Page 1 of 1
Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:05 am
by zyngalu
Just letting everyone know that I have two computers (networked) running synergy.
Synergy has never worked this well on any other system..
Im very Happy....
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:29 pm
by Paul..
This looks like a
really interesting system...I see that Synergy 1.9 codebase has been forked to Barrier, since the parent company has suspended development of the version 1.9 of Synergy and moved to a closed-source 2.x product.
Here's a link to the on-going development of Synergy, now called Barrier
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier.
Have you tried Barrier, or are you sticking with Synergy v1.9?
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:19 pm
by f.denys
Here another happy and registered Synergy 1.9 user. Using Synergy since several years and preferring 1.9.
Synergy 2.x, gave me issues -contrary to 1.9- which in combination with MX indeed performs very well.
Never heard of Barrier however, interesting, will have a look once they will have available a (promised) .deb version.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:00 pm
by Fibogacci
Barrier can be found in MXPI in Flatpaks.
I also have never heard of Barrier (or Synergy) and found it here in this Forum's thread, so I've installed.
As they say on their github project site:
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier
What is it?
Barrier is KVM software forked from Symless's synergy 1.9 codebase. Synergy was a commercialized reimplementation of the original CosmoSynergy written by Chris Schoeneman.
What's different?
Whereas synergy has moved beyond its goals from the 1.x era, Barrier aims to maintain that simplicity. Barrier will let you use your keyboard and mouse from machine A to control machine B (or more). It's that simple.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:11 pm
by zyngalu
I'm a paid up user of Synergy 1 Pro. (Latest Version) I paid for Synergy because I needed it so badly back in my Linux to MS days and I like to show some gratitude. I'll definitely be making a donation to the MXlinux crew too. (Thx )
*I also once used "Mouse Without Borders" back in my MS to MS days. (Never Again).
I didn't know about Barrier.
My Ubuntu Studio to Ubuntu Studio Synergy setup started stalling on the Client computer. The mouse and keyboard would hang. Now on MXlinux all is well. This is important to me as my server (Keyboard / Mouse) is my screen capture (Simple screen recorder) computer and my client computer is my Kdenlive computer.
*"Mouse Without Borders" is a Windows version of Synergy.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 4:16 am
by kajakob
Hi Fibogacci,
Fibogacci wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:00 pm
...
I also have never heard of Barrier (or Synergy) and found it here in this Forum's thread, so I've installed.
....
Currently I use a main pc and a second one for testing. Taking the right keyboard or mouse is not always easy.
With the "Linux Mint" I have "barrier" running, but with the "MX Linux 18" I don't manage to install "barrier".
I hope you can explain to a DAU how it works from the given source ....
possibly with - configure - make - make install
Thank you
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 4:22 pm
by Fibogacci
kajakob wrote: Mon May 27, 2019 4:16 am
Hi Fibogacci,
Currently I use a main pc and a second one for testing. Taking the right keyboard or mouse is not always easy.
With the "Linux Mint" I have "barrier" running, but with the "MX Linux 18" I don't manage to install "barrier".
I hope you can explain to a DAU how it works from the given source ....
possibly with - configure - make - make install
Thank you
Hello,
well, I did manage to install barrier - it is in MX Package Installer (start menu Whisker > MX Tools > MX Package Installer), tab Flatpaks. Type 'barrier' in search form/filter (right top corner) and check box, then click on Install button.
As I wrote, I installed it and run, but I couldn't connect my two computers. Maybe it was something wrong with my settings/configuration, maybe something with installation/flatpak or something else.
I've downloaded Synergy (earlier version, 1.4.16), but I did'n test it yet, so I don't know how/if it works.
Good luck.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 5:48 pm
by kajakob
Fibogacci wrote: Tue May 28, 2019 4:22 pm
....
As I wrote, I installed it and run, but I couldn't connect my two computers. Maybe it was something wrong with my settings/configuration, maybe something with installation/flatpak or something else.
...
Thank you very much - that was the solution - about Flatpaks.
I think you have read how it works basically ...
Two things are important, No "Auto config" - enter the server IP manually. Second deactivate "Enable SSL" at "Barrier/Change Setting".
This is really a big help for me - thanks again.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2021 7:29 am
by Aksh
Hi,
On MX-21, I'm not able to connect from MX-21 to WIN-10 or MX-21 to MX-18 using Barrier. It's working from WIN-10 to WIN-10 just fine.
Any help/pointers in this regard would be appreciated.
Thanks You.
Regards,
Aksh
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2021 7:49 am
by SwampRabbit
@Aksh to start, we need to have your Quick System Information and what version of Barrier you’re trying to use
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2021 8:23 am
by f.denys
No problems here, using Synergy 1 PRO (paid). Using MX21 as Synergy-server and MX19.4 as client.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 10:21 pm
by Aksh
Hi
@SwampRabbit,
Sorry for that.
I'm using Barrier 2.3.3+dfsg-1.1 installed through MXPI and Below is the QSI...
Code: Select all
System:
Host: <filter> Kernel: 5.10.0-10-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: N/A
parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-10-amd64
root=UUID=<filter> ro quiet splash
Desktop: Xfce 4.16.0 tk: Gtk 3.24.24 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm4
dm: LightDM 1.26.0 Distro: MX-21_x64 Wildflower October 20 2021
base: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Machine:
Type: Desktop System: Gigabyte product: H110M-S2 v: N/A
serial: <filter>
Mobo: Gigabyte model: H110M-S2-CF v: x.x serial: <filter>
UEFI: American Megatrends v: F23 date: 12/14/2017
CPU:
Topology: Dual Core model: Intel Core i3-6100 bits: 64 type: MT MCP
arch: Skylake-S family: 6 model-id: 5E (94) stepping: 3 microcode: EA
L2 cache: 3072 KiB
flags: avx avx2 lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx
bogomips: 29598
Speed: 800 MHz min/max: 800/3700 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 800 2: 800
3: 800 4: 800
Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: KVM: VMX disabled
Type: l1tf mitigation: PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes,
SMT vulnerable
Type: mds mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI
Type: spec_store_bypass
mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp
Type: spectre_v1
mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Full generic retpoline, IBPB:
conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP: conditional, RSB filling
Type: srbds mitigation: Microcode
Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics:
Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 530 vendor: Gigabyte driver: i915
v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:1912
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: modesetting
unloaded: fbdev,vesa resolution: 1366x768~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa Intel HD Graphics 530 (SKL GT2)
v: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.5 direct render: Yes
Audio:
Device-1: Intel 100 Series/C230 Series Family HD Audio
vendor: Gigabyte driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 00:1f.3
chip ID: 8086:a170
Sound Server: ALSA v: k5.10.0-10-amd64
Network:
Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet
vendor: Gigabyte driver: r8168 v: 8.048.03-NAPI port: e000
bus ID: 01:00.0 chip ID: 10ec:8168
IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
Device-2: Ralink MT7601U Wireless Adapter type: USB driver: mt7601u
bus ID: 1-5:4 chip ID: 148f:7601 serial: <filter>
IF: wlan0 state: down mac: <filter>
Drives:
Local Storage: total: 698.65 GiB used: 171.85 GiB (24.6%)
ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD2500AVVS-61L2B0
size: 232.89 GiB block size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B
speed: 3.0 Gb/s serial: <filter> rev: 3A01 scheme: MBR
ID-2: /dev/sdb vendor: Crucial model: CT500MX500SSD1 size: 465.76 GiB
block size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s
serial: <filter> rev: 043 scheme: GPT
Partition:
ID-1: / raw size: 50.00 GiB size: 48.91 GiB (97.83%)
used: 22.74 GiB (46.5%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdb6
ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.00 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) fs: swap
swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache pressure: 100 (default)
dev: /dev/sdb5
Sensors:
System Temperatures: cpu: 41.0 C mobo: N/A
Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Repos:
No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib non-free
2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main contrib non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
1: deb http://mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in/mx-mirror/packages/mx/repo/ bullseye main non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mxpitemp.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/skype-stable.list
1: deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.skype.com/deb stable main
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vivaldi.list
1: deb [arch=amd64] http://repo.vivaldi.com/stable/deb/ stable main
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vscode.list
1: deb [arch=amd64] https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/vscode stable main
Info:
Processes: 244 Uptime: 13m Memory: 3.73 GiB used: 1.85 GiB (49.5%)
Init: SysVinit v: 2.96 runlevel: 5 default: 5 Compilers: gcc: 10.2.1
alt: 10 Shell: quick-system-in running in: quick-system-in
inxi: 3.0.36
Thank You,
Regards,
Aksh
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 10:23 pm
by Aksh
f.denys wrote: Sun Dec 26, 2021 8:23 am
No problems here, using Synergy 1 PRO (paid). Using MX21 as Synergy-server and MX19.4 as client.
Thanks for the Quick Reply but I'm having issues with Barrier and not Synergy.
Regards,
Aksh
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 11:36 pm
by SwampRabbit
You should have gotten 2.4.0 as an update since you manually enabled the Debian backports.
It’s not recommended to manually enable this Repo permanently, but either way you should get 2.4.0 as an update since you did enable it.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2021 2:04 am
by Aksh
I don't know how exactly I enabled the Debian Backports. Does it get enabled with Tab Click? Any reading material to understand this further?
Anyways, I would not like to deviate from the standard practice as recommended by the distro so would rather disable Debian Backports. How to do that? Post that will Barrier 2.3.3 work as expected?
Thanks,
Aksh
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:30 am
by Aksh
Aksh wrote: Sun Dec 26, 2021 7:29 am
On MX-21, I'm not able to connect from MX-21 to WIN-10 or MX-21 to MX-18 using Barrier. It's working from WIN-10 to WIN-10 just fine.
It seems on my main machine, I had Firewall Settings enabled to prevent incoming traffic, allowing that made Barrier work as expected and I could connect from MX-21 to MX-18. With regards to MX-21 to Win-10, It should work as well but I'll confirm in a while.
Thanks.
Cheers!

Aksh.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:24 am
by SwampRabbit
@Aksh thats good news. Sorry for the delayed reply. You can ensure the backports Repo is disabled using MX Repo Manager.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 11:08 am
by Aksh
SwampRabbit wrote: Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:24 am
@Aksh thats good news. Sorry for the delayed reply. You can ensure the backports Repo is disabled using MX Repo Manager.
No Problem. Appreciate all your help.
Thanks,
Aksh
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:35 pm
by Aksh
Aksh wrote: Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:30 am
With regards to MX-21 to Win-10, It should work as well but I'll confirm in a while.
It's not working.
Regards,
Aksh.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:04 am
by SwampRabbit
@Aksh you're best bet unless someone else tests it is to troubleshoot like you did before:
- check the firewall on both end
- on MX launch barrier from the terminal to see if there is any output
- verify what they have on their GitHub
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/#usage
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/#f ... -questions
I see some commits recently since the last release for issues with Windows, if you can't get it to work, I can try and build off the latest source files in the next week or so.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:20 am
by Aksh
SwampRabbit wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:04 am
@Aksh you're best bet unless someone else tests it is to troubleshoot like you did before:
- check the firewall on both end
- on MX launch barrier from the terminal to see if there is any output
- verify what they have on their GitHub
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/#usage
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/#f ... -questions
I see some commits recently since the last release for issues with Windows, if you can't get it to work, I can try and build off the latest source files in the next week or so.
Thanks for very useful pointers as always. I'll troubleshoot it myself and will update.
Aksh.
Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 2:14 am
by Aksh
Aksh wrote: Sat Jan 08, 2022 3:20 am
Thanks for very useful pointers as always. I'll troubleshoot it myself and will update.
Aksh.
Alright, After trying to troubleshoot with many permutations and combinations with very useful pointers from
@SwampRabbit, could fix the issue finally, which was so trivial that it could easily go unnoticed. I'll get some time off to write a detailed note on the same.
Till Then,
Cheers!
Aksh

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:02 am
by SwampRabbit
@Aksh thats good news, I would have actually helped more but I don't have a Windows system I can test with at the moment, but glad you got it sorted.