirement should be lower)

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
my working horse Desktop AMD Ryzen 9 3900x, 32GB Ram // SSD ... enough
mx-fluxbox, what else?

In nature there are neither rewards nor punishments.
There are consequences.


my wallpaper gallery

User avatar
radonrose
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:59 am

Re: Lightweight music player?

#14 Post by radonrose »

I was never a library type of guy, so I always went with Audacious until I discovered DeaDBeeF.
Stevo wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 2:47 pm There's also a fork of Clementine called Strawberry with the library features, though I don't know if it's lighter. We have it in the main MX repos.
Never really measured CPU and RAM usage for music players, but I was impressed by how fast DeaDBeeF loaded up, compared to anything else that offered tabbed playlists or similar. Also, Strawberry used to load up way faster than Clementine on my previous system (Pentium Dual Core mobile with Fedora KDE and later LXDE), but that was before 2017.
manyroads wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 9:29 am FWIW I use DeadBeef (music) and Celluloid (Youtube Video Music).
May i suggest mpv with the --no-video flag?
AND1s, tuna, blast processing.
Αν δε βρίσκεις αυτό που ψάχνεις στα Ελληνικά, στείλε μου μήνυμα. Ίσως μπορώ να βοηθήσω.

User avatar
RallyDarkstrike
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:51 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#15 Post by RallyDarkstrike »

asqwerth wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 11:03 am Pragha?

It's pretty light, has music library function, and I find the default sound (on my humble speakers ) good. I've used it in various of my distros for at least 5 years. Not to say I don't use Clementine as well; the latter is just old reliable and I've never had issues with it.
Huh, never heard of Pragha! I'll have to look into it!

I don't have any issues with Clementine, I really like it in fact and use it on my HTPC and my 'daily driver' laptop with 12GB of RAM....just wondering if I should replace it on this, my 'tinkering laptop, as when I'm browsing the net and have several tabs open (I can't have many on 2GB of non-replaceable RAM), Clementine is eating up a fair chunk of that if I am listening to it while doing my thing (seems like it uses about 100-130MB of RAM while playing my MP3s)
Image

User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: Lightweight music player?

#16 Post by JayM »

Open MX Package Installer, click the Stable Repo tab, type lightweight music player in the Search field. For more information about each one, right-click on each result then click More Info. For even more information about each one, search the web to get screenshots etc.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

Huckleberry Finn

Re: Lightweight music player?

#17 Post by Huckleberry Finn »

@RallyDarkstrike Slimjet from MXPI Popular Apps tab (as the browser). I promise you, you'll see the difference. And.. shortly: If you don't have such a sound skipping issue (just have a try): DeadBeef .

Edit: Oh, sorry, I forgot you mentioned you wanted "Media Library function" on post #8 ..

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22252
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: Lightweight music player?

#18 Post by dolphin_oracle »

mpd dameon and something like cantata for a front end might suffice. but honestly, none of the players are particularly heavy.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
JayM
Posts: 6796
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:47 am

Re: Lightweight music player?

#19 Post by JayM »

You might be better off conserving RAM by using Fluxbox instead of a full desktop environment like Xfce and configuring unneeded services to not start at boot. viewtopic.php?p=560215#p560215
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.

User avatar
pianokeyjoe
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:08 am

Re: Lightweight music player?

#20 Post by pianokeyjoe »

Would Alsaplayer be an acceptable light weight media player in this case use?
Pianokeyjoe
Intel i5 3.10ghz ,8GB ram, Intel onboard everything, 500GB HDD, MX-LINUX 19.3 :penguin:

Post Reply

Return to “Software / Configuration”