Celluloid v0.28 Request  [Solved]

Message
Author
User avatar
ForkTheWire
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2023 7:41 am

Celluloid v0.28 Request

#1 Post by ForkTheWire »

Hi,
I upgraded celluloid yesterday from V0.20 to the Test Repo Version 0.25, just to test if a few bugs I was hoping for were fixed, but it came with a couple of new :p . I've checked and saw there is a quite newer version out (v0.28) and it's on Debian 13 too. If it ain't much trouble could someone package it, thanks !
https://github.com/celluloid-player/celluloid
https://github.com/celluloid-player/celluloid/releases

BV206
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 10:55 am

Re: Celluloid v0.28 Request

#2 Post by BV206 »

I thought about requesting newer Celluloid a while back but then I saw LinuxMint "downgraded" the version they use because of problems caused by the latest Gnome version that I didn't understand. I tried to install their current version .deb file and it would not install due to dependency problems or something. I can't remember if it was ffmpeg or something else.

User avatar
ForkTheWire
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2023 7:41 am

Re: Celluloid v0.28 Request

#3 Post by ForkTheWire »

BV206 wrote: Tue May 13, 2025 10:53 am I thought about requesting newer Celluloid a while back but then I saw LinuxMint "downgraded" the version they use because of problems caused by the latest Gnome version that I didn't understand. I tried to install their current version .deb file and it would not install due to dependency problems or something. I can't remember if it was ffmpeg or something else.
I couldn't locate the article/thread you are referring to, or any similar issue really on any other distro that I looked. I wouldn't compare Mint with MX though, it's quite different. Here is the repology link from the celluloid github page for a rough estimate on which distros have which versions: [https://repology.org/project/celluloid/versions]. As for dependencies ffmpeg is available on both enabled and test repos of MX but it's not a dependency of celluloid v0.20 nor v0.25, it wouldn't make much sense to be really. If there isn't an out of hand obstacle, I'd really like to test it :crossfingers: .

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14888
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: Celluloid v0.28 Request

#4 Post by Stevo »

Celluloid uses the mpv libmpv2 library, which in turns depends on ffmpeg libraries, and so much more:

Code: Select all

Depends: libarchive13 (>= 3.4.0), libasound2 (>= 1.0.27), libass9 (>= 1:0.15.0), libavcodec59 (>= 7:5.0), libavdevice59 (>= 7:5.0), libavfilter8 (>= 7:5.0), libavformat59 (>= 7:5.0), libavutil57 (>= 7:5.1), libbluray2 (>= 1:0.2.2), libc6 (>= 2.34), libcaca0 (>= 0.99.beta20), libcdio-cdda2 (>= 10.2+2.0.0), libcdio-paranoia2 (>= 10.2+2.0.0), libcdio19 (>= 2.1.0), libdrm2 (>= 2.4.105), libdvdnav4 (>= 4.1.3), libegl1, libgbm1 (>= 17.1.0~rc2), libjack-jackd2-0 (>= 1.9.10+20150825) | libjack-0.125, libjpeg62-turbo (>= 1.3.1), liblcms2-2 (>= 2.6), liblua5.2-0 (>= 5.2.4), libmujs2 (>= 1.0.7), libpipewire-0.3-0 (>= 0.3.50), libplacebo208 (>= 4.208.0), libpulse0 (>= 0.99.4), librubberband2 (>= 3.1.2+dfsg0), libsdl2-2.0-0 (>= 2.0.12), libsixel1 (>= 1.10.3), libswresample4 (>= 7:5.0), libswscale6 (>= 7:5.0), libuchardet0 (>= 0.0.1), libva-drm2 (>= 1.1.0), libva-wayland2 (>= 1.3.0), libva-x11-2 (>= 1.0.3), libva2 (>= 2.2.0), libvdpau1 (>= 0.2), libvulkan1 (>= 1.2.131.2), libwayland-client0 (>= 1.20.0), libwayland-cursor0 (>= 1.15.0), libwayland-egl1 (>= 1.15.0), libx11-6 (>= 2:1.2.99.901), libxext6, libxinerama1 (>= 2:1.1.4), libxkbcommon0 (>= 0.5.0), libxpresent1, libxrandr2 (>= 2:1.4.0), libxss1, libxv1, libzimg2 (>= 0.3.1), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14888
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: Celluloid v0.28 Request  [Solved]

#5 Post by Stevo »

Anyway, the newer Celluloid would require a much newer GTK+ 4 to backport than we have available in Bookworm repos, so that's a non-starter. Maybe there is a flatpak that one could test.

I use SMPlayer as a frontend to the mpv 0.40 in our test repos quite a bit. Mpv can be used alone with its really simple GUI, too.
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

User avatar
ForkTheWire
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2023 7:41 am

Re: Celluloid v0.28 Request

#6 Post by ForkTheWire »

Stevo wrote: Thu May 15, 2025 4:25 pm Anyway, the newer Celluloid would require a much newer GTK+ 4 to backport than we have available in Bookworm repos, so that's a non-starter. Maybe there is a flatpak that one could test.

I use SMPlayer as a frontend to the mpv 0.40 in our test repos quite a bit. Mpv can be used alone with its really simple GUI, too.
Alright! Thanks for the clarification and suggestions Stevo! Good Day!

Post Reply

Return to “Package Requests - MX-23”