Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without a separate boot partition?

When you run into problems installing MX Linux XFCE
Message
Author
Jiwan
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:07 am

Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without a separate boot partition?

#1 Post by Jiwan »

Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without a separate /boot partition?

Like this partition laytout:
ESP -> /boot/efi (FAT32)
Root (with encryption) -> / (BTRFS)

QSI:

Code: Select all

System:
  Kernel: 6.14.2-1-liquorix-amd64 [6.14-3~mx23ahs] arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 12.2.0 parameters: audit=0
    intel_pstate=disable amd_pstate=disable BOOT_IMAGE=/@/boot/vmlinuz-6.14.2-1-liquorix-amd64
    root=UUID=<filter> ro rootflags=subvol=@ quiet splash
  Desktop: Xfce v: 4.20.0 tk: Gtk v: 3.24.38 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm v: 4.20.0 vt: 7
    dm: LightDM v: 1.32.0 Distro: MX-23.6_ahs_x64 Libretto April 13  2025 base: Debian GNU/Linux 12
    (bookworm)
Machine:
  Type: Laptop System: Apple product: MacBookPro9,2 v: 1.0 serial: <superuser required> Chassis:
    type: 10 v: Mac-6F01561E16C75D06 serial: <superuser required>
  Mobo: Apple model: Mac-6F01561E16C75D06 v: MacBookPro9,2 serial: <superuser required>
    UEFI: Apple v: 429.0.0.0.0 date: 03/18/2022
Battery:
  ID-1: BAT0 charge: 51.1 Wh (100.0%) condition: 51.1/62.9 Wh (81.2%) volts: 12.5 min: 10.9
    model: SMP bq20z451 type: Li-ion serial: N/A status: full cycles: 129
CPU:
  Info: model: Intel Core i5-3210M bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Ivy Bridge gen: core 3 level: v2
    built: 2012-15 process: Intel 22nm family: 6 model-id: 0x3A (58) stepping: 9 microcode: 0x21
  Topology: cpus: 1x cores: 2 tpc: 2 threads: 4 smt: enabled cache: L1: 128 KiB
    desc: d-2x32 KiB; i-2x32 KiB L2: 512 KiB desc: 2x256 KiB L3: 3 MiB desc: 1x3 MiB
  Speed (MHz): avg: 1560 high: 1666 min/max: 1200/2501 boost: enabled scaling:
    driver: acpi-cpufreq governor: ondemand cores: 1: 1542 2: 1666 3: 1400 4: 1634 bogomips: 19954
  Flags: avx ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx
  Vulnerabilities:
  Type: gather_data_sampling status: Not affected
  Type: ghostwrite status: Not affected
  Type: itlb_multihit status: KVM: VMX disabled
  Type: l1tf mitigation: PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes, SMT vulnerable
  Type: mds mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
  Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI
  Type: mmio_stale_data status: Unknown: No mitigations
  Type: reg_file_data_sampling status: Not affected
  Type: retbleed status: Not affected
  Type: spec_rstack_overflow status: Not affected
  Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
  Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
  Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines; IBPB: conditional; IBRS_FW; STIBP: conditional; RSB
    filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected
  Type: srbds status: Vulnerable: No microcode
  Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics:
  Device-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics vendor: Apple driver: i915 v: kernel arch: Gen-7
    process: Intel 22nm built: 2012-13 ports: active: LVDS-1 empty: DP-1, DP-2, DP-3, HDMI-A-1,
    HDMI-A-2, HDMI-A-3, VGA-1 bus-ID: 00:02.0 chip-ID: 8086:0166 class-ID: 0300
  Device-2: Apple FaceTime HD Camera type: USB driver: uvcvideo bus-ID: 2-1.1:3
    chip-ID: 05ac:8509 class-ID: 0e02 serial: <filter>
  Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.7 compositor: xfwm v: 4.20.0 driver: X:
    loaded: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa dri: crocus gpu: i915 display-ID: :0.0 screens: 1
  Screen-1: 0 s-res: 1280x800 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 338x211mm (13.31x8.31") s-diag: 398mm (15.69")
  Monitor-1: LVDS-1 model: Apple 0x9cc3 built: 2009 res: 1280x800 hz: 60 dpi: 114 gamma: 1.2
    size: 286x179mm (11.26x7.05") diag: 337mm (13.3") ratio: 16:10 modes: 1280x800
  API: OpenGL v: 4.2 Mesa 24.2.8-1mx23ahs renderer: Mesa Intel HD Graphics 4000 (IVB GT2)
    direct-render: Yes
Audio:
  Device-1: Intel 7 Series/C216 Family High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel
    bus-ID: 00:1b.0 chip-ID: 8086:1e20 class-ID: 0403
  API: ALSA v: k6.14.2-1-liquorix-amd64 status: kernel-api tools: alsamixer,amixer
  Server-1: PipeWire v: 1.0.0 status: active with: 1: pipewire-pulse status: active
    2: wireplumber status: active 3: pipewire-alsa type: plugin 4: pw-jack type: plugin
    tools: pactl,pw-cat,pw-cli,wpctl
Network:
  Device-1: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM57765 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe driver: tg3 v: kernel pcie: gen: 1
    speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: N/A bus-ID: 01:00.0 chip-ID: 14e4:16b4 class-ID: 0200
  IF: eth0 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
  Device-2: Broadcom BCM4331 802.11a/b/g/n vendor: Apple AirPort Extreme driver: wl v: kernel
    modules: bcma pcie: gen: 1 speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 bus-ID: 02:00.0 chip-ID: 14e4:4331
    class-ID: 0280
  IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
Bluetooth:
  Device-1: Apple Bluetooth USB Host Controller type: USB driver: btusb v: 0.8 bus-ID: 4-1.8.1.3:9
    chip-ID: 05ac:821d class-ID: fe01
  Report: hciconfig ID: hci0 rfk-id: 1 state: up address: <filter> bt-v: 2.1 lmp-v: 4.0
    sub-v: 229c hci-v: 4.0 rev: 171a
  Info: acl-mtu: 1021:6 sco-mtu: 64:1 link-policy: rswitch sniff link-mode: peripheral accept
    service-classes: rendering, capturing, object transfer, audio, telephony
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 953.87 GiB used: 5.69 GiB (0.6%)
  SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required.
  ID-1: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: TeamGroup model: T2531TB size: 953.87 GiB block-size:
    physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> rev: 0A0 scheme: GPT
Partition:
  ID-1: / raw-size: 952.7 GiB size: 952.7 GiB (100.00%) used: 5.69 GiB (0.6%) fs: btrfs
    dev: /dev/sda2 maj-min: 8:2
  ID-2: /boot/efi raw-size: 1.17 GiB size: 1.17 GiB (99.80%) used: 576 KiB (0.0%) fs: vfat
    dev: /dev/sda1 maj-min: 8:1
  ID-3: /home raw-size: 952.7 GiB size: 952.7 GiB (100.00%) used: 5.69 GiB (0.6%) fs: btrfs
    dev: /dev/sda2 maj-min: 8:2
  ID-4: /opt raw-size: 952.7 GiB size: 952.7 GiB (100.00%) used: 5.69 GiB (0.6%) fs: btrfs
    dev: /dev/sda2 maj-min: 8:2
  ID-5: /tmp raw-size: 952.7 GiB size: 952.7 GiB (100.00%) used: 5.69 GiB (0.6%) fs: btrfs
    dev: /dev/sda2 maj-min: 8:2
  ID-6: /var/log raw-size: 952.7 GiB size: 952.7 GiB (100.00%) used: 5.69 GiB (0.6%) fs: btrfs
    dev: /dev/sda2 maj-min: 8:2
Swap:
  Kernel: swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache-pressure: 100 (default)
  ID-1: swap-1 type: zram size: 3.88 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: 101 dev: /dev/zram0
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 62.0 C mobo: N/A
  Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Repos:
  Packages: pm: dpkg pkgs: 2134 libs: 1061 tools: apt,apt-get,aptitude,nala,synaptic pm: rpm
    pkgs: 0 pm: flatpak pkgs: 0
  No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
    1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
    1: deb http://mirror.rise.ph/mxlinux-pkg/mx/repo/ bookworm main non-free
    2: deb http://mirror.rise.ph/mxlinux-pkg/mx/repo/ bookworm ahs
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/signal-xenial-added-by-mxpi.list
    1: deb [arch=amd64] https://updates.signal.org/desktop/apt xenial main
Info:
  Processes: 274 Uptime: 57m wakeups: 3 Memory: 15.53 GiB used: 2.89 GiB (18.6%) Init: SysVinit
  v: 3.06 runlevel: 5 default: graphical tool: systemctl Compilers: gcc: 12.2.0 alt: 12
  Client: shell wrapper v: 5.2.15-release inxi: 3.3.26
Boot Mode: UEFI

User avatar
DukeComposed
Posts: 1445
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without boot partition?

#2 Post by DukeComposed »

Jiwan wrote: Thu Jun 19, 2025 10:42 pm Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without /boot partition?

Like this partition laytout:
ESP -> /boot/efi (FAT32)
Root (with encryption) -> / (BTRFS)
If I understand the question correctly: can one create an encrypted root partition without an unencrypted /boot partition (?), then yes, this can be done.

One could use an MBR-style partition table. One could create a LUKS container the size of the desired install, open it, and then create the necessary partition(s) inside the LUKS container.

If the question is subtly asking if creating a FAT32 partition can be avoided in a UEFI setup, no, I don't think that's possible.

Jiwan
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:07 am

Re: Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without a separate boot partition?

#3 Post by Jiwan »

What I was trying to do is something like this, see attached. Highlighted in red box is the root partition (Btrfs) that I wanted to encrypt. As you can see I have put a checked mark on the Encrypt column for that specific partition. My partition table is GPT. When I click next it prompts me with a message that I need to create a boot partition and that confuse me. I thought ESP partition is already a boot partition that is mounted to "/boot/efi". Am I missing something here? To let you know guys am new to Linux please bare with me.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
DukeComposed
Posts: 1445
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without a separate boot partition?

#4 Post by DukeComposed »

Jiwan wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:05 am When I click next it prompts me with a message that I need to create a boot partition and that confuse me.
The error message should precisely say "You must choose a separate boot partition when encrypting root." So let's think about this for a second. You've specified an ESP (EFI System Partition) and you think that should live under /boot.

But where's /boot going to go? A very important thing to remember if you're going to try to get fancy with Linux partitions: mountpoints are hierarchical. If you want /boot/efi, you need to have a /boot first. If you want /var/log, you need a /var first. And in all cases you need a root partition, "/", first, too. So if you don't have an exact place for /boot it's automatically going to go under root, and... you've encrypted root.

Make sure you're creating a /boot partition and a 1 MB BIOS-GRUB partition. I ran a test install of MX-23 on a VM with this setup (GPT partition table, /boot, BIOS-GRUB, and an encrypted ext4 partition for /) and it boots as expected.

Jiwan
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:07 am

Re: Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without a separate boot partition?

#5 Post by Jiwan »

DukeComposed wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 5:04 pm
Jiwan wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:05 am When I click next it prompts me with a message that I need to create a boot partition and that confuse me.
The error message should precisely say "You must choose a separate boot partition when encrypting root." So let's think about this for a second. You've specified an ESP (EFI System Partition) and you think that should live under /boot.

But where's /boot going to go? A very important thing to remember if you're going to try to get fancy with Linux partitions: mountpoints are hierarchical. If you want /boot/efi, you need to have a /boot first. If you want /var/log, you need a /var first. And in all cases you need a root partition, "/", first, too. So if you don't have an exact place for /boot it's automatically going to go under root, and... you've encrypted root.

Make sure you're creating a /boot partition and a 1 MB BIOS-GRUB partition. I ran a test install of MX-23 on a VM with this setup (GPT partition table, /boot, BIOS-GRUB, and an encrypted ext4 partition for /) and it boots as expected.
Thank you for these information. I will try your suggestion.

User avatar
DukeComposed
Posts: 1445
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:57 pm

Re: Is it possible to setup an encrypted root partition without a separate boot partition?

#6 Post by DukeComposed »

Jiwan wrote: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:19 pm Thank you for these information. I will try your suggestion.
Good luck!

Post Reply

Return to “Installation”