Synergy Loves MXlinux

Message
Author
f.denys
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 4:06 am

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#11 Post by f.denys »

No problems here, using Synergy 1 PRO (paid). Using MX21 as Synergy-server and MX19.4 as client.

User avatar
Aksh
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:12 am

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#12 Post by Aksh »

Hi @SwampRabbit,

Sorry for that.

I'm using Barrier 2.3.3+dfsg-1.1 installed through MXPI and Below is the QSI...

Code: Select all

System:
  Host: <filter> Kernel: 5.10.0-10-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: N/A 
  parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-10-amd64 
  root=UUID=<filter> ro quiet splash 
  Desktop: Xfce 4.16.0 tk: Gtk 3.24.24 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm4 
  dm: LightDM 1.26.0 Distro: MX-21_x64 Wildflower October 20  2021 
  base: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) 
Machine:
  Type: Desktop System: Gigabyte product: H110M-S2 v: N/A 
  serial: <filter> 
  Mobo: Gigabyte model: H110M-S2-CF v: x.x serial: <filter> 
  UEFI: American Megatrends v: F23 date: 12/14/2017 
CPU:
  Topology: Dual Core model: Intel Core i3-6100 bits: 64 type: MT MCP 
  arch: Skylake-S family: 6 model-id: 5E (94) stepping: 3 microcode: EA 
  L2 cache: 3072 KiB 
  flags: avx avx2 lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx 
  bogomips: 29598 
  Speed: 800 MHz min/max: 800/3700 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 800 2: 800 
  3: 800 4: 800 
  Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: KVM: VMX disabled 
  Type: l1tf mitigation: PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes, 
  SMT vulnerable 
  Type: mds mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable 
  Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI 
  Type: spec_store_bypass 
  mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp 
  Type: spectre_v1 
  mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization 
  Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Full generic retpoline, IBPB: 
  conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP: conditional, RSB filling 
  Type: srbds mitigation: Microcode 
  Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected 
Graphics:
  Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 530 vendor: Gigabyte driver: i915 
  v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:1912 
  Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.11 driver: modesetting 
  unloaded: fbdev,vesa resolution: 1366x768~60Hz 
  OpenGL: renderer: Mesa Intel HD Graphics 530 (SKL GT2) 
  v: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.5 direct render: Yes 
Audio:
  Device-1: Intel 100 Series/C230 Series Family HD Audio 
  vendor: Gigabyte driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 00:1f.3 
  chip ID: 8086:a170 
  Sound Server: ALSA v: k5.10.0-10-amd64 
Network:
  Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet 
  vendor: Gigabyte driver: r8168 v: 8.048.03-NAPI port: e000 
  bus ID: 01:00.0 chip ID: 10ec:8168 
  IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter> 
  Device-2: Ralink MT7601U Wireless Adapter type: USB driver: mt7601u 
  bus ID: 1-5:4 chip ID: 148f:7601 serial: <filter> 
  IF: wlan0 state: down mac: <filter> 
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 698.65 GiB used: 171.85 GiB (24.6%) 
  ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 
  size: 232.89 GiB block size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B 
  speed: 3.0 Gb/s serial: <filter> rev: 3A01 scheme: MBR 
  ID-2: /dev/sdb vendor: Crucial model: CT500MX500SSD1 size: 465.76 GiB 
  block size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s 
  serial: <filter> rev: 043 scheme: GPT 
Partition:
  ID-1: / raw size: 50.00 GiB size: 48.91 GiB (97.83%) 
  used: 22.74 GiB (46.5%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sdb6 
  ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.00 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) fs: swap 
  swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache pressure: 100 (default) 
  dev: /dev/sdb5 
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 41.0 C mobo: N/A 
  Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A 
Repos:
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list 
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
  1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
  1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib non-free
  2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main contrib non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list 
  1: deb http://mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in/mx-mirror/packages/mx/repo/ bullseye main non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mxpitemp.list 
  1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib non-free
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/skype-stable.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.skype.com/deb stable main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vivaldi.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] http://repo.vivaldi.com/stable/deb/ stable main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vscode.list 
  1: deb [arch=amd64] https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/vscode stable main
Info:
  Processes: 244 Uptime: 13m Memory: 3.73 GiB used: 1.85 GiB (49.5%) 
  Init: SysVinit v: 2.96 runlevel: 5 default: 5 Compilers: gcc: 10.2.1 
  alt: 10 Shell: quick-system-in running in: quick-system-in 
  inxi: 3.0.36 
Thank You,

Regards,
Aksh
Last edited by Aksh on Tue Dec 28, 2021 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Aksh
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:12 am

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#13 Post by Aksh »

f.denys wrote: Sun Dec 26, 2021 8:23 am No problems here, using Synergy 1 PRO (paid). Using MX21 as Synergy-server and MX19.4 as client.
Thanks for the Quick Reply but I'm having issues with Barrier and not Synergy.

Regards,
Aksh

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#14 Post by SwampRabbit »

You should have gotten 2.4.0 as an update since you manually enabled the Debian backports.

It’s not recommended to manually enable this Repo permanently, but either way you should get 2.4.0 as an update since you did enable it.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

User avatar
Aksh
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:12 am

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#15 Post by Aksh »

I don't know how exactly I enabled the Debian Backports. Does it get enabled with Tab Click? Any reading material to understand this further?

Anyways, I would not like to deviate from the standard practice as recommended by the distro so would rather disable Debian Backports. How to do that? Post that will Barrier 2.3.3 work as expected?

Thanks,
Aksh

User avatar
Aksh
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:12 am

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#16 Post by Aksh »

Aksh wrote: Sun Dec 26, 2021 7:29 am On MX-21, I'm not able to connect from MX-21 to WIN-10 or MX-21 to MX-18 using Barrier. It's working from WIN-10 to WIN-10 just fine.
It seems on my main machine, I had Firewall Settings enabled to prevent incoming traffic, allowing that made Barrier work as expected and I could connect from MX-21 to MX-18. With regards to MX-21 to Win-10, It should work as well but I'll confirm in a while.

Thanks.

Cheers! :toast2:
Aksh.

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#17 Post by SwampRabbit »

@Aksh thats good news. Sorry for the delayed reply. You can ensure the backports Repo is disabled using MX Repo Manager.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

User avatar
Aksh
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:12 am

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#18 Post by Aksh »

SwampRabbit wrote: Fri Dec 31, 2021 5:24 am @Aksh thats good news. Sorry for the delayed reply. You can ensure the backports Repo is disabled using MX Repo Manager.
No Problem. Appreciate all your help.

Thanks,
Aksh

User avatar
Aksh
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:12 am

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#19 Post by Aksh »

Aksh wrote: Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:30 am With regards to MX-21 to Win-10, It should work as well but I'll confirm in a while.
It's not working.

Regards,
Aksh.

SwampRabbit
Posts: 3602
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: Synergy Loves MXlinux

#20 Post by SwampRabbit »

@Aksh you're best bet unless someone else tests it is to troubleshoot like you did before:
- check the firewall on both end
- on MX launch barrier from the terminal to see if there is any output
- verify what they have on their GitHub
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/#usage
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier/#f ... -questions

I see some commits recently since the last release for issues with Windows, if you can't get it to work, I can try and build off the latest source files in the next week or so.
NEW USERS START HERE FAQS, MX Manual, and How to Break Your System - Don't use Ubuntu PPAs! Always post your Quick System Info (QSI) when asking for help.

Post Reply

Return to “Chat”