hardinfo2 dependencies

Message
Author
User avatar
dreamer
Posts: 926
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

hardinfo2 dependencies

#1 Post by dreamer »

I noticed that hardinfo2 is the same version in debian backports and mx repo, but the latter pulls in a lot more dependencies. Is this correct behavior? I figured it was best to mention since MX isos are built with hardinfo2 included.
Note to self and others: SysVinit is a good option. However if you run into problems try with systemd first. This applies to AppImages, Flatpaks, GitHub packages and even some Debian packages.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 22366
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:17 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#2 Post by dolphin_oracle »

dreamer wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 6:36 am I noticed that hardinfo2 is the same version in debian backports and mx repo, but the latter pulls in a lot more dependencies. Is this correct behavior? I figured it was best to mention since MX isos are built with hardinfo2 included.
yes.

debian installs recommends by default, so sometimes we set up hard depends since we do not install recommends by default.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12740
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#3 Post by fehlix »

I do agree, suggest to take those recomments from the backports hardinfo2 package :

Code: Select all

Recommends: dmidecode, fwupd, iperf3, lm-sensors, lsscsi, mesa-utils, sysbench, udisks2, vulkan-tools, x11-xserver-utils, xdg-utils
So user can decide whether they really need/want fwupd.
Also fwupd runs a daemon, at least I don't want this, so for now I have removed hardinfo2.
iperf is currrently in Suggests, maybe fine.
The other are already installed, so doesn't hurt to have them in Recomments also.
Can we do this? @Stevo

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14665
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#4 Post by Stevo »

So just move fwupd back to Recommends?

There's an update that's not in Debian yet: https://hardinfo2.org/news Note the cool little packaging status repology widget at the bottom.
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14665
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#5 Post by Stevo »

2.2.7 update packages with fwupd back as recommended can be downloaded early here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/104D-Qn ... sp=sharing
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12740
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#6 Post by fehlix »

Stevo wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 3:58 pm So just move fwupd back to Recommends?

There's an update that's not in Debian yet: https://hardinfo2.org/news Note the cool little packaging status repology widget at the bottom.
fwupd is probably the most “critical” program in that list, which perhaps not every user wants. So thank you.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14665
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#7 Post by Stevo »

Could you test the new version so we can move it to main?
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

User avatar
FullScale4Me
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2021 11:30 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#8 Post by FullScale4Me »

Tested on two hardware PCs. All looks good.
Michael O'Toole
MX Linux facebook group moderator
Dell OptiPlex 7050 i7-7700, MX Linux 23 Xfce & Win 11 Pro
HP Pavilion P2-1394 i3-2120T, MX Linux 23 Xfce & Win 10 Home
Dell Inspiron N7010 Intel Core i5 M 460, MX Linux 23 Xfce & KDE, Win 10

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 12740
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#9 Post by fehlix »

Stevo wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 9:46 pm Could you test the new version so we can move it to main?
Works here. thanks.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 14665
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:07 pm

Re: hardinfo2 dependencies

#10 Post by Stevo »

Nice. Since it also works fine for me, I'll ask for it to move to main.
MXPI = MX Package Installer
QSI = Quick System Info from menu
The MX Test repository is mostly backports; not the same as Debian testing

Post Reply

Return to “MX Repositories”