Lightweight music player?
Re: Lightweight music player?
There's also a fork of Clementine called Strawberry with the library features, though I don't know if it's lighter. We have it in the main MX repos.
Re: Lightweight music player?
If you don't mind using a CLI instead of a GUI, cmus is extremely lightweight.
Re: Lightweight music player?
cmus is only very lightweight if you use xterm instead of the xfce terminal.
With xterm around 40mb with xfce terminal around 80mb
Pragha on the other hand is a full featured Gui music player, easy to use and requires only 105-110mb of ram at startup. This is on par with VLC (which can also play video, but I don't think it has a library).
Pragha is a bit "outdated" in MXPI, but since it works, I wouldn't worry about it.
For comparison, because I prefer it to VLC, QMPlay2 is around 200mb.
All values for required RAM taken from the task manager, ahs_64bit. on a 32bit system the ressurcen requirement should be lower)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
With xterm around 40mb with xfce terminal around 80mb
Pragha on the other hand is a full featured Gui music player, easy to use and requires only 105-110mb of ram at startup. This is on par with VLC (which can also play video, but I don't think it has a library).
Pragha is a bit "outdated" in MXPI, but since it works, I wouldn't worry about it.
For comparison, because I prefer it to VLC, QMPlay2 is around 200mb.
All values for required RAM taken from the task manager, ahs_64bit. on a 32bit system the ressurcen requirement should be lower)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
my working horse Desktop AMD Ryzen 9 3900x, 32GB Ram // SSD ... enough
mx-fluxbox, what else?
In nature there are neither rewards nor punishments.
There are consequences.
my wallpaper gallery
mx-fluxbox, what else?
In nature there are neither rewards nor punishments.
There are consequences.
my wallpaper gallery
Re: Lightweight music player?
I was never a library type of guy, so I always went with Audacious until I discovered DeaDBeeF.
Never really measured CPU and RAM usage for music players, but I was impressed by how fast DeaDBeeF loaded up, compared to anything else that offered tabbed playlists or similar. Also, Strawberry used to load up way faster than Clementine on my previous system (Pentium Dual Core mobile with Fedora KDE and later LXDE), but that was before 2017.Stevo wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 2:47 pm There's also a fork of Clementine called Strawberry with the library features, though I don't know if it's lighter. We have it in the main MX repos.
May i suggest mpv with the --no-video flag?manyroads wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 9:29 am FWIW I use DeadBeef (music) and Celluloid (Youtube Video Music).
AND1s, tuna, blast processing.
Αν δε βρίσκεις αυτό που ψάχνεις στα Ελληνικά, στείλε μου μήνυμα. Ίσως μπορώ να βοηθήσω.
Αν δε βρίσκεις αυτό που ψάχνεις στα Ελληνικά, στείλε μου μήνυμα. Ίσως μπορώ να βοηθήσω.
- RallyDarkstrike
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:51 pm
Re: Lightweight music player?
Huh, never heard of Pragha! I'll have to look into it!asqwerth wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 11:03 am Pragha?
It's pretty light, has music library function, and I find the default sound (on my humble speakers ) good. I've used it in various of my distros for at least 5 years. Not to say I don't use Clementine as well; the latter is just old reliable and I've never had issues with it.
I don't have any issues with Clementine, I really like it in fact and use it on my HTPC and my 'daily driver' laptop with 12GB of RAM....just wondering if I should replace it on this, my 'tinkering laptop, as when I'm browsing the net and have several tabs open (I can't have many on 2GB of non-replaceable RAM), Clementine is eating up a fair chunk of that if I am listening to it while doing my thing (seems like it uses about 100-130MB of RAM while playing my MP3s)
Re: Lightweight music player?
Open MX Package Installer, click the Stable Repo tab, type lightweight music player in the Search field. For more information about each one, right-click on each result then click More Info. For even more information about each one, search the web to get screenshots etc.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.
Re: Lightweight music player?
@RallyDarkstrike Slimjet from MXPI Popular Apps tab (as the browser). I promise you, you'll see the difference. And.. shortly: If you don't have such a sound skipping issue (just have a try): DeadBeef .
Edit: Oh, sorry, I forgot you mentioned you wanted "Media Library function" on post #8 ..
Edit: Oh, sorry, I forgot you mentioned you wanted "Media Library function" on post #8 ..
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 22252
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Re: Lightweight music player?
mpd dameon and something like cantata for a front end might suffice. but honestly, none of the players are particularly heavy.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
Re: Lightweight music player?
You might be better off conserving RAM by using Fluxbox instead of a full desktop environment like Xfce and configuring unneeded services to not start at boot. viewtopic.php?p=560215#p560215
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.
- pianokeyjoe
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:08 am
Re: Lightweight music player?
Would Alsaplayer be an acceptable light weight media player in this case use?
Pianokeyjoe
Intel i5 3.10ghz ,8GB ram, Intel onboard everything, 500GB HDD, MX-LINUX 19.3
Intel i5 3.10ghz ,8GB ram, Intel onboard everything, 500GB HDD, MX-LINUX 19.3
