davidy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2025 8:03 pm
As for Mint being #1? Total lies. Mint is for the person switching from windows who knows nothing about pc's in general, much less windows itself incl. linux.
Not necessarily. When I decided to make Linux my daily driver, I first went with an Arch-based distro and gave up after 5 weeks and the roughly one dozen kernel updates that occurred in that time frame. My second choice was Linux Mint, and I made that selection after a careful analysis of how it would satisfy my needs. Mint is an Ubuntu-based distribution, and at the time Ubuntu was shipping ZFS built directly into their kernels. I don't recall how long the standard Ubuntu LTS releases were supported, but Mint's support timeline for their releases is long and steady.
Mint offered multiple choices for a desktop environment, easy-ish ZFS-on-root support, years of updates, and that extra bit of polish and attention to detail that clem and team are renowned for providing. It suits the concept of "it just works" to a tee. While all this boils down to "it's a good distro for beginners", don't make the mistake of thinking that experts can't find something useful about the Mint project.
I switched from Mint 18.3 to MX Linux in large part because I was loathing the extensive systemd overgrowth in Mint 18 and 19 and wanted to reduce my use of and dependency on Lennart Poettering software. Still, the amount of utility I got out of Mints 14-ish through 17 can't be overstated. It's clean, stable, and easy to maintain. I cannot bring myself to look down on Linux Mint or its dev team because they clearly show care and competency when it comes to building a release. I haven't run Mint in any capacity in six or seven years, but when a new Mint Xfce gets released I make a point to download the torrent and seed it. It's the least I can do.