Page 2 of 3

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:14 am
by jorgosek
<post deleted by Mod, user banned>

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:01 am
by anticapitalista
please delete spammer above

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:26 am
by GuiGuy
anticapitalista wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:01 am please delete spammer above
In fact he is not a spammer: he is just pointing out that the software in question is non-free and expensive.
I reported his post before I realized that it was really OK, and I see no way to cancel my report.

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:02 am
by fehlix
GuiGuy wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:26 am
anticapitalista wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:01 am please delete spammer above
In fact he is not a spammer: he is just pointing out that the software in question is non-free and expensive.
I reported his post before I realized that it was really OK, and I see no way to cancel my report.
What's actually missing in that post is that Softmaker Office is an excellent Office Product
and comes in two variants:
As commercial product
and
as a freeware product https://www.freeoffice.com/en/
The freeware version is full functional, with only some slight restrictions,e.g not a full commercial
spell-and grammer-checker included, but the opensource spellchecker variant.
What I understand from users using it, and from published reports,
is that SoftmakerOffice/Freeoffice beats most other commercial and free Office products
including LibreOffice in regard to compatibility to MS Office.
:puppy:

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:05 am
by anticapitalista
GuiGuy wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:26 am
anticapitalista wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:01 am please delete spammer above
In fact he is not a spammer: he is just pointing out that the software in question is non-free and expensive.
I reported his post before I realized that it was really OK, and I see no way to cancel my report.
How do you know that the post is pointing out the app is non-free and expensive?
It seems to me that poster is advertising the product (and not the 'free' one)

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:11 am
by fehlix
anticapitalista wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:05 am
GuiGuy wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:26 am
anticapitalista wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:01 am please delete spammer above
In fact he is not a spammer: he is just pointing out that the software in question is non-free and expensive.
I reported his post before I realized that it was really OK, and I see no way to cancel my report.
How do you know that the post is pointing out the app is non-free and expensive?
It seems to me that poster is advertising the product (and not the 'free' one)
Agreed in this sense, it is a stupid spam post.

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:12 am
by Jerry3904
That's how I saw it, and acted.

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:15 am
by GuiGuy
Thanks for that interesting information, fehlix.
I will try the freeware version.

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:41 am
by dphn
The free version of Softmaker is a fine product for MS-Office-Documents. Better support than LO. The freeware product has limitations. You can't save in the old MS-Formats *.doc, *.xls *.ppt and you have no commercial spell-checker, see posting by fehlix. Documents in the free standard *.odt are supported but no others. That's a shame. This restriction have all variants of Softmaker Office and for all versions you need to register.

I personally use the Standard Version of the product. Standard Version can save Documents in the old *.doc, *.xls, formats etc. but the commercial spell-checker only aviable in the professional edition.

Re: libreoffice

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2018 9:10 am
by cyrilus31
fehlix wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 5:02 am What's actually missing in that post is that Softmaker Office is an excellent Office Product
and comes in two variants:
As commercial product
and
as a freeware product https://www.freeoffice.com/en/
The freeware version is full functional, with only some slight restrictions,e.g not a full commercial
spell-and grammer-checker included, but the opensource spellchecker variant.
What I understand from users using it, and from published reports,
is that SoftmakerOffice/Freeoffice beats most other commercial and free Office products
including LibreOffice in regard to compatibility to MS Office.
:puppy:
I know you defend your fellow citizen fehlix :p
Softmaker is good indeed even in his free version but sincerely I tried many software and no one is perfectly compatible with M$ office standards and SM is no exception. It's sad to say but even Office is not fully compatible with another version of Office.