Looks there are already a lot of opposing view for systemd.
(In my lotus sutra teaching says, It's a bit extreme, "Cut off root of one evil. Don't tolerate it. Stand boldly."
So "tolerate or cut off". It seems like our hopes are pretty much the same.)
Needless to say, future MX style will very differ depending on main Dev selects.
Should we plan on systemd ?
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
In the world filled desire,
I seek only essence, serve for MX.
I just needing only ideal in the art at all.
I want to protect place of rest called MX LINUX.
Sony VAIO Pro 11inch Silver (FHD) extrox (MX23)
I seek only essence, serve for MX.
I just needing only ideal in the art at all.
I want to protect place of rest called MX LINUX.

Sony VAIO Pro 11inch Silver (FHD) extrox (MX23)
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
The question is, can be completely free of systemd and reliable the following basic?
Browser
Sound server
Network Manager
If not, then this discussion is useless.
Browser
Sound server
Network Manager
If not, then this discussion is useless.
If your case is solved, and you want to help other users, click on the Solved-Button on the top right of a user's post.
Don't forget a system backup!
Don't forget a system backup!
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
+ 1asinoro wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2024 5:05 am The question is, can be completely free of systemd and reliable the following basic?
Browser
Sound server
Network Manager
If not, then this discussion is useless.

" Outside the square , inside the cube "
- DukeComposed
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:57 pm
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
Microsoft's attitude towards Linux has evolved from where it was just a decade or two ago.artytux wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2024 4:06 am I could never buy into that 'Oh no M$ loves Linux', yeah right, when money is the driver there are no friends.
That being said, Linux is the most popular OS running on Azure these days. I've heard the ratio of Linux to other is 2:1 but I don't have concrete data to prove it.
- DukeComposed
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2023 1:57 pm
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
Linux wasn't exactly hurting for a better reputation regarding stability before 2011.asinoro wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2024 5:05 am The question is, can be completely free of systemd and reliable the following basic?
Browser
Sound server
Network Manager
If not, then this discussion is useless.
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
After reading many many of your posts I never ever thought of you as easily tricked because of being too trusting.
Time will tell about M$.
Time will tell about M$.
" Outside the square , inside the cube "
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
Network manager is not free from systemd already, in MX. Dolphin always has to make some tweaks so it works with sysV, from what I understand.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Re: Should we plan on systemd ?
The original question has been answered. And endless opinions have been given. Topic is closed
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB