Re: MX17.x migrated to MX18.3 : What kernel should I be on?
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:15 am
My kernel is now
and I will be paying more attention to see if I get updates. Thinking back over the last 10 years or so, I think this is the first time that my 'aptitude full-upgrades' did not bring me an updated kernel several times a year.
Regarding the microcode issue, I see MXPI tells me I have a greyed out iucode-tool 2.1.1-1 from Stable Repo, but Debian Backports is tempting me with iucode-tool 2.3.1-1-bpo9+1. Can I safely experiment with this update to see if it changes performance/stability/reported vulnerabilities, without exploding my Intel Core2 Duo E7500 (which does not actually seem to be HyperThreading capable, according to Intel) ?
Thanks for the guidance.
P.S. Is MXPI just casually opening a temporary portal into other repositories so I can browse them, without actually making permanent changes that might bite me if I forget them? That is seriously cool.
Code: Select all
$ uname -a
Linux brain 4.19.0-12-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.152-1~mx17+1 (2020-10-20) x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ aptitude search 'linux-image ?installed'
i linux-image-4.13.0-1-amd64 - Linux 4.13 for 64-bit PCs
i linux-image-4.19.0-12-amd64-unsigned - Linux 4.19 for 64-bit PCs
Regarding the microcode issue, I see MXPI tells me I have a greyed out iucode-tool 2.1.1-1 from Stable Repo, but Debian Backports is tempting me with iucode-tool 2.3.1-1-bpo9+1. Can I safely experiment with this update to see if it changes performance/stability/reported vulnerabilities, without exploding my Intel Core2 Duo E7500 (which does not actually seem to be HyperThreading capable, according to Intel) ?
Thanks for the guidance.
P.S. Is MXPI just casually opening a temporary portal into other repositories so I can browse them, without actually making permanent changes that might bite me if I forget them? That is seriously cool.